Canon SX720 HS vs Samsung NX1000
89 Imaging
46 Features
51 Overall
48
90 Imaging
60 Features
60 Overall
60
Canon SX720 HS vs Samsung NX1000 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20.3MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-960mm (F3.3-6.9) lens
- 270g - 110 x 64 x 36mm
- Announced February 2016
- Succeeded the Canon SX710 HS
- Updated by Canon SX730 HS
(Full Review)
- 20MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 12800
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Samsung NX Mount
- 222g - 114 x 63 x 37mm
- Announced April 2012
- Refreshed by Samsung NX1100
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Canon SX720 HS vs. Samsung NX1000: A Veteran’s Take on Two Distinct Cameras for Enthusiasts and Pros
Choosing a camera is often like picking the right tool from a crowded toolbox: the best one depends on what you want to build. Today, I'll unpack my hands-on experience with two curious contenders from slightly different playbooks - the Canon PowerShot SX720 HS, a small sensor superzoom compact, and the Samsung NX1000, an entry-level mirrorless camera. Both have held their own in the past decade but cater to different creative appetites. So, buckle up for a pragmatic, no-nonsense comparison that draws on years of shooting in the field, lab, and every spot in between.

Diverging Paths: Why Compare These Two?
At first glance, slapping these two cameras side by side might seem like comparing apples and oranges - Canon’s SX720 HS is a bridge-style compact boasting a 40x superzoom, while Samsung’s NX1000 is a mirrorless with interchangeable lenses. One is about ultimate convenience and reach, the other about optical quality and creative flexibility. But both target enthusiasts with budget-conscious options, making their real-world utility overlap for travelers, hobbyists, or entry-level pros curious about stepping up their gear.
Let’s tackle the most critical aspects methodically - not only specs but what they deliver in actual shooting scenarios.
Build and Handling: Compact Convenience vs. Mirrorless Control
Handling and ergonomics shape the day-to-day joy of photography, so I tested both in various shooting conditions - from street wandering to casual landscape outings.
Canon SX720 HS: Pocketable Powerhouse
At 110 x 64 x 36 mm and weighing about 270 grams, the SX720 HS feels truly compact and pocketable. Its fixed lens and small, no-frills body mean it doesn’t intimidate or exhaust the hand - great for casual snaps or travel strolls. The 3-inch fixed LCD (922k dots) lacks touch capability but is bright and angled enough for most outdoor situations. However, no electronic viewfinder means you’re fully dependent on the rear screen, which can be tricky in bright daylight.
Samsung NX1000: Grip and Customizability
The NX1000 is slightly larger and ergonomically more traditional for a mirrorless camera, measuring 114 x 63 x 37 mm and weighing 222 grams. Without a built-in viewfinder but sporting a 3-inch TFT LCD with similar resolution (921k dots), it leans into manual handling with dedicated dials and buttons for exposure variables. The body feels more substantial and confident for someone who wants tactile controls and the possibility to change lenses.

My takeaway: If you value lightweight, pocket-friendly convenience, the Canon excels. But for shooters who want to grow into manual modes and explore lens options, Samsung’s design is more inviting and professional in approach.
Sensor Technologies and Image Quality: The Heart of the Matter
Image quality is always upfront in my testing regime - I use standardized test charts mixed with diverse real-life scenes from portraits to landscapes, and everything in between.
Sensor Size and Resolution
The Canon SX720 HS sports a 1/2.3” BSI-CMOS sensor with 20.3 MP, whereas the Samsung NX1000 offers a much larger APS-C CMOS sensor (23.5 x 15.7 mm) with a close resolution at 20 MP.

This difference in sensor area (28.07mm² vs. 368.95mm²) is monumental. In practical terms, the APS-C sensor in the NX1000 delivers better dynamic range, superior low-light performance, and generally more malleable RAW files (thanks to Samsung’s RAW support, unlike Canon’s JPEG-only output).
Image Quality in Practice
- Dynamic Range: The NX1000’s APS-C sensor achieves roughly 12.4 EV, allowing for immense latitude in shadows and highlights. The SX720 HS, constrained by the tiny sensor, delivers more compressed tonal gradations.
- Noise Performance: In my ISO ramp tests, the NX1000 holds clean images up to ISO 1600 comfortably. The SX720 HS becomes noticeably noisy by ISO 800, handicapped further by smaller photosites.
- Color Depth: Samsung triumphs here with 22.8 bits, offering smooth gradations critical for portrait skin tones and subtle landscape hues.
In real-world shooting - say, a sunset hike or museum portraits with mixed lighting - I preferred the NX1000’s files for their editing latitude. The Canon is no slouch for daylight or well-lit snaps but lacks the robustness a professional or advanced amateur often needs for post-processing work.
Autofocus and Speed: Catching the Decisive Moment
In the field, autofocus (AF) can make or break your shot, especially for dynamic subjects.
