Clicky

Casio EX-FC150 vs Fujifilm S9400W

Portability
93 Imaging
33 Features
20 Overall
27
Casio Exilim EX-FC150 front
 
Fujifilm FinePix S9400W front
Portability
61 Imaging
40 Features
44 Overall
41

Casio EX-FC150 vs Fujifilm S9400W Key Specs

Casio EX-FC150
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Display
  • ISO 64 - 1600
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 37-185mm (F3.6-4.5) lens
  • 173g - 99 x 58 x 28mm
  • Launched November 2009
Fujifilm S9400W
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 12800
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 24-1200mm (F2.9-6.5) lens
  • 670g - 123 x 87 x 116mm
  • Introduced January 2014
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Casio EX-FC150 vs Fujifilm S9400W Overview

On this page, we will be comparing the Casio EX-FC150 versus Fujifilm S9400W, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by companies Casio and FujiFilm. There is a substantial difference among the sensor resolutions of the EX-FC150 (10MP) and Fujifilm S9400W (16MP) but both cameras provide the same sensor dimensions (1/2.3").

Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

The EX-FC150 was brought out 5 years earlier than the Fujifilm S9400W and that is a fairly big difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of the cameras have different body design with the Casio EX-FC150 being a Compact camera and the Fujifilm S9400W being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.

Before going into a in-depth comparison, here is a simple summary of how the EX-FC150 scores against the Fujifilm S9400W for portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images 
	
	

		

		
Reasons to pick Casio EX-FC150 over the Fujifilm S9400W

		

		

			
 EX-FC150 Fujifilm S9400W 
Manually focus  Dial exact focusing
		

	

	
	

		

		
Reasons to pick Fujifilm S9400W over the Casio EX-FC150

		

		

			
 Fujifilm S9400W EX-FC150 
IntroducedJanuary 2014November 2009More recent by 50 months
Screen dimensions3"2.7"Bigger screen (+0.3")
Screen resolution460k230kCrisper screen (+230k dot)
		

	

	
	

		

		
Common features in the Casio EX-FC150 and Fujifilm S9400W

		

		

			
 EX-FC150 Fujifilm S9400W 
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Selfie screen  Neither includes selfie screen
Touch screen  Absent Touch screen
		

	

	

	
	
	
	

	

		

		
Casio EX-FC150 vs Fujifilm S9400W Physical Comparison

		

		

			
In case you're intending to lug around your camera frequently, you have to consider its weight and proportions. The Casio EX-FC150 features outer dimensions of 99mm x 58mm x 28mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 1.1") along with a weight of 173 grams (0.38 lbs) whilst the Fujifilm S9400W has measurements of 123mm x 87mm x 116mm (4.8" x 3.4" x 4.6") accompanied by a weight of 670 grams (1.48 lbs).
Look at the Casio EX-FC150 versus Fujifilm S9400W in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses
Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you have attached at the time. Below is a front view over all size comparison of the EX-FC150 vs the Fujifilm S9400W.
Casio EX-FC150 vs Fujifilm S9400W size comparison
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability grade of the EX-FC150 and Fujifilm S9400W is 93 and 61 respectively.
Casio EX-FC150 vs Fujifilm S9400W top view buttons comparison		

	

	
	

		

		
Casio EX-FC150 vs Fujifilm S9400W Sensor Comparison

		

		

			
Generally, its tough to imagine the difference in sensor measurements just by looking through technical specs. The graphic underneath might give you a stronger sense of the sensor sizes in the EX-FC150 and Fujifilm S9400W.
As you can tell, both of the cameras have the same sensor dimensions albeit different megapixels. You can expect the Fujifilm S9400W to render extra detail having its extra 6 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also allow you to crop shots a bit more aggressively. The older EX-FC150 will be disadvantaged in sensor tech.
	
			Casio EX-FC150 vs Fujifilm S9400W sensor size comparison			
		

	

	
	

		

		
Casio EX-FC150 vs Fujifilm S9400W Screen and ViewFinder

		

		

					

		Casio EX-FC150 vs Fujifilm S9400W Screen and Viewfinder comparison	

	
			Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video	

	
	
	
	

	

		
Photography Type Scores

		

	

