Clicky

Casio EX-10 vs Samsung SL202

Portability
83
Imaging
38
Features
65
Overall
48
Casio Exilim EX-10 front
 
Samsung SL202 front
Portability
94
Imaging
33
Features
17
Overall
26

Casio EX-10 vs Samsung SL202 Key Specs

Casio EX-10
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
  • 3.5" Tilting Display
  • ISO 80 - 12800
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
  • 384g - 120 x 68 x 49mm
  • Announced November 2013
Samsung SL202
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 1600
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 28-102mm (F2.8-5.7) lens
  • 168g - 92 x 61 x 23mm
  • Revealed February 2009
  • Alternative Name is PL50
TikTok Developing Photo App to Challenge Instagram's Dominance

Casio EX-10 vs Samsung SL202 Overview

In this article, we will be matching up the Casio EX-10 versus Samsung SL202, both Small Sensor Compact cameras by companies Casio and Samsung. The sensor resolution of the EX-10 (12MP) and the SL202 (10MP) is pretty close but the EX-10 (1/1.7") and SL202 (1/2.3") possess different sensor size.

Leica struggles with L-Mount camera sales, tougher than Q or M

The EX-10 was unveiled 4 years later than the SL202 and that is a fairly sizable difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).

Before getting through a thorough comparison, below is a quick overview of how the EX-10 matches up against the SL202 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Peek Behind the Lens of 'Photographer' and Their Go-To Cameras
	
	

Reasons to pick Casio EX-10 over the Samsung SL202

 EX-10 SL202 
RevealedNovember 2013February 2009Fresher by 58 months
Manually focus Very accurate focus
Screen typeTiltingFixed Tilting screen
Screen sizing3.5"2.7"Bigger screen (+0.8")
Screen resolution922k230kClearer screen (+692k dot)
Touch screen Quickly navigate

Reasons to pick Samsung SL202 over the Casio EX-10

 SL202 EX-10 

Common features in the Casio EX-10 and Samsung SL202

 EX-10 SL202 
Selfie screen No selfie screen

Casio EX-10 vs Samsung SL202 Physical Comparison

For anybody who is going to carry your camera frequently, you need to factor its weight and measurements. The Casio EX-10 enjoys physical dimensions of 120mm x 68mm x 49mm (4.7" x 2.7" x 1.9") and a weight of 384 grams (0.85 lbs) whilst the Samsung SL202 has proportions of 92mm x 61mm x 23mm (3.6" x 2.4" x 0.9") having a weight of 168 grams (0.37 lbs).

Look at the Casio EX-10 versus Samsung SL202 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Remember that, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you are employing at that moment. The following is the front view measurements comparison of the EX-10 against the SL202.

Casio EX-10 vs Samsung SL202 size comparison

Using size and weight, the portability grade of the EX-10 and SL202 is 83 and 94 respectively.

Casio EX-10 vs Samsung SL202 top view buttons comparison

Casio EX-10 vs Samsung SL202 Sensor Comparison

Generally, it is difficult to imagine the contrast in sensor sizing merely by researching technical specs. The graphic below will help give you a better sense of the sensor dimensions in the EX-10 and SL202.

As you can tell, both of those cameras enjoy different resolutions and different sensor sizing. The EX-10 with its bigger sensor is going to make shooting shallow depth of field less difficult and the Casio EX-10 will result in more detail having an extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also make it easier to crop photographs far more aggressively. The younger EX-10 provides an advantage when it comes to sensor tech.

Casio EX-10 vs Samsung SL202 sensor size comparison

Casio EX-10 vs Samsung SL202 Screen and ViewFinder

Casio EX-10 vs Samsung SL202 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Europe Approves Revolutionary AI Legislation

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Casio EX-10 Portrait photography highlights
Samsung SL202 Portrait photography highlights
42
manual focus
offers face detection autofocus
delivers RAW files
cannot use external flash
megapixel count low (12 megapixels)
small sensor (1/1.7")
25
offers face detect focusing
lack of manual focus
lack of manual exposure
external flash not possible
MP count low (10 megapixels)
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW files
Fujifilm accuses Eastman Kodak of patent violation in new lawsuit

Street Comparison

Casio EX-10 Street photography highlights
Samsung SL202 Street photography highlights
67
screen tilts
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
delivers RAW files
provides focus via touch
small sensor (1/1.7")
heavier than competition (384g)
47
screen does not articulate
lack of image stabilization
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW files
Ulanzi's Tripod Ensures Ultra Smooth Filming

