Casio EX-10 vs Sony W650
83 Imaging
37 Features
65 Overall
48
![Casio Exilim EX-10 front Casio Exilim EX-10 front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/Casio-Exilim-EX-10/Casio-EX-10-front.jpg)
![Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W650 front Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W650 front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/Sony-Cyber-shot-DSC-W650/Sony-W650-front.jpg)
96 Imaging
39 Features
32 Overall
36
Casio EX-10 vs Sony W650 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3.5" Tilting Display
- ISO 80 - 12800
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
- 384g - 120 x 68 x 49mm
- Released November 2013
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 25-125mm (F2.6-6.3) lens
- 124g - 94 x 56 x 19mm
- Introduced January 2012
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/photography-glossary-218x150.jpg)
Casio EX-10 vs Sony W650 Overview
Lets examine more closely at the Casio EX-10 and Sony W650, both Small Sensor Compact digital cameras by manufacturers Casio and Sony. There exists a considerable gap between the sensor resolutions of the EX-10 (12MP) and W650 (16MP) and the EX-10 (1/1.7") and W650 (1/2.3") possess totally different sensor dimensions.
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/No-Surprise-Pentax-17-Pre-Orders-218x150.jpg)
The EX-10 was released 23 months later than the W650 making the cameras a generation apart from one another. Both of the cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before getting through a thorough comparison, below is a quick introduction of how the EX-10 grades vs the W650 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/iphone-optical-stabilization-218x150.jpg)
Casio EX-10 vs Sony W650 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Casio Exilim EX-10 & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W650. The complete galleries are viewable at Casio EX-10 Gallery & Sony W650 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-10 over the Sony W650
EX-10 | W650 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | November 2013 | ![]() | January 2012 | Fresher by 23 months |
Focus manually | ![]() | Very accurate focusing | ||
Display type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting display |
Display sizing | 3.5" | ![]() | 3" | Larger display (+0.5") |
Display resolution | 922k | ![]() | 230k | Clearer display (+692k dot) |
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Sony W650 over the Casio EX-10
W650 | EX-10 |
---|
Common features in the Casio EX-10 and Sony W650
EX-10 | W650 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Selfie screen | ![]() | Missing selfie screen |
Casio EX-10 vs Sony W650 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is intending to carry your camera regularly, you need to take into account its weight and measurements. The Casio EX-10 features outer dimensions of 120mm x 68mm x 49mm (4.7" x 2.7" x 1.9") having a weight of 384 grams (0.85 lbs) while the Sony W650 has proportions of 94mm x 56mm x 19mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.7") accompanied by a weight of 124 grams (0.27 lbs).
Compare the Casio EX-10 and Sony W650 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.![Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses](https://pxlmag.com/db/assets/camera-size-comparison-animation.gif)
Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you choose at the time. Underneath is the front view proportions comparison of the EX-10 compared to the W650.
![Casio EX-10 vs Sony W650 size comparison Casio EX-10 vs Sony W650 size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Casio-Exilim-EX-10-vs-Sony-Cyber-shot-DSC-W650-size-comparison.jpg)
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the EX-10 and W650 is 83 and 96 respectively.
![Casio EX-10 vs Sony W650 top view buttons comparison Casio EX-10 vs Sony W650 top view buttons comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Casio-Exilim-EX-10-vs-Sony-Cyber-shot-DSC-W650-top-view-buttons-comparison.jpg)
Casio EX-10 vs Sony W650 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it can be difficult to see the gap between sensor sizing simply by reading through a spec sheet. The graphic here will help give you a greater sense of the sensor dimensions in the EX-10 and W650.
Clearly, the 2 cameras enjoy different resolutions and different sensor sizing. The EX-10 due to its larger sensor will make achieving shallow DOF simpler and the Sony W650 will give you more detail as a result of its extra 4MP. Greater resolution will also enable you to crop pics far more aggressively. The fresher EX-10 is going to have a benefit with regard to sensor tech.
![Casio EX-10 vs Sony W650 sensor size comparison Casio EX-10 vs Sony W650 sensor size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/sensor-compare/Casio-Exilim-EX-10-vs-Sony-Cyber-shot-DSC-W650-sensor-size-comparison.png)
Casio EX-10 vs Sony W650 Screen and ViewFinder
![Casio EX-10 vs Sony W650 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Casio EX-10 vs Sony W650 Screen and Viewfinder comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Casio-Exilim-EX-10-vs-Sony-Cyber-shot-DSC-W650-screen-back-comparison.jpg)
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/samsung-evo-microsd-cards-featur-218x150.jpg)
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/LP3_cut_13f_0212-218x150.jpg)
Street Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/snapchat-218x150.jpg)
Sports Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/ai-licence-218x150.jpg)
Travel Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/maxresdefault-218x150.jpg)
Landscape Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/tiktok-218x150.jpg)
Vlogging Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/Approach-to-AI-Generated-Content-218x150.jpg)
Casio EX-10 vs Sony W650 Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-10 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W650 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Casio | Sony |
Model | Casio Exilim EX-10 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W650 |
Type | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
Released | 2013-11-14 | 2012-01-10 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | Exilim Engine HS 3 | BIONZ |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/1.7" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 41.5mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4608 x 3456 |
Max native ISO | 12800 | 3200 |
Lowest native ISO | 80 | 80 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 28-112mm (4.0x) | 25-125mm (5.0x) |
Highest aperture | f/1.8-2.5 | f/2.6-6.3 |
Macro focus distance | 1cm | 5cm |
Crop factor | 4.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 3.5" | 3" |
Resolution of display | 922 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Display tech | Super Clear LCD with 180 degree upward tilt | Clear Photo TFT LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 250 secs | 2 secs |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/1600 secs |
Continuous shutter rate | 10.0 frames per sec | 1.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 10.90 m | 3.70 m |
Flash settings | Auto, off, fill-in, redeye reduction | Auto, On, Off, Slow Sync |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 384 gr (0.85 lbs) | 124 gr (0.27 lbs) |
Dimensions | 120 x 68 x 49mm (4.7" x 2.7" x 1.9") | 94 x 56 x 19mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 455 photos | 220 photos |
Style of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | Li-130A | NP-BN |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Portrait 1/2) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC, microSD/micro SDHC, Memory Stick Duo/Memory Stick Pro Duo, Memory Stick Pro-HG Duo |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Cost at release | $456 | $140 |