Clicky

Canon SX720 HS vs Sony A7R II

Portability
89
Imaging
46
Features
51
Overall
48
Canon PowerShot SX720 HS front
 
Sony Alpha A7R II front
Portability
68
Imaging
74
Features
84
Overall
78

Canon SX720 HS vs Sony A7R II Key Specs

Canon SX720 HS
(Full Review)
  • 20.3MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 3200
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 24-960mm (F3.3-6.9) lens
  • 270g - 110 x 64 x 36mm
  • Launched February 2016
  • Superseded the Canon SX710 HS
  • Refreshed by Canon SX730 HS
Sony A7R II
(Full Review)
  • 42MP - Full frame Sensor
  • 3" Tilting Display
  • ISO 100 - 25600 (Expand to 102400)
  • Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
  • No Anti-Alias Filter
  • 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
  • 3840 x 2160 video
  • Sony E Mount
  • 625g - 127 x 96 x 60mm
  • Released June 2015
  • Older Model is Sony A7R
  • Successor is Sony A7R III
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

A Tale of Two Cameras: Canon SX720 HS vs. Sony A7R II - Compact Convenience Meets Professional Precision

When faced with the challenge of choosing between the Canon PowerShot SX720 HS and the Sony Alpha A7R II, you're essentially deciding between two wildly different beasts under the same photography umbrella: one a portable superzoom pocket rocket, the other a full-frame professional mirrorless powerhouse. Both bear the Canon and Sony badges, but their ambitions diverge dramatically - and so do their capabilities, handling, and workflows.

Having spent thousands of hours behind camera grips, pushing gear through demanding tests, I've learned that the best camera rarely comes down to megapixels alone (spoiler: the A7R II packs 42 MP against the SX720’s 20) but rather how the tool matches your vision, shooting style, and budget. So, buckle up. Let's peel back the specs, look under the hood, and - most importantly - see how they hold up in real life across every major photography domain.

First Impressions: Size, Ergonomics, and Build Quality

Imagine comparing a sprinter to a marathoner; that's roughly what we face when looking at these two. The Canon SX720 HS is a compact superzoom designed for convenience, cramming a 40x zoom into a pocket-friendly chassis. Meanwhile, the Sony A7R II is a beefy, mirrorless full-frame camera built for uncompromising image quality and professional control.

Canon SX720 HS vs Sony A7R II size comparison

When placed side by side, the Canon SX720 HS measures a dainty 110 x 64 x 36 mm and tips the scales at a mere 270g. It fits nicely in a jacket pocket - perfect for strolling the streets or traveling light. The Sony A7R II is substantially larger and heavier at 127 x 96 x 60 mm and 625g, reflecting its robust mid-sized body with room for interchangeable lens mount and a hefty sensor.

Build quality echoes these distinctions. The Canon’s plastic compact body feels well put-together but lacks weather sealing, dustproofing, or any rugged protections. Good for casual use, less ideal for challenging environments. Conversely, the Sony A7R II features a magnesium alloy frame with extensive weather sealing - a camera you’d trust hiking through a drizzle or a dusty landscape.

Canon SX720 HS vs Sony A7R II top view buttons comparison

The Canon’s control layout is minimalistic with essential buttons and a fixed 3-inch screen - more on the screen later - whereas the Sony A7R II boasts a thoughtfully milled grip, numerous customizable buttons, a top panel status screen, and a refined shutter release that feels as serious as its price tag.

If you’re prioritizing portability and shooting spontaneity, Canon’s offering charms with its diminutive frame. For photographer-types who value tactile controls and durability, the Sony announces its presence instantly.

Sensor Size and Image Quality: The Heart of the Matter

Canon’s SX720 crams a 1/2.3-inch type BSI-CMOS sensor with 20.3 megapixels - a common size for compact superzooms - while the Sony A7R II proudly houses a 35.9 x 24mm full-frame BSI-CMOS sensor with a whopping 42.4 MP resolution.

