Clicky

Canon SX600 HS vs Nikon L840

Portability
93
Imaging
40
Features
45
Overall
42
Canon PowerShot SX600 HS front
 
Nikon Coolpix L840 front
Portability
67
Imaging
40
Features
48
Overall
43

Canon SX600 HS vs Nikon L840 Key Specs

Canon SX600 HS
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 3200
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1280 video
  • 25-450mm (F3.8-6.9) lens
  • 188g - 104 x 61 x 26mm
  • Released January 2014
  • Replacement is Canon SX610 HS
Nikon L840
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Tilting Screen
  • ISO 100 - 6400
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 23-855mm (F3.0-6.5) lens
  • 538g - 114 x 89 x 96mm
  • Launched February 2015
  • Earlier Model is Nikon L830
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Canon SX600 HS vs Nikon Coolpix L840: The Definitive Small Sensor Superzoom Showdown

When selecting a small-sensor superzoom camera, your priorities range from zoom reach and image quality to portability and ergonomics. Both the Canon PowerShot SX600 HS and the Nikon Coolpix L840 have long attracted enthusiasts seeking versatile all-in-one solutions at reasonable prices. Having tested and compared hundreds of cameras in this class over the years, I’ll walk you through their real-world strengths, technical underpinnings, and which model fits various photographic ambitions best.

Let’s break down these two titans of the compact superzoom category - released just over a year apart but offering markedly different value propositions - to help you zero in on the camera that makes your creative journey smooth and enjoyable.

First Look: Size, Handling, and Build Quality

The physical form and feel of a camera massively affect your shooting comfort, especially on long outings.

Feature Canon SX600 HS Nikon L840
Dimensions (W×H×D) 104 × 61 × 26 mm 114 × 89 × 96 mm
Weight 188 g 538 g
Body Type Compact Bridge-style (SLR-like)
Weather Sealing None None
Battery Lithium-ion NB-6LH 4× AA batteries

Canon SX600 HS vs Nikon L840 size comparison

The SX600 HS is remarkably pocketable - at just under 190 grams and slim, easily slipping into everyday bags. It’s ideal if you’re prioritizing lightness and on-the-go shooting. In contrast, the L840 impresses with an SLR-style grip and heftier frame, lending a sense of stability, especially for long telephoto shots, but its chunky size and weight (over half a kilogram) demand more commitment when transporting.

Build quality across both is solid but plainly plastic, typical for this class and price point. Neither provides environmental sealing - keep them sheltered from rain or dust.

The Nikon’s bulkier body includes a tilting rear LCD screen (a plus for creative angles), while Canon offers a fixed display.

Control Layout and Interface: Ease of Use in Action

How a camera’s buttons and dials are laid out influences your ability to shoot intuitively, a non-negotiable for seizing fleeting moments.

Canon SX600 HS vs Nikon L840 top view buttons comparison

  • Canon SX600 HS opts for minimalism. With no mode dial or manual exposure control, it targets point-and-shoot simplicity.
  • The Nikon L840 offers slightly more control with dedicated AF modes and a shutter-speed range up to 1/4000s, though lacking full manual exposure modes.
  • Neither camera has touchscreen capability or an electronic viewfinder, so you’re relying on the rear LCD for composing shots.
  • Both include common flash modes; Nikon’s built-in flash offers greater range.

For beginners or casual shooters wanting auto-focused shooting without fuss, the Canon’s straightforward design appeals. If you want to tweak focus areas or benefit from continuous AF, Nikon’s extra options help bridge the gap toward advanced usage.

Sensor Technology and Image Quality: What’s Behind the Lens?

Despite similar nominal sensor sizes, image quality can vary significantly with processing power and sensor design.

Feature Canon SX600 HS Nikon L840
Sensor Size 1/2.3" BSI CMOS (6.17×4.55 mm) 1/2.3" CMOS (6.17×4.55 mm)
Resolution 16 MP 16 MP
Max ISO 3200 6400
Antialias Filter Yes Yes
RAW Support No No
Image Processor DIGIC 4+ Not specified

Canon SX600 HS vs Nikon L840 sensor size comparison

Both cameras share identical sensor dimensions, but the Canon uses a Backside Illuminated (BSI) CMOS sensor, which improves low-light sensitivity by capturing more light in the pixel wells. Nikon’s sensor lacks this BSI design but compensates with a higher max ISO rating, theoretically enabling brighter images in darker conditions.

