Canon SX710 HS vs Olympus 7040
89 Imaging
45 Features
51 Overall
47
95 Imaging
36 Features
31 Overall
34
Canon SX710 HS vs Olympus 7040 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-750mm (F3.2-6.9) lens
- 269g - 113 x 66 x 35mm
- Revealed January 2015
- Previous Model is Canon SX700 HS
- Later Model is Canon SX720 HS
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-196mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 144g - 95 x 56 x 26mm
- Announced January 2010
- Other Name is mju 7040
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Canon SX710 HS vs Olympus Stylus 7040: An Expert Comparison for Enthusiasts and Professionals
When considering compact cameras, especially in the small sensor superzoom and compact categories, understanding the nuanced strengths and limitations of each model is crucial. Today we’ll examine two intriguing options: Canon’s PowerShot SX710 HS and Olympus’s Stylus 7040 (also known as mju 7040). Despite belonging to the same compact family, these cameras differ significantly in features, performance, and target users.
Drawing from my extensive hands-on evaluation of hundreds of cameras - from entry-level point-and-shoots to pro-grade mirrorless systems - I bring you a thorough, unbiased comparison. By focusing on real-world performance across multiple photography disciplines, alongside technical analysis, I’ll help you decide which camera better suits your creative ambitions and budget.
First Impressions: Design, Build, and Handling
Before diving into image quality and features, the physical feel and ergonomics can make or break the shooting experience. Both Canon SX710 HS and Olympus 7040 are designed as compact point-and-shoots, but their handling varies considerably.

-
Canon SX710 HS: Measures 113 x 66 x 35 mm and weighs 269g. The camera sports a more substantial grip and well-marked buttons. Though not bulky, it feels solid in hand. The build quality is lightweight plastic but tolerably robust for everyday travel.
-
Olympus 7040: Smaller and lighter at 95 x 56 x 26 mm and just 144g. Its slim, rectangular slab design is pocket-friendly but less “grip-friendly” during extended use, which can impact comfort for those with larger hands.
My Take: If you prioritize portability without sacrificing control comfort, the SX710 HS’s ergonomics give it an edge. The Olympus 7040 wins on ultra-compact size but at the cost of less tactile handling and fewer physical controls.
Tougher Look: Control Layout and Interface
How cameras organize their buttons and dials profoundly affects shooting speed and customization potential.

-
The Canon SX710 HS provides dedicated exposure modes such as shutter priority, aperture priority, and full manual exposure. This flexibility appeals to enthusiasts wanting more creative control.
-
Olympus 7040 sticks to fully automatic exposure, with no manual or prioritized modes, aimed more at casual users or those who prefer point-and-shoot simplicity.
-
Both cameras lack electronic viewfinders (EVF) and rely solely on the rear LCD for framing, which can challenge framing in bright outdoor conditions.
User interface: The SX710 HS has a sharper 922k-dot screen compared to the 7040’s 230k-dot display, enhancing usability and image preview accuracy.

My Take: For photographers leaning towards creative flexibility, the SX710 HS’s advanced control layout and higher-resolution screen significantly enhance the shooting process. The 7040 keeps things dead simple but, in doing so, limits your ability to finely tune exposure or focus settings.
Sensor and Image Quality: Technical Edge Goes to Canon
Both cameras rely on small 1/2.3-inch sensors typical of compact designs, but their sensor technology, resolution, and processing markedly differ.

-
Canon SX710 HS: Employs a 20MP backside-illuminated (BSI) CMOS sensor paired with DIGIC 6 image processing. This combo optimizes light gathering and noise reduction, crucial in small sensors, yielding sharper and cleaner images.
-
Olympus 7040: Features a 14MP CCD sensor with older TruePic III processing. CCD sensors generally produce pleasant color rendition but lag in dynamic range, high ISO noise handling, and image sharpness, especially in lower light.
Resolution and ISO performance: The Canon’s higher megapixel count and wider ISO range (up to 3200 native) enable greater image detail and better performance in dim scenarios. Olympus maxes out at ISO 1600 with more noise evident in tests.
Real-World Photography Applications
Let’s explore how each camera performs in different genres and shooting conditions, based on hands-on testing and comparative analysis.
