Casio EX-FS10 vs Nikon S6400
96 Imaging
32 Features
18 Overall
26
94 Imaging
39 Features
37 Overall
38
Casio EX-FS10 vs Nikon S6400 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 9MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- 1280 x 720 video
- 38-114mm (F3.9-7.1) lens
- 121g - 102 x 55 x 20mm
- Launched January 2009
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-300mm (F3.1-6.5) lens
- 150g - 95 x 58 x 27mm
- Revealed August 2012
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Casio EX-FS10 vs Nikon S6400 Overview
Following is a complete analysis of the Casio EX-FS10 versus Nikon S6400, both Ultracompact digital cameras by companies Casio and Nikon. There is a large difference between the image resolutions of the EX-FS10 (9MP) and S6400 (16MP) but they enjoy the exact same sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe EX-FS10 was revealed 4 years before the S6400 which is quite a serious difference as far as tech is concerned. Both of the cameras come with the identical body type (Ultracompact).
Before going straight into a in depth comparison, below is a quick introduction of how the EX-FS10 scores versus the S6400 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Casio EX-FS10 vs Nikon S6400 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery photos for Casio Exilim EX-FS10 & Nikon Coolpix S6400. The full galleries are provided at Casio EX-FS10 Gallery & Nikon S6400 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-FS10 over the Nikon S6400
| EX-FS10 | S6400 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | Very precise focus |
Reasons to pick Nikon S6400 over the Casio EX-FS10
| S6400 | EX-FS10 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | August 2012 |  | January 2009 | More modern by 44 months |
| Screen dimension | 3" |  | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.5") |
| Screen resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Crisper screen (+230k dot) |
| Touch screen |  | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Casio EX-FS10 and Nikon S6400
| EX-FS10 | S6400 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither contains selfie screen |
Casio EX-FS10 vs Nikon S6400 Physical Comparison
For those who are aiming to carry around your camera often, you'll need to take into account its weight and measurements. The Casio EX-FS10 has got outer measurements of 102mm x 55mm x 20mm (4.0" x 2.2" x 0.8") with a weight of 121 grams (0.27 lbs) while the Nikon S6400 has proportions of 95mm x 58mm x 27mm (3.7" x 2.3" x 1.1") along with a weight of 150 grams (0.33 lbs).
Examine the Casio EX-FS10 versus Nikon S6400 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you are employing at the time. Underneath is the front view proportions comparison of the EX-FS10 versus the S6400.
Looking at size and weight, the portability rating of the EX-FS10 and S6400 is 96 and 94 respectively.
Casio EX-FS10 vs Nikon S6400 Sensor Comparison
Often, it's tough to visualize the gap between sensor sizes merely by checking technical specs. The pic underneath might provide you a clearer sense of the sensor measurements in the EX-FS10 and S6400.
As you can tell, the 2 cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements albeit different megapixels. You can count on the Nikon S6400 to resolve extra detail because of its extra 7MP. Higher resolution can also help you crop photographs somewhat more aggressively. The more aged EX-FS10 is going to be behind when it comes to sensor tech.
Casio EX-FS10 vs Nikon S6400 Screen and ViewFinder
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesStreet Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneSports Comparison
Photography GlossaryTravel Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesLandscape Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideVlogging Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
Casio EX-FS10 vs Nikon S6400 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-FS10 | Nikon Coolpix S6400 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Casio | Nikon |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-FS10 | Nikon Coolpix S6400 |
| Class | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
| Launched | 2009-01-08 | 2012-08-22 |
| Physical type | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | - | Expeed C2 |
| Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 9 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 3456 x 2592 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Highest native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 125 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 38-114mm (3.0x) | 25-300mm (12.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/3.9-7.1 | f/3.1-6.5 |
| Macro focusing distance | - | 10cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 2.5 inches | 3 inches |
| Screen resolution | 230k dots | 460k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Screen technology | - | TFT LCD monitor |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 1 secs | 4 secs |
| Max shutter speed | 1/1250 secs | 1/4000 secs |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 448 x 336 (30, 240 fps), 640 x 480 (120 fps), 448 x 336 (240 fps), 224 x 168 (420 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Eye-Fi Connected |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 121 grams (0.27 lb) | 150 grams (0.33 lb) |
| Dimensions | 102 x 55 x 20mm (4.0" x 2.2" x 0.8") | 95 x 58 x 27mm (3.7" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 160 images |
| Battery style | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | NP-80 | EN-EL19 |
| Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | Yes (10 or 2 seconds) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage type | SDHC Memory Card, SD Memory Card, Eye-Fi Wireless Card compatible | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Launch pricing | $200 | $500 |