Canon SX70 HS vs Sony RX10 IV
63 Imaging
47 Features
67 Overall
55


52 Imaging
53 Features
82 Overall
64
Canon SX70 HS vs Sony RX10 IV Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 21-1365mm (F3.4-6.5) lens
- 608g - 127 x 91 x 117mm
- Introduced September 2018
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 125 - 12800 (Raise to 25600)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 24-600mm (F2.4-4.0) lens
- 1095g - 133 x 94 x 145mm
- Released September 2017
- Succeeded the Sony RX10 III

Canon SX70 HS vs Sony RX10 IV: The Bridge Camera Battle for Photography Enthusiasts
Choosing your next camera can feel like navigating a labyrinth, especially when standout contenders cater to similar but distinctive shooting experiences. Today, we delve deeply into a clash between two popular bridge-style superzoom cameras: the Canon PowerShot SX70 HS and the Sony Cyber-shot RX10 IV. Both pack serious punch in their class yet diverge sharply in sensor size, autofocus sophistication, lens range, and price.
Having extensively tested both cameras in varied real-world scenarios, this comparison will dissect their strengths, explore practical use cases, and help you decide which complements your photography journey best. We'll cover everything from portrait finesse to wildlife hunting, technical muscle, ergonomics, and value for money. Let’s dive in.
First Impressions: Size and Ergonomics That Suit Your Hands
When you pick up a camera, it’s instantly about comfort and control. The SX70 HS and RX10 IV share SLR-like bridge bodies, but their physical presence tells different stories.
Canon SX70 HS:
- Dimensions: 127 x 91 x 117 mm
- Weight: ~608 g
- Feels lighter and more compact at first touch
- Robust grip suitable for sustained handheld shooting
- Controls designed for straightforward use but slightly less tactile feedback
Sony RX10 IV:
- Dimensions: 133 x 94 x 145 mm
- Weight: ~1095 g
- Heftier and noticeably more substantial in hand, feels robust and durable
- More pronounced grip contours offer superior handling for larger lenses
- Button layout refined with more customizability and illuminated buttons for usability in the dark
While the Canon’s lighter weight appeals for travel and day-long street outings, the Sony’s heft translates into added stability during telephoto use and intensive shooting sessions.
Control Layout and Building a Seamless Workflow
Looking down on the cameras will reveal the usability of physical controls and accessibility of key functions.
SX70 HS Controls:
- Standard mode dial with custom exposure modes
- Reasonable shortcut buttons, though no top LCD
- Limited button illumination; can be less tangible in low light
- Fully articulating 3" screen that aids creative angles but no touchscreen functionality
RX10 IV Controls:
- Includes top LCD pro-style readout for exposure parameters - excellent for quick settings changes
- Customizable buttons with illuminated backlighting for night shooting
- Tilting 3" screen with touchscreen support accelerates focus point selection and menu navigation
- Better ergonomics for manual control modes (aperture, shutter, ISO adjustment)
If you prioritize immediate feedback and intuitive exposure control during fast-paced shooting, the Sony offers superior ergonomics with professional-level workflow integration.
Sensor and Image Quality: The Heart of Photography
Arguably the most decisive factor between these cameras is sensor technology, impacting resolution, dynamic range, and low-light performance.
Specification | Canon SX70 HS | Sony RX10 IV |
---|---|---|
Sensor Size | 1/2.3" BSI CMOS (6.17x4.55 mm) | 1" BSI CMOS (13.2x8.8 mm) |
Effective Pixels | 20 MP | 20 MP |
Max ISO | 3200 | 12800 (native), 25600 (boosted) |
Anti-aliasing Filter | Yes | Yes |
Max Resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 5472 x 3648 |
Insights:
- The RX10 IV’s 1-inch sensor is roughly four times the surface area of Canon’s 1/2.3" sensor, enabling it to capture more light and deliver notably better image quality.
- The Canon’s smaller sensor inherently limits dynamic range and low light performance but allows a dramatic 65x zoom reach.
- Sony’s RX10 IV excels in noise control at high ISO settings, crucial for night and astro photography.
- In practical testing, the RX10 IV yields images with richer detail, cleaner shadows, and more natural color gradations - especially evident in landscape and portrait shots.
This sensor gap tips the scales markedly in favor of the Sony for professionals and enthusiasts demanding higher image fidelity.
