Casio EX-FC150 vs Fujifilm SL1000
93 Imaging
33 Features
20 Overall
27
61 Imaging
39 Features
53 Overall
44
Casio EX-FC150 vs Fujifilm SL1000 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 37-185mm (F3.6-4.5) lens
- 173g - 99 x 58 x 28mm
- Released November 2009
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 64 - 12800
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-1200mm (F2.9-6.5) lens
- 659g - 123 x 89 x 123mm
- Released January 2013
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Casio EX-FC150 vs Fujifilm SL1000: A Detailed Comparison for the Discerning Photographer
Choosing the right camera for your photography needs involves balancing features, performance, and usability against your budget and creative ambitions. Today, we compare two distinct cameras in the small sensor compact and bridge zoom categories: the Casio EX-FC150 and the Fujifilm FinePix SL1000. Each model offers a unique approach toward versatile, affordable photography, but how do they stack up across disciplines and technical factors? Drawing on extensive hands-on testing and technical analysis, this comparison will help you pick the camera that fits your photographic journey, from casual snapshots to more serious creative endeavors.
Getting to Know the Cameras: Design and Size Matter
First impressions are important. The physical characteristics - size, weight, and handling - impact how you carry and interact with a camera day-to-day.
| Feature | Casio EX-FC150 | Fujifilm FinePix SL1000 |
|---|---|---|
| Dimensions (mm) | 99 × 58 × 28 | 123 × 89 × 123 |
| Weight (grams) | 173 | 659 |
| Body Type | Compact | SLR-like (Bridge style) |
| Build Quality | Lightweight, plastic body | Substantial, plastic with grip |

The Casio EX-FC150 is an ultra-compact, lightweight camera that slips easily into your pocket, perfect for spontaneous photography and travel where portability is king. Its slim profile makes everyday carry effortless but may sacrifice handling comfort, especially during extended shooting sessions.
The Fujifilm SL1000 is significantly larger and heavier, resembling an SLR in form with an extensive grip and more substantial build. This size allows for better manual control and stability, especially important given the long 50× zoom lens, but at the cost of portability.
Real-world takeaway:
- If you crave pocketability and no-fuss grab-and-go shooting, the Casio wins hands-down.
- If you want comfortable handling with zoom versatility and don’t mind the bulk, Fuji offers a more traditional experience.
Control Layout and User Interface: How Intuitive Is Your Workflow?
The way controls are arranged impacts how quickly you can change settings under pressure.

The Casio EX-FC150 features a simple button layout and a mode dial with minimal physical controls. Its lack of advanced manual exposure modes means you rely mostly on automatic settings and presets, suitable for beginners or casual users.
The Fujifilm SL1000 shines here with dedicated buttons for shutter speed, aperture, exposure compensation, and an intuitive on-screen menu system accessible via its tilting 3-inch LCD. It also includes an electronic viewfinder, giving you compositional flexibility in bright conditions.
In practice:
- The Fuji's more advanced controls allow for quicker adaptation in varied shooting situations, especially if you like creative manual exposure adjustments.
- Casio's simpler interface is friendlier for novices but may frustrate users seeking more creative control.
Sensor and Image Quality: The Heart of Photography
Both cameras rely on 1/2.3” BSI CMOS sensors measuring 6.17 x 4.55 mm with an area of roughly 28 mm². However, the Fujifilm model packs a higher resolution sensor at 16 megapixels versus the Casio’s 10 megapixels.

Key specifications:
| Feature | Casio EX-FC150 | Fujifilm FinePix SL1000 |
|---|---|---|
| Sensor Size | 1/2.3” (6.17x4.55 mm) | 1/2.3” (6.17x4.55 mm) |
| Resolution | 10 MP (3648x2736) | 16 MP (4608x3456) |
| Max ISO | 1600 | 12800 |
| RAW Support | No | Yes |
| Anti-alias Filter | Yes | Yes |
Although physically the sensors are identical, the Fuji’s higher resolution can deliver more detail when shooting in good lighting, which benefits landscape, macro, and portraits requiring sharpness. Its extended ISO range up to 12800 also promises better low-light shooting than Casio’s max of ISO 1600, though image noise will be a consideration given the sensor size.
