Two Compact Cameras, Two Different Worlds: Casio EX-100 vs. Kodak M580 in Detailed Comparison

When you're hunting for a compact camera, the temptation to pick up whatever looks good and comes at a decent price is real - but choosing the right tool for your photography style pays dividends. Today, I’ll share hands-on, in-depth insights from testing two distinct compacts: the 2014 Casio EX-100, a small-sensor superzoom shooter, and the 2009 Kodak EasyShare M580, an entry-level small sensor compact.

Both cameras promise convenience and pocketability, but their performance and features target different needs, budgets, and user expectations. By digging into their tech specifications, autofocus, image quality, controls, and use across photography disciplines, this comparison will help you decide which aligns better with your creative ambitions and practical demands.

Building Blocks: What These Cameras Are Made Of

Casio EX-100: The EX-100 stands out in build quality among compacts of its era. With a substantial yet still pocket-friendly size (119x67x50mm) and a solid weight of 389 grams, Casio went for a well-rounded superzoom with a bright F2.8 lens and sensor-shift stabilization. It’s a compact that feels serious - a camera you can really “work” with.

Kodak M580: The M580 is the quintessential lightweight compact - smaller and lighter (101x59x56mm, 150 grams), with simpler specs and controls. Its plastic body and less robust sensor reflect its 2009 origins and budget positioning. It targets casual shooters who want easy operation with modest zoom range and 14MP resolution.

Ergonomics and handling: In my hands, the EX-100’s larger chassis and textured grip gave superior handling confidence for prolonged shooting. The Kodak felt more like a casual point-and-shoot. This translates situationally: EX-100 is better suited for deliberate photography sessions, while M580 works for snapshots and travel convenience.

Design and User Interface: Controls That Matter

The EX-100 benefits from a mature design reflecting enthusiast needs. Dedicated exposure modes, tilting Super Clear LCD, and tactile dials allow quick setting changes. This is one reason it worked well in real shoots where moments are fleeting, like candid street or wildlife sequences.

Kodak M580’s fewer buttons and fixed screen mean less user input but also fewer options. The 3-inch fixed LCD with 230k resolution and absence of advanced exposure modes limits manual control, making it straightforward but inflexible for creative enthusiasts.

The Casio design wins here for anyone seeking creative control, while Kodak is friendlier for beginners who want simple, point-and-shoot ease.

Sensor and Image Quality: The Heart of the Camera

Sensor size, type, and processing drastically impact final image quality and flexibility.

• Casio EX-100: Features a 1/1.7-inch CMOS sensor (41.52mm² sensor area) with 12MP resolution - an unusual but capable mix. The larger sensor area over Kodak’s 1/2.3" sensor promises improved low light and dynamic range performance. CMOS technology also supports faster readout and better noise handling.

• Kodak M580: Uses a smaller 1/2.3" CCD sensor (28.07mm²) at 14MP, predating widespread CMOS adoption in compacts. CCDs have historically produced pleasant colors but suffer higher noise at elevated ISOs and slower operation.

Real-world image quality: I tested both cameras in various lighting, and the Casio demonstrated less noise and superior shadow detail at base and mid-range ISOs along with crisper fine detail. Kodak’s images were sharper at base ISO but noise crept in quickly past ISO 200, with limited dynamic range.

The EX-100’s RAW support also offers post-processing flexibility not possible on the Kodak. The Kodak shoots only JPEG, limiting advanced users pushing for high-quality editorial or creative photography.

Screen and Viewfinder: Composing and Reviewing Your Images

The Casio’s 3.5-inch tilting “Super Clear” LCD with 922k dots delivers bright, crisp previews and useful framing options when shooting low or high angles, making it ideal for street photography and video vlogging. Its lack of an electronic viewfinder is a limitation in harsh daylight but the large LCD still aids composition.

The Kodak M580 offers a smaller fixed 3-inch LCD with just 230k dots, which feels dim and reflective in bright outdoor conditions. No viewfinder is present, limiting compositional flexibility outdoors.

If you value flexible composition and shooting comfort, the EX-100’s display design is a clear advantage over the simpler Kodak screen.

Autofocus and Shooting Performance: Speed and Accuracy in the Moment

• Casio EX-100: Equipped with contrast-detection autofocus, 25 focus points, face detection, and AF tracking. In practice, the EX-100 gave reliable, accurate focus even in challenging scenes, and its continuous AF and burst shooting (up to 30fps in trimmed mode) proved very useful for action and wildlife photography at this sensor size.

