Casio EX-10 vs Samsung SL30
83 Imaging
37 Features
65 Overall
48
95 Imaging
33 Features
14 Overall
25
Casio EX-10 vs Samsung SL30 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3.5" Tilting Screen
- ISO 80 - 12800
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
- 384g - 120 x 68 x 49mm
- Announced November 2013
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 38-114mm (F2.8-5.7) lens
- 140g - 94 x 61 x 23mm
- Released February 2009
- Alternate Name is ES15
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Casio EX-10 vs Samsung SL30 Overview
Below, we are analyzing the Casio EX-10 versus Samsung SL30, both Small Sensor Compact cameras by companies Casio and Samsung. The sensor resolution of the EX-10 (12MP) and the SL30 (10MP) is very comparable but the EX-10 (1/1.7") and SL30 (1/2.3") come with totally different sensor dimensions.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe EX-10 was released 4 years later than the SL30 and that is a fairly large difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of these cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before diving straight into a in depth comparison, below is a concise view of how the EX-10 matches up vs the SL30 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Casio EX-10 vs Samsung SL30 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pics for Casio Exilim EX-10 & Samsung SL30. The complete galleries are viewable at Casio EX-10 Gallery & Samsung SL30 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-10 over the Samsung SL30
| EX-10 | SL30 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | November 2013 |  | February 2009 | More recent by 58 months |
| Manually focus |  | More accurate focusing | ||
| Display type | Tilting |  | Fixed | Tilting display |
| Display dimension | 3.5" |  | 2.5" | Larger display (+1") |
| Display resolution | 922k |  | 230k | Sharper display (+692k dot) |
| Touch display |  | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Samsung SL30 over the Casio EX-10
| SL30 | EX-10 |
|---|
Common features in the Casio EX-10 and Samsung SL30
| EX-10 | SL30 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Selfie screen |  | Neither features selfie screen |
Casio EX-10 vs Samsung SL30 Physical Comparison
For those who are looking to lug around your camera, you need to factor in its weight and proportions. The Casio EX-10 enjoys outside dimensions of 120mm x 68mm x 49mm (4.7" x 2.7" x 1.9") accompanied by a weight of 384 grams (0.85 lbs) whilst the Samsung SL30 has measurements of 94mm x 61mm x 23mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") along with a weight of 140 grams (0.31 lbs).
Analyze the Casio EX-10 versus Samsung SL30 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you have attached at that moment. Underneath is the front view physical size comparison of the EX-10 and the SL30.
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability grade of the EX-10 and SL30 is 83 and 95 respectively.
Casio EX-10 vs Samsung SL30 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it can be hard to see the difference in sensor measurements only by checking out technical specs. The photograph underneath will give you a greater sense of the sensor dimensions in the EX-10 and SL30.
As you have seen, both cameras have got different resolutions and different sensor measurements. The EX-10 because of its larger sensor will make shooting shallow depth of field less difficult and the Casio EX-10 will show greater detail as a result of its extra 2MP. Greater resolution will let you crop photos much more aggressively. The younger EX-10 will have an advantage when it comes to sensor technology.
Casio EX-10 vs Samsung SL30 Screen and ViewFinder
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photography GlossaryStreet Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneSports Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesTravel Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoLandscape Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesVlogging Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Casio EX-10 vs Samsung SL30 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-10 | Samsung SL30 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Casio | Samsung |
| Model | Casio Exilim EX-10 | Samsung SL30 |
| Also Known as | - | ES15 |
| Type | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
| Announced | 2013-11-14 | 2009-02-17 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | Exilim Engine HS 3 | - |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/1.7" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor area | 41.5mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 10 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
| Max resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 3648 x 2736 |
| Max native ISO | 12800 | 1600 |
| Min native ISO | 80 | 80 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-112mm (4.0x) | 38-114mm (3.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/1.8-2.5 | f/2.8-5.7 |
| Macro focus distance | 1cm | 5cm |
| Crop factor | 4.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Tilting | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3.5 inch | 2.5 inch |
| Screen resolution | 922 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Screen tech | Super Clear LCD with 180 degree upward tilt | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 250s | 8s |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/1500s |
| Continuous shutter speed | 10.0 frames per sec | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 10.90 m | 4.60 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, off, fill-in, redeye reduction | Auto, On, Off, Auto & Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync, Fill-in Flash, Flash Off, Red-Eye Fix |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 800 x 592 (20 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
| Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 384 grams (0.85 lbs) | 140 grams (0.31 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 120 x 68 x 49mm (4.7" x 2.7" x 1.9") | 94 x 61 x 23mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 455 photos | - |
| Battery format | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | Li-130A | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/MMC/SDHC card, Internal |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Launch pricing | $456 | $93 |