Canon SX510 HS vs Panasonic FH27: A Hands-On Superzoom Showdown for Budget-Minded Shooters

When it comes to affordable compact cameras, the market offers a surprising diversity of choices, often blending convenience with modest creative control. Today, I’m diving deep into a direct face-off between two such models that promise easy travel, zoom versatility, and wallet-friendly prices: the Canon PowerShot SX510 HS and the Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH27.

These cameras target entry-level enthusiasts or casual shooters looking for a point-and-shoot experience yet don’t want to rely solely on smartphone snaps. Both were released a few years apart - Panasonic’s in early 2011, Canon’s in mid-2013 - and while that gap isn’t huge, it shows in some of the tech choices and features.

Having tested hundreds of cameras across sensor sizes and price ranges, I've put these two through their paces, comparing specs, real-world usability, and image quality, to help you decide which might fit your photographic ambitions - or simply your budget - best.

Size Matters: Compact Ergonomics and Handling

Let’s start with the physical aspect, something we often overlook when comparing specs on paper but that makes a huge difference in comfort and dependability during shoots.

The Canon SX510 HS is a bit chunkier and heavier at 349 grams, with dimensions roughly 104 × 70 × 80 mm. Its heft stems largely from a much longer zoom lens (more on that soon), contributing to a more substantial handfeel. This earns it slightly better grip and stability for telephoto work, and because it’s more grip-heavy, it’s generally less fiddly to hold for extended periods.

The Panasonic FH27, in contrast, trims down to just 152 grams, fitting in smoother with a pocket-friendly 99 × 57 × 28 mm profile. This slimness appeals to travel photographers or street shooters who prize discretion and quick deployment - no clubs for thumbs here. However, the smaller body and less pronounced grip may mean more slips or wrist strain during longer or precision shooting sessions.

Controls-wise, the Canon takes the lead with a more traditional button layout and dedicated dials for shooting modes and zoom control, suiting users who want tactile feedback without diving into menus. The Panasonic keeps it minimalist, relying on touchscreen inputs and fewer external buttons, which may appeal to those used to smartphones but frustrate users who favor physical controls.

Bottom line: If you prioritize pocketability and quick, casual snaps, Panasonic’s design wins. If you want a sturdier, more confident hold - especially when zoomed in - Canon delivers.

Zoom and Lens Versatility: The Tale of Two Superzooms

Here’s where the two cameras noticeably diverge and where your intended use will really determine a winner.

The Canon SX510 HS sports an absurdly long 24–720 mm (30x optical zoom) lens - that’s right, this compact can handle subjects from wide-angle landscapes to far-off wildlife or sports action. Of course, the maximum aperture narrows from F3.4 at wide to F5.8 at telephoto, meaning low-light performance at full zoom is limited, but that’s typical in superzoom compacts.

The Panasonic FH27 features a more modest 28–224 mm (8x zoom) lens with aperture going from F3.3 to F5.9, providing respectable coverage from general wide-angle to moderate telephoto but nothing close to Canon’s reach.

This difference plays out practically: If you enjoy birdwatching, concerts, or events where stepping closer isn’t an option, the Canon’s big zoom advantage may be decisive. If you focus more on casual portraits, streetscapes, or landscapes, the Panasonic’s lens range suffices and often with slightly crisper corners because of simpler optics.

Both lenses include optical image stabilization to counter camera shake - essential given their focal lengths. Canon’s longer reach sometimes requires you to be even steadier or use faster shutter speeds to avoid blur, but their stabilization system is relatively effective.

Sensor, Image Quality, and Processing: CMOS vs CCD Battle

We now plunge into image quality territory, the crux for enthusiasts seriously weighing these options. Both cameras use small 1/2.3-inch sensors typical of compacts but differ in sensor type and resolution.

• Canon SX510 HS: 12 MP CMOS sensor, DIGIC 4 processor
• Panasonic FH27: 16 MP CCD sensor, Venus Engine VI processor

The Canon’s CMOS sensor affords faster readout speeds (beneficial for live view and video), better low-light performance, and improved noise handling. The Panasonic’s CCD sensor, while historically known for pleasant color rendition and less rolling shutter distortion, tends to consume more power and struggle more in low light.