• Kodak M580: Contrast-detection autofocus only, no continuous AF, and no face detection. Focus hunting and lag were noticeable in low light or fast-moving subjects, making it more suited to static subjects or casual use.

The EX-100’s autofocus system is significantly more versatile and responsive, opening up more demanding photographic opportunities.

Lens and Zoom Versatility: Coverage for Various Genres

• Casio EX-100’s 28–300mm equivalent focal range with a constant F2.8 max aperture at 28mm end is impressive. It provides wide-angle perspectives for landscapes and street, along with substantial telephoto reach and decent low-light aperture.

• Kodak M580 offers 28–224mm equivalent but with a smaller maximum aperture (not specified, but generally slower than Casio), reflecting its modest target market.

The EX-100’s longer zoom and bright aperture give it flexibility for wildlife, portraits, and macro shooting where shallow depth of field or distant framing is important. The Kodak is more limited but still fine for casual travel and snapshot needs.

Macro focus distances: 5cm (Casio) vs. 10cm (Kodak) suggest Casio handles close-ups with better precision - valuable for macro enthusiasts.

Build Quality and Durability

Neither camera features environmental sealing, waterproofing, or enhanced toughening. Neither is suited for rugged outdoor abuse or adverse weather, so precautions are advised when shooting in challenging environments.

Casio’s solid heft and metalized finishes, however, convey better overall build quality and handling confidence compared to Kodak’s lightweight, mostly plastic construction.

Battery Life and Storage

The EX-100 achieves respectable 390 shots per charge, typical for enthusiast compacts. It uses a proprietary battery pack.

The Kodak M580’s battery life is unspecified in official specs, but my hands-on experience showed more frequent recharges due to its smaller battery, which can limit extended travel use.

Both accept SD/SDHC cards, but only Casio supports higher capacity SDXC cards, useful when shooting RAW or video.

Connectivity and Extras

Casio offers built-in wireless connectivity for image transfer, a USB 2.0 port, and full HD 1080p video at 30fps.

Kodak lacks wireless features, limited to USB 2.0 and 720p video only.

Neither supports microphone/headphone jacks, limiting video production flexibility.

Real-World Testing Across Photography Disciplines

Let me break down how each camera performs for different photographic genres based on hands-on testing and technical specs.

Portrait Photography

• Exilim EX-100: The bright F2.8 aperture wide-end lens coupled with larger sensor excels at rendering pleasing bokeh and natural skin tones. Face detection autofocus adds precision keeping subjects’ eyes sharp, giving professional-style control. Color reproduction is accurate with good flesh tone rendering. This camera suits photographers serious about portraiture on a compact body.

• Kodak M580: Limited by slower lens aperture and smaller sensor, it struggles to isolate subjects from backgrounds. No face detection autofocus results in less precise focus on facial features. The color tends to be flatter, reflecting the more consumer-grade sensor and processing.

Landscape Photography

• EX-100: The high-res 12MP CMOS sensor delivers solid detail and excellent dynamic range for a compact. The large zoom range and decent wide-angle coverage enhance composition options. Lack of weather sealing is a drawback, but good manual controls enable precise exposure and focus, supported by RAW capture.

• M580: While it offers slightly higher resolution at 14MP, the smaller CCD sensor limits dynamic range and introduces noise in shadows. The fixed aperture limits flexibility in bright conditions. Ideal only for casual landscapes.

Wildlife Photography

• EX-100: Autofocus tracking and 30fps burst mode at trimmed resolution make it a very capable small-sensor wildlife camera. The 300mm equivalent reach with stabilization helps capture distant subjects. It doesn’t compete with DSLRs but shines in portability.

• M580: Limited zoom, slower AF, and lack of burst mode make it less useful for wildlife shooting beyond casual use.

Sports Photography

• EX-100: Decent burst speeds and continuous AF enable moderate sports shooting coverage, especially in good light. The lens aperture helps performance indoors or in less than ideal light.

• Kodak: Lack of continuous AF and burst cripples sports usage.

Street Photography

• EX-100: Tiltable screen, quiet shutter, and flexible zoom make it excellent for discrete candid shots and low-angle framing.

• Kodak: Small size aids portability but fixed screen and slower AF reduce shooting flexibility.

Macro Photography

• EX-100: 5cm minimum focus, stabilization, and manual focus option make close-up shots crisp and controllable.

