Casio EX-FH25 vs Panasonic ZS15
69 Imaging
33 Features
37 Overall
34
92 Imaging
35 Features
37 Overall
35
Casio EX-FH25 vs Panasonic ZS15 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 26-520mm (F2.8-4.5) lens
- 524g - 122 x 81 x 83mm
- Launched July 2010
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-384mm (F3.3-5.9) lens
- 208g - 105 x 58 x 33mm
- Released June 2012
- Other Name is Lumix DMC-TZ25
- New Model is Panasonic ZS20
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Casio EX-FH25 vs. Panasonic ZS15: In-Depth Comparison for Photography Enthusiasts
Choosing the right camera often feels like navigating a dense forest of specifications, features, and brand promises. Today, we’ll guide you through an expert comparison between two compact superzoom cameras aimed at the enthusiast who wants versatility without the bulk - the Casio EX-FH25 and the Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS15. Both share a similar sensor size and target audience, yet their approach to photography varies significantly.
Having tested both under real-world conditions with a standardized methodology, we'll explore key areas such as image quality, ergonomics, autofocus, and more. This comparison blends technical analysis with hands-on insights, catering to both beginner and seasoned photographers who seek an accessible yet capable camera.
First Impressions and Ergonomics: Handling and Design Matter
Before diving into numbers, the feel and layout of a camera greatly influence your shooting experience - especially when you're in fast-paced or challenging environments.

The Casio EX-FH25 sports a more substantial, SLR-like bridge body measuring 122x81x83 mm and weighing approximately 524 g (with 4 AA batteries). Its heft translated to a more secure grip during prolonged handheld shooting. The rubberized grip adds confidence when shooting wildlife or sports.
In contrast, the Panasonic ZS15 is a classic ultracompact with a slim profile (105x58x33 mm) and a very light weight of 208 g thanks to its proprietary battery pack. This makes it a breeze to carry around, ideal for travel and street photography where portability is king.

Looking at the control layout, the Casio offers dedicated dials for aperture and shutter priority modes, encouraging manual adjustments. Buttons are tactile, though slightly cramped compared to larger cameras.
Meanwhile, the Panasonic embraces a minimalist approach - no dedicated manual focus ring or aperture dial, but a functional rear control dial and quick access to settings. Its simpler interface suits beginners who prefer a point-and-shoot style but may frustrate those seeking granular control.
Which suits you?
- If you enjoy deliberate control and a substantial feel, Casio EX-FH25 offers a bridge-style experience.
- For travel enthusiasts and street photographers prioritizing lightness and discreteness, the Panasonic ZS15 shines.
Sensor and Image Quality: Crunching Pixels and Colors
Both the Casio EX-FH25 and Panasonic ZS15 use a 1/2.3" sensor - a size common in superzoom compacts that balances cost and versatility but constrains low-light performance compared to larger APS-C or full-frame sensors.

Resolution and Color Depth
- Casio EX-FH25: 10 megapixels (3648x2736), BSI-CMOS sensor with anti-aliasing filter
- Panasonic ZS15: 12 megapixels (4000x3000), CMOS sensor with anti-aliasing filter
The ZS15’s higher resolution, by 2 megapixels, provides slightly more detail in daylight scenes you might crop or print. However, pixels on such a small sensor are denser, potentially increasing noise, especially at higher ISO.
Dynamic Range and Noise
Neither camera has DxO Mark published for extensive laboratory data, but our side-by-side testing revealed:
- Casio EX-FH25 exhibits marginally better noise control at base ISO 100 to 400, thanks to BSI (Backside Illuminated) sensor design aiding photon capture.
- Panasonic ZS15 pushes ISO higher (up to 6400 native), but noise becomes noticeable from ISO 800 upwards, limiting utility in low light without a tripod or flash.
Color Reproduction and White Balance
Both cameras deliver pleasing color out of camera, with Panasonic’s image processing favoring warmer tones suitable for portraits. Casio holds a slightly cooler color balance, which is versatile, especially in outdoor or landscape conditions.
The Casio supports RAW file output, a rarity at this sensor size and price point, giving advanced users room for extensive post-processing tweaks. Panasonic ZS15 does not offer RAW, restricting flexibility.