Portraits: Skin Tones, Bokeh, and Autofocus
Portraiture demands faithful skin tone reproduction, pleasing background separation, and precise eye/face detection.
-
Canon SX710 HS: With its advanced autofocus offering 9 AF points, face detection, and continuous AF tracking, the SX710 HS maintains sharp focus on eyes and faces smoothly - a necessity for fleeting expressions.
-
Olympus 7040: The single AF mode is contrast-detection only and lacks face or eye detection, making portrait focus more hit-or-miss, particularly in low contrast scenarios.
Lens and bokeh: The Canon’s 30x zoom lens starts at 25mm equivalent with a maximum aperture of f/3.2, allowing softer backgrounds at modest telephoto focal lengths, while Olympus’s 7x (28–196mm equivalent) zoom at f/3.0–5.9 produces less background blur.
Color and skin tone accuracy: In my tests under natural light, Canon’s RAW-like JPEG processing delivered natural, warm skin tones without oversaturation. Olympus images were slightly cooler and less vibrant.
Winner: Canon SX710 HS for portraits thanks to AF sophistication and better background separation.
Landscapes: Dynamic Range and Resolution
Landscape photographers crave high resolution, wide dynamic range, and durable construction for outdoor use.
-
Both cameras’ small sensors limit dynamic range compared to APS-C or full-frame models. However, Canon’s BSI CMOS sensor and improved noise handling allow slightly more highlight and shadow detail recovery during post-processing.
-
The SX710 HS’s 20MP resolution yields larger prints and crop flexibility compared to Olympus’s 14MP.
-
Weather sealing: Neither camera features environmental sealing, so care is necessary shooting in adverse weather.
-
Lens coverage: Canon's extensive 30x zoom range isn’t a direct benefit to landscapes focused on wide angles but offers compositional versatility.
Wildlife and Sports: Autofocus Speed & Burst Rates
Tracking fast-moving subjects tests autofocus systems and continuous shooting capabilities.
| Camera | Max Burst Rate (fps) | AF Mode Details | Telephoto Reach |
|---|---|---|---|
| Canon SX710 HS | 6 fps | 9-point continuous AF, face detect | 25-750mm equiv. (30x zoom) |
| Olympus Stylus 7040 | 1 fps | Single AF, contrast detect only | 28-196mm equiv. (7x zoom) |
The significant difference in burst rates favors Canon, allowing capture of moments in action sequences. Coupled with better AF tracking and 30x zoom range, the SX710 HS is a far more capable wildlife and sports companion in casual scenarios.
Street Photography: Discreetness and Portability
Street photography demands a camera that suits quick, discreet shooting and easy carry.
-
Olympus 7040’s slim profile and light weight make it naturally inconspicuous, ideal for candid street shots where less visual impact is preferable.
-
Canon’s bulkier SX710 HS, longer lens, and louder zooming may draw more attention.
However, Canon offers faster startup and more responsive autofocus, which can make the difference capturing decisive moments.
Macro Photography: Focusing Precision and Magnification
Macro shooters need close focusing and stability to get detailed close-ups.
| Feature | Canon SX710 HS | Olympus Stylus 7040 |
|---|---|---|
| Macro Focusing Distance | Down to 1 cm | Down to 2 cm |
| Image Stabilization | Optical (lens-based) | Sensor-Shift |
| Manual Focus | Supported | Not supported |
Canon’s closer macro focusing distance and manual focus option provide more creative control and sharper close-ups, while Olympus’s sensor-shift stabilization aids holding shots steady but lacks focus precision controls.
Night and Astrophotography: ISO Performance and Exposure
Low-light and night scenes push sensors to their limits.
-
The Canon SX710 HS advances here with a native ISO range up to 3200, usable for ambient light shots with manageable noise.
-
Olympus’s CCD sensor tops out at ISO 1600 but exhibits more visible noise and less detail retention in dark shadows.
Neither camera offers specialized night or bulb exposure modes typical of advanced cameras, and long exposures at highest ISO cause image degradation.
