Canon PowerShot SX620 HS vs. Canon PowerShot SX700 HS: The Compact Superzoom Showdown

When diving into the world of superzoom compacts, Canon’s PowerShot lineup often surfaces as a reliable choice for photography enthusiasts craving versatility without the bulk of interchangeable lenses. Two contenders from this family - the Canon PowerShot SX620 HS and the Canon PowerShot SX700 HS - might seem close cousins at first glance. But beneath their modest façades lies a tale of subtle evolutions, trade-offs, and target user differences. As someone who has tested hundreds of compact zoom cameras over the past decade, I’m excited to unpack these two models in detail to help you navigate which one will best serve your photo adventures.

Let's start with the basics before zooming (pun intended) into their strengths, quirks, and practical performance.

First Impressions: Size and Handling - Compact by Any Measure?

Physically, both the SX620 HS and SX700 HS are designed to be pocketable travel companions. However, they do present slightly different profiles that influence how comfortable and stable they feel in-hand.

The SX620 HS is notably more compact and lightweight - at 97×57×28 mm and 182g compared to the SX700 HS’s 113×66×35 mm and 269g. That’s a difference you’ll feel, especially after long shooting days or when stuffing the camera in tight pockets or small bags. I remember trekking through urban streets and realizing how gloves or winter jackets also affect pocket space - if you’re size-conscious, the SX620 HS wins hands down.

The physical dimensions aside, the SX700 HS’s larger body offers more surface area for grip and control, which some might prefer for steadier handling - especially with those long telephoto focal lengths. So it's a trade-off: compactness versus a more reassuring hold.

Design and Control Layout - Intuitive and Ready

A camera’s physical controls are critical for smooth shooting - especially for enthusiasts who like to tinker on the fly rather than fumbling with menus.

Taking a peek from above reveals the nuanced differences between these two models:

Both cameras feature the typical PowerShot design - a mode dial, shutter button, zoom toggle, and power switch arranged ergonomically. However, the SX700 HS, sporting the older Digic 6 processor era design, benefits from a slightly more substantial mode dial with clear labeling, which somehow feels a tad more tactile compared to the smaller, slightly more streamlined dial on the SX620 HS.

Neither camera sports touchscreens, which feels like a missed opportunity in an age where touch-based control significantly enhances usability. Both have fixed 3-inch LCDs, but we’ll return to that momentarily since screen quality affects real-world shooting comfort.

The absence of an electronic viewfinder (EVF) on both models is notable, though not surprising in this price and size bracket. That means composing in bright sunlight requires squinting at the rear LCD - more on the efficiency of those LCDs later.

Sensor and Image Quality: Same-Sized Sensors, Different Processing

Both cameras use a 1/2.3” BSI-CMOS sensor measuring 6.17 x 4.55mm - this is a tiny sensor by professional standards but par for the course in compact superzooms aiming for reach rather than shallow depth of field or ultra-high resolution.

Here, size is roughly the same, but the SX620 HS boasts a 20-megapixel sensor resolution versus 16 megapixels on the SX700 HS. You might immediately think “20MP is better, right?” - but as anyone with sensor testing experience knows, more pixels on the same sensor size can lead to increased noise if the pixel pitch shrinks too small.

Digging deeper, the SX620 HS uses Canon’s DIGIC 4+ image processor, while the SX700 HS is powered by the more advanced DIGIC 6 engine. The DIGIC 6 brings improvements in noise reduction, speed, and image processing sophistication.

From practical side-by-side shooting in daylight and low light, I noticed the SX700 HS, thanks to DIGIC 6, tends to render cleaner images at mid-to-high ISOs despite the slightly lower resolution. The SX620 HS, while high-res, can show more grain in challenging lighting.

Neither camera supports RAW file capture - a major limitation for enthusiasts who want full post-processing flexibility - so you’re relying on JPEG processing exclusively. Of course, Canon's JPEG algorithms typically do a decent job, but power users might feel the sting here.

For dynamic range, both cameras offer reasonable latitude for their class but don't expect DSLR or mirrorless-like performance. Highlights can clip easily in high-contrast scenes, and shadows tend to crumble into noise quickly above ISO 800.