Canon SX720 HS vs Sony A7R II sensor size comparison

The sensor size difference alone is monumental: 861.6 mm² (Sony) vs. 28.07 mm² (Canon) - that’s roughly 30 times larger in sensor area for the Sony. This translates directly into vastly superior image quality potential for the A7R II, thanks to:

  • Better low-light performance
  • Wider dynamic range
  • Shallower depth-of-field control
  • Higher resolution detail rendering

In my extensive testing, the A7R II’s sensor shines in all conditions, resolving intricate details in landscapes, maintaining skin tone fidelity in portraits, and preserving shadows and highlights remarkably well. Its lack of an anti-aliasing filter sharpens details further - making pixel-peepers very happy indeed.

On the other hand, the Canon SX720 HS offers respectable daylight images suitable for casual sharing or family albums. It’s not designed for large prints or pixel-level cropping. Noise becomes prominent above ISO 800, and dynamic range is limited, often requiring careful exposure choices or post-processing compromise.

So, if image quality is paramount (say, client work, gallery prints, or serious landscape shoots), the Sony’s full-frame sensor is an unbeatable advantage. But if you’re after quick grabs with versatile zoom and easy sharing, the Canon serves well.

Navigating the Interface: Screens, Viewfinders, and User Experience

Another critical consideration for hands-on photographers is how well the camera interfaces accommodate your shooting style.

Canon SX720 HS vs Sony A7R II Screen and Viewfinder comparison

The Canon SX720 HS has a 3-inch fixed LCD screen with 922k-dot resolution, which is bright and reasonably sharp for framing shots or menu navigation. However, the lack of a touchscreen makes quick focus shifts or menu changes less intuitive, and the absence of an electronic viewfinder (EVF) means composing exclusively via LCD in all lighting conditions - a challenge under bright sunlight, where glare kills visibility.

The Sony A7R II’s 3-inch tilting LCD boasts a higher 1.23 million-dot resolution, which makes reviewing images a delight. It also sports a high-res 2.36M-dot OLED electronic viewfinder that covers 100% of the frame with 0.78x magnification. For me, this EVF is a game changer: it offers eye-level shooting, precise focus checking, and reduced eye fatigue during long sessions or harsh daylight.

While the Sony lacks touchscreen functionality (a bit surprising for a modern camera at its price point), its button and dial ergonomics compensate, providing swift access to settings without fumbling. The Canon’s simplified controls suit beginners but feel limiting for advanced users.

Lens Options and Zoom Capabilities: Fixed Versus Interchangeable

A considerable gulf exists between these models’ optical systems.

The Canon SX720 HS is equipped with a fixed 24-960mm equivalent lens - an impressive 40x optical zoom that covers ultra-wide to super-telephoto ranges. This makes the SX720 an outstanding pocket telescope for wildlife snapshots, distant monuments, or casual travel photography without the burden of multiple lenses.

However, the lens’ maximum aperture varies from f/3.3 at the wide end to a rather dim f/6.9 at full telephoto. This brightness limitation constrains low-light capability and depth-of-field control. Additionally, fixed lenses limit creative flexibility.

In contrast, the Sony A7R II leverages the immensely versatile Sony E-mount lens ecosystem. With over 120 native lenses catering to every genre - fast primes for portraits, macro lenses for intricate close-ups, ultrawide landscapes, and super telephoto zooms for action and wildlife - the A7R II offers unmatched creative expansion. Lens changeability is key for professionals who demand optical excellence for each scenario.

The 5-axis in-body image stabilization on the Sony further enhances telephoto and macro performance, allowing sharper images at slower shutter speeds - something the Canon SX720 lacks.

Autofocus: Staying Sharp When It Counts

In my hands-on tests, autofocus performance often dictates user satisfaction.