In practice, the Canon SX600 HS renders slightly cleaner images at ISO 800 and below, useful for daylight and modest indoor lighting. However, Nikon’s expanded ISO range provides more exposure flexibility at the cost of increased noise.

Neither supports RAW format - meaning image processing happens internally, limiting post-processing latitude. This is a trade-off of the superzoom compact class, emphasizing convenience over maximal image control.

Lens and Zoom Performance: Reach, Speed, and Sharpness

A hallmark of superzoom cameras is the extraordinary zoom range, perfect for diverse shooting scenarios without swapping lenses.

Feature Canon SX600 HS Nikon L840
Focal Range 25-450 mm (18× zoom equiv.) 23-855 mm (38× zoom equiv.)
Max Aperture Range f/3.8 - 6.9 f/3.0 - 6.5
Macro Focus Range 5 cm 1 cm
Optical Image Stabilizer Yes (Optical) Yes (Optical)

The Nikon’s 38× zoom truly dwarfs Canon’s 18× reach, especially valuable when photographing subjects at a distance - wildlife, sports, or architectural details.

  • Nikon’s wider aperture at the wide end (f/3.0 vs f/3.8) allows marginally more light in, beneficial for indoor and low-light shooting.
  • Macro photography favors Nikon again, with a minimum focusing distance down to 1 cm versus Canon’s 5 cm, letting you get closer to insect or texture details.
  • Both cameras feature optical image stabilization, helping reduce blur at long focal lengths or handheld shooting.

Sharpness and chromatic aberration vary with focal length and zoom extent. The Canon lens produces relatively consistent, good-quality images across its range, while Nikon’s extreme zoom introduces some softness and edge distortion when fully zoomed.

Autofocus and Shooting Speed: Catching the Moment

Autofocus performance is key for action, wildlife, and casual shooting alike.

Feature Canon SX600 HS Nikon L840
Focus Points 9 Not specified
AF Modes Face detection only Face detection, continuous AF, tracking
AF System Contrast detection Contrast detection
Burst Mode 4 fps 7.4 fps

The Nikon Coolpix L840 stands out in this category:

  • It offers continuous autofocus and tracking, maintaining focus on moving subjects.
  • Nearly double the burst frame rate (7.4 fps versus Canon’s 4 fps) makes it much more capable for fast action or sports scenarios.
  • Canon’s autofocus system is limited to center point and face detection, better suited for static subjects or portraits.

In busy street photography or wildlife environments, Nikon’s autofocus capability and shooting speed add a crucial advantage.

Exposure, White Balance, and Metering: Control and Flexibility

Neither camera features full manual aperture or shutter speed controls, so exposure is largely program-driven.

  • Both cameras include custom white balance, helping you handle tricky lighting.
  • Exposure compensation and bracketing features are mostly absent or minimal.
  • Metering uses center-weighted patterns with spot metering available on Canon and Nikon.

This setup suits casual users better than professionals needing precise manual overrides.

Rear Screen and Viewfinder: Composing Your Shots

Your viewfinder or screen greatly impacts how comfortably you can compose images.

Feature Canon SX600 HS Nikon L840
Screen Size 3.0 inches 3.0 inches
Resolution 461k dots 921k dots
Screen Type Fixed PureColor II G (TFT) Tilting LCD (no touchscreen)
Viewfinder None None

Canon SX600 HS vs Nikon L840 Screen and Viewfinder comparison

The Nikon’s 921k-dot screen is nearly twice as sharp, enhancing visibility in bright light. Its tilting design enables low or high-angle shooting - ideal for creative compositions or video.

The Canon’s fixed screen is basic and less sharp but perfectly serviceable for casual use. Neither offers an electronic viewfinder (EVF), requiring composition via the LCD.

Video Capabilities: Quality and Usability

Small sensor superzooms usually target stills shooters, but video is an increasingly important feature for content creators.

