Canon SX710 HS vs Fujifilm S8400W: A Thorough Comparison for Photography Enthusiasts

When it comes to small sensor superzoom cameras, enthusiasts often balance zoom range, image quality, handling, and price - and this delicate balance is where the Canon PowerShot SX710 HS and the Fujifilm FinePix S8400W stake their claims. Both released in the mid-2010s and tailored to enthusiasts looking for strong reach without the bulk of DSLRs, these cameras represent distinct design philosophies within the same category. After testing both extensively under various shooting conditions, let me walk you through a detailed comparison to help you understand which camera matches your photographic pursuits and style.

First Impressions and Physical Handling: Compact vs Bridge-Style

Handling and ergonomics are foundational to enjoyability and practical usability, especially for superzoom shooters who often work in variable conditions and on the go.

The Canon SX710 HS is a compact, pocketable camera that emphasizes portability. Its physical dimensions are a sleek 113 x 66 x 35 mm, weighing only 269 grams. In contrast, the Fujifilm S8400W adopts a bulkier, bridge-style design at 123 x 87 x 116 mm and poses significantly at 670 grams. The size difference is palpable at first grip.

The Canon’s smaller footprint makes it a more attractive option for casual travel, street photography, or anyone prioritizing convenience. It slips easily into jackets or small bags. The Fujifilm’s DSLR-esque grip and size suggest more serious handling, but at the cost of an obviously larger carry presence - admittedly, less appealing for spontaneous shooting.

Looking at the control layouts atop the bodies tells us a bit more about their intended users:

The FUji S8400W has a more traditional DSLR-inspired control layout, including a zoom rocker surrounding the shutter and a mode dial that feels familiar to users upgrading from older bridge or DSLR cameras. The Canon, meanwhile, opts for minimal controls, emphasizing simplicity and touch-based menu navigation.

In real-world practice, the Fujifilm’s larger buttons and dials translate to quicker manual adjustments in dynamic environments like wildlife or sports photography - where every second counts. The Canon, while not cumbersome, requires slightly more menu diving for exposure adjustments, due mainly to the lack of physical dials.

If you’re someone who values compactness and grab-and-go style, the Canon SX710 HS is your camera. For a more tactile, deliberate shooting experience - with a more robust build for extended handling - lean toward the Fujifilm S8400W.

Sensor and Image Quality: The Heart of Performance

Let’s dive into the specs that underpin image quality - the sensor and image processing. Both cameras feature the popular 1/2.3” BSI-CMOS sensor size with a physical size of 6.17 x 4.55mm, translating to 28.07 mm² sensor area. While identical in sensor footprint, they differ in resolution and processor technology.

• Canon SX710 HS: 20MP, DIGIC 6 processor
• Fujifilm S8400W: 16MP, no specific processor named

The Canon’s higher resolution sensor theoretically offers more detail, especially advantageous for cropping or large prints. However, higher megapixels on such a small sensor can sometimes increase noise at higher ISO settings, meaning the trade-off between resolution and image noise is a real-world consideration.

In practice, the DIGIC 6 processor integrated with the Canon allows for superior noise reduction algorithms and color reproduction compared to the Fujifilm’s more generic image processing pipeline. Skin tones from the Canon appear warmer and more natural under mixed lighting, a boon for portrait shooters.

Fujifilm’s sensor resolution is lower, but this advantageously translates to better signal-to-noise ratio per pixel, particularly at elevated ISOs. The Fujifilm’s max native ISO stretches up to 12,800 compared to Canon’s 3,200, but with caution: The Fujifilm's small sensor results in more noticeable noise at its upper ISO range despite higher numeric rating.

Both cameras apply an anti-aliasing (AA) filter to limit moiré, which impacts sharpness. Canon’s more recent DIGIC engine gives it some processing edge, but neither is going to rival larger sensor cameras for ultimate image quality.

For landscape enthusiasts, dynamic range is a key metric. Neither camera provides official DXO Mark scores, so my field tests focused on blown highlights and shadow recovery in RAW-equivalent JPEGs. Canon’s images retained more shadow detail, attributed to intelligent algorithms built into DIGIC 6. Fujifilm tended toward slightly higher contrast JPEGs requiring careful exposure to avoid lost highlights.