Canon SX720 HS
Equipped with 9 contrast-detection AF points (no phase-detection), the SX720 HS offers face detection and continues AF during video. It’s decent for stationary subjects but shows hesitation with erratic movements or low-contrast scenes. Continuous shooting is capped at 5.9 fps - quite respectable for a compact but not exactly sports-grade speed.
Samsung NX1000
With 15 contrast-detection AF points and selective AF modes, the NX1000 provides more precise focusing flexibility, albeit no face tracking in continuous mode. Burst shooting at 8 fps is solid given its mirrorless sensor.
In my experience photographing street performances and active kids, the NX1000 maintained sharper tracking overall. The Canon’s AF occasionally lagged behind faster-moving subjects at telephoto lengths, which detracted from its usefulness for wildlife or sports.
Lens Ecosystem and Optical Versatility: Fixed vs. Interchangeable
One of the most striking differences here is the lens mount paradigm.
- Canon SX720 HS: Fixed built-in zoom lens, offering an impressive 24-960 mm (40x) focal range, max aperture varies between f/3.3 (wide) and f/6.9 (telephoto).
- Samsung NX1000: Features an interchangeable Samsung NX mount supporting 32 lenses spanning primes, zooms, primes with large aperture options, and macro lenses.
This zoom range in the Canon is a clear winner for those seeking ultimate reach without carrying lens bags. The tradeoff is the smaller maximum aperture and limited manual control over the optics. The lens’s optical quality is decent given its range but can be prone to chromatic aberrations and softness at the extreme telephoto end.
Samsung’s NX1000, meanwhile, invites creativity. For instance, a bright 30mm f/2 lens paired with the APS-C sensor unlocks excellent shallow depth-of-field portraits with creamy bokeh - something the SX720 HS cannot replicate. Macro addicts can look toward specific dedicated NX lenses offering superior focusing precision and sharper details than the Canon’s fixed lens macro mode (which starts extremely close at 1 cm but can't match dedicated optics).
Stability and Shutter Mechanics
The Canon SX720 HS features Optical Image Stabilization (OIS) which is critical at long focal lengths to prevent blur from camera shake. In handheld shooting at telephoto reach, OIS is a lifeline. The Samsung NX1000 doesn’t have in-body image stabilization, relying on any stabilization provided in individual lenses (which are few or none for NX). This makes the Canon more adaptable to handheld telephoto or low-light shooting without resorting to a tripod.
Regarding shutter range, SX720 offers 1/15s to 1/3200s, whereas NX1000’s shutter spans from 1/30s to 1/4000s. The faster upper shutter speed on Samsung helps freeze fast action shots more effectively.
Display and User Interface: The Window to Your Creativity
Both cameras share similar 3-inch LCD screens with near-identical resolution. Neither boasts a touchscreen or articulating design, which seems a missed opportunity given their intended markets.

Navigating menus and tuning settings is straightforward in both, but Samsung’s UI is slightly more complex to accommodate interchangeable lens controls and additional exposure features. Canon offers more point-and-shoot simplicity, which could favor beginners uneasy with layers of manual adjustments.
Video Performance: Limitations and Capabilities
Both cameras max out at 1080p Full HD video, but with subtle distinctions:
- Canon SX720 HS: 1080p at 60 fps for smoother motion, plus 720p and VGA options. Buoyed by optical stabilization for steadier handheld recordings.
- Samsung NX1000: 1080p at 30 fps max, with additional lower-res modes. No OIS but adjustable manual exposure control in video mode.
If video is a minor side ambition, Canon’s higher frame rate and stabilization push it ahead. Serious videographers will find both somewhat underwhelming by modern standards due to codec limitations and lack of microphone jack.
Battery Life and Connectivity: Keeping You Shooting Out There
- Canon SX720 HS: Rated around 250 shots per charge, powered by NB-13L battery. Includes built-in Wi-Fi and NFC for easy image transfer - a boon for social sharing.
- Samsung NX1000: Slightly better with 320 shots per charge (BC1030 battery), Wi-Fi built-in but lacks NFC.
In practical use, neither surprised me with epic endurance, but the NX1000’s slightly higher count reflects its focus on semi-professional usage.
Price and Value: Throwing Dollars Into Perspective
As of this writing, both models hover around $380. Their market positioning is for budget-conscious buyers wanting respectable imaging capability.
- The Canon’s all-in-one superzoom convenience and simple interface justify its price for travelers, casual shooters, and videographers.
- The Samsung’s larger sensor and open lens ecosystem make it more suitable for learning, experimentation, and better-quality imagery at the cost of additional investment in lenses.
Real-World Sample Gallery: Peeking Through the Lens
Here is a brief peek at images taken with both cameras in varied conditions - portraits, landscapes, action, and close-ups.
Notice the NX1000’s sharper detail rendition and dynamic range, especially in sky gradients and shadow areas. The Canon’s images exhibit more noise and less depth but impress with telephoto compression and reach.
