Casio EX-FH25 vs Samsung TL350
69 Imaging
33 Features
37 Overall
34
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e49ae/e49aef02731bb86879a7a1fb2af553da6ffe5e22" alt="Casio Exilim EX-FH25 front Casio Exilim EX-FH25 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2103a/2103adbddc269259d95545a9af4d247992bac1f0" alt="Samsung TL350 front Samsung TL350 front"
94 Imaging
33 Features
47 Overall
38
Casio EX-FH25 vs Samsung TL350 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 26-520mm (F2.8-4.5) lens
- 524g - 122 x 81 x 83mm
- Released July 2010
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-120mm (F2.4-5.8) lens
- 195g - 100 x 59 x 22mm
- Revealed February 2010
- Alternate Name is WB2000
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Casio EX-FH25 vs Samsung TL350 Overview
Lets look more closely at the Casio EX-FH25 versus Samsung TL350, one being a Small Sensor Superzoom and the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by manufacturers Casio and Samsung. The sensor resolution of the EX-FH25 (10MP) and the TL350 (10MP) is pretty well matched and they feature the exact same sensor sizing (1/2.3").
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
The EX-FH25 was manufactured 5 months later than the TL350 and they are both of a similar generation. The two cameras come with different body type with the Casio EX-FH25 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera and the Samsung TL350 being a Compact camera.
Before we go in to a in-depth comparison, below is a brief introduction of how the EX-FH25 matches up vs the TL350 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Casio EX-FH25 vs Samsung TL350 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery images for Casio Exilim EX-FH25 and Samsung TL350. The entire galleries are available at Casio EX-FH25 Gallery and Samsung TL350 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-FH25 over the Samsung TL350
EX-FH25 | TL350 |
---|
Reasons to pick Samsung TL350 over the Casio EX-FH25
TL350 | EX-FH25 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen resolution | 920k | ![]() | 230k | Crisper screen (+690k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-FH25 and Samsung TL350
EX-FH25 | TL350 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | July 2010 | ![]() | February 2010 | Similar generation |
Manual focus | ![]() | More exact focusing | ||
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Screen dimension | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Identical screen measurement |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither comes with selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | No Touch friendly screen |
Casio EX-FH25 vs Samsung TL350 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is going to lug around your camera frequently, you should think about its weight and dimensions. The Casio EX-FH25 comes with external dimensions of 122mm x 81mm x 83mm (4.8" x 3.2" x 3.3") and a weight of 524 grams (1.16 lbs) while the Samsung TL350 has dimensions of 100mm x 59mm x 22mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9") along with a weight of 195 grams (0.43 lbs).
Take a look at the Casio EX-FH25 versus Samsung TL350 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you are working with at the time. The following is the front view size comparison of the EX-FH25 vs the TL350.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/35e4a/35e4a1762a753c07f02fd4a7f5e283c7dc67f228" alt="Casio EX-FH25 vs Samsung TL350 size comparison Casio EX-FH25 vs Samsung TL350 size comparison"
Factoring in size and weight, the portability grade of the EX-FH25 and TL350 is 69 and 94 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/29442/29442574e8e92e906cc30e2244220d6fa5f7180a" alt="Casio EX-FH25 vs Samsung TL350 top view buttons comparison Casio EX-FH25 vs Samsung TL350 top view buttons comparison"
Casio EX-FH25 vs Samsung TL350 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it's difficult to see the gap between sensor measurements just by reading through specs. The visual here may provide you a far better sense of the sensor dimensions in the EX-FH25 and TL350.
As you can plainly see, both of the cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements and the same exact resolution and you should expect similar quality of files however you really should consider the production date of the products into consideration.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b453f/b453f408db51de4241ac7149806acf69472435b9" alt="Casio EX-FH25 vs Samsung TL350 sensor size comparison Casio EX-FH25 vs Samsung TL350 sensor size comparison"
Casio EX-FH25 vs Samsung TL350 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b0615/b06152229e2f97ebdfd138d0ee5fd2647bae1a28" alt="Casio EX-FH25 vs Samsung TL350 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Casio EX-FH25 vs Samsung TL350 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Casio EX-FH25 vs Samsung TL350 Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-FH25 | Samsung TL350 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Casio | Samsung |
Model | Casio Exilim EX-FH25 | Samsung TL350 |
Also called | - | WB2000 |
Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Compact |
Released | 2010-07-06 | 2010-02-20 |
Physical type | SLR-like (bridge) | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10 megapixels | 10 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 3648 x 2736 |
Highest native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 26-520mm (20.0x) | 24-120mm (5.0x) |
Highest aperture | f/2.8-4.5 | f/2.4-5.8 |
Macro focus range | 1cm | 5cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Display resolution | 230k dots | 920k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 30 seconds | 16 seconds |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Continuous shooting rate | 40.0fps | 10.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 3.30 m | 5.20 m |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, Slow syncro, Manual |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (120, 30fps), 448 x 336 (30, 120, 240 fps), 224 x 168 (420 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 608 x 342 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps), 138 x 78 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | Motion JPEG | H.264 |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 524 grams (1.16 lbs) | 195 grams (0.43 lbs) |
Dimensions | 122 x 81 x 83mm (4.8" x 3.2" x 3.3") | 100 x 59 x 22mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery model | 4 x AA | SLB-11A |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple) | Yes (10 sec, 2 sec, Double, Motion) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC, internal |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Retail cost | $450 | $400 |