Canon SX600 HS Nikon Coolpix L840
Max Video Resolution 1920 × 1280 @ 30fps 1920 × 1080 @ up to 60i/p
Video Format H.264 MPEG-4, H.264
Mic & Headphone Ports None None
Image Stabilization Optical Optical

The Nikon L840 provides full HD at 1080p with both 30 and 60 interlaced or progressive frames per second, resulting in smoother motion capture compared to the Canon’s 1280-pixel vertical resolution and 30fps cap.

Neither camera supports external microphones, limiting audio control and quality, but the optical stabilization aids handheld video use.

For casual video blogging or family moments, Nikon’s video specs give it the edge.

Battery Life and Storage: Keeping You Shooting Longer

Battery endurance and storage options dictate how practicable a camera is on extended trips.

Feature Canon SX600 HS Nikon L840
Battery Type NB-6LH Lithium-Ion 4× AA Alkaline/NiMH batteries
Shots per Charge ~290 ~590
Storage Media SD/SDHC/SDXC SD/SDHC/SDXC

Nikon’s use of common AA batteries means easier field replacement but results in heavier weight. The longer rated battery life (~590 shots) is impressive in this low-end zoom category.

The Canon’s proprietary lithium-ion battery is lighter but requires recharging.

Both cameras support standard SD cards, ensuring accessible and expandable storage.

Connectivity and Extras: Staying Connected on the Go

Feature Canon SX600 HS Nikon L840
Wireless Connectivity Wi-Fi Built-in + NFC Wi-Fi Built-in + NFC
USB USB 2.0 USB 2.0
HDMI Mini HDMI Mini HDMI
GPS None None

Both cameras offer Wi-Fi and NFC, enabling easy image transfer to smartphones for social media sharing or backup.

Sample Images: Real-World Performance Comparison

From landscapes to portraits, both produce vibrant photos. The Nikon shows a bit more versatility with zoom reach and better macro capability. Canon delivers reliable colors and sharpness but struggles slightly at the telephoto end.

Camera Scores and Overall Performance Ratings

The Nikon L840 ranks higher overall, especially excelling in autofocus, zoom range, and battery life metrics. The Canon SX600 HS scores well for portability and straightforward usability.

Specialized Performance Across Photography Types

Photography Genre Canon SX600 HS Nikon Coolpix L840
Portrait Good skin tone reproduction, face detection AF only Confident face detection with continuous AF for sharper eyes
Landscape Decent dynamic range, fixed screen Higher resolution screen aids composition, stronger zoom for details
Wildlife Limited autofocus, moderate zoom Excellent zoom and AF tracking for wildlife action
Sports Modest burst rate Faster burst and AF for moving subjects
Street Compact and discrete Larger but more control with tilt screen
Macro Acceptable but 5 cm min focus Better at 1 cm focusing distance
Night/Astro Low max ISO dampens low light Higher sensitivity, better for dim situations
Video 720p cap limits smoothness Full HD at 60 fps
Travel Lightweight, fits in pocket Heavy but one-camera travel solution
Professional Work Limited manual controls, no RAW support No RAW, but better autofocus and image stabilization

Who Should Choose Canon SX600 HS?

  • You want the most compact and lightweight superzoom that fits easily in pockets or small bags.
  • You’re a beginner or casual shooter wanting reliable automatic shooting with simple controls.
  • Your budget is tight - Canon retails for about $249.
  • Occasional travel or family events where ease of use outweighs advanced features.
  • Everyday photography with some zoom flexibility without ergonomic bulk.

Who Should Choose Nikon Coolpix L840?

  • You desire maximum zoom reach and faster autofocus to shoot wildlife, sports, or distant subjects.
  • You want longer battery life with easy AA replacement on remote trips.
  • Video capture at Full HD 60fps is important to you.
  • Macro photography and more robust burst rates matter.
  • Ergonomics and tilt screen versatility enhance your composition.
  • You’re willing to carry a larger bridge-style camera for a more capable all-in-one.

Closing Thoughts: Expert Recommendations

Both the Canon SX600 HS and Nikon L840 provide strong value in the small sensor superzoom niche, but their fundamental differences dictate distinct user profiles.

Choose the Canon SX600 HS for lightweight, casual photography with respectable zoom and good image quality for its class. Its intuitive design suits beginners and travelers prioritizing convenience without sacrificing essential features.