	
Portrait Comparison
Portrait photography with Casio EX-FC150
Portrait photography with Fujifilm S9400W
26
 manual focus
 manual mode not available
 cannot use external flash
 low resolution (10 megapixels)
 sensor  is tiny (1/2.3")
 lack of RAW support
37
 good MP (16 megapixels)
 includes face detect focusing
 lack of manual focus
 external flash not possible
 small sensor size (1/2.3")
 lacks RAW support
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
Street Comparison
Casio EX-FC150 Street photography advice
Fujifilm S9400W Street photography advice
55
 has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
 no articulating screen
 sensor  is tiny (1/2.3")
 lack of RAW support
41
 image stabilization (Optical)
 screen does not articulate
 small sensor size (1/2.3")
 lacks RAW support
 more heavy than competitors in class (670 grams)
Photography Glossary
Sports Comparison
Sports photography with Casio EX-FC150
Sports photography with Fujifilm S9400W
30
 max frames per second high (40.0 fps)
 has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
 max shutter speed is low (1/1,000s)
 lack of shutter priority mode
 low resolution (10MP)
 sensor  is tiny (1/2.3")
 lack of phase detect auto focus
55
 incredible zoom range (24-1200mm  50.0 x zoom)
 image stabilization (Optical)
 good MP (16MP)
 includes tracking focus
 good battery (500 shots)
 small sensor size (1/2.3")
 lacks phase detect AF
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
Travel Comparison
Travel photography with Casio EX-FC150
Travel photography with Fujifilm S9400W
50
 built-in flash
 does not have Time Lapse recording
 low resolution (10MP)
 display isn't selfie friendly
 wide angle not good (37mm)
 sluggish max aperture (f3.6)
54
 good battery (500 per charge)
 good MP (16MP)
 has built in flash
 quite wide (24mm)
 great reach (1200mm)
 no Timelapse mode
 more heavy than competitors in class (670g)
 display is not selfie friendly
 slow maximum aperture (f2.9)
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
Landscape Comparison
Landscape photography with Casio EX-FC150
Landscape photography with Fujifilm S9400W
31
 manual focus
 has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
 lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
 wide angle not good (37mm)
 sluggish max aperture (f3.6)
 tiny screen (2.7")
 manual mode not available
 low resolution (10MP)
 sensor  is tiny (1/2.3")
 lack of RAW support
 does not have Time Lapse recording
44
 quite wide (24mm)
 screen size is good (3 inches)
 image stabilization (Optical)
 good MP (16MP)
 good battery (500 CIPA)
 lack of manual focus
 can't change lens (fixed lens mount)
 slow maximum aperture (f2.9)
 small sensor size (1/2.3")
 lacks RAW support
 no Timelapse mode
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
Vlogging Comparison
Casio EX-FC150 Vlogging advice
Fujifilm S9400W Vlogging advice
25
 has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
 wide angle not good (37mm)
 sluggish max aperture (f3.6)
 display isn't selfie friendly
 video res low (640 x 480 pixels)
 does not have mic support
26
 quite wide (24mm)
 image stabilization (Optical)
 includes face detect focusing
 video res high (1920 x 1080 pxls)
 slow maximum aperture (f2.9)
 display is not selfie friendly
 no microphone port
 more heavy than competitors in class (670g)
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
	

		

			
Casio EX-FC150 vs Fujifilm S9400W Specifications

		

		

					

		
		

			Detailed spec comparison table for Casio EX-FC150 and Fujifilm S9400W
 Casio Exilim EX-FC150Fujifilm FinePix S9400W
General Information
Brand Casio FujiFilm
Model type Casio Exilim EX-FC150 Fujifilm FinePix S9400W
Type Small Sensor Compact Small Sensor Superzoom
Launched 2009-11-16 2014-01-06
Body design Compact SLR-like (bridge)
Sensor Information
Sensor type BSI-CMOS CMOS
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 6.17 x 4.55mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor area 28.1mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 10 megapixel 16 megapixel
Anti alias filter    
Aspect ratio 4:3, 3:2 and  16:9 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and  16:9
Highest resolution 3648 x 2736 4608 x 3456
Highest native ISO 1600 12800
Minimum native ISO 64 100
RAW images    
Autofocusing
Focus manually    
Touch to focus    
Autofocus continuous    
Autofocus single    
Autofocus tracking    
Autofocus selectice    
Autofocus center weighted    
Multi area autofocus    
Live view autofocus    
Face detect autofocus    
Contract detect autofocus    
Phase detect autofocus    
Cross type focus points - -
Lens
Lens mount type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 37-185mm (5.0x) 24-1200mm (50.0x)
Max aperture f/3.6-4.5 f/2.9-6.5
Macro focusing distance 5cm 1cm
Crop factor 5.8 5.8
Screen
Display type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display sizing 2.7 inch 3 inch
Resolution of display 230 thousand dot 460 thousand dot
Selfie friendly    
Liveview    
Touch friendly    
Display tech - TFT LCD
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None Electronic
Viewfinder resolution - 201 thousand dot
Viewfinder coverage - 97%
Features
Slowest shutter speed 30 secs 8 secs
Maximum shutter speed 1/1000 secs 1/1700 secs
Continuous shooting speed 40.0 frames per second 10.0 frames per second
Shutter priority    
Aperture priority    
Manual exposure    
Exposure compensation - Yes
Set white balance    
Image stabilization    
Integrated flash    
Flash distance 2.60 m 7.00 m
Flash options Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye Auto, forced flash, suppressed flash, slow synchro
External flash    
Auto exposure bracketing    
White balance bracketing    
Exposure
Multisegment metering    
Average metering    
Spot metering    
Partial metering    
AF area metering    
Center weighted metering    
Video features
Video resolutions 1280 × 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 448 x 336 (30, 240 fps), 640 x 480 (120 fps), 448 x 336 (240 fps), 224 x 168 (420 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps) 1920 x 1080 (60i), 1280 x 960 (60p), 640 x 480 (30p)
Highest video resolution 640x480 1920x1080
Video data format Motion JPEG H.264
Microphone jack    
Headphone jack    
Connectivity
Wireless Eye-Fi Connected Built-In
Bluetooth    
NFC    
HDMI    
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment seal    
Water proofing    
Dust proofing    
Shock proofing    
Crush proofing    
Freeze proofing    
Weight 173g (0.38 pounds) 670g (1.48 pounds)
Physical dimensions 99 x 58 x 28mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 1.1") 123 x 87 x 116mm (4.8" x 3.4" x 4.6")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery life - 500 shots
Battery form - AA
Battery ID NP-40 4 x AA
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple) Yes (2 or 10 sec)
Time lapse recording    
Type of storage SD/SDHC card, Internal SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal
Storage slots Single Single
Price at launch $350 $330