Autofocus Systems - Speed, Accuracy, and Tracking

Autofocus is where the rubber meets the road, especially if you shoot wildlife, sports, or street photography where split-second focus precision is essential.

Both models revolve around contrast-detection autofocus with 9 focus points, plus face detection - no phase-detection AF here, which slows performance in comparison to modern mirrorless cameras.

The SX700 HS supports continuous AF but lacks AF tracking during burst shooting, which can frustrate attempts to shoot moving subjects reliably. The SX620 HS adds AF tracking, though it's still contrast-based and prone to hunting in low light or with fast-moving targets.

In my tests with moving cars and brisk walking subjects, SX620 HS’s AF tracking saved a few shots, albeit inconsistently. The SX700 HS felt faster on single shot snaps but less adaptable to tracking dynamic scenes.

For wildlife or sports enthusiasts on a budget, these cameras deliver stop-gap performance, but you’ll want to temper expectations.

Zoom Range and Lens Performance - Stretching the Frames

When it comes to superzooms, the lens focal length range is undoubtedly a headline feature.

The SX700 HS boasts a 30x zoom equivalent to 25–750 mm, giving you extra reach for distant subjects - wildlife in the backyard, or snagging that bird on the wire. By contrast, the SX620 HS offers a still generous but slightly shorter 25x zoom, translating to 25–625 mm.

Both lenses have similar maximum apertures, sliding from f/3.2 at the wide end to the mid- to high f/6 range telephoto end. Not fast lenses, but understandable given the extreme zoom range.

Image stabilization is optical on both models, which is crucial to tame handshake at telephoto lengths - and indeed, stabilization performed admirably in my handheld shooting tests up to about 300–400mm equivalent. Beyond that, a tripod or steady support is highly advisable.

The SX700 HS’s extra 125 mm reach was genuinely helpful for distant wildlife or event coverage - but remember, the small sensor and limited aperture restrict low-light telephoto usability.

LCD and Interface - Your Digital Window

Both cameras come with a fixed 3-inch LCD screen at 922k-dot resolution - decent but not spectacular.

A subtle difference is the SX700 HS's "PureColor II G TFT" screen technology, which delivers slightly better contrast and viewing angles, a boon when shooting outdoors under bright sun.

Neither screen supports touch, so you’ll rely on physical buttons and dials - a bit old-fashioned, but familiar to those used to traditional compacts. Lack of articulation means awkward angles for low or high shooting.

Both cameras lack any viewfinder, making the rear screen your sole option for composition - limiting in bright conditions or fast-moving scenes.

Video Capabilities - Good Enough, But Nothing Fancy

Video performance is crucial for many photographers experimenting with motion.

The SX700 HS supports Full HD 1080p video at 60 fps, a nice plus for smoother footage. The SX620 HS also outputs 1080p but caps at 30 fps. Both shoot H.264 codec, which is broadly compatible but not the highest efficiency.

Neither camera offers 4K video or advanced features like log profiles or microphone inputs - unsurprising for the segment, but notable for enthusiasts wanting to dabble in serious videography.

The lack of microphone and headphone jacks limits sound control - expect mostly casual video capture.

Battery Life and Storage - Longevity in the Field

Battery endurance and storage options are often overlooked but essential practical considerations.

The SX620 HS manages approximately 295 shots per charge, edging past the SX700 HS's 250 shots. It might not sound significant, but those extra shots make a difference on long daytrips without recharging opportunities.

Both cameras use proprietary rechargeable battery packs - the SX700 HS specifically uses NB-6LH batteries.

Storage-wise, both accept SD/SDHC/SDXC cards with a single slot - predictable and convenient, but without dual card redundancy that professionals might crave.

Wireless Connectivity - Modern Sharing Features

Surprisingly, both include built-in Wi-Fi and NFC for quick pairing with smartphones and tablets. No Bluetooth, which could have provided background transfer convenience.

This inclusion means uploading images on the go is a breeze - a big plus in today’s social media-oriented ecosystem.

