Casio EX-100 vs Ricoh GR
83 Imaging
37 Features
64 Overall
47


90 Imaging
57 Features
54 Overall
55
Casio EX-100 vs Ricoh GR Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3.5" Tilting Screen
- ISO 80 - 12800 (Bump to 25600)
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1/20000s Maximum Shutter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-300mm (F2.8) lens
- 389g - 119 x 67 x 50mm
- Released February 2014
(Full Review)
- 16MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 25600
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28mm (F2.8) lens
- 245g - 117 x 61 x 35mm
- Revealed April 2013
- Successor is Ricoh GR II

Casio EX-100 vs Ricoh GR Overview
Its time to examine more in depth at the Casio EX-100 vs Ricoh GR, former being a Small Sensor Superzoom while the latter is a Large Sensor Compact by manufacturers Casio and Ricoh. There exists a noticeable gap among the sensor resolutions of the EX-100 (12MP) and GR (16MP) and the EX-100 (1/1.7") and GR (APS-C) use different sensor size.

The EX-100 was revealed 10 months later than the GR which means that they are both of a similar age. Both the cameras come with different body type with the Casio EX-100 being a Compact camera and the Ricoh GR being a Large Sensor Compact camera.
Before we go through a in depth comparison, below is a simple synopsis of how the EX-100 grades versus the GR when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Casio EX-100 vs Ricoh GR Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery photos for Casio Exilim EX-100 & Ricoh GR. The full galleries are viewable at Casio EX-100 Gallery & Ricoh GR Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-100 over the Ricoh GR
EX-100 | GR | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | February 2014 | ![]() | April 2013 | More recent by 10 months |
Screen type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting screen |
Screen dimension | 3.5" | ![]() | 3" | Bigger screen (+0.5") |
Reasons to pick Ricoh GR over the Casio EX-100
GR | EX-100 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen resolution | 1230k | ![]() | 922k | Sharper screen (+308k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-100 and Ricoh GR
EX-100 | GR | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | Dial accurate focus | ||
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither provides selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Lacking Touch friendly screen |
Casio EX-100 vs Ricoh GR Physical Comparison
In case you're going to lug around your camera regularly, you will want to take into account its weight and volume. The Casio EX-100 provides outside dimensions of 119mm x 67mm x 50mm (4.7" x 2.6" x 2.0") accompanied by a weight of 389 grams (0.86 lbs) whilst the Ricoh GR has sizing of 117mm x 61mm x 35mm (4.6" x 2.4" x 1.4") having a weight of 245 grams (0.54 lbs).
Look at the Casio EX-100 vs Ricoh GR in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you are utilizing at that moment. The following is the front view measurement comparison of the EX-100 versus the GR.

Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability score of the EX-100 and GR is 83 and 90 respectively.

Casio EX-100 vs Ricoh GR Sensor Comparison
Normally, it is very difficult to visualize the gap in sensor measurements merely by seeing a spec sheet. The photograph underneath will provide you a stronger sense of the sensor sizes in the EX-100 and GR.
As you can see, both of these cameras have got different resolutions and different sensor measurements. The EX-100 with its smaller sensor is going to make shooting shallower depth of field harder and the Ricoh GR will produce more detail because of its extra 4MP. Higher resolution will let you crop pictures much more aggressively. The younger EX-100 provides an edge when it comes to sensor technology.

Casio EX-100 vs Ricoh GR Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Casio EX-100 vs Ricoh GR Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-100 | Ricoh GR | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Casio | Ricoh |
Model | Casio Exilim EX-100 | Ricoh GR |
Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Large Sensor Compact |
Released | 2014-02-06 | 2013-04-17 |
Body design | Compact | Large Sensor Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/1.7" | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 23.7 x 15.7mm |
Sensor area | 41.5mm² | 372.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 |
Max resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4928 x 3264 |
Max native ISO | 12800 | 25600 |
Max enhanced ISO | 25600 | - |
Lowest native ISO | 80 | 100 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Number of focus points | 25 | - |
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 28-300mm (10.7x) | 28mm (1x) |
Maximum aperture | f/2.8 | f/2.8 |
Macro focus distance | 5cm | - |
Crop factor | 4.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 3.5 inch | 3 inch |
Screen resolution | 922k dot | 1,230k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Screen tech | Super Clear LCD | TFT LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Optical (optional) |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 15 seconds | 300 seconds |
Max shutter speed | 1/20000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
Continuous shutter speed | 30.0fps | 4.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 6.10 m | 5.40 m (at ISO 100) |
Flash options | Auto, flash on, flash off, redeye reduction | - |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Max flash sync | - | 1/4000 seconds |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 | 1920 x 1080 (30, 25, 24 fps), 1280 x 720 ( 60, 50, 30, 25, 24 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 25, 24 fps) |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | - | MPEG-4 |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 389 grams (0.86 lb) | 245 grams (0.54 lb) |
Dimensions | 119 x 67 x 50mm (4.7" x 2.6" x 2.0") | 117 x 61 x 35mm (4.6" x 2.4" x 1.4") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | 78 |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 23.6 |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 13.5 |
DXO Low light score | not tested | 972 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 390 photographs | 290 photographs |
Style of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | - | DB65 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD, SDHC, SDXC |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Pricing at release | $572 | $971 |