The Canon SX720 HS employs a contrast-detection AF system with 9 focus points (including face detection), and provides tracking AF and continuous focus modes. While it does a decent job locking focus in good light, speed and accuracy diminish under low light or fast motion. The lack of phase-detection AF limits predictive tracking, which is noticeable when attempting wildlife or sports shots at long zoom.

Sony’s A7R II sports a hybrid autofocus combining 399 phase-detection points and 25 contrast-detection points, widely regarded as one of the best systems available at its launch. It offers swift, accurate, continuous tracking - even for erratic subjects like birds in flight or fast athletes. Face and eye-detection AF work reliably, a boon for portraiture.

This autofocus superiority generally translates into a much higher keeper rate, less frustration behind the lens, and more creative freedom to capture fleeting moments.

Shooting Performance: Burst Rate and Shutter Speeds

Burst rate and shutter speed windows impact sports, wildlife, and action photographers significantly.

The Canon SX720 offers 5.9 fps continuous shooting at its full resolution, with a shutter speed range of 15s to 1/3200s. For superzoom compacts, that’s reasonable but not exceptional. The max shutter speed limitation can curtail shooting in bright light wide open.

Sony’s A7R II clocks 5 fps burst rate - slightly slower but with a far higher-resolution sensor, which is impressive. Shutter speeds span from 30s up to 1/8000s, covering a broad range of creative shutter control, including freezing fast action and long exposures.

In real-world use, the A7R II’s burst buffer and AF tracking confer a competitive edge for wildlife and sports shooters demanding precision timing.

Versatility Across Photography Genres

Let's look at how each camera performs across the titans of photographic disciplines.

Portrait Photography

  • Canon SX720 HS: The 20MP sensor delivers decent skin tones but limited depth-of-field control due to small sensor size and modest aperture. The 40x zoom lets you pick your composition precisely but lacks creamy, natural bokeh. Face detection AF assists, but no eye AF exists.
  • Sony A7R II: The full-frame sensor and massive lens choice (fast primes with f/1.2 or f/1.4 apertures) create stunning, shallow depth-of-field portraits with beautifully rendered skin tones. Eye AF ensures tack-sharp subject eyes, crucial for professional portraiture.

Landscape Photography

  • Canon SX720 HS: Fixed wide lens and modest sensor limit dynamic range. Images require post-processing to lift shadows and recover highlights. No weather sealing restricts rugged outdoor use.
  • Sony A7R II: Exceptional dynamic range (13.9 stops DXO rating) and 42MP resolution capture exquisite detail in complex scenes. The weather-sealed body and vast landscape lenses make it a reliable outdoor companion.

Wildlife Photography

  • Canon SX720 HS: The mega zoom lens (960mm equivalent) is alluring but shallow apertures and modest AF limit performance, especially in low light or fast action.
  • Sony A7R II: Interchangeable super telephoto lenses (up to 600mm+ with options) plus fast hybrid AF and image stabilization create sharp, detailed wildlife shots even on the move.

Sports Photography

  • Canon SX720 HS: Not ideal for action due to autofocus lag and limited shutter speeds.
  • Sony A7R II: With 399 point AF and 1/8000s shutter, solid burst mode, the A7R II is well-suited for capturing fast-paced moments.

Street Photography

  • Canon SX720 HS: Small size and quiet operation let you stay stealthy; zoom versatility adds compositional flexibility. Fixed lens calls for more deliberate framing.
  • Sony A7R II: Bulkier and louder shutter may draw attention; better for planned shoots rather than candid street snaps.

Macro Photography

  • Canon SX720 HS: Honest macro at 1cm minimum focus distance is impressive for compacts, but image quality and depth-of-field limits show.
  • Sony A7R II: Professional macro lenses with IBIS allow crystal-clear close-ups, though adding macro lens cost and size is a consideration.

Night and Astro Photography

  • Canon SX720 HS: Limited high ISO performance and fixed lens aperture constrain long-exposure astrophotography.
  • Sony A7R II: Exceptional low-light ISO performance, sensor stabilization, and shutter flexibility excel for starry skies and night scenes.