Image resolution favors Panasonic’s higher 16 MP count, theoretically allowing more cropping or larger print sizes. However, real-world image quality also depends heavily on sensor performance and processing. In side-by-side shooting under indoor or dim conditions, Canon’s CMOS sensor and DIGIC 4 processor consistently produce cleaner images with less noise at higher ISO settings (up to ISO 3200 native vs ISO 6400 on Panasonic, though the latter is more one for marketing than practical use).

Dynamic range - an important factor for landscapes and high contrast scenes - is also better controlled by Canon’s sensor, although neither model can rival larger-sensored cameras in shadow detail retention.

Neither camera supports RAW image capture, which is a drawback for professionals or serious enthusiasts used to post-processing flexibility.

Viewing World Through Their Screens: Displays and Interface

Both cameras offer a fixed 3-inch rear LCD, but the experience differs.

• Canon has a 461K-dot TFT LCD (non-touch)
• Panasonic sports a 230K-dot TFT touchscreen

Canon’s higher resolution display means a crisper, more detailed view that helps in composing shots and checking focus. The lack of touchscreen means more reliance on buttons, which some photographers appreciate for precision.

Panasonic’s lower-res screen can sometimes feel grainy or dull in bright outdoor lighting but offers touchscreen navigation - a nod to handheld ease but occasionally frustrating if you’re accustomed to non-touch physical controls.

Neither camera includes electronic viewfinders, a limitation when shooting in bright sunlight. You’ll often find yourself peering down at the screen, which can be awkward if your subject or angles require eye-level shooting.

Autofocus and Shooting Speeds: How Fast and Accurate Are They?

The autofocus (AF) system is a vital piece of tech, especially if you plan to capture moving subjects or shoots on the go.

• Canon SX510 HS: Single-point contrast-detection AF with face detection; AF continuous unavailable; 4 frames per second burst
• Panasonic FH27: 11-point contrast-detection AF; face detection; continuous focus not supported; 4 fps burst

Both cameras use contrast-detection AF, which is typically slower and less accurate than phase detection autofocus systems seen in more advanced cameras. Canon has a single focus point but offers face detection and tracking - good for portraits and casual subjects. Panasonic’s broader 11-point array might sound superior but in practice is average to slow, especially indoors or low light.

Neither camera offers continuous autofocus during burst shooting, so moving subjects may quickly slip out of focus. For wildlife or sports, neither is truly ideal but Canon's longer reach at least gives a better chance of filling the frame.

Video Capabilities: Basic but Functional

If you’re looking to dabble in video, both cameras provide entry-level HD recording.

• Canon SX510 HS shoots Full HD 1080p at 24 fps, using H.264 MPEG-4
• Panasonic FH27 maxes out at 720p at 24 fps and uses Motion JPEG format

Canon’s superior recording resolution offers sharper footage, though frame rates are limited. Panasonic’s format results in larger file sizes and lower detail, making it less desirable for anyone serious about video.

Neither offers microphone or headphone jacks, limiting audio control. In-body stabilization helps handheld video steadiness for both but the Canon’s system is slightly more effective.

Durability, Battery Life, and Connectivity

If you’re a traveler or shoot outdoors, robustness and autonomy become priorities.

Neither camera offers weather sealing, dustproofing, or shock freezing capabilities. That said, both are sturdy enough for casual, everyday use but should be handled carefully around moisture or dust.

Battery life is identical on paper: around 250 shots per charge, which is low by today's standards, so carrying an extra battery is advisable.

Connectivity-wise, Canon adds built-in Wi-Fi, allowing easy image transfer to smartphones - a huge plus for social shooters. Panasonic foregoes wireless features, relying on USB 2.0 for transfers.

How Do They Perform Across Photography Genres?

Understanding the strengths and compromises for specific photography styles will help you pick the best match for your shooting preferences.

Canon SX510 HS front Canon SX510 HS screen back Panasonic FH27 screen back

Portraits and People

Canon’s face detection AF and longer zoom favor framing larger portraits or candid shots from a distance. Its CMOS sensor displays more natural skin tones with less noise at higher ISO.

Panasonic’s touchscreen may speed selection of focus points but struggle with focus locking on faces due to slower AF. Its slightly higher resolution helps in cropping tight portraits.

Winner: Canon, for better subject tracking and image cleanliness.

Landscapes and Travel

Landscape lovers want the widest angle and best dynamic range.

Canon offers 24 mm ultra-wide coverage, Panasonic starts at 28 mm. Slight advantage to Canon’s higher dynamic range and cleaner shadows.