Sports Comparison

Sports photography with Casio EX-10
Sports photography with Samsung SL202
44
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
offers tracking autofocus
great battery life (455 CIPA)
megapixel count low (12MP)
small sensor (1/1.7")
lack of phase detect autofocus
16
lack of shutter priority mode
lack of image stabilization
MP count low (10MP)
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
doesn't have phase detect AF
Apple patent reveals improved iPhone camera durability

Travel Comparison

Casio EX-10 Travel photography details
Samsung SL202 Travel photography details
65
great battery life (455 shots)
provides focus via touch
has built in flash
really wide (28mm)
great maximum aperture (f1.8)
heavier than competition (384g)
megapixel count low (12 megapixels)
screen isn't selfie friendly
57
flash built-in
decently wide (28mm)
no Time Lapse function
MP count low (10 megapixels)
does not have a selfie friendly display
slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
AI-Powered Photo Editing Tools Could Be Added to WhatsApp

Landscape Comparison

Landscape photography with Casio EX-10
Landscape photography with Samsung SL202
58
manual focus
really wide (28mm)
great maximum aperture (f1.8)
very good size screen (3.5")
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
delivers RAW files
great battery life (455 CIPA)
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
megapixel count low (12 megapixels)
small sensor (1/1.7")
27
decently wide (28mm)
lack of manual focus
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
screen is somewhat small (2.7 inches)
lack of manual exposure
lack of image stabilization
MP count low (10 megapixels)
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW files
no Time Lapse function
Nikon Coolpix camera search on Google skyrockets by 8,500%

Vlogging Comparison

Casio EX-10 Vlogging information
Samsung SL202 Vlogging information
33
really wide (28mm)
great maximum aperture (f1.8)
touch screen
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
offers face detection autofocus
video res high (1920 x 1080 resolution)
screen isn't selfie friendly
lack of external mic support
heavier than competition (384 grams)
27
decently wide (28mm)
offers face detect focusing
slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
does not have a selfie friendly display
lack of image stabilization
video res low (640 x 480 pxls)
no mic support
Google AI Gemini Could Enhance iPhone Experience, Talks Suggest

Casio EX-10 vs Samsung SL202 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Casio EX-10 and Samsung SL202
 Casio Exilim EX-10Samsung SL202
General Information
Company Casio Samsung
Model Casio Exilim EX-10 Samsung SL202
Also called as - PL50
Type Small Sensor Compact Small Sensor Compact
Announced 2013-11-14 2009-02-17
Physical type Compact Compact
Sensor Information
Processor Exilim Engine HS 3 -
Sensor type CMOS CCD
Sensor size 1/1.7" 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 7.44 x 5.58mm 6.08 x 4.56mm
Sensor area 41.5mm² 27.7mm²
Sensor resolution 12MP 10MP
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 4:3 and 16:9
Max resolution 4000 x 3000 3648 x 2736
Max native ISO 12800 1600
Min native ISO 80 80
RAW images
Autofocusing
Manual focus
Touch focus
AF continuous
Single AF
Tracking AF
Selective AF
AF center weighted
Multi area AF
AF live view
Face detect focusing
Contract detect focusing
Phase detect focusing
Cross focus points - -
Lens
Lens mounting type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 28-112mm (4.0x) 28-102mm (3.6x)
Largest aperture f/1.8-2.5 f/2.8-5.7
Macro focus distance 1cm 5cm
Crop factor 4.8 5.9
Screen
Display type Tilting Fixed Type
Display sizing 3.5" 2.7"
Resolution of display 922 thousand dots 230 thousand dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch function
Display technology Super Clear LCD with 180 degree upward tilt -
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None None
Features
Min shutter speed 250s 8s
Max shutter speed 1/4000s 1/1500s
Continuous shutter rate 10.0 frames per second -
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation Yes -
Set WB
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash range 10.90 m 4.60 m
Flash options Auto, off, fill-in, redeye reduction Auto, On, Off, Auto & Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync, Fill-in Flash, Flash Off, Red-Eye Fix
Hot shoe
AE bracketing
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Video resolutions 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) 800 x 592 (20 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps)
Max video resolution 1920x1080 640x480
Video data format MPEG-4, H.264 Motion JPEG
Mic support
Headphone support
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 384g (0.85 pounds) 168g (0.37 pounds)
Dimensions 120 x 68 x 49mm (4.7" x 2.7" x 1.9") 92 x 61 x 23mm (3.6" x 2.4" x 0.9")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery life 455 images -
Battery style Battery Pack -
Battery model Li-130A SLB-10A
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec) Yes
Time lapse shooting
Type of storage SD/SDHC/SDXC SD/MMC/SDHC card, Internal
Card slots One One
Retail price $456 $140