Casio EX-FS10 vs Ricoh CX4
96 Imaging
32 Features
18 Overall
26
92 Imaging
33 Features
34 Overall
33
Casio EX-FS10 vs Ricoh CX4 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 9MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600
- 1280 x 720 video
- 38-114mm (F3.9-7.1) lens
- 121g - 102 x 55 x 20mm
- Released January 2009
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-300mm (F3.5-5.6) lens
- 205g - 102 x 59 x 29mm
- Announced August 2010
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Casio EX-FS10 vs Ricoh CX4 Overview
Let's look much closer at the Casio EX-FS10 vs Ricoh CX4, one being a Ultracompact and the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by competitors Casio and Ricoh. The image resolution of the EX-FS10 (9MP) and the CX4 (10MP) is fairly close and they use the exact same sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe EX-FS10 was manufactured 19 months prior to the CX4 making the cameras a generation apart from each other. Both of the cameras come with different body type with the Casio EX-FS10 being a Ultracompact camera and the Ricoh CX4 being a Compact camera.
Before delving through a more detailed comparison, below is a simple synopsis of how the EX-FS10 grades against the CX4 for portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Casio EX-FS10 vs Ricoh CX4 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pictures for Casio Exilim EX-FS10 and Ricoh CX4. The entire galleries are provided at Casio EX-FS10 Gallery and Ricoh CX4 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-FS10 over the Ricoh CX4
| EX-FS10 | CX4 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Ricoh CX4 over the Casio EX-FS10
| CX4 | EX-FS10 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | August 2010 |  | January 2009 | Fresher by 19 months |
| Display dimension | 3" |  | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.5") |
| Display resolution | 920k |  | 230k | Sharper display (+690k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-FS10 and Ricoh CX4
| EX-FS10 | CX4 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | Dial precise focusing | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither includes selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | Neither includes Touch display |
Casio EX-FS10 vs Ricoh CX4 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is aiming to carry your camera often, you need to think about its weight and dimensions. The Casio EX-FS10 features outer dimensions of 102mm x 55mm x 20mm (4.0" x 2.2" x 0.8") with a weight of 121 grams (0.27 lbs) whilst the Ricoh CX4 has dimensions of 102mm x 59mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") with a weight of 205 grams (0.45 lbs).
Take a look at the Casio EX-FS10 vs Ricoh CX4 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you have chosen at the time. Following is the front view sizing comparison of the EX-FS10 and the CX4.
Using size and weight, the portability rating of the EX-FS10 and CX4 is 96 and 92 respectively.
Casio EX-FS10 vs Ricoh CX4 Sensor Comparison
Usually, its hard to visualise the contrast in sensor sizing just by looking through specifications. The visual underneath will offer you a better sense of the sensor sizes in the EX-FS10 and CX4.
To sum up, the two cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements but not the same megapixels. You should anticipate the Ricoh CX4 to result in extra detail due to its extra 1 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also enable you to crop pics much more aggressively. The older EX-FS10 will be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor innovation.
Casio EX-FS10 vs Ricoh CX4 Screen and ViewFinder
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banStreet Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesSports Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsTravel Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoLandscape Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneVlogging Comparison
Photography Glossary
Casio EX-FS10 vs Ricoh CX4 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-FS10 | Ricoh CX4 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Casio | Ricoh |
| Model | Casio Exilim EX-FS10 | Ricoh CX4 |
| Class | Ultracompact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Released | 2009-01-08 | 2010-08-19 |
| Physical type | Ultracompact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | - | Smooth Imaging Engine IV |
| Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 9 megapixels | 10 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 |
| Maximum resolution | 3456 x 2592 | 3648 x 2736 |
| Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detect focus | ||
| Contract detect focus | ||
| Phase detect focus | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 38-114mm (3.0x) | 28-300mm (10.7x) |
| Largest aperture | f/3.9-7.1 | f/3.5-5.6 |
| Macro focus distance | - | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 2.5 inch | 3 inch |
| Display resolution | 230k dots | 920k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 1 secs | 8 secs |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/1250 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shooting rate | - | 5.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | - | 4.00 m |
| Flash options | - | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 448 x 336 (30, 240 fps), 640 x 480 (120 fps), 448 x 336 (240 fps), 224 x 168 (420 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 121 gr (0.27 lbs) | 205 gr (0.45 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 102 x 55 x 20mm (4.0" x 2.2" x 0.8") | 102 x 59 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | NP-80 | DB-100 |
| Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | Yes (2, 10 or Custom) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage type | SDHC Memory Card, SD Memory Card, Eye-Fi Wireless Card compatible | SD/SDHC/SDXC card, Internal |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Cost at launch | $200 | $211 |