Video Capabilities: Resolutions and Stability
Video shooting quality is increasingly important.
| Feature | Canon SX710 HS | Olympus Stylus 7040 |
|---|---|---|
| Max Resolution | Full HD 1920x1080 @ 60p | HD 1280x720 @ 30p |
| Video Formats | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Stabilization | Optical IS | Sensor-Shift IS |
| Mic and Headphone Ports | None | None |
| 4K/6K Photo | No | No |
Canon’s Full HD 60p video with built-in optical image stabilization results in smoother, more fluid footage, better suited to casual videographers wanting sharp videos with less blur. Olympus’s older Motion JPEG videos are larger files with lower compression efficiency and less detail.
Travel Photography: Versatility, Battery, and Size/Weight
Travel photographers demand balance between image quality, zoom range, battery longevity, and portability.
-
Canon SX710 HS: Offers a versatile 30x zoom lens (25-750mm equivalent) and manual exposure modes for diverse settings. Weighing 269g, it’s portable though not exceedingly compact. Battery life rated around 230 shots per charge - average for compact cameras.
-
Olympus 7040: More pocketable at 144g, but limited zoom range and simpler controls reduce versatility. Battery life specs are unspecified, but likely less than Canon’s based on similar models and older chemistry.
Professional Use: Reliability and Workflow Integration
Neither camera targets professional workflows directly, lacking RAW support, external flash connectivity, or advanced tethering.
-
Canon SX710 HS’s ability to shoot RAW is absent, limiting post-processing control. However, it does provide some manual modes favored by pros for creative control in casual or travel shoots.
-
Olympus 7040 lacks manual or RAW options entirely, restricting serious professional use.
Key Technical Considerations
Autofocus Systems
-
Canon SX710 HS: Contrast-detection AF with 9 points, continuous AF tracking, and face detection deliver reliable and speedy focus for everyday shooting and moderate action.
-
Olympus 7040: Single-point contrast detect AF without face detect causes slower, less accurate focusing.
Image Stabilization
-
Canon employs optical stabilization integrated in the lens, effective across the zoom range to combat handshake.
-
Olympus uses sensor-shift stabilization, which can be useful for longer exposures but may struggle with some video and telephoto applications.
Sensor Technology
-
Canon’s BSI-CMOS sensor is industry-standard for small compacts to achieve good low-light performance.
-
Olympus’s CCD sensor, while capable in daylight, falls short in ISO flexibility and dynamic range.
Build and Weather Sealing
- Both lack weather resistance features and rugged builds. Neither suited for adverse conditions without protective housing.
Battery and Storage
-
Canon uses NB-6LH lithium-ion battery with moderate life; SX710 HS supports SD/SDHC/SDXC cards.
-
Olympus 7040 details on battery specs are scarce; uses SC/SDHC cards and also features internal storage.
Connectivity
-
Canon has built-in Wi-Fi and NFC for wireless transfer and smartphone integration.
-
Olympus 7040 offers no wireless connectivity options.
Sample Image Comparison
Viewing actual photos from both cameras under typical shooting conditions illustrates the differences in image rendering.
Canon’s images show more detail, less noise in shadows, and punchier yet natural colors. Olympus images appear flatter with less color saturation and visible softening.
Overall Scores and Performance Ratings
-
Canon SX710 HS generally scores higher in most performance categories: image quality, autofocus, video, and versatility.
-
Olympus 7040 rates lower, reflecting its earlier technology generation and simplified feature set.
Genre-Specific Performance Breakdown
-
Portraits, wildlife, sports: Canon SX710 HS leads with better AF and zoom.
-
Street and travel photography: Olympus’s compactness rates well but lags in control and image quality.
-
Macro and night shooting: Canon’s sensor and features offer stronger performance.
Summarizing the Pros and Cons
Canon PowerShot SX710 HS
Pros:
- 20MP BSI-CMOS sensor delivers sharp, detailed images
- 30x zoom lens covers wide focal range (25-750 mm equiv.)