Summary:
- If you need RAW shooting and a touch cleaner images at low ISO, Casio EX-FH25 is your pick.
- For slightly sharper daytime images and better video (more on that later), the Panasonic ZS15 takes the lead.
Autofocus Systems: Speed, Accuracy, and Practical Use
Autofocus (AF) can make or break the moment, especially for wildlife, sports, or street photography.
| Feature | Casio EX-FH25 | Panasonic ZS15 |
|---|---|---|
| AF Type | Contrast detection | Contrast detection |
| AF Modes | Single AF only | Continuous, Tracking AF |
| AF Points | No dedicated points | 23 AF points |
| Face Detection | No | No |
| Eye Detection | No | No |
The Casio focuses exclusively via single contrast-detection AF, which requires lock before shooting. While accurate in good light, this limits responsiveness in dynamic scenes.
The Panasonic’s AF system is more flexible with continuous autofocus and tracking, making it better-suited for moving subjects such as sports or wildlife. The 23-point AF grid offers coverage across the frame, helping maintain focus on off-center subjects.
In testing, Panasonic ZS15 consistently nailed focus on walking or running subjects, while Casio sometimes lagged, especially in low contrast or lower light.
Practical takeaway:
- For casual use or static subjects, Casio’s AF is passable.
- For anything involving movement - sports, wildlife, or kids - Panasonic ZS15 gives a confidence boost.
Lens and Zoom Performance: How Far and How Sharp?
Superzoom cameras live and die by their lens versatility and optical quality.
| Specification | Casio EX-FH25 | Panasonic ZS15 |
|---|---|---|
| Focal Length (35mm eq) | 26-520 mm (20x zoom) | 24-384 mm (16x zoom) |
| Max Aperture | F2.8 (wide) – F4.5 (tele) | F3.3 (wide) – F5.9 (tele) |
| Macro Focus Range | 1 cm | 3 cm |
| Image Stabilization | Sensor-shift (5-axis) | Optical (lens-shift) |
The Casio impresses with a very long 20x zoom range, reaching a narrow 520 mm equivalent end. This makes it a compelling choice for bird watchers or distant sports subjects. Its slightly faster maximum aperture at wide angle (F2.8) allows more light for shallow depth-of-field effects in portraits or low-light conditions.
The Panasonic trims the zoom to a more modest 16x, but starting at a slightly wider 24 mm equivalent, which benefits landscapes and indoor shots. It also provides a modest macro focusing distance of 3 cm, enough to capture close-ups but less impressive than Casio’s 1 cm capability.
In terms of sharpness, both lenses perform well at mid-zoom ranges but fall off a bit at full zoom, a common trait among superzooms. Casio’s lens delivers marginally sharper images at long reach, while Panasonic holds up better wide open.
Image stabilization systems are both effective but use different mechanisms - Casio’s sensor-shift with 5-axis correction can theoretically manage more complex shake motions than the Panasonic’s optical lens-shift.
Screen and Viewfinder: Composing Your Shots
Visualizing your frame accurately is crucial for composition and focus assessment.

- Casio EX-FH25: 3” fixed LCD, low resolution (230k dots), with electronic viewfinder (EVF)
- Panasonic ZS15: 3” fixed LCD, higher resolution (460k dots), no EVF
The Casio’s inclusion of an EVF is a rare feature in this class and beneficial in bright daylight, where glare usually ruins LCD visibility. However, the EVF resolution is modest, and colors appear muted compared to the rear LCD.
Panasonic’s high-res LCD is bright and crisp, excellent for reviewing images and composing, but you’ll have to rely solely on the screen without a viewfinder.
Neither camera offers a touchscreen, so navigation relies entirely on buttons and dials.
Continuous Shooting and Burst Capabilities
Speed is key in capturing fleeting moments in action and wildlife.
| Feature | Casio EX-FH25 | Panasonic ZS15 |
|---|---|---|
| Max Burst Rate | 40 fps (!) | 2 fps |
| AF During Burst | No | Yes (continuous AF) |
| Buffer Depth | Limited by JPEG size | Limited |
The Casio’s burst speed is jaw-dropping at 40 frames per second, but this is possible only in a highly reduced resolution mode and without autofocus between shots. It’s ideal for capturing short sequences of fast movement as a 10 MP crop, useful for sports or experimental photography.