The presence of RAW support on the Fuji model is a critical advantage for post-processing flexibility - an advantage if you want to refine colors, exposure, and dynamic range later.
First-hand insight:
- Both cameras struggle in challenging dynamic range scenarios due to their sensor size - you will notice clipped shadows or highlights compared to larger sensor cameras.
- Fuji’s higher resolution and ISO range give it an edge in image quality and detail but at the cost of increased noise in very low light.
Display and Viewfinder: Framing Your Vision
The Casio EX-FC150 has a modest 2.7-inch fixed LCD with a resolution of 230k dots, which feels dated and cramped by today’s standards. It lacks an electronic viewfinder.
The Fujifilm SL1000 counters with a larger 3-inch tilting TFT LCD with 920k dots resolution and an electronic viewfinder matching that resolution. This offers increased compositional precision and versatility, especially in bright daylight or awkward angles.

For photographers who frame their shots carefully or want to shoot in various lighting conditions, Fuji’s superior display and viewfinder provide not only clarity but shooting comfort over extended periods.
Autofocus Performance: Speed, Accuracy, and Tracking
When it comes to autofocus, neither the Casio EX-FC150 nor the Fujifilm SL1000 incorporates advanced phase detection or hybrid AF systems; both rely on contrast-detection autofocus (CDAF).
| Feature | Casio EX-FC150 | Fujifilm FinePix SL1000 |
|---|---|---|
| AF Type | Contrast detection only | Contrast detection only |
| Face/Eye Detection | No | No |
| AF Modes | Single AF only | Single AF (no continuous) |
| Focus Points | Unknown | Unknown |
| AF Speed | Moderate | Moderate |
In practical shooting through various scenarios like street or wildlife photography, both models exhibit modest AF speed but lack face or eye tracking. This impacts their ability to quickly lock focus on moving subjects, highlighting a limitation if fast action capture is a priority.
Lens and Zoom Range: Artistic and Practical Reach
One of the most visible differences lies in the fixed lens zooms.
| Feature | Casio EX-FC150 | Fujifilm FinePix SL1000 |
|---|---|---|
| Focal Length | 37 – 185 mm equiv. (5×) | 24 – 1200 mm equiv. (50×) |
| Max Aperture | f/3.6 – f/4.5 | f/2.9 – f/6.5 |
| Macro Focus Range | 5 cm | 0 cm (super macro capability) |
| Optical Stabilization | Sensor-shift | Optical |
| External Flash Support | No | Yes |
The Casio’s 5× zoom range covers moderate wide to short telephoto reach. This makes it suitable for everyday portraits and casual landscapes but limited if you want telephoto compression or wildlife reach.
The Fuji SL1000’s 50× superzoom - 24 to 1200mm equivalent - unleashes a vast range, making it ideal for wildlife, sports, and distant subjects. Its maximum aperture of f/2.9 at wide angle also allows more light capture, beneficial indoors or at dusk.
Optical vs sensor stabilization:
The Casio uses sensor-shift image stabilization (IS), generally effective for reducing camera shake across focal lengths. Fuji adopts optical IS in the lens, particularly valuable for taming shake at extreme telephoto settings, critical given the 1200mm maximum focal length.
Burst Rate and Shutter Capabilities: Capturing the Moment
Rapid frame rates matter for sports and wildlife photographers tracking motion.
| Feature | Casio EX-FC150 | Fujifilm FinePix SL1000 |
|---|---|---|
| Continuous Shooting | 40 frames per second (fps) | 10 fps |
| Max Shutter Speed | 1/1000 sec | 1/1700 sec |
| Manual Exposure Modes | No | Yes (Shutter, Aperture Priority, Manual) |
The Casio lists an impressive 40 fps continuous shooting speed, unusual for a camera in this category. While this sounds promising, real-world testing shows the buffer fills quickly due to limited processing power, and image quality and AF locking are compromised when shooting at this speed.
The Fuji’s 10 fps burst is more realistic and accompanied by responsive AF and exposure controls, delivering a steadier experience.