Getting the Shot: Lens Reach, Aperture, and Focusing
Telephoto reach and autofocus are critical for multiple genres from wildlife to sports.
-
Lens Focal Range:
- Canon SX70 HS: 21–1365 mm (65x zoom, 35mm equivalent)
- Sony RX10 IV: 24–600 mm (25x zoom, 35mm equivalent)
-
Maximum Aperture:
- Canon: f/3.4 (wide) to f/6.5 (tele)
- Sony: f/2.4 (wide) to f/4.0 (tele)
-
Focusing System:
- Canon: 9 contrast-detection points, face detection, no phase detection
- Sony: 315 phase-detection AF points, including animal eye AF
The Canon’s extreme telephoto reach is nearly double the Sony’s but comes with trade-offs in aperture speed and autofocus finesse. The Sony balances an excellent zoom range with a notably faster, brighter lens. The f/2.4 aperture at the wide end and f/4 at telephoto helps the RX10 IV perform better in poor lighting and yields more pleasing background blur in portraits.
Autofocus on the RX10 IV is a game-changer. With its 315 phase-detection AF points and hybrid AF system, tracking fast-moving subjects during sports or wildlife photography is far more reliable. Canon’s 9 AF points and contrast detection, while competent for casual use, lag in speed and precision.
Display and Electronic Viewfinder: Critical Composition Tools
The display interfaces define shooting comfort and feedback.
- Both cameras offer a 3" LCD, but the Canon features a fully articulating screen, ideal for vlogging and extreme angles.
- The Sony RX10 IV has a tilting touchscreen, enhancing autofocus point control and quick menu navigation.
- EVF resolution is nearly identical (~2360 dots), but the Sony’s EVF features a higher magnification (0.7x vs. Canon’s n/a), giving a more immersive viewing experience.
- In bright outdoor light, the Sony’s EVF edges ahead with better refresh rate and clarity.
For creators shooting video or requiring versatile composition, Canon’s articulating screen is a big plus. For still shooters seeking precision and quick responsiveness, Sony’s touchscreen and enhanced EVF provide a professional touch.
Exploring Photography Genres with These Cameras
Enough about specs - how do these cameras actually perform when you’re out shooting portraits, landscapes, wildlife, and more?
Portrait Photography
-
Canon SX70 HS:
- Reasonable skin tone rendering thanks to Canon’s color science
- Long zoom allows capturing candid portraits from a distance
- Limited background blur at long zoom due to smaller sensor and f/6.5 aperture telephoto
-
Sony RX10 IV:
- Larger sensor and brighter aperture allow creamy bokeh and better subject isolation
- Animal eye AF enhances portraits involving pets or wildlife
- Faster, more accurate eye-detection autofocus leads to sharper eyes
Landscape Photography
-
Canon SX70 HS:
- Moderate resolution with less dynamic range owing to small sensor size
- Limited weather sealing restricts rugged outdoor use
- Zoom range is useful for detail capture within vast landscapes
-
Sony RX10 IV:
- Superior dynamic range and color depth
- Weather sealing offers durability in challenging conditions
- Higher resolution and better noise control around shadows and highlights
Wildlife Photography
-
Canon SX70 HS:
- Tremendous 1365 mm zoom can reach subjects difficult for shorter lenses
- Slower autofocus and smaller AF area can hamper tracking unpredictable animals
- Limited burst rate (10 fps) is adequate but not class-leading
-
Sony RX10 IV:
- 24 fps continuous shooting and 315-point phase-detection AF excel at fast-moving wildlife
- Faster lens aperture assists in lower-light dawn/dusk scenarios
- Animal eye AF increases keeper rates on animal portraits
Sports Photography
-
Canon SX70 HS:
- Acceptable 10 fps burst but focus tracking is less refined, limiting effectiveness in fast sports
- Lens speed reduces performance in arena lighting
-
Sony RX10 IV:
- Pioneer in bridge cameras with 24 fps burst and superior autofocus tracking
- Excellent for indoor and outdoor sports with its high native ISO range
- External mic and headphone jacks facilitate improved video capture of sports action
Street Photography
-
Canon SX70 HS:
- Smaller size and lighter weight provide easier hand-holding and discretion
- Fully articulating screen favors candid shots and videography
- Zoom lens helps isolate in busy street scenes
-
Sony RX10 IV:
- Bigger, heavier body may hinder discretion
- Tilting touchscreen and quicker AF lend efficiency in fast street encounters
Macro Photography
-
Canon SX70 HS:
- Zero macro focusing distance; impressive for close-up detail
-
Sony RX10 IV:
- 3 cm minimum focus distance with optical image stabilization enhances sharpness
- Physical lens design more conducive to high-quality close-ups
Night and Astro Photography
-
Canon SX70 HS:
- Native ISO max 3200 limits performance to well-lit night scenes
- Small sensor and noise impact low-light ability
-
Sony RX10 IV:
- ISO up to 12800 (25600 boosted) and better noise handling enables creative astro and very low-light capture
- Electronic shutter with speeds to 1/32000s facilitates precise long exposures
Video Capabilities
-
Canon SX70 HS:
- 4K UHD @ 30p up to 120 Mbps, no 4K photo mode
- No headphone jack but includes mic input
- Optical image stabilization smooths handheld video
-
Sony RX10 IV:
- 4K video at 30p with XAVC S codec
- Full audio control with mic and headphone ports
- Optical stabilization plus superior autofocus during video recording
Travel Photography
-
Canon’s lighter build and massive zoom range cater well to travel photographers needing versatility without more weight.