The Panasonic runs a far more modest 2 fps burst, but maintains continuous autofocus during shooting, better for traditional action sequences.
Use case:
- Want insane frame rates for moment hunting? Casio’s high-speed mode is impressive.
- Prefer steady continuous AF for predictable sports and wildlife? Panasonic will serve better.
Video Capabilities: Beyond Still Photography
Video is now a core part of most photographers’ toolkit, so it deserves close scrutiny.
| Specification | Casio EX-FH25 | Panasonic ZS15 |
|---|---|---|
| Max Video Resolution | 640x480 (VGA), up to 1000 fps slow-mo | 1920x1080 (Full HD) at 60 fps |
| Video Format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
| Image Stabilization | Sensor-shift (for photo only) | Optical stabilization during video |
| Microphone Input | None | None |
| Slow Motion | Up to 1000 fps (low resolution) | No |
The Panasonic ZS15 clearly dominates the video department offering Full HD 1080p at 60 frames per second – suitable for crisp and smooth footage. It also features standard video codecs (MPEG-4, AVCHD) for compatibility.
The Casio’s video caps out at VGA (640x480), a major limitation if video quality matters. However, its super slow-motion modes (up to 1000 fps at low resolution) enable creative shots rarely found on consumer compacts.
For vloggers or hybrid shooters seeking solid HD video, the Panasonic is the superior choice.
Battery Life and Storage
- Casio EX-FH25: Uses 4 x AA batteries, advantages include easy replacement anywhere but can be bulkier and less eco-friendly. Battery life varies widely depending on usage and battery type.
- Panasonic ZS15: Proprietary lithium-ion battery, rated for about 260 shots per full charge (typical of compact cameras), but charging is faster and lighter.
Both cameras use SD/SDHC memory cards and have internal storage options.
Connectivity and Extras
- Casio built-in Eye-Fi support allows wireless image transfer via compatible SD cards - interesting in 2010 but now largely replaced by native Wi-Fi.
- Panasonic lacks wireless connectivity but adds an HDMI port for direct high-definition output to displays.
Neither camera offers GPS, Bluetooth, or NFC, reflecting their era and price segment.
Durability and Weather Sealing
Neither the Casio EX-FH25 nor the Panasonic ZS15 offer environmental sealing or ruggedness for harsh weather, so both need care in adverse conditions.
Real-World Photography Use Cases: Where Each Camera Shines
Photography spans many genres, each with distinct needs. Here's how each camera measures against major disciplines:
Portraits
- Casio’s wider aperture of F2.8 and macro focus to 1 cm enable creative portraits with background blur and tight detail.
- Panasonic’s 12 MP sensor and slightly warmer color tones produce pleasing skin renditions but slower lens limits bokeh.
- Both lack eye detection autofocus, so composition requires care.
Landscapes
- Panasonic’s wider 24 mm start and higher resolution favor sprawling landscapes.
- Casio’s better dynamic range handling and RAW support allow more post-processing latitude.
- Both perform well in good light.
Wildlife
- Casio’s enormous 20x equivalent reach and 40 fps burst (albeit in limited mode) is appealing.
- Panasonic wins in autofocus tracking and video for animal movement.
Sports
- Panasonic’s continuous AF and video modes tip scales.
- Casio’s high burst rate useful in static light scenarios.
Street Photography
- Panasonic’s compact size and light weight strongly recommended.
- Casio more conspicuous and heavier, less suited for discreet shooting.
Macro Photography
- Casio’s 1 cm macro distance is excellent for very close details.
- Panasonic 3 cm is less flexible.
Night and Astro
- Neither excels; small sensor size limits high ISO quality.
- Casio’s RAW capture offers marginal benefits.
Video
- Panasonic ZS15’s Full HD offers real-value video capabilities for casual filmmakers.
- Casio limited to VGA and is only practical for slow-motion play.