Viewing Experience: LCD and Viewfinder Realities

Examining the displays and viewing options makes it clear how these cameras cater to different shooting approaches.

The Canon SX710 HS sports a 3” fixed LCD with 922k dots, offering bright and crisp image review. The screen is fixed and non-touch, requiring button presses for navigation. Its high resolution helps in framing and assessing detail on-site.

The Fujifilm S8400W also has a 3” fixed LCD but with a much lower 460k dots resolution, making the image preview less detailed and somewhat grainy in bright environments. However, crucially, it adds an electronic viewfinder (EVF) with 201k dots resolution, covering 97% of the frame - a feature the Canon completely lacks.

For bright outdoor shooting - especially landscapes or wildlife under harsh sunlight - the presence of an EVF on the Fujifilm is a huge advantage, allowing more stable framing and less eye strain. The Canon's lack of finder confines you to LCD use only, which can be challenging in full sun.

The Canon’s user interface leans on simplicity, with clear menu structures, but the lack of touchscreen means slower navigation compared to other modern compacts. The Fujifilm’s menus are more old-school but benefit from the dedicated dials and buttons.

Focal Range and Lens Capabilities: Zooming Deep or Quick?

One of the most decisive features in a superzoom camera is the zoom range and optical performance across that range.

At first glance, Fujifilm’s whopping 44x zoom promises reach that could handle safari wildlife or distant sports events like few bridge cameras of its era. The Canon maxes out at an appreciable 30x zoom but falls short of the Fujifilm’s telephoto reach.

Canon SX710 HS front Canon SX710 HS screen back Fujifilm S8400W front Fujifilm S8400W screen back

I tested both in real-world scenarios: Canon’s faster aperture at the wide end (f/3.2 vs f/2.9) helps in lower-light indoor or evening photography. The Fujifilm’s slight advantage there is negligible in most conditions. At the telephoto end, both close down to around f/6.5-f/6.9, limiting light and bokeh possibilities.

Image sharpness suffers at extreme zooms for both cameras, but surprisingly, the Canon SX710 HS maintains better edge-to-edge consistency, likely owing to more modern lens coatings and processing. Fujifilm’s extended range lenses showed more chromatic aberration and softness near max zoom. These are understandable optical trade-offs given the level of zoom.

Both cameras have excellent macro capabilities down to 1 cm focusing distance - great for table-top and flower photography. Built-in optical image stabilization in both cameras helps tame shake at long focal lengths and handheld macro shots.

Autofocus and Shooting Performance: Speed vs Accuracy

Autofocus (AF) performance is vital across genres - from snap street photos to dynamic wildlife and sports. Here’s how these two cameras stack up:

Canon’s SX710 HS boasts a modern contrast-detection AF system with face detection and continuous autofocus modes which perform well in daylight and evenly lit scenes. Eye detection is missing but face detection improves portrait results significantly, keeping skin tones sharp.

Conversely, Fujifilm’s AF system does not have face or eye detection and lacks continuous autofocus, relegating it to single AF mode for many shooting scenarios. It compensates somewhat by offering a blazing continuous shooting rate of 10 fps, useful if you’re shooting fast action but willing to pre-focus manually or accept some hunting.

In practical use, the Canon’s AF is better suited for moving subjects needing focus tracking - such as children, pets, or street performers. For wildlife, where subjects make unpredictable movements and focal distances frequently shift, the Canon again feels more reliable.

The Fujifilm’s high burst is appealing for sports, but the lack of continuous AF and face tracking limits utility except perhaps for static or predictable subjects.

Video Features: Solid HD with Limitations

Video recording capabilities matter more than ever, so let’s see how these compacts fare.

• Canon SX710 HS records Full HD at 1080p with 60 and 30 fps options, using H.264 codec and MPEG-4 format.
• Fujifilm S8400W offers similar 1080p recording at 60 fps plus high-speed modes at very low resolutions (up to 480 fps) for slow motion.

Neither camera supports 4K or advanced video features like microphone or headphone jacks - limiting their appeal for serious videographers.

In testing, Canon’s videos featured smoother autofocus during recording thanks to continuous AF support, good color rendition, and somewhat better stabilization. Fujifilm’s video had less steady autofocus and more noticeable rolling shutter, making handheld smooth video more challenging.

