Casio EX-100 vs Sigma SD9
83 Imaging
37 Features
64 Overall
47


54 Imaging
38 Features
27 Overall
33
Casio EX-100 vs Sigma SD9 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3.5" Tilting Screen
- ISO 80 - 12800 (Boost to 25600)
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1/20000s Maximum Shutter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-300mm (F2.8) lens
- 389g - 119 x 67 x 50mm
- Launched February 2014
(Full Review)
- 3MP - APS-C Sensor
- 1.8" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 400
- 1/6000s Maximum Shutter
- No Video
- Sigma SA Mount
- 950g - 152 x 120 x 79mm
- Introduced November 2002
- Replacement is Sigma SD10

Casio EX-100 vs Sigma SD9 Overview
Its time to take a deeper look at the Casio EX-100 and Sigma SD9, former is a Small Sensor Superzoom while the latter is a Advanced DSLR by rivals Casio and Sigma. There is a considerable difference among the sensor resolutions of the EX-100 (12MP) and SD9 (3MP) and the EX-100 (1/1.7") and SD9 (APS-C) boast totally different sensor sizing.

The EX-100 was manufactured 11 years after the SD9 which is a fairly large difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both of the cameras have different body design with the Casio EX-100 being a Compact camera and the Sigma SD9 being a Mid-size SLR camera.
Before getting into a in-depth comparison, here is a brief summation of how the EX-100 grades against the SD9 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Casio EX-100 vs Sigma SD9 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery photos for Casio Exilim EX-100 & Sigma SD9. The entire galleries are provided at Casio EX-100 Gallery & Sigma SD9 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-100 over the Sigma SD9
EX-100 | SD9 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | February 2014 | ![]() | November 2002 | More modern by 137 months |
Screen type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting screen |
Screen dimensions | 3.5" | ![]() | 1.8" | Bigger screen (+1.7") |
Screen resolution | 922k | ![]() | 130k | Clearer screen (+792k dot) |
Reasons to pick Sigma SD9 over the Casio EX-100
SD9 | EX-100 |
---|
Common features in the Casio EX-100 and Sigma SD9
EX-100 | SD9 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | Very exact focusing | ||
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither includes selfie screen | ||
Touch screen | ![]() | Neither includes Touch screen |
Casio EX-100 vs Sigma SD9 Physical Comparison
If you're intending to carry around your camera, you'll have to factor in its weight and volume. The Casio EX-100 features physical measurements of 119mm x 67mm x 50mm (4.7" x 2.6" x 2.0") with a weight of 389 grams (0.86 lbs) and the Sigma SD9 has sizing of 152mm x 120mm x 79mm (6.0" x 4.7" x 3.1") having a weight of 950 grams (2.09 lbs).
Take a look at the Casio EX-100 and Sigma SD9 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you are employing at that moment. Underneath is a front view dimension comparison of the EX-100 versus the SD9.

Using size and weight, the portability grade of the EX-100 and SD9 is 83 and 54 respectively.

Casio EX-100 vs Sigma SD9 Sensor Comparison
Often, it is hard to visualise the contrast in sensor sizes only by looking through specifications. The picture here may offer you a stronger sense of the sensor sizing in the EX-100 and SD9.
To sum up, both of the cameras provide different megapixels and different sensor sizes. The EX-100 featuring a smaller sensor will make shooting shallow depth of field tougher and the Casio EX-100 will provide you with greater detail due to its extra 9MP. Higher resolution will also enable you to crop shots more aggressively. The younger EX-100 will have an edge with regard to sensor tech.

Casio EX-100 vs Sigma SD9 Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Casio EX-100 vs Sigma SD9 Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-100 | Sigma SD9 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Casio | Sigma |
Model type | Casio Exilim EX-100 | Sigma SD9 |
Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Advanced DSLR |
Launched | 2014-02-06 | 2002-11-26 |
Body design | Compact | Mid-size SLR |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS (Foveon X3) |
Sensor size | 1/1.7" | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 20.7 x 13.8mm |
Sensor surface area | 41.5mm² | 285.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 3 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 3:2 |
Maximum resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 2268 x 1512 |
Maximum native ISO | 12800 | 400 |
Maximum boosted ISO | 25600 | - |
Lowest native ISO | 80 | 100 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Total focus points | 25 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | Sigma SA |
Lens zoom range | 28-300mm (10.7x) | - |
Maximal aperture | f/2.8 | - |
Macro focusing distance | 5cm | - |
Total lenses | - | 76 |
Crop factor | 4.8 | 1.7 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3.5" | 1.8" |
Screen resolution | 922k dot | 130k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Screen technology | Super Clear LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Optical (pentaprism) |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 98 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.77x |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 15s | 30s |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/20000s | 1/6000s |
Continuous shooting speed | 30.0fps | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 6.10 m | no built-in flash |
Flash options | Auto, flash on, flash off, redeye reduction | - |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Maximum flash sync | - | 1/180s |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 | - |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | None |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 389 gr (0.86 lb) | 950 gr (2.09 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 119 x 67 x 50mm (4.7" x 2.6" x 2.0") | 152 x 120 x 79mm (6.0" x 4.7" x 3.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 390 photographs | - |
Battery form | Battery Pack | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (10 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | Compact Flash Type I or II |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Price at launch | $572 | $3,001 |