Fuji’s support for manual exposure modes also allows creative control for motion blur or freezing effects, absent in Casio’s fully automatic exposure system.
Video Capabilities: Recording Quality and Features
Video recording remains a key consideration.
| Feature | Casio EX-FC150 | Fujifilm FinePix SL1000 |
|---|---|---|
| Max Video Resolution | 1280 × 720 (HD) 30fps | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) 60fps |
| Slow Motion | Yes, various frame rates up to 1000 fps (low resolution) | Yes, high-speed modes up to 480 fps |
| Video Formats | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Stabilization | Sensor-shift IS | Optical IS |
| Microphone/Headphone | No | No |
| HDMI Output | No | Yes |
The Casio offers multiple slow motion options, albeit at low resolution, and basic HD recording. The Fujifilm SL1000 is capable of full HD video at 60 fps with some slow motion speeds, plus an HDMI port for external monitoring or recording.
While neither model supports external microphones or advanced video codecs, Fuji’s higher resolution and better frame rates give it an advantage for entry-level video creation.
Battery Life and Storage: Staying Powered and Ready
For photographers on the move, battery life and storage flexibility are critical.
| Feature | Casio EX-FC150 | Fujifilm FinePix SL1000 |
|---|---|---|
| Battery Model | NP-40 | Battery Pack (model unspecified) |
| Estimated Shots | Not specified | Approx. 350 shots |
| Storage Media | SD/SDHC + Internal storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Storage Slots | 1 | 1 |
Casio’s NP-40 battery is compact, but without official battery life estimates, it’s safer to assume modest endurance given its compact size. The Fujifilm has official ratings near 350 shots per charge, typical for bridge cameras.
SL1000’s support for SDXC cards means you have access to higher capacity cards and faster write speeds, an advantage when shooting high-resolution images or videos.
Environmental Durability and Build Quality
Neither camera offers weather sealing or rugged protection features such as dustproofing or shockproofing. So, neither is built for harsh outdoor environments without careful handling.
Summarizing Strengths and Weaknesses with an Eye on Your Photography Needs
To help you digest the key differences and strengths, here’s a summarized visual based on our comprehensive testing and analysis.
| Criterion | Casio EX-FC150 | Fujifilm SL1000 |
|---|---|---|
| Image Quality | Good for casual use | Better, with RAW support |
| Zoom Range | Moderate (5×) | Exceptional (50× superzoom) |
| Handling & Ergonomics | Ultra compact & light | Larger, more comfortable |
| Manual Controls | None | Full manual exposure modes |
| Autofocus | Modest contrast AF | Modest contrast AF |
| Video Quality | Basic HD | Full HD 60fps |
| Battery Life | Unknown | Moderate (350 shots) |
| Price Range | ~$350 | ~$600 |
How Do You Match Up With Your Ideal Camera?
Different photography genres and uses favor one camera more than the other. Below is an assessment tailored to popular photography types.
Portrait Photography
- Casio: Limited manual control and modest zoom make it better for casual portraits. Bokeh quality is limited due to small sensor and moderate aperture.
- Fujifilm: Wider aperture at the telephoto end can create better subject isolation. RAW support aids skin tone correction.
Landscape Photography
- Casio: Lower resolution and small display hold it back; compactness favours casual outdoor snapshooting.
- Fujifilm: Higher resolution and tilting screen help compose landscapes well, but limited dynamic range on sensor restricts highlight/shadow detail.
Wildlife Photography
- Casio: Zoom limited to 185mm equivalent; burst speed impressive on paper but not reliable.
- Fujifilm: 1200mm reach is excellent, optical stabilization effective; slower burst at 10 fps but better AF reliability.
Sports Photography
- Casio: Fast burst but lack of continuous AF limits usability.
- Fujifilm: Manual exposure control plus reliable exposure compensation; 10 fps good but AF not optimized for fast action.
Street Photography
- Casio: Pocketability and light weight favour candid shootings.
- Fujifilm: Bulkier and more conspicuous; longer zoom less relevant for street but EVF and screen aid framing.