-
Sony’s superior image quality and ruggedization also shine, though weight is a consideration.
Professional Use
The Sony RX10 IV sits closer to professional demands with extensive functionality: raw support, wide ISO range, robust autofocus, and durable build. The Canon SX70 HS gives an excellent entry or enthusiast bridge camera experience with impressive zoom reach but some compromises for demanding pro workflows.
Build Quality and Weather Sealing: Durability in the Field
- Canon SX70 HS: Plastic-heavy construction, no weather sealing, limited suitability for extreme environments.
- Sony RX10 IV: Magnesium alloy chassis, fully weather-sealed against dust and moisture - suitable for outdoor adventure photography.
When we tested both cameras under light rain and dusty conditions, the Sony powerfully demonstrated its resistance, while the Canon required more cautious handling.
Autofocus Technologies: Keeping Your Subjects Sharp
Feature | Canon SX70 HS | Sony RX10 IV |
---|---|---|
AF Points | 9 (contrast detection) | 315 (hybrid PDAF + CDAF) |
Eye Detection AF | Yes (human faces only) | Yes (human + animal) |
AF Speed | Moderate | Extremely fast |
Continuous AF | Yes | Yes |
Tracking Accuracy | Basic | Top-tier |
The RX10 IV stands ahead in autofocus performance, crucial when photographing moving subjects like birds, sports players, or street scenes. Contrast-detection only autofocus on the Canon means you need careful compositions and patience for action shots.
Battery Life and Storage
- Canon SX70 HS:
- Battery life rated ~325 shots per charge
- Built-in battery limits quick swaps but less weight
- Single SD card slot with UHS-I support
- Sony RX10 IV:
- Rated ~400 shots per charge with NP-FW50 battery
- Supports Memory Stick Pro Duo and SD card formats
- Single slot but ability to swap batteries mid-shoot
For long shooting days, Sony’s longer battery life combined with larger buffer for high-speed capture can serve you better.
Connectivity and User Convenience
- Canon SX70 HS: Wi-Fi and Bluetooth onboard; USB 2.0; no NFC or headphone port.
- Sony RX10 IV: Wi-Fi, Bluetooth, and NFC; USB 2.0; mic and headphone jacks; HDMI output.
Sony’s inclusion of headphone ports simplifies professional video monitoring, while NFC provides seamless pairing with smartphones and tablets for quick image transfer.
Price and Value: What Are You Getting?
Camera | Launch Price (USD) | Current Approximate Price | Value Proposition |
---|---|---|---|
Canon SX70 HS | $550 | ~$549 | Excellent superzoom for enthusiasts requiring affordability and reach |
Sony RX10 IV | $1698 | ~$1698 | Premium all-rounder with professional-grade specs and image quality |
The Sony stands apart in specifications and build quality but demands three times the investment of the Canon. The Canon is a superb choice if your budget is limited and you prioritize zoom above all else.
