Casio EX-10 vs Casio EX-S200
83 Imaging
37 Features
65 Overall
48
96 Imaging
37 Features
25 Overall
32
Casio EX-10 vs Casio EX-S200 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3.5" Tilting Screen
- ISO 80 - 12800
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
- 384g - 120 x 68 x 49mm
- Launched November 2013
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 50 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 27-108mm (F3.2-5.9) lens
- 132g - 100 x 55 x 18mm
- Launched August 2010
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Casio EX-10 vs Casio EX-S200 Overview
The following is a complete comparison of the Casio EX-10 versus Casio EX-S200, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Ultracompact and they are both created by Casio. The resolution of the EX-10 (12MP) and the EX-S200 (14MP) is relatively similar but the EX-10 (1/1.7") and EX-S200 (1/2.3") come with different sensor sizes.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe EX-10 was unveiled 3 years after the EX-S200 which is quite a big difference as far as technology is concerned. Each of these cameras come with different body type with the Casio EX-10 being a Compact camera and the Casio EX-S200 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before going through a thorough comparison, below is a brief summation of how the EX-10 grades versus the EX-S200 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Casio EX-10 vs Casio EX-S200 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery photos for Casio Exilim EX-10 & Casio Exilim EX-S200. The full galleries are available at Casio EX-10 Gallery & Casio EX-S200 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-10 over the Casio EX-S200
| EX-10 | EX-S200 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | November 2013 |  | August 2010 | Newer by 40 months |
| Screen type | Tilting |  | Fixed | Tilting screen |
| Screen dimension | 3.5" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.8") |
| Screen resolution | 922k |  | 230k | Sharper screen (+692k dot) |
| Touch screen |  | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Casio EX-S200 over the Casio EX-10
| EX-S200 | EX-10 |
|---|
Common features in the Casio EX-10 and Casio EX-S200
| EX-10 | EX-S200 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | More precise focus | ||
| Selfie screen |  | Neither contains selfie screen |
Casio EX-10 vs Casio EX-S200 Physical Comparison
When you are going to travel with your camera frequently, you'll have to factor its weight and dimensions. The Casio EX-10 has got outer dimensions of 120mm x 68mm x 49mm (4.7" x 2.7" x 1.9") accompanied by a weight of 384 grams (0.85 lbs) whilst the Casio EX-S200 has dimensions of 100mm x 55mm x 18mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.7") accompanied by a weight of 132 grams (0.29 lbs).
Analyze the Casio EX-10 versus Casio EX-S200 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you have chosen at that time. Below is the front view dimensions comparison of the EX-10 compared to the EX-S200.
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability score of the EX-10 and EX-S200 is 83 and 96 respectively.
Casio EX-10 vs Casio EX-S200 Sensor Comparison
Normally, its hard to visualize the gap between sensor dimensions purely by going over specifications. The image here will offer you a far better sense of the sensor sizes in the EX-10 and EX-S200.
To sum up, each of the cameras posses different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The EX-10 using its bigger sensor is going to make achieving shallower DOF easier and the Casio EX-S200 will offer greater detail having an extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution will let you crop photographs somewhat more aggressively. The newer EX-10 should have an advantage with regard to sensor tech.
Casio EX-10 vs Casio EX-S200 Screen and ViewFinder
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banStreet Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideSports Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneTravel Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsLandscape Comparison
Photography GlossaryVlogging Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
Casio EX-10 vs Casio EX-S200 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-10 | Casio Exilim EX-S200 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Casio | Casio |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-10 | Casio Exilim EX-S200 |
| Type | Small Sensor Compact | Ultracompact |
| Launched | 2013-11-14 | 2010-08-03 |
| Body design | Compact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | Exilim Engine HS 3 | Exilim Engine 5.0 |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/1.7" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 41.5mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4320 x 3240 |
| Maximum native ISO | 12800 | 3200 |
| Lowest native ISO | 80 | 50 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-112mm (4.0x) | 27-108mm (4.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/1.8-2.5 | f/3.2-5.9 |
| Macro focusing range | 1cm | - |
| Crop factor | 4.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Tilting | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3.5" | 2.7" |
| Resolution of screen | 922k dot | 230k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Screen tech | Super Clear LCD with 180 degree upward tilt | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 250 secs | 4 secs |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shooting speed | 10.0fps | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 10.90 m | - |
| Flash settings | Auto, off, fill-in, redeye reduction | Auto, flash off, flash on, red eye reduction |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 × 720 (20 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
| Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 384 grams (0.85 lbs) | 132 grams (0.29 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 120 x 68 x 49mm (4.7" x 2.7" x 1.9") | 100 x 55 x 18mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 455 pictures | - |
| Battery format | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | Li-130A | NP-120 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC, Internal |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Cost at launch | $456 | $0 |