Clicky

Canon SX520 HS vs Sigma SD1 Merrill

Portability
69
Imaging
41
Features
44
Overall
42
Canon PowerShot SX520 HS front
 
Sigma SD1 Merrill front
Portability
57
Imaging
56
Features
45
Overall
51

Canon SX520 HS vs Sigma SD1 Merrill Key Specs

Canon SX520 HS
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 3200
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 24-1008mm (F3.4-6.0) lens
  • 441g - 120 x 82 x 92mm
  • Released July 2014
  • Replaced the Canon SX510 HS
  • Successor is Canon SX530 HS
Sigma SD1 Merrill
(Full Review)
  • 15MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 6400
  • No Video
  • Sigma SA Mount
  • 790g - 146 x 113 x 80mm
  • Launched April 2012
  • Previous Model is Sigma SD1
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Canon SX520 HS vs Sigma SD1 Merrill Overview

The following is a complete assessment of the Canon SX520 HS and Sigma SD1 Merrill, one is a Small Sensor Superzoom and the latter is a Advanced DSLR by rivals Canon and Sigma. The resolution of the SX520 HS (16MP) and the SD1 Merrill (15MP) is pretty similar but the SX520 HS (1/2.3") and SD1 Merrill (APS-C) boast different sensor sizing.

Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

The SX520 HS was revealed 2 years after the SD1 Merrill which is quite a serious gap as far as tech is concerned. Both cameras feature different body design with the Canon SX520 HS being a Compact camera and the Sigma SD1 Merrill being a Mid-size SLR camera.

Before getting straight to a complete comparison, here is a simple introduction of how the SX520 HS grades against the SD1 Merrill with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
	
	

Reasons to pick Canon SX520 HS over the Sigma SD1 Merrill

 SX520 HS SD1 Merrill 
LaunchedJuly 2014April 2012Newer by 28 months
Screen resolution461k460kSharper screen (+1k dot)

Reasons to pick Sigma SD1 Merrill over the Canon SX520 HS

 SD1 Merrill SX520 HS 

Common features in the Canon SX520 HS and Sigma SD1 Merrill

 SX520 HS SD1 Merrill 
Manual focus More accurate focus
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Screen size3"3"Same screen measurement
Selfie screen Lacking selfie screen
Touch friendly screen Lacking Touch friendly screen

Canon SX520 HS vs Sigma SD1 Merrill Physical Comparison

If you're planning to travel with your camera frequently, you should consider its weight and proportions. The Canon SX520 HS comes with outer dimensions of 120mm x 82mm x 92mm (4.7" x 3.2" x 3.6") having a weight of 441 grams (0.97 lbs) and the Sigma SD1 Merrill has measurements of 146mm x 113mm x 80mm (5.7" x 4.4" x 3.1") accompanied by a weight of 790 grams (1.74 lbs).

Examine the Canon SX520 HS and Sigma SD1 Merrill in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you select during that time. Below is a front view physical size comparison of the SX520 HS compared to the SD1 Merrill.

Canon SX520 HS vs Sigma SD1 Merrill size comparison

Looking at size and weight, the portability score of the SX520 HS and SD1 Merrill is 69 and 57 respectively.

Canon SX520 HS vs Sigma SD1 Merrill top view buttons comparison

Canon SX520 HS vs Sigma SD1 Merrill Sensor Comparison

Often, it is hard to picture the contrast between sensor dimensions just by reviewing a spec sheet. The picture here may provide you a stronger sense of the sensor dimensions in the SX520 HS and SD1 Merrill.

As you can see, the two cameras feature different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The SX520 HS using its tinier sensor is going to make achieving shallower depth of field more challenging and the Canon SX520 HS will offer you greater detail because of its extra 1MP. Higher resolution can also help you crop photographs way more aggressively. The more recent SX520 HS should have an advantage in sensor innovation.

Canon SX520 HS vs Sigma SD1 Merrill sensor size comparison

Canon SX520 HS vs Sigma SD1 Merrill Screen and ViewFinder

Canon SX520 HS vs Sigma SD1 Merrill Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Canon SX520 HS as a Portrait photography camera
Sigma SD1 Merrill as a Portrait photography camera
44
has manual focus
resolution is good (16 megapixels)
features face detection focusing
no external flash support
small sensor (1/2.3")
lacks RAW support
65
has manual focus
megapixel count good (15 megapixels)
decent sensor size (APS-C)
exports RAW formats
no liveview feature
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Street Comparison

Canon SX520 HS Street photography details
Sigma SD1 Merrill Street photography details
47
image stabilization (Optical)
no articulating screen
small sensor (1/2.3")
lacks RAW support
57
decent sensor size (APS-C)
exports RAW formats
environment sealing
fixed screen
lack of image stabilization
Photography Glossary