- Manual, aperture, shutter priority exposure modes
- Optical image stabilization enhances sharpness and video smoothness
- Full HD 1080p video at 60fps with H.264 codec
- Built-in Wi-Fi and NFC for connectivity
- Superior autofocus with face detection and continuous tracking
- Higher resolution rear LCD screen
Cons:
- Moderate battery life (~230 shots)
- No EVF, potentially challenging in bright outdoors
- Slightly larger and heavier to carry in pocket
- No RAW format support
Olympus Stylus 7040
Pros:
- Ultra compact and light (144g), super pocketable
- Sensor-shift stabilization helps steady shots
- Built-in flash with multiple modes including red-eye reduction
- Simple point-and-shoot operation ideal for casual users
- Slightly longer macro focusing distance (2cm) still respectable
- HDMI output available
Cons:
- Older 14MP CCD sensor with inferior low-light and color performance
- No manual exposure or RAW shooting options
- Single-point contrast AF, no face detection
- Lower-resolution LCD screen (230k dots)
- Slow continuous shooting (1 fps) doesn’t support action capture
- No wireless connectivity
- Lesser zoom range (7x only) reduces compositional flexibility
Who Should Buy Which?
Choose Canon SX710 HS if…
- You want maximum zoom versatility for travel, wildlife, and sports
- Manual exposure control and customizable shooting are important
- You need better autofocus reliability and face detection for portraits
- Video quality (1080p60) and optical stabilization are priorities
- You appreciate wireless features for fast sharing
- You value image quality and low-light performance in a compact package
Choose Olympus Stylus 7040 if…
- Your top priority is a truly pocketable, lightweight travel companion
- You prefer totally automatic operation with minimal settings
- Budget constraints favor an affordable, basic compact camera
- You mainly shoot in good light and don’t mind slower AF or fewer creative controls
- Wireless connectivity and video quality are not significant concerns
Final Thoughts and Expert Recommendations
Evaluating these two compact cameras from the vantage point of years of camera testing, the Canon PowerShot SX710 HS emerges as the clear winner for those seeking flexibility, modern sensor performance, and creative control in a compact form. It embodies the advancements in sensor and processor design that deliver superior stills and videos even within the constraints of a small sensor compact.
The Olympus Stylus 7040, while quite outdated by today’s standards, can still appeal to casual photographers who prioritize pocket-fit size and simplicity above all. However, its limited performance and aging tech mean it’s best viewed as a budget-friendly option for beginners or a secondary easy-to-carry camera.
In closing, be sure you’re buying the best tool for your photography needs. If image quality, control, versatility, and future-proof connectivity matter, Canon’s SX710 HS is worth the slight bulk. Conversely, if uncompromising portability and ease-of-use top your list, Olympus remains a contender - albeit with many compromises.
Always remember, the best camera is the one you enjoy using consistently. I hope this detailed, hands-on comparison helps you make an informed decision that elevates your creative photography journey.
This article reflects my direct testing and evaluation of both cameras, cross-referencing sensor data, autofocus behavior, real-world image samples, and usability to deliver a balanced, trustworthy review.
If you have any specific shooting scenarios or questions, feel free to ask - helping photographers get the right gear is what I do best!
Canon SX710 HS vs Olympus 7040 Specifications
| Canon PowerShot SX710 HS | Olympus Stylus 7040 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Canon | Olympus |
| Model | Canon PowerShot SX710 HS | Olympus Stylus 7040 |
| Also called as | - | mju 7040 |
| Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Compact |
| Revealed | 2015-01-06 | 2010-01-07 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | DIGIC 6 | TruePic III |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 20MP | 14MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 4288 x 3216 |
| Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
| Lowest native ISO | 80 | 64 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Number of focus points | 9 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 25-750mm (30.0x) | 28-196mm (7.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/3.2-6.9 | f/3.0-5.9 |
| Macro focus range | 1cm | 2cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 3" | 3" |
| Screen resolution | 922k dot | 230k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 15s | 4s |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/3200s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shutter speed | 6.0 frames per second | 1.0 frames per second |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 3.50 m | 5.70 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, on, off, slow synchro | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60p, 30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 269 grams (0.59 pounds) | 144 grams (0.32 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 113 x 66 x 35mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.4") | 95 x 56 x 26mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 1.0") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 230 photos | - |
| Type of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | NB-6LH | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs, custom) | Yes (2 or 12 seconds) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC card | SC/SDHC, Internal |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Cost at release | $349 | $299 |