Overall Performance Scores: Numeric Snapshot of Capability
To distill the nitty-gritty from the numbers crowd, I’ve compiled overall ratings based on testing parameters like image quality, autofocus, ergonomics, and versatility.
Samsung NX1000 edges out primarily on image quality and manual control, while Canon SX720 HS shines in portability and zoom versatility.
Specialized Use-Case Scores: Where Each Camera Excels
Breaking it down by photographic discipline:
- Portraits: NX1000’s bigger sensor and better lens options deliver superior skin tones and bokeh.
- Landscapes: NX’s dynamic range and resolution outclass Canon’s compact crop.
- Wildlife/Sports: The Canon’s superzoom and OIS allow long-distance shooting, albeit slower AF and reduced image quality.
- Street: Both somewhat bulky compared to rangefinders, but Canon wins if you want stealthy zoom reach, NX for image aesthetic.
- Macro: NX with dedicated optics beats Canon’s fixed lens macro.
- Night/Astro: NX’s higher ISO tolerance leads.
- Video: Canon’s 1080p@60fps + IS benefits casual use.
- Travel: Canon’s lightweight and zoom trump NX overall size.
- Professional Work: NX’s RAW output and better image files support workflows.
The Verdict: Matching Cameras to Photography Needs
After extensive shooting and evaluation, here’s my no-fluff recommendation:
-
Choose the Canon PowerShot SX720 HS if:
- You crave extreme zoom in a pocket-friendly body.
- Video recording at 60fps is attractive.
- You want zero fuss and a reliable walk-around travel camera.
- You prioritize image stabilization for handheld long-range shots.
- You don’t want the hassle or expense of interchangeable lenses.
-
Choose the Samsung NX1000 if:
- You want superior image quality with APS-C sensor advantages.
- You’re eager to grow with an interchangeable lens system.
- You engage in portrait or landscape photography requiring greater dynamic range.
- You appreciate manual exposure controls and RAW format support.
- You can accept carrying additional lenses and the marginally larger form factor.
Neither camera is a blockbuster by today’s mirrorless or compact standards, but each occupies a well-defined niche. I still find the Samsung NX1000 rewarding for controlled creativity, while the Canon SX720 HS serves admirably as a practical, do-it-all pocket camera.
Final Thoughts: Cameras as Personal Tools
Choosing between these two comes down to your shooting philosophy. If you want all-in-one simplicity and zoom reach, the Canon SX720 HS is a sensible choice - it’s like carrying a Swiss Army knife for everyday imagery. However, if you’re serious about image quality and creative scope, the Samsung NX1000’s bigger sensor and lens flexibility open doors that a superzoom compact simply cannot.
From my years testing gear - from pro DSLRs to casual compacts - I've learned that no camera is perfect; it’s about how you use what they offer. Hopefully, this deep dive arms you with the clarity to pick a tool that won’t just sit on a shelf but will inspire your next chapter in photography.
Happy shooting!
Disclaimer: All observations stem from hands-on testing involving side-by-side image comparisons, standardized test charts, and diverse shooting conditions over several weeks.
Canon SX720 HS vs Samsung NX1000 Specifications
| Canon PowerShot SX720 HS | Samsung NX1000 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Canon | Samsung |
| Model | Canon PowerShot SX720 HS | Samsung NX1000 |
| Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
| Announced | 2016-02-18 | 2012-04-19 |
| Physical type | Compact | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | DIGIC 6 | - |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.5 x 15.7mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 369.0mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 20.3 megapixels | 20 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 5472 x 3648 |
| Max native ISO | 3200 | 12800 |
| Min native ISO | 80 | 100 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Number of focus points | 9 | 15 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | Samsung NX |
| Lens focal range | 24-960mm (40.0x) | - |
| Max aperture | f/3.3-6.9 | - |
| Macro focus distance | 1cm | - |
| Total lenses | - | 32 |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 1.5 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3" | 3" |
| Screen resolution | 922 thousand dots | 921 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Screen tech | - | TFT LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 15s | 30s |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/3200s | 1/4000s |
| Continuous shooting rate | 5.9fps | 8.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 4.00 m | no built-in flash |
| Flash options | Auto, on, off, slow synchro | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, 1st/2nd Curtain, Smart Flash, Manual |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Highest flash synchronize | - | 1/180s |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60p, 30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1920 x 810 (24 fps) 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | Optional |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 270 grams (0.60 lb) | 222 grams (0.49 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 110 x 64 x 36mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.4") | 114 x 63 x 37mm (4.5" x 2.5" x 1.5") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | 72 |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 22.8 |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 12.4 |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | 840 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 250 images | 320 images |
| Style of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | NB-13L | BC1030 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs, custom) | Yes (2 sec to 30 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC card | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Pricing at launch | $379 | $388 |