Opt for the Nikon Coolpix L840 if your creative pursuits demand longer zoom reach, faster shooting, and greater versatility, particularly for wildlife, sports, and video. Despite its heft, it offers more control and robust performance, appealing to serious enthusiasts wanting a bridge camera experience on a reasonable budget.

Feel free to check out in-store demos or online sample galleries to get a hands-on feel for these cameras’ ergonomics and output, and consider the lenses or accessories you might pair with them for your photographic goals.

Thanks for joining us on this detailed exploration - here’s to capturing countless inspiring moments with your next camera!

Appendix: Specs Summary Table

Specification Canon PowerShot SX600 HS Nikon Coolpix L840
Release Date January 2014 February 2015
Sensor Size 1/2.3" BSI CMOS 1/2.3" CMOS
Megapixels 16 MP 16 MP
Max ISO 3200 6400
Zoom Range (equiv.) 25-450 mm (18×) 23-855 mm (38×)
Max Aperture (Wide-Tele) f/3.8 - 6.9 f/3.0 - 6.5
Burst Rate 4 fps 7.4 fps
Video Max Resolution 1920×1280 @ 30 fps 1920×1080 @ up to 60i/p
Rear Screen 3" fixed, 461k dots 3" tilting, 921k dots
Viewfinder None None
Weight 188 g 538 g
Battery Lithium-ion NB-6LH 4× AA
Price (approx.) $249 $400

If you’re ready to dive into photography with the right superzoom companion, explore these models in depth, and discover what matches your shooting style best!

Canon SX600 HS vs Nikon L840 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Canon SX600 HS and Nikon L840
 Canon PowerShot SX600 HSNikon Coolpix L840
General Information
Brand Canon Nikon
Model Canon PowerShot SX600 HS Nikon Coolpix L840
Type Small Sensor Superzoom Small Sensor Superzoom
Released 2014-01-06 2015-02-10
Physical type Compact SLR-like (bridge)
Sensor Information
Powered by DIGIC 4+ -
Sensor type BSI-CMOS CMOS
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 6.17 x 4.55mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor area 28.1mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 16 megapixel 16 megapixel
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 4:3
Highest Possible resolution 4608 x 3456 4608 x 3456
Maximum native ISO 3200 6400
Min native ISO 100 100
RAW files
Autofocusing
Manual focus
Touch focus
Autofocus continuous
Single autofocus
Autofocus tracking
Selective autofocus
Center weighted autofocus
Multi area autofocus
Autofocus live view
Face detection autofocus
Contract detection autofocus
Phase detection autofocus
Number of focus points 9 -
Lens
Lens mounting type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 25-450mm (18.0x) 23-855mm (37.2x)
Maximum aperture f/3.8-6.9 f/3.0-6.5
Macro focus range 5cm 1cm
Crop factor 5.8 5.8
Screen
Screen type Fixed Type Tilting
Screen diagonal 3" 3"
Resolution of screen 461k dots 921k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch display
Screen tech PureColor II G (TFT) -
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None None
Features
Minimum shutter speed 15 seconds 4 seconds
Fastest shutter speed 1/2000 seconds 1/4000 seconds
Continuous shutter rate 4.0 frames/s 7.4 frames/s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Custom white balance
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash range 3.50 m (50 cm � 3.5 m (W) / 1.0 m � 2.0 m (T)) 6.90 m (at Auto ISO)
Flash settings Auto, Manual Flash On / Off, Slow Synchro -
External flash
AEB
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Video resolutions 1920 x 1280 (30fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) 1920 x 1080 (60i, 50i, 30p, 25p), 1280 x 720 (30p, 25p), 640 x 480 (30p, 25p)
Maximum video resolution 1920x1280 1920x1080
Video format H.264 MPEG-4, H.264
Microphone support
Headphone support
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In Built-In
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 188g (0.41 lb) 538g (1.19 lb)
Dimensions 104 x 61 x 26mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.0") 114 x 89 x 96mm (4.5" x 3.5" x 3.8")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery life 290 photos 590 photos
Battery style Battery Pack AA
Battery model NB-6LH -
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec, custom) Yes (2 or 10 sec)
Time lapse shooting
Type of storage SD/SDHC/SDXC SC/SDHC/SDXC
Card slots Single Single
Launch pricing $249 $400