Both benefit from optical image stabilization for handheld shooting. Audio quality is basic from built-in mics on both, with no external mic options to improve sound quality.

Battery Life and Storage: Practical Usability Matters

Shooting long days on location requires stamina. The Canon uses a proprietary NB-6LH rechargeable battery rated for approximately 230 shots per charge. The Fujifilm models take four AA batteries, rated for about 300 shots under standard CIPA conditions.

Using real-world usage and power modes, the Fujifilm’s AA-based system can benefit from rechargeable NiMH AAs, which can be swapped quickly mid-shoot with spares. The Canon’s proprietary pack requires charging downtime or carrying a spare battery.

Storage-wise, both cameras support SD, SDHC, and SDXC cards with one slot each - the standard for the class.

Weight-wise, the Canon’s lightweight body and battery give it an advantage for travel or event photography where you’re on your feet all day.

Weather Sealing and Build Quality: How Tough Are They?

Neither model claims weather, dust, or shock resistance. Both cameras are primarily designed for casual enthusiasts rather than outdoor professionals. The Fujifilm’s larger plastic body feels more rugged but does not offer official sealing.

If you shoot frequently in challenging environments, consider protective housing or a more dedicated outdoor camera.

Connectivity and Wireless Features: Sharing on the Move

Wireless connectivity can drastically improve user experience for instant sharing.

• Canon SX710 HS offers built-in Wi-Fi and NFC for quick smartphone pairing, image transfer, and remote shooting.
• Fujifilm S8400W also has built-in Wi-Fi but lacks NFC.

The Canon’s NFC support makes it easier for casual users to connect without fumbling through menus.

Performance Summary: Who Excels at What?

To round off the comparison, here’s an analytical perspective on how these cameras perform across different photographic niches.

Final Thoughts and Recommendations

Both the Canon SX710 HS and Fujifilm S8400W are compelling options in the small sensor superzoom space but fundamentally target slightly different audiences.

When to Choose the Canon SX710 HS

• You prioritize portability without sacrificing essential zoom reach.
• Your focus is on portrait, street, or travel photography where compactness and convenience matter.
• You want better image processing and more accurate autofocus with face detection.
• Video shooting is casual but you appreciate stabilization and decent continuous AF.
• Wireless connectivity via NFC for quick sharing is important.

When to Lean Toward the Fujifilm S8400W

• Your primary interest is wildlife or sports photography, where reach (44x zoom) and high burst rates are key.
• You don’t mind carrying a larger, heavier camera for the sake of zoom capabilities and handling grip.
• You desire an electronic viewfinder to assist framing in bright conditions.
• You want maximum battery flexibility with AA replaceable batteries.
• You shoot landscapes where reach to distant subjects matters more than ultimate image sharpness.

The Bottom Line

While both cameras are now somewhat dated compared to newer models, my hands-on testing reveals the Canon SX710 HS remains the better all-around choice for enthusiasts wanting a more balanced, lightweight superzoom experience with modern AF capabilities. The Fujifilm S8400W’s extended zoom and burst speed come with compromises in AF and bulk that narrow its appeal to specialized use cases.

This dog is a good boy for casual travel and everyday shooting; that one prefers the longer lens and doesn’t mind the extra weight.

In an era increasingly dominated by mirrorless and smartphone cameras, these superzooms still carve niches for photographers craving long reach in compact - or bridge - packages. Knowing your priorities and shooting style is key in deciding between them.

Additional Resources and Considerations

• Remember that neither camera supports RAW image capture, placing a premium on getting exposures right in-camera.
• For those invested in macro or night photography, external gear such as macro extension tubes or tripods will boost potential.
• Both cameras’ lack of weather sealing means you should avoid harsh conditions unless directly protected.
• Firmware updates years after release are unlikely, so evaluate your preferred features carefully before purchase.
• Consider lens accessory compatibility if future upgrades matter; fixed lens means commitment with these models.

Thanks for reading this in-depth comparison! I encourage you to try both cameras hands-on if possible or study sample galleries extensively before deciding - personal ergonomics and feel are just as critical as specs and lab scores.

Happy shooting!