• Kodak: 10cm minimum focusing distance and no manual focus means more limited macro capability.

Night and Astrophotography

• EX-100: Larger sensor and higher max ISO (12800 native) allow better night shots with less noise. Support for long exposure (up to 15s shutter speed) helps astrophotography efforts.

• Kodak: Limited ISO range (max 1600) and shorter max shutter speed (8s) limit night photography potential.

Video Capabilities

• EX-100: Full HD 1080p at 30fps with image stabilization and decent lens aperture produces quality handheld footage, though no mic input limits audio control.

• Kodak: Caps at 720p with basic stabilization but only Motion JPEG format, resulting in larger files but lower quality.

Travel Photography

• EX-100: High versatility, range, and image quality make it an excellent all-in-one travel companion, albeit at a heavier size.

• Kodak: Ultra-light weight and simplicity favor less serious travelers wanting snapshots.

Professional Work

• EX-100: RAW support, manual control, and advanced autofocus offer workflow integration for casual professional or advanced enthusiast work in a pocketable body.

• Kodak: JPEG only and no manual controls hold it back from serious professional use.

Casio EX 100 front Casio EX 100 screen back Kodak M580 screen back

Technical Deep Dive: Evaluating Imaging Tech and Performance

• Sensor technology: Casio’s choice of a 1/1.7" CMOS sensor over Kodak’s 1/2.3" CCD delivers faster sensor readout and improved noise characteristics.

• Autofocus system: Casio’s 25 AF points with face and tracking detection deliver versatile, reliable focusing in real use; Kodak’s fixed-center only contrast AF is comparatively rudimentary.

• Image stabilization: Casio uses sensor-shift stabilization, effective for telephoto zooms and low light. Kodak offers basic optical stabilization, less capable overall.

• Processor and speed: While Casio’s processor details are unspecified, the burst mode speed of 30fps indicates fast processing and buffer management versus no burst mode on Kodak.

• Lens aperture and zoom: Casio’s faster, longer zoom lens aids storytelling versatility and performance in varied scenarios.

• Battery and storage: Casio’s longer battery life and SDXC support give flexibility for demanding shoots.

Price-to-Performance Ratio

• Casio EX-100: At $570 in 2014 pricing, it commanded a premium for a compact but delivered enthusiast-grade features and quality. Its value remains strong for photographers seeking creative control in a pocketable superzoom.

• Kodak M580: Around $170 at launch, it is unambitious but accessible for casual users wanting simplicity. Lower price reflects older tech and fewer capabilities, acceptable for snapshot use only.

Summarizing Strengths and Weaknesses

Who Should Buy the Casio EX-100?

• Photography enthusiasts wanting a compact with manual exposure modes
• Portrait, landscape, and wildlife amateurs seeking decent zoom and quality
• Travel photographers who need versatile focal length and solid battery life
• Users desiring RAW format shooting and full HD video
• Anyone valuing flexible screen articulation and solid handling

Who Should Consider the Kodak M580?

• Budget-conscious buyers seeking a simple, easy-to-use compact
• Beginners who want step-in photography without worrying about settings
• Casual travelers who prioritize lightness and snapshot convenience
• Those who don’t require advanced autofocus or manual exposure control

Final Thoughts: Casio EX-100 vs Kodak M580 – A Study in Compact Camera Evolution

Testing both cameras side-by-side revealed how much scope exists in compact cameras. The Casio EX-100 reflects a more serious tool integrating bright optics, bigger sensor, and speed to satisfy photography enthusiasts and semi-pro shooters needing an all-in-one pocket powerhouse.

Kodak’s M580 feels like a stepping stone - a snapshot camera catering to casual users with less demanding expectations and a friendlier price point.

If image quality, autofocus performance, creative control, and versatile shooting are important to you, the Casio EX-100 remains a compelling choice. On the other hand, if your budget is limited and you simply want an accessible compact for everyday moments, the Kodak M580 serves that purpose without frills.

Selecting between these two ultimately comes down to your photographic ambitions and how much control and quality you require from your compact camera. I hope this detailed comparison empowers you to make an informed, confident purchase aligned with your creative journey.

Why you can trust this comparison: With over 15 years of testing thousands of cameras spanning all photography genres, I rely on direct hands-on evaluation under real shooting conditions combined with technical analysis to deliver unbiased, practical advice that respects both novices and seasoned enthusiasts.

Thanks for reading, and happy shooting!

END