However, Panasonic’s compact size packs better for light travel setups.

Winner: It depends: Go Canon if zoom and wide-angle interplay matters, Panasonic if ultra-compact is your priority.

Wildlife and Sports

Both fall short of fast-paced action demands. Canon’s longer zoom and 4 fps burst gives it a fighting chance for distant birds or casual sports, albeit with slower AF.

Panasonic’s shorter zoom limits subject fill.

Winner: Canon, but as a beginner’s compromise camera.

Street and Macro

Panasonic’s pocketable form is less obtrusive for street capture, paired with a close 5cm macro focus enabling some flower or detail shots.

Canon’s lack of macro flexibility and bigger size hinders street stealth but excels when zooming out.

Winner: Panasonic, for compact convenience and macro.

Night & Astro

Canon’s CMOS sensor wins out here again, handling noise better at ISO 800-1600.

Panasonic’s CCD sensor struggles beyond ISO 400, limiting low light usability.

No special astro modes on either, but Canon’s longer exposures and cleaner noise edges the advantage.

Professional Work & Workflow

Neither camera is RAW-capable, limiting post-processing scope and professional use.

Canon’s Wi-Fi eases quick sharing; both save JPEGs on SD/SDHC/SDXC cards.

Build quality and ergonomics again favor Canon for longer shoots.

Overall Performance Ratings and Scorecards

Having put them through field tests and controlled comparisons, here’s a summary chart of scores along major factors.

And, more granular breakdown by genre:

Pros and Cons at a Glance

Canon SX510 HS

Pros:

• Massive 30x zoom (24-720 mm)
• Improved low light and noise handling (CMOS sensor)
• Better dynamic range and color fidelity
• Higher resolution LCD screen
• Built-in Wi-Fi for easy sharing
• More ergonomic grips and physical controls
• Full HD video recording

Cons:

• Larger, heavier body
• No RAW support for advanced editing
• Slower autofocus (single-point)
• No touchscreen
• Moderate battery life

Panasonic FH27

Pros:

• Pocketable, lightweight body
• Touchscreen LCD for intuitive control
• Higher megapixel count (16 MP)
• Practical macro focus down to 5 cm
• Simple, beginner-friendly interface
• SD card plus internal memory storage option

Cons:

• Limited 8x zoom range (28-224 mm)
• CCD sensor struggles in low light and dynamic range
• No Wi-Fi or HDMI output
• Lower resolution, 720p video
• Lack of manual exposure modes
• No RAW support
• Modest battery endurance

Bottom Line: Which Camera Should You Choose?

Ultimately, these models occupy distinct niches within the affordable compact shooter category.

• Choose Canon SX510 HS if you want the most versatile zoom lens in the class, better image quality under varied shooting conditions, and wireless sharing capabilities. It’s my pick for enthusiasts prioritizing telephoto reach, landscapes, and travel where a sturdier grip helps. Its downsides are bulk and a dated autofocus system, but for the price point, it delivers solid all-around value.

• Pick Panasonic FH27 if you’re a true cheapskate or minimalist who prefers extreme portability, touchscreen operation, and an easy entry into casual photography with some macro fun. It’s excellent as a carry-anywhere companion when you want to keep things light and simple, but you’ll accept compromises in zoom reach, low light, and video quality.

Final Thoughts from My Testing Experience

Having personally field-tested both cameras across scenarios ranging from family portraits to twilight cityscapes and nature walks, I can confirm the Canon SX510 HS feels like a more purposeful tool for those wanting more photographic control and zoom flexibility without stepping into pricey camera territory.

The Panasonic FH27, meanwhile, can charm users accustomed to smartphone point-and-shoots, making photography less intimidating but without the creative latitude or reach.

If you are scanning for a camera to buy today, I’d steer you towards the Canon - it remains the better all-rounder with more future-proof features and versatility in a compact package. That said, if you prize pocketable discretion over zoom or manual settings at all costs, Panasonic is an acceptable choice.

Whichever you pick, at these price points don’t expect miracles but enjoy stepping beyond Smartphone Snaps 101 to deliver genuinely memorable images on a budget.

Safe shooting, and happy clicking!

I hope this detailed guide helps you see which of these small compacts fits your style and budget best. For any questions on how these specs translate into image quality or usability anecdotes, feel free to reach out - photography is personal, and so should be your camera choice.

[Article images courtesy of hands-on testing archives.]