Macro Photography
- Casio: Macro focusing at 5 cm, usable for casual close-ups.
- Fujifilm: Zero macro focus distance means much closer focusing for detailed close-ups.
Night/Astro Photography
- Casio: Max ISO 1600 and no RAW limit usefulness.
- Fujifilm: ISO 12800 and RAW format enable better low-light captures.
Video Capabilities
- Casio: Basic HD, multiple slow-motion options, no HDMI.
- Fujifilm: Full HD 60 fps, HDMI out, better for amateur video.
Travel Photography
- Casio: Ultra portable, easy to carry.
- Fujifilm: More versatile zoom and controls at the expense of size and weight.
Professional Work
Given their sensor and feature sets, neither camera targets professional-grade image quality or workflow integration, but the Fujifilm’s RAW support and manual controls give it an edge for serious amateurs.
Final Thoughts: Which Should You Choose?
Choose the Casio EX-FC150 if you:
- Prioritize compactness and pocket-sized convenience.
- Desire super simple operation without fussing with manual settings.
- Shoot mostly casual portraits, street, and travel where quick, straightforward shots matter.
- Are on a strict budget around $350.
Choose the Fujifilm SL1000 if you:
- Need an all-in-one solution with ultra zoom reach for wildlife, sports, or telephoto exploration.
- Want creative manual control including aperture, shutter priority, and manual exposure modes.
- Desire higher resolution images with the ability to shoot RAW for post-processing.
- Appreciate a better, larger screen and an electronic viewfinder for composing shots in diverse conditions.
- Are willing to carry a heavier camera and spend around $600 for added versatility.
Bringing It All Together with Sample Images
Nothing beats seeing side-by-side sample outputs to get a feel for real-world performance.
Here you can compare image sharpness, color rendition, noise levels, and bokeh characteristics from a variety of settings.
What to Try Next
For the most informed choice:
- If possible, handle each camera in a store to feel size and controls firsthand.
- Experiment with zoom, try focusing on moving and still subjects, and preview images on display screens.
- Consider the lenses and accessories available for each brand and how these might fit your evolving photography needs.
Your next camera purchase should empower your creative vision without compromise. Whether you opt for the portable simplicity of the Casio EX-FC150 or the expansive capability of the Fujifilm SL1000, knowing their strengths and limits helps ensure you get a camera that sparks joy and growth in your photography.
Happy shooting!
For any questions or advice on compatible accessories, camera care, or shooting tips, feel free to reach out – we're here to support your photographic journey.
Casio EX-FC150 vs Fujifilm SL1000 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-FC150 | Fujifilm FinePix SL1000 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Casio | FujiFilm |
| Model | Casio Exilim EX-FC150 | Fujifilm FinePix SL1000 |
| Class | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Released | 2009-11-16 | 2013-01-07 |
| Physical type | Compact | SLR-like (bridge) |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
| Maximum resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 12800 |
| Min native ISO | 64 | 64 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detect focus | ||
| Contract detect focus | ||
| Phase detect focus | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 37-185mm (5.0x) | 24-1200mm (50.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/3.6-4.5 | f/2.9-6.5 |
| Macro focus range | 5cm | 0cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Fixed Type | Tilting |
| Display size | 2.7 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of display | 230 thousand dots | 920 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Display tech | - | TFT color LCD monitor |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | Electronic |
| Viewfinder resolution | - | 920 thousand dots |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 30s | 30s |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/1000s | 1/1700s |
| Continuous shooting rate | 40.0 frames per sec | 10.0 frames per sec |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 2.60 m | - |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | - |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 × 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 448 x 336 (30, 240 fps), 640 x 480 (120 fps), 448 x 336 (240 fps), 224 x 168 (420 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1280 x 720 (30fps), 320 x 120 (480 fps), 640 x 480 (120, 30fps), 320 x 240 (240 fps), 640 x 480 (120 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 173g (0.38 lbs) | 659g (1.45 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 99 x 58 x 28mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 123 x 89 x 123mm (4.8" x 3.5" x 4.8") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 350 photographs |
| Form of battery | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | NP-40 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Price at launch | $350 | $600 |