Sports Comparison

Canon SX520 HS Sports photography features
Sigma SD1 Merrill Sports photography features
45
incredible zoom range (24-1008mm 42.0 x zoom)
image stabilization (Optical)
resolution is good (16MP)
features tracking autofocus
slow fps (2.0 fps)
small sensor (1/2.3")
terrible battery life (210 CIPA)
lacks phase detect AF
61
megapixel count good (15 megapixels)
decent sensor size (APS-C)
environment sealing
supports phase detect AF
no liveview feature
lack of image stabilization
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Travel Comparison

Canon SX520 HS Travel photography information
Sigma SD1 Merrill Travel photography information
55
resolution is good (16 megapixels)
flash built-in
quite wide (24mm)
long reach (1008mm)
doesn't have Timelapse function
terrible battery life (210 per charge)
display is not selfie friendly
slow maximum aperture (f3.4)
54
environment sealing
megapixel count good (15 megapixels)
no Timelapse function
display is not selfie friendly
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Landscape Comparison

Canon SX520 HS as a Landscape photography camera
Sigma SD1 Merrill as a Landscape photography camera
46
has manual focus
quite wide (24mm)
screen size is good (3")
image stabilization (Optical)
resolution is good (16MP)
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
slow maximum aperture (f3.4)
small sensor (1/2.3")
lacks RAW support
terrible battery life (210 CIPA)
doesn't have Timelapse function
63
has manual focus
interchangeable lenses (Sigma SA mount)
screen size is good (3 inch)
megapixel count good (15MP)
decent sensor size (APS-C)
exports RAW formats
environment sealing
no liveview feature
lack of image stabilization
no Timelapse function
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Vlogging Comparison

Canon SX520 HS Vlogging information
Sigma SD1 Merrill Vlogging information
29
quite wide (24mm)
image stabilization (Optical)
features face detection focusing
high quality video (1920 x 1080 resolution)
slow maximum aperture (f3.4)
display is not selfie friendly
doesn't have external microphone support
9
can't record video
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Canon SX520 HS vs Sigma SD1 Merrill Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Canon SX520 HS and Sigma SD1 Merrill
 Canon PowerShot SX520 HSSigma SD1 Merrill
General Information
Brand Canon Sigma
Model type Canon PowerShot SX520 HS Sigma SD1 Merrill
Category Small Sensor Superzoom Advanced DSLR
Released 2014-07-29 2012-04-10
Physical type Compact Mid-size SLR
Sensor Information
Processor Chip Digic 4+ Dual True II
Sensor type BSI-CMOS CMOS (Foveon X3)
Sensor size 1/2.3" APS-C
Sensor measurements 6.17 x 4.55mm 24 x 16mm
Sensor surface area 28.1mm² 384.0mm²
Sensor resolution 16MP 15MP
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 -
Full resolution 4608 x 3456 4800 x 3200
Max native ISO 3200 6400
Lowest native ISO 100 100
RAW data
Autofocusing
Focus manually
AF touch
AF continuous
Single AF
AF tracking
AF selectice
Center weighted AF
Multi area AF
Live view AF
Face detect focusing
Contract detect focusing
Phase detect focusing
Total focus points 9 -
Lens
Lens mount type fixed lens Sigma SA
Lens zoom range 24-1008mm (42.0x) -
Highest aperture f/3.4-6.0 -
Macro focusing distance 0cm -
Total lenses - 76
Focal length multiplier 5.8 1.5
Screen
Display type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display size 3 inch 3 inch
Display resolution 461k dots 460k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch friendly
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None Optical (pentaprism)
Viewfinder coverage - 96 percent
Viewfinder magnification - 0.64x
Features
Lowest shutter speed 15 secs -
Highest shutter speed 1/2000 secs -
Continuous shooting rate 2.0 frames per sec -
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Change WB
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash distance 5.50 m no built-in flash
Flash modes Auto, on, off, slow synchro no built-in flash
Hot shoe
AEB
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Video resolutions 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) -
Max video resolution 1920x1080 None
Video format MPEG-4, H.264 -
Microphone support
Headphone support
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 441 grams (0.97 lbs) 790 grams (1.74 lbs)
Physical dimensions 120 x 82 x 92mm (4.7" x 3.2" x 3.6") 146 x 113 x 80mm (5.7" x 4.4" x 3.1")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery life 210 pictures -
Battery style Battery Pack -
Battery ID NB-6LH -
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec, Custom) Yes
Time lapse recording
Type of storage SD/SDHC/SDXC Compact Flash (Type I, UDMA compatible)
Card slots One One
Price at launch $219 $2,339