Casio EX-FH25 vs Ricoh CX1
69 Imaging
33 Features
37 Overall
34
93 Imaging
32 Features
30 Overall
31
Casio EX-FH25 vs Ricoh CX1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 26-520mm (F2.8-4.5) lens
- 524g - 122 x 81 x 83mm
- Revealed July 2010
(Full Review)
- 9MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-200mm (F3.3-5.2) lens
- 180g - 102 x 58 x 28mm
- Revealed February 2009
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Casio EX-FH25 vs Ricoh CX1 Overview
Following is a thorough comparison of the Casio EX-FH25 and Ricoh CX1, former is a Small Sensor Superzoom while the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by manufacturers Casio and Ricoh. The image resolution of the EX-FH25 (10MP) and the CX1 (9MP) is pretty close and they enjoy the exact same sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe EX-FH25 was announced 17 months after the CX1 which makes the cameras a generation away from one another. Both of the cameras come with different body type with the Casio EX-FH25 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera and the Ricoh CX1 being a Compact camera.
Before diving in to a in depth comparison, below is a concise view of how the EX-FH25 matches up against the CX1 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Casio EX-FH25 vs Ricoh CX1 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery images for Casio Exilim EX-FH25 & Ricoh CX1. The whole galleries are available at Casio EX-FH25 Gallery & Ricoh CX1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-FH25 over the Ricoh CX1
| EX-FH25 | CX1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | July 2010 |  | February 2009 | More modern by 17 months |
Reasons to pick Ricoh CX1 over the Casio EX-FH25
| CX1 | EX-FH25 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen resolution | 920k |  | 230k | Crisper screen (+690k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-FH25 and Ricoh CX1
| EX-FH25 | CX1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | Dial exact focus | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen dimension | 3" |  | 3" | Identical screen sizing |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither contains selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Absent Touch screen |
Casio EX-FH25 vs Ricoh CX1 Physical Comparison
When you are looking to carry around your camera regularly, you should take into account its weight and volume. The Casio EX-FH25 has got exterior measurements of 122mm x 81mm x 83mm (4.8" x 3.2" x 3.3") along with a weight of 524 grams (1.16 lbs) whilst the Ricoh CX1 has sizing of 102mm x 58mm x 28mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") and a weight of 180 grams (0.40 lbs).
Contrast the Casio EX-FH25 and Ricoh CX1 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you choose at that time. Here is the front view dimension comparison of the EX-FH25 and the CX1.
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability score of the EX-FH25 and CX1 is 69 and 93 respectively.
Casio EX-FH25 vs Ricoh CX1 Sensor Comparison
Normally, its difficult to visualise the difference in sensor sizes merely by researching technical specs. The picture below should offer you a stronger sense of the sensor sizing in the EX-FH25 and CX1.
As you can tell, each of these cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements albeit not the same megapixels. You can expect the Casio EX-FH25 to provide you with greater detail with its extra 1 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also help you crop pictures somewhat more aggressively. The newer EX-FH25 is going to have an edge when it comes to sensor innovation.
Casio EX-FH25 vs Ricoh CX1 Screen and ViewFinder
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesStreet Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesSports Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banTravel Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
Photography GlossaryVlogging Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
Casio EX-FH25 vs Ricoh CX1 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-FH25 | Ricoh CX1 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Casio | Ricoh |
| Model | Casio Exilim EX-FH25 | Ricoh CX1 |
| Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Compact |
| Revealed | 2010-07-06 | 2009-02-19 |
| Body design | SLR-like (bridge) | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | - | Smooth Imaging Engine IV |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10 megapixels | 9 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 |
| Max resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 3456 x 2592 |
| Max native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 26-520mm (20.0x) | 28-200mm (7.1x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/2.8-4.5 | f/3.3-5.2 |
| Macro focus distance | 1cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Resolution of screen | 230 thousand dot | 920 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Electronic | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 30s | 8s |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shutter speed | 40.0 frames/s | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 3.30 m | 3.00 m |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (120, 30fps), 448 x 336 (30, 120, 240 fps), 224 x 168 (420 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps) | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 640x480 | 640x480 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 524g (1.16 pounds) | 180g (0.40 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 122 x 81 x 83mm (4.8" x 3.2" x 3.3") | 102 x 58 x 28mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | 4 x AA | DB-70 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple) | Yes (2, 10 or Custom) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Launch price | $450 | $299 |