Durability and Environmental Resistance - Not Built for Extremes

Neither camera features any weather sealing, dustproofing, or rugged resistance. Be careful using these on beach trips or wet hikes - they are delicate companions that benefit from a protective case.

Real-World Photography Scenarios: How Do They Stack Up?

The true test: how these cameras perform in the field, across key photography genres.

Portraits: Skin Tones and Bokeh

Portraiture benefits from smooth skin tone rendition and pleasing background blur. Neither camera’s small sensor and fixed zoom lens excel at shallow depth of field. The maximum apertures at longer focal lengths are narrow, and the 1/2.3” sensor naturally produces higher depth of field, limiting creamy bokeh possibilities.

Still, the SX700 HS’s DIGIC 6 processor produces slightly better color reproduction and less noise on skin tones under moderate light. For casual portraits in natural light, both cameras suffice; for serious portrait artists, look elsewhere.

Landscapes: Dynamic Range and Resolution

Landscape photography tests dynamic range and resolution. The SX620 HS’s higher 20MP count provides a resolution edge for large prints, but the limited dynamic range and noise handling restrict capture of contrast-rich scenes.

Both lack aggressive highlight recovery but produce decent results with careful exposure. The SX700 HS performs marginally better in handling shadows, thanks again to its processing engine.

Neither model has weather sealing, so photographers venturing into rugged environments should proceed cautiously.

Wildlife: Autofocus Speed and Telephoto Performance

Wildlife shooting exposes autofocus latency and zoom reach.

The SX700 HS’s 30x zoom offers extra reach - useful in birding or skittish subjects. However, its AF tracking is limited, making subjects at a distance tricky to nail consistently.

The SX620 HS has better AF tracking but sacrifices reach. For casual wildlife photos, both work but don't expect professional results with fast-moving subjects.

Sports: Tracking and Burst Frame Rates

Sports photography demands fast continuous shooting and tracking.

Here, the SX700 HS shines with 9 fps burst (versus SX620 HS’s 2.5 fps), making it better suited to capturing fast action sequences, albeit with limited focus tracking.

Both cameras’ modest AF tracking and contrast-based sensors mean catching razor-sharp frames in high-speed sports is a challenge.

Street Photography: Discreteness and Portability

Street photographers prize compact size and stealth.

The SX620 HS wins here thanks to its smaller size and less obtrusive design. Both cameras operate quietly, but the SX700 HS’s bulk makes it slightly more conspicuous.

Low light performance is limited on both; fast prime lens compacts or mirrorless with larger sensors excel here.

Macro: Magnification and Focus Precision

Both models focus down to 1 cm, allowing decent macro capabilities.

Optical image stabilization helps with handholding; however, without focus stacking or manual focus aids, precision can be difficult.

In practice, casual macro shots (flowers, small objects) come out well, but don’t expect professional close-up performance.

Night and Astro: High ISO and Exposure Modes

Low-light capability is hampered by small sensors and modest max ISO (3200 native).

The SX700 HS’s DIGIC 6 processor provides cleaner images at ISO 800-1600, useful for night street scenes.

Neither model offers built-in intervalometer or advanced exposure modes for astrophotography.

Video for Vlogging and Beyond

Full HD video with image stabilization is good for casual video content.

Higher frame rate 60p on the SX700 HS enables smoother slow-motion, an edge for creative shooters.

Both lack mic input, limiting audio quality potential.

Travel Photography: Versatility and Longevity

Here both cameras largely deliver their promise: compactness, zoom versatility, and wireless features.

The SX620 HS's smaller size, longer battery life, and lighter weight make it an excellent travel buddy for casual shooting.

The SX700 HS’s increased zoom and faster processing offer creative options at the cost of bulk and battery.

Professional Use: Reliability and Workflow Integration

Neither camera targets professionals - no RAW support, no external flash, no weather sealing, and limited manual controls.

They’re best seen as advanced point-and-shoots for enthusiasts wanting a lightweight superzoom.

Value Analysis: Price vs. Performance

At retail prices (approx. $279 for SX620 HS and $349 for SX700 HS), both offer affordable paths into long-range compact zoom photography.

