Casio EX-FH100 vs Samsung WB50F
92 Imaging
33 Features
36 Overall
34
92 Imaging
40 Features
36 Overall
38
Casio EX-FH100 vs Samsung WB50F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 24-240mm (F3.2-5.7) lens
- 201g - 104 x 60 x 28mm
- Revealed June 2010
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-288mm (F3.1-6.3) lens
- 207g - 101 x 68 x 27mm
- Launched January 2014
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Casio EX-FH100 vs Samsung WB50F Overview
Its time to look a little more closely at the Casio EX-FH100 versus Samsung WB50F, one is a Small Sensor Compact and the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by companies Casio and Samsung. There is a significant difference between the sensor resolutions of the EX-FH100 (10MP) and WB50F (16MP) but both cameras posses the same sensor measurements (1/2.3").
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe EX-FH100 was manufactured 4 years prior to the WB50F which is quite a sizable gap as far as tech is concerned. Both of these cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before diving into a in-depth comparison, here is a concise summary of how the EX-FH100 scores vs the WB50F with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Photography Glossary Casio EX-FH100 vs Samsung WB50F Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pictures for Casio Exilim EX-FH100 and Samsung WB50F. The entire galleries are available at Casio EX-FH100 Gallery and Samsung WB50F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-FH100 over the Samsung WB50F
| EX-FH100 | WB50F |
|---|
Reasons to pick Samsung WB50F over the Casio EX-FH100
| WB50F | EX-FH100 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | January 2014 |  | June 2010 | Newer by 43 months |
| Display resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Sharper display (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-FH100 and Samsung WB50F
| EX-FH100 | WB50F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | Very accurate focusing | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display dimensions | 3" |  | 3" | Equal display measurements |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither contains selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | Neither contains Touch friendly display |
Casio EX-FH100 vs Samsung WB50F Physical Comparison
If you're planning to travel with your camera, you will have to take into account its weight and volume. The Casio EX-FH100 has got external dimensions of 104mm x 60mm x 28mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.1") having a weight of 201 grams (0.44 lbs) and the Samsung WB50F has sizing of 101mm x 68mm x 27mm (4.0" x 2.7" x 1.1") along with a weight of 207 grams (0.46 lbs).
Take a look at the Casio EX-FH100 versus Samsung WB50F in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you are employing at that time. Below is a front view size comparison of the EX-FH100 and the WB50F.
Considering size and weight, the portability score of the EX-FH100 and WB50F is 92 and 92 respectively.
Casio EX-FH100 vs Samsung WB50F Sensor Comparison
Often, it is hard to visualise the gap between sensor dimensions just by looking at a spec sheet. The picture here will help offer you a much better sense of the sensor sizes in the EX-FH100 and WB50F.
As you can see, each of these cameras have the same sensor dimensions but not the same resolution. You should anticipate the Samsung WB50F to give extra detail due to its extra 6 Megapixels. Greater resolution will allow you to crop photos a bit more aggressively. The more aged EX-FH100 is going to be behind in sensor tech.
Casio EX-FH100 vs Samsung WB50F Screen and ViewFinder
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneStreet Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoSports Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideTravel Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesLandscape Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesVlogging Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Casio EX-FH100 vs Samsung WB50F Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-FH100 | Samsung WB50F | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Casio | Samsung |
| Model | Casio Exilim EX-FH100 | Samsung WB50F |
| Class | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Revealed | 2010-06-16 | 2014-01-07 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10MP | 16MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 24-240mm (10.0x) | 24-288mm (12.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/3.2-5.7 | f/3.1-6.3 |
| Macro focus range | 7cm | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3" | 3" |
| Resolution of screen | 230k dot | 460k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 4s | - |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000s | - |
| Continuous shooting speed | 4.0 frames/s | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash settings | Auto, flash off, flash on, red eye reduction | - |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 × 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 448 x 336 (30, 240 fps), 640 x 480 (120 fps), 448 x 336 (240 fps), 224 x 168 (420 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps) | 1280 x 720 |
| Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | - |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | none |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 201 gr (0.44 lbs) | 207 gr (0.46 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 104 x 60 x 28mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.1") | 101 x 68 x 27mm (4.0" x 2.7" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | NP-90 | BP70A |
| Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | - |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC card, Internal | MicroSD, MicroSDHC, MicroSDXC |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Launch cost | $299 | $180 |