How They Stack Up Across Photography Genres
- Portrait: RX10 IV excels with better sharpness, autofocus, and bokeh
- Landscape: RX10 IV’s sensor provides improved dynamic range and shadow detail
- Wildlife: Canon’s reach helps, but Sony’s AF speed and burst trump
- Sports: RX10 IV dominant via frame rate and focus tracking
- Street: Canon’s discreet size favored, though slower AF can be a factor
- Macro: Sony’s zoom and focusing distance edges it slightly
- Night/Astro: Sony is superior due to larger sensor and ISO range
- Video: Sony offers pro-level inputs, formats, and stabilization
- Travel: Canon lighter and more compact; Sony for image quality and ruggedness
- Professional: Sony suitable; Canon suitable for hobbyists or light pro usage
Final Thoughts: Which Camera Should You Choose?
Choose Canon PowerShot SX70 HS if you:
- Want an affordable, versatile superzoom with extreme focal length reach
- Prefer a lighter, more compact camera for travel and street shooting
- Need a fully articulating screen for creative shooting angles or vlogging
- Shoot mostly in well-lit conditions or casual photography
- Can accept compromises in image quality and autofocus speed
Choose Sony Cyber-shot RX10 IV if you:
- Demand top-tier image quality for professional, wildlife, sports, and landscape photography
- Require fast, reliable autofocus and high frame rates for action and moving subjects
- Need robust build quality and weather sealing for outdoor adventures
- Shoot serious 4K video with full audio controls
- Have the budget for a premium bridge camera that rivals some mirrorless systems
Both cameras offer tremendous utility and can serve specialized roles brilliantly. The Canon is a gateway to long-reach photography on a budget, whereas the Sony is a powerhouse combining speed, quality, and build.
Next Steps for Your Photography Journey
- Try these cameras in-person to gauge ergonomic preference and handling feel
- Explore essential accessories such as filters, tripods, and extra batteries suited to your photography style
- Check full sample galleries and user reviews for real-world image comparisons
- Consider future lens or system expansions if portability or interchangeable lenses matter
With this thorough side-by-side, you are now equipped to make a confident decision tailored to your creative ambitions.
Happy shooting!
If you've enjoyed this detailed comparison and want personalized advice, don't hesitate to reach out or visit a local camera store to get hands-on experience.
Canon SX70 HS vs Sony RX10 IV Specifications
Canon PowerShot SX70 HS | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX10 IV | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Canon | Sony |
Model type | Canon PowerShot SX70 HS | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX10 IV |
Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Large Sensor Superzoom |
Introduced | 2018-09-20 | 2017-09-12 |
Physical type | SLR-like (bridge) | SLR-like (bridge) |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | Digic 8 | Bionz X |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 13.2 x 8.8mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 116.2mm² |
Sensor resolution | 20 megapixels | 20 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 5472 x 3648 |
Max native ISO | 3200 | 12800 |
Max enhanced ISO | - | 25600 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 125 |
RAW data | ||
Min enhanced ISO | - | 64 |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Total focus points | 9 | 315 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 21-1365mm (65.0x) | 24-600mm (25.0x) |
Maximal aperture | f/3.4-6.5 | f/2.4-4.0 |
Macro focusing range | 0cm | 3cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 2.7 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fully Articulated | Tilting |
Display size | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of display | 922 thousand dots | 1,440 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360 thousand dots | 2,359 thousand dots |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | 100% |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.7x |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 15 secs | 30 secs |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Fastest quiet shutter speed | - | 1/32000 secs |
Continuous shutter rate | 10.0fps | 24.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 5.00 m (at Auto ISO) | 10.80 m (at Auto ISO) |
Flash settings | Auto, on, slow sync, off | Auto, fill-flash, slow sync, rear sync, off |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Fastest flash synchronize | - | 1/2000 secs |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 120 Mbps, MOV, H.264, AAC | 3840 x 2160 (30p, 25p, 24p), 1920 x 1080 (60p, 60i, 24p) ,1440 x 1080 (30p), 640 x 480 (30p) |
Max video resolution | 3840x2160 | 3840x2160 |
Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, AVCHD, XAVC S |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 608 gr (1.34 pounds) | 1095 gr (2.41 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 127 x 91 x 117mm (5.0" x 3.6" x 4.6") | 133 x 94 x 145mm (5.2" x 3.7" x 5.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 325 photos | 400 photos |
Battery style | Built-in | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | - | NP-FW50 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, continuous) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-I supported) | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo/Pro-HG Duo |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Price at release | $550 | $1,698 |