Casio EX-10 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV
83 Imaging
37 Features
65 Overall
48
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/75375/7537523d320c2bfccd4e37a12f883cfcd9ded6c0" alt="Casio Exilim EX-10 front Casio Exilim EX-10 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/66cf9/66cf9a75906dc0e9f2d3d249d34bb9f3f9d5798c" alt="Ricoh GR Digital IV front Ricoh GR Digital IV front"
92 Imaging
35 Features
47 Overall
39
Casio EX-10 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3.5" Tilting Display
- ISO 80 - 12800
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
- 384g - 120 x 68 x 49mm
- Introduced November 2013
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28mm (F1.9) lens
- 190g - 109 x 59 x 33mm
- Revealed September 2011
- Superseded the Ricoh GR Digital III
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Casio EX-10 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Overview
Lets examine more in depth at the Casio EX-10 versus Ricoh GR Digital IV, both Small Sensor Compact cameras by brands Casio and Ricoh. The image resolution of the EX-10 (12MP) and the GR Digital IV (10MP) is pretty comparable and they possess the exact same sensor dimensions (1/1.7").
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
The EX-10 was announced 2 years after the GR Digital IV which is a fairly sizable gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of the cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before getting in to a step-by-step comparison, below is a concise introduction of how the EX-10 grades vs the GR Digital IV in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Casio EX-10 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Casio Exilim EX-10 and Ricoh GR Digital IV. The whole galleries are viewable at Casio EX-10 Gallery and Ricoh GR Digital IV Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-10 over the Ricoh GR Digital IV
EX-10 | GR Digital IV | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | November 2013 | ![]() | September 2011 | More modern by 27 months |
Screen type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting screen |
Screen dimension | 3.5" | ![]() | 3" | Bigger screen (+0.5") |
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Ricoh GR Digital IV over the Casio EX-10
GR Digital IV | EX-10 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen resolution | 1230k | ![]() | 922k | Crisper screen (+308k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-10 and Ricoh GR Digital IV
EX-10 | GR Digital IV | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | Very precise focus | ||
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither contains selfie screen |
Casio EX-10 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Physical Comparison
For those who are looking to carry around your camera, you will want to think about its weight and proportions. The Casio EX-10 has got external dimensions of 120mm x 68mm x 49mm (4.7" x 2.7" x 1.9") accompanied by a weight of 384 grams (0.85 lbs) and the Ricoh GR Digital IV has measurements of 109mm x 59mm x 33mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.3") accompanied by a weight of 190 grams (0.42 lbs).
Contrast the Casio EX-10 versus Ricoh GR Digital IV in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you are using at that time. The following is the front view measurements comparison of the EX-10 compared to the GR Digital IV.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f1312/f1312c5f1d559f05521f53db43ce4e25f227f29a" alt="Casio EX-10 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV size comparison Casio EX-10 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV size comparison"
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability score of the EX-10 and GR Digital IV is 83 and 92 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6a72/a6a7250bcc14248b4e4f6863e2e0bb6146675b83" alt="Casio EX-10 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV top view buttons comparison Casio EX-10 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV top view buttons comparison"
Casio EX-10 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Sensor Comparison
Typically, it is difficult to picture the difference in sensor sizes just by going through a spec sheet. The pic below should offer you a stronger sense of the sensor dimensions in the EX-10 and GR Digital IV.
As you can see, each of these cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements albeit different resolution. You should expect the Casio EX-10 to produce extra detail with its extra 2MP. Higher resolution will help you crop photographs somewhat more aggressively. The fresher EX-10 provides an edge in sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c2d2e/c2d2ed4e3e5e6453a5dd5c1eb4f79d225ee777e0" alt="Casio EX-10 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV sensor size comparison Casio EX-10 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV sensor size comparison"
Casio EX-10 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/df274/df27461d95c57076bd1e93bc482e3d1b40cb1b2a" alt="Casio EX-10 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Screen and Viewfinder comparison Casio EX-10 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Casio EX-10 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-10 | Ricoh GR Digital IV | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Casio | Ricoh |
Model type | Casio Exilim EX-10 | Ricoh GR Digital IV |
Class | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
Introduced | 2013-11-14 | 2011-09-15 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | Exilim Engine HS 3 | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/1.7" | 1/1.7" |
Sensor dimensions | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 7.44 x 5.58mm |
Sensor surface area | 41.5mm² | 41.5mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 10 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 |
Maximum resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 3648 x 2736 |
Maximum native ISO | 12800 | 3200 |
Minimum native ISO | 80 | 80 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 28-112mm (4.0x) | 28mm (1x) |
Max aperture | f/1.8-2.5 | f/1.9 |
Macro focusing range | 1cm | 1cm |
Focal length multiplier | 4.8 | 4.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Display size | 3.5" | 3" |
Display resolution | 922 thousand dot | 1,230 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Display technology | Super Clear LCD with 180 degree upward tilt | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Optical (optional) |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 250s | 1s |
Highest shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shooting speed | 10.0fps | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 10.90 m | 3.00 m |
Flash options | Auto, off, fill-in, redeye reduction | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 384g (0.85 lb) | 190g (0.42 lb) |
Dimensions | 120 x 68 x 49mm (4.7" x 2.7" x 1.9") | 109 x 59 x 33mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 455 pictures | 390 pictures |
Form of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | Li-130A | DB65 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC, Internal |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Retail pricing | $456 | $599 |