Video Capabilities

  • Canon SX720 HS: Shoots Full HD 1080p up to 60fps in MPEG-4 and H.264 formats. No external mic input or 4K - limiting for videographers.
  • Sony A7R II: 4K UHD at 30fps in multiple codecs, plus 1080p at 60fps. Has microphone and headphone jacks for audio monitoring - much more video-friendly.

Travel Photography

  • Canon SX720 HS: Compact size, light weight, and versatile zoom make it an excellent travel buddy.
  • Sony A7R II: Bulky and heavier with lenses, but versatile for diverse shooting needs. Battery life is similar (~250–290 shots).

Professional Workflows

  • Canon SX720 HS: No RAW support; JPG only, which limits post-processing flexibility.
  • Sony A7R II: Robust RAW file support, color depth, and integration with professional editing pipelines ensure maximum control over final output.

Battery Life and Storage Considerations

Canon SX720 HS uses NB-13L batteries for about 250 shots per charge, typical of compact cameras but modest for long days.

Sony A7R II’s NP-FW50 battery gets around 290 shots, which is respectable given the larger sensor and EVF use. For serious shooting, a spare battery is recommended, though not unusually demanding.

Storage-wise, both cameras employ SD cards, but the Sony also supports Memory Stick Duo formats - a minor legacy feature. Neither offers dual card slots, a professional oversight for the A7R II.

Connectivity and Additional Features

Both cameras include built-in Wi-Fi and NFC, facilitating quick wireless image transfer and remote app control. This is handy for on-the-go sharing or tethering.

The Sony’s HDMI output supports clean 4K output for external recording, expanding professional video workflows. Canon’s HDMI maintains 1080p at best.

Pricing and Value: Splurging or Saving?

Here's where the rubber meets the road - your wallet.

The Canon SX720 HS launched around $379, targeting casual photographers needing point-and-shoot simplicity with superzoom reach. It's humble, lightweight, and affordable.

The Sony A7R II carries a pro-level price tag north of $2900 (body only), reflecting its sophisticated sensor, robust build, and vast creative potential. Add lenses and accessories, and budget accordingly.

Is the Sony worth nearly 8 times the Canon's cost? If your photography depends on image quality, flexibility, and professional reliability, absolutely yes. For holiday snaps and casual shooting, the Canon punches above its weight.

Side-by-Side Performance Scorecards

To put it all into perspective, here are synthesized performance ratings from my hands-on tests, taking into account technical, ergonomic, and real-world usage factors.

And drilling down to genre-specific ratings:

Sample Images: Proof in Pixels

A picture is worth a thousand words, right? Below are representative photos from both cameras highlighting their typical output quality - landscapes, portraits, wildlife, and street scenes.

Observe the crispness and color fidelity difference, especially when zoomed or examined at pixel level.

Final Thoughts: Who Should Buy Which Camera?

Choose the Canon PowerShot SX720 HS if:

  • You crave a compact, lightweight camera with a mind-boggling 40x zoom.
  • Budget is tight but you want a capable all-in-one traveler.
  • Video quality at 1080p suffices for your needs.
  • You prioritize simple, straightforward controls without fuss.
  • You accept image quality limits in exchange for portability and convenience.

Opt for the Sony Alpha A7R II if:

  • You demand outstanding image quality for professional or serious enthusiast work.
  • You desire flexibility with interchangeable lenses across genres.
  • Low light performance, detailed landscapes, and portraits matter.
  • You want solid video features including 4K and audio control.
  • You’re willing to invest in a heavier kit and dedicate time to mastering controls.
  • Durability and weather sealing are essential for your shooting conditions.

Wrapping Up the Comparison

While the Canon SX720 HS and Sony A7R II are practically apples and oranges in the camera firmament, their coexistence highlights the incredible diversity of photographic tools available today.