The SX620 HS delivers a modern DIGIC 4+ chipset, higher resolution, and improved battery life - great value for casual users prioritizing portability.

The SX700 HS, despite older age, offers faster continuous shooting, advanced exposure modes, and a slight zoom reach edge - better for semi-serious shooters willing to tolerate extra size and weight.

Summary of Strengths and Weaknesses

Feature	Canon PowerShot SX620 HS	Canon PowerShot SX700 HS
Size and Weight	Compact and lightweight (182g)	Larger, heavier (269g)
Processor	DIGIC 4+	DIGIC 6 (more advanced)
Sensor Resolution	20 MP (higher res)	16 MP
Zoom Range	25x (25–625mm)	30x (25–750mm)
Continuous Shooting	2.5 fps	9 fps
Video Frame Rate	1080p @ 30 fps	1080p @ 60 fps
Autofocus Tracking	Available (contrast detection)	Limited
Battery Life	~295 shots/charge	~250 shots/charge
Screen Quality	Good LCD, no touch	Slightly better LCD, no touch
RAW Support	No	No
Weather Sealing	No	No
Price	Lower (~$279)	Higher (~$349)

Visual Sample Gallery - How Do Images Stack Side by Side?

To underscore these observations, here are sample images taken under varying conditions and focal lengths with both cameras:

These samples illustrate the SX700 HS’s advantage in noise control at higher ISO and smoother video frame rates, whereas the SX620 HS impresses with fine detail where light is ample.

Overall Performance Ratings (Including User Experience and Technical Metrics)

Having painstakingly tested both models for responsiveness, focus accuracy, image quality, and user comfort, I assign the following overall scores:

SX700 HS edges out for speed and versatility, while SX620 HS scores better for compactness and ease of use.

Genre-Specific Performance Analysis: Which Camera Fits Your Photography Style?

Breaking down performance by popular photography genres:

• Portraits: Tie, slight edge SX700 HS for better skin tone processing
• Landscape: SX620 HS favored for resolution, SX700 HS for dynamic range
• Wildlife: SX700 HS leads due to longer zoom and burst rate
• Sports: SX700 HS better with 9 fps continuous shooting
• Street: SX620 HS for portability
• Macro: Tie; both adequate for casual close-ups
• Night/Astro: SX700 HS performs better at high ISO
• Video: SX700 HS thanks to 60p mode
• Travel: SX620 HS more convenient for travel due to size and weight
• Professional use: Neither ideal; both are casual enthusiast cameras

So, Which One Should You Choose?

After all this, how do you decide between the SX620 HS and SX700 HS? It boils down to your priorities:

• Buy the Canon PowerShot SX620 HS if:
  You want the smallest possible camera that still packs an impressive zoom lens and respectable image quality. Perfect for casual users, travelers, and street photographers who prize portability, decent image resolution, and longer battery life. Its AF tracking feature slightly nudges it forward for moving subjects too.

• Buy the Canon PowerShot SX700 HS if:
  You crave the longest zoom reach and faster burst shooting - handy for wildlife or sports intermittently. You can tolerate a bulkier body and shorter battery life for faster processing power and superior video frame rates. Also, requires slightly more manual control flexibility than the SX620 offers.

Final Thoughts

Canon’s SX620 HS and SX700 HS are commendable superzoom compact cameras tailored to enthusiastic hobbyists who need a pocketable yet versatile zoom tool. Neither is a professional powerhouse - no RAW, no weather sealing, limited low-light capabilities - but they shine as easy-to-use, all-in-one solutions for everyday shooting and travel.

The SX620 HS seduces with modern compactness and a tidy feature set, whereas the SX700 HS demands attention with its longer reach, faster shooting, and more flexible exposure modes.

Whichever side you favor, hands-on experience remains king: try holding each camera, test their AF and control responsiveness, and envision your shooting scenarios. That’s the best way to ensure your next compact superzoom will be a dependable partner on your photographic journeys.

Happy shooting!

If you want to dive deeper or see more side-by-side sample images or control walk-throughs, drop a comment - I’m always game for demystifying camera tech with a dash of fun.