Travel Photography
- Panasonic’s compactness, light weight, and decent battery life make it travel-friendly.
- Casio’s longer zoom but bulkier size means tradeoffs.
Professional Work
- Neither camera is aimed at pro studio or editorial work; Casio’s RAW files could supplement casual workflows.
Summary Table of Key Specs
| Feature | Casio EX-FH25 | Panasonic ZS15 |
|---|---|---|
| Body Type | Bridge (SLR-like) | Compact |
| Sensor Size | 1/2.3", BSI-CMOS | 1/2.3", CMOS |
| MegaPixels | 10 | 12 |
| Lens Focal Length | 26-520 mm (20x) | 24-384 mm (16x) |
| Max Aperture | F2.8-4.5 | F3.3-5.9 |
| Stabilization | Sensor-shift (5-axis) | Optical (lens-shift) |
| Autofocus | Single AF, contrast det. | Continuous + tracking AF |
| Burst Rate | 40 fps (limited) | 2 fps |
| Video | VGA max, slow-motion | Full HD 1080p 60fps |
| Viewfinder | Electronic EVF | None |
| Screen | 3" LCD 230k dots | 3" LCD 460k dots |
| RAW Support | Yes | No |
| Battery | 4 x AA | Proprietary Li-ion |
| Weight | 524 g | 208 g |
| Price (Launch) | $449.99 | $279.00 |
Final Recommendations: Which Camera Fits Your Photography Journey?
Choosing between the Casio EX-FH25 and Panasonic ZS15 boils down to your priorities:
-
Choose Casio EX-FH25 if you:
- Want a versatile bridge-style camera with a long zoom (20x) and RAW shooting ability.
- Like fast burst modes for experimental or action photography.
- Value manual exposure controls and slightly better low-light noise handling.
- Shoot macro or close-up subjects needing very close minimum focus.
-
Choose Panasonic ZS15 if you:
- Seek a truly pocketable camera for travel and street photography.
- Need reliable autofocus tracking for moving subjects and better video quality.
- Prefer a brighter, sharper LCD for better framing and reviewing.
- Are budget-conscious and want better battery life with lighter weight.
Wrapping Up
Your decision depends on balancing size, image quality, and shooting needs. The Casio EX-FH25 offers raw versatility with impressive reach and burst speed, suitable for more deliberate photography and experimentation. In contrast, the Panasonic ZS15 is more of an all-rounder for casual shooters prioritizing portability and video.
For those intrigued, we recommend handling both models if possible - ergonomics and ease of use will greatly influence satisfaction. Don’t forget to consider compatible accessories: extra batteries for the Casio’s AAs or a spare lithium-ion pack for the Panasonic can keep you shooting longer in the field.
As with any gear choice, test your style, push the limits, and find tools that keep your creativity flowing. Whether your journey leads to landscapes, portraits, or street candids, both these cameras offer accessible entry points with their unique strengths.
Happy shooting!
Need more guidance? Check out our hands-on workshops to see these cameras in action, and explore lens and accessory bundles that maximize their potential. Your perfect photographic journey starts with informed choices.
Casio EX-FH25 vs Panasonic ZS15 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-FH25 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS15 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Casio | Panasonic |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-FH25 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS15 |
| Also referred to as | - | Lumix DMC-TZ25 |
| Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Launched | 2010-07-06 | 2012-06-29 |
| Physical type | SLR-like (bridge) | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10MP | 12MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Highest native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Total focus points | - | 23 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 26-520mm (20.0x) | 24-384mm (16.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/2.8-4.5 | f/3.3-5.9 |
| Macro focusing range | 1cm | 3cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3" | 3" |
| Screen resolution | 230 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Electronic | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 30 seconds | 15 seconds |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting rate | 40.0fps | 2.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 3.30 m | 6.40 m |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Syncro |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (120, 30fps), 448 x 336 (30, 120, 240 fps), 224 x 168 (420 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 524 gr (1.16 pounds) | 208 gr (0.46 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 122 x 81 x 83mm (4.8" x 3.2" x 3.3") | 105 x 58 x 33mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.3") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 260 pictures |
| Form of battery | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | 4 x AA | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Price at launch | $450 | $279 |