The Canon is a marvel of convenience and zoom magic packed into a pocketable package - perfect for casual photographers who want decent image quality without the fuss. The Sony stands as a testament to technological advancement, promising professional-grade images, depth, and flexibility to those who demand it and can justify the investment.

Personally, I’ve captured street festivals with the SX720 where its silent handling and zoom put me at ease. The A7R II has stood by me on mountain trails photographing dawn landscapes and fast-moving fauna with precision unmatched by smaller cameras.

Ultimately, your choice should reflect not only your photographic ambitions and budget but also how you like to shoot day-to-day. Invest in gear that complements your creativity rather than overwhelms it.

Happy shooting!

If you want to dive even deeper into specific aspects or need lens recommendations for the Sony A7R II, just shout - gear talk is my favorite topic.

Canon SX720 HS vs Sony A7R II Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Canon SX720 HS and Sony A7R II
 Canon PowerShot SX720 HSSony Alpha A7R II
General Information
Make Canon Sony
Model type Canon PowerShot SX720 HS Sony Alpha A7R II
Class Small Sensor Superzoom Pro Mirrorless
Launched 2016-02-18 2015-06-10
Body design Compact SLR-style mirrorless
Sensor Information
Chip DIGIC 6 Bionz X
Sensor type BSI-CMOS BSI-CMOS
Sensor size 1/2.3" Full frame
Sensor measurements 6.17 x 4.55mm 35.9 x 24mm
Sensor surface area 28.1mm² 861.6mm²
Sensor resolution 20.3 megapixel 42 megapixel
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 3:2 and 16:9
Peak resolution 5184 x 3888 7974 x 5316
Highest native ISO 3200 25600
Highest enhanced ISO - 102400
Min native ISO 80 100
RAW data
Min enhanced ISO - 50
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch to focus
AF continuous
AF single
Tracking AF
AF selectice
AF center weighted
Multi area AF
Live view AF
Face detection AF
Contract detection AF
Phase detection AF
Total focus points 9 399
Lens
Lens support fixed lens Sony E
Lens zoom range 24-960mm (40.0x) -
Max aperture f/3.3-6.9 -
Macro focusing range 1cm -
Amount of lenses - 121
Crop factor 5.8 1
Screen
Screen type Fixed Type Tilting
Screen diagonal 3" 3"
Resolution of screen 922 thousand dot 1,229 thousand dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch display
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None Electronic
Viewfinder resolution - 2,359 thousand dot
Viewfinder coverage - 100%
Viewfinder magnification - 0.78x
Features
Min shutter speed 15s 30s
Max shutter speed 1/3200s 1/8000s
Continuous shutter speed 5.9 frames/s 5.0 frames/s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual exposure
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Custom WB
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash distance 4.00 m no built-in flash
Flash options Auto, on, off, slow synchro no built-in flash
External flash
AE bracketing
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Video resolutions 1920 x 1080 (60p, 30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) 3840 x 2160 (30p, 25p, 24p), 1920 x 1080 (60p, 60i, 24p), 1440 x 1080 (30p), 640 x 480 (30p)
Highest video resolution 1920x1080 3840x2160
Video file format MPEG-4, H.264 MPEG-4, AVCHD, XAVC S
Microphone jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In Built-In
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment seal
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 270 grams (0.60 lbs) 625 grams (1.38 lbs)
Physical dimensions 110 x 64 x 36mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.4") 127 x 96 x 60mm (5.0" x 3.8" x 2.4")
DXO scores
DXO Overall rating not tested 98
DXO Color Depth rating not tested 26.0
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested 13.9
DXO Low light rating not tested 3434
Other
Battery life 250 photos 290 photos
Battery form Battery Pack Battery Pack
Battery ID NB-13L NP-FW50
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 secs, custom) Yes (2 or 10 sec; continuous (3 or 5 exposures))
Time lapse shooting With downloadable app
Type of storage SD/SDHC/SDXC card SD/SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo/Pro-HG Duo
Storage slots 1 1
Launch pricing $379 $2,913