Casio EX-FC150 vs Ricoh WG-4
93 Imaging
33 Features
20 Overall
27
90 Imaging
40 Features
44 Overall
41
Casio EX-FC150 vs Ricoh WG-4 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 37-185mm (F3.6-4.5) lens
- 173g - 99 x 58 x 28mm
- Launched November 2009
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 230g - 124 x 64 x 33mm
- Released February 2014
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Casio EX-FC150 vs Ricoh WG-4 Overview
Let's look more closely at the Casio EX-FC150 and Ricoh WG-4, one is a Small Sensor Compact and the latter is a Waterproof by rivals Casio and Ricoh. There exists a huge gap between the resolutions of the EX-FC150 (10MP) and WG-4 (16MP) but both cameras boast the same sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe EX-FC150 was launched 5 years earlier than the WG-4 which is quite a significant gap as far as technology is concerned. The two cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before going right into a detailed comparison, here is a brief view of how the EX-FC150 grades versus the WG-4 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Casio EX-FC150 vs Ricoh WG-4 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery photos for Casio Exilim EX-FC150 and Ricoh WG-4. The complete galleries are provided at Casio EX-FC150 Gallery and Ricoh WG-4 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-FC150 over the Ricoh WG-4
| EX-FC150 | WG-4 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-4 over the Casio EX-FC150
| WG-4 | EX-FC150 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | February 2014 |  | November 2009 | Newer by 51 months |
| Screen dimensions | 3" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
| Screen resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Clearer screen (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-FC150 and Ricoh WG-4
| EX-FC150 | WG-4 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | Dial exact focusing | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Lacking selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Neither includes Touch friendly screen |
Casio EX-FC150 vs Ricoh WG-4 Physical Comparison
If you're planning to travel with your camera regularly, you'll have to consider its weight and volume. The Casio EX-FC150 features physical measurements of 99mm x 58mm x 28mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 173 grams (0.38 lbs) while the Ricoh WG-4 has sizing of 124mm x 64mm x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") along with a weight of 230 grams (0.51 lbs).
Examine the Casio EX-FC150 and Ricoh WG-4 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you are utilising at that time. Below is a front view measurements comparison of the EX-FC150 versus the WG-4.
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the EX-FC150 and WG-4 is 93 and 90 respectively.
Casio EX-FC150 vs Ricoh WG-4 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it is very tough to visualise the gap between sensor dimensions simply by going over specs. The image below might offer you a better sense of the sensor measurements in the EX-FC150 and WG-4.
As you can plainly see, each of these cameras have the same sensor dimensions albeit not the same MP. You should count on the Ricoh WG-4 to offer more detail utilizing its extra 6 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also make it easier to crop shots a bit more aggressively. The more aged EX-FC150 is going to be behind when it comes to sensor innovation.
Casio EX-FC150 vs Ricoh WG-4 Screen and ViewFinder
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photography GlossaryStreet Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsSports Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesTravel Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthLandscape Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoVlogging Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
Casio EX-FC150 vs Ricoh WG-4 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-FC150 | Ricoh WG-4 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Casio | Ricoh |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-FC150 | Ricoh WG-4 |
| Category | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
| Launched | 2009-11-16 | 2014-02-05 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Highest resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Highest native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
| Minimum native ISO | 64 | 125 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Total focus points | - | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 37-185mm (5.0x) | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/3.6-4.5 | f/2.0-4.9 |
| Macro focusing range | 5cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 2.7 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of screen | 230 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Screen tech | - | TFT LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 30 secs | 4 secs |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/1000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
| Continuous shooting speed | 40.0 frames per second | 2.0 frames per second |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 2.60 m | 10.00 m (Auto ISO) |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye, on + redeye |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 × 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 448 x 336 (30, 240 fps), 640 x 480 (120 fps), 448 x 336 (240 fps), 224 x 168 (420 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p) |
| Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | H.264 |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 173 grams (0.38 lbs) | 230 grams (0.51 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 99 x 58 x 28mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 124 x 64 x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 240 photographs |
| Battery form | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | NP-40 | D-LI92 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple) | Yes (2 or 10 secs) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Launch price | $350 | $330 |