Casio EX-10 vs Samsung SL202
83 Imaging
37 Features
65 Overall
48
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/75375/7537523d320c2bfccd4e37a12f883cfcd9ded6c0" alt="Casio Exilim EX-10 front Casio Exilim EX-10 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e9341/e93412f40c7362d3e09ff5f3d2f972e609f5d64d" alt="Samsung SL202 front Samsung SL202 front"
94 Imaging
33 Features
17 Overall
26
Casio EX-10 vs Samsung SL202 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3.5" Tilting Display
- ISO 80 - 12800
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
- 384g - 120 x 68 x 49mm
- Announced November 2013
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-102mm (F2.8-5.7) lens
- 168g - 92 x 61 x 23mm
- Revealed February 2009
- Alternative Name is PL50
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Casio EX-10 vs Samsung SL202 Overview
In this article, we will be matching up the Casio EX-10 versus Samsung SL202, both Small Sensor Compact cameras by companies Casio and Samsung. The sensor resolution of the EX-10 (12MP) and the SL202 (10MP) is pretty close but the EX-10 (1/1.7") and SL202 (1/2.3") possess different sensor size.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
The EX-10 was unveiled 4 years later than the SL202 and that is a fairly sizable difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before getting through a thorough comparison, below is a quick overview of how the EX-10 matches up against the SL202 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Casio EX-10 vs Samsung SL202 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Casio Exilim EX-10 & Samsung SL202. The full galleries are available at Casio EX-10 Gallery & Samsung SL202 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-10 over the Samsung SL202
EX-10 | SL202 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | November 2013 | ![]() | February 2009 | Fresher by 58 months |
Manually focus | ![]() | Very accurate focus | ||
Screen type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting screen |
Screen sizing | 3.5" | ![]() | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.8") |
Screen resolution | 922k | ![]() | 230k | Clearer screen (+692k dot) |
Touch screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Samsung SL202 over the Casio EX-10
SL202 | EX-10 |
---|
Common features in the Casio EX-10 and Samsung SL202
EX-10 | SL202 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Selfie screen | ![]() | No selfie screen |
Casio EX-10 vs Samsung SL202 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is going to carry your camera frequently, you need to factor its weight and measurements. The Casio EX-10 enjoys physical dimensions of 120mm x 68mm x 49mm (4.7" x 2.7" x 1.9") and a weight of 384 grams (0.85 lbs) whilst the Samsung SL202 has proportions of 92mm x 61mm x 23mm (3.6" x 2.4" x 0.9") having a weight of 168 grams (0.37 lbs).
Look at the Casio EX-10 versus Samsung SL202 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Remember that, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you are employing at that moment. The following is the front view measurements comparison of the EX-10 against the SL202.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b34bc/b34bc89aed82757752085d1bf0bcea9ebe5ef891" alt="Casio EX-10 vs Samsung SL202 size comparison Casio EX-10 vs Samsung SL202 size comparison"
Using size and weight, the portability grade of the EX-10 and SL202 is 83 and 94 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/95aac/95aacd9f8171574c522723ac34e81d3620d7d1d5" alt="Casio EX-10 vs Samsung SL202 top view buttons comparison Casio EX-10 vs Samsung SL202 top view buttons comparison"
Casio EX-10 vs Samsung SL202 Sensor Comparison
Generally, it is difficult to imagine the contrast in sensor sizing merely by researching technical specs. The graphic below will help give you a better sense of the sensor dimensions in the EX-10 and SL202.
As you can tell, both of those cameras enjoy different resolutions and different sensor sizing. The EX-10 with its bigger sensor is going to make shooting shallow depth of field less difficult and the Casio EX-10 will result in more detail having an extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also make it easier to crop photographs far more aggressively. The younger EX-10 provides an advantage when it comes to sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f90e4/f90e44fbab89a161adef4390f84113a6b07a9743" alt="Casio EX-10 vs Samsung SL202 sensor size comparison Casio EX-10 vs Samsung SL202 sensor size comparison"
Casio EX-10 vs Samsung SL202 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3591f/3591f3b33d25cc7780f2269860c372a0e7646643" alt="Casio EX-10 vs Samsung SL202 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Casio EX-10 vs Samsung SL202 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Casio EX-10 vs Samsung SL202 Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-10 | Samsung SL202 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Casio | Samsung |
Model | Casio Exilim EX-10 | Samsung SL202 |
Also called as | - | PL50 |
Type | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
Announced | 2013-11-14 | 2009-02-17 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | Exilim Engine HS 3 | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/1.7" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor area | 41.5mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12MP | 10MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 3648 x 2736 |
Max native ISO | 12800 | 1600 |
Min native ISO | 80 | 80 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 28-112mm (4.0x) | 28-102mm (3.6x) |
Largest aperture | f/1.8-2.5 | f/2.8-5.7 |
Macro focus distance | 1cm | 5cm |
Crop factor | 4.8 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 3.5" | 2.7" |
Resolution of display | 922 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Display technology | Super Clear LCD with 180 degree upward tilt | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 250s | 8s |
Max shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/1500s |
Continuous shutter rate | 10.0 frames per second | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 10.90 m | 4.60 m |
Flash options | Auto, off, fill-in, redeye reduction | Auto, On, Off, Auto & Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync, Fill-in Flash, Flash Off, Red-Eye Fix |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 800 x 592 (20 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 384g (0.85 pounds) | 168g (0.37 pounds) |
Dimensions | 120 x 68 x 49mm (4.7" x 2.7" x 1.9") | 92 x 61 x 23mm (3.6" x 2.4" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 455 images | - |
Battery style | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | Li-130A | SLB-10A |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/MMC/SDHC card, Internal |
Card slots | One | One |
Retail price | $456 | $140 |