Casio EX-FS10 vs Samsung HZ10W
96 Imaging
32 Features
18 Overall
26
90 Imaging
33 Features
27 Overall
30
Casio EX-FS10 vs Samsung HZ10W Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 9MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600
- 1280 x 720 video
- 38-114mm (F3.9-7.1) lens
- 121g - 102 x 55 x 20mm
- Introduced January 2009
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-240mm (F3.3-5.8) lens
- 249g - 105 x 61 x 37mm
- Released May 2009
- Alternate Name is WB500
Photography Glossary Casio EX-FS10 vs Samsung HZ10W Overview
Lets look a bit more closely at the Casio EX-FS10 vs Samsung HZ10W, former is a Ultracompact while the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by rivals Casio and Samsung. The sensor resolution of the EX-FS10 (9MP) and the HZ10W (10MP) is pretty well matched and they use the same exact sensor size (1/2.3").
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe EX-FS10 was manufactured 4 months earlier than the HZ10W so they are of a similar age. Both the cameras offer different body type with the Casio EX-FS10 being a Ultracompact camera and the Samsung HZ10W being a Compact camera.
Before going through a more detailed comparison, below is a brief highlight of how the EX-FS10 grades vs the HZ10W with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Casio EX-FS10 vs Samsung HZ10W Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery images for Casio Exilim EX-FS10 & Samsung HZ10W. The entire galleries are provided at Casio EX-FS10 Gallery & Samsung HZ10W Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-FS10 over the Samsung HZ10W
| EX-FS10 | HZ10W |
|---|
Reasons to pick Samsung HZ10W over the Casio EX-FS10
| HZ10W | EX-FS10 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen sizing | 2.7" |  | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.2") |
Common features in the Casio EX-FS10 and Samsung HZ10W
| EX-FS10 | HZ10W | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | January 2009 |  | May 2009 | Similar age |
| Manual focus |  | More accurate focusing | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen resolution | 230k |  | 230k | Exact same screen resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | Absent selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Absent Touch screen |
Casio EX-FS10 vs Samsung HZ10W Physical Comparison
If you're going to travel with your camera frequently, you have to factor in its weight and dimensions. The Casio EX-FS10 comes with physical measurements of 102mm x 55mm x 20mm (4.0" x 2.2" x 0.8") and a weight of 121 grams (0.27 lbs) and the Samsung HZ10W has dimensions of 105mm x 61mm x 37mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.5") with a weight of 249 grams (0.55 lbs).
Contrast the Casio EX-FS10 vs Samsung HZ10W in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you have chosen during that time. The following is the front view measurements comparison of the EX-FS10 vs the HZ10W.
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability score of the EX-FS10 and HZ10W is 96 and 90 respectively.
Casio EX-FS10 vs Samsung HZ10W Sensor Comparison
Typically, it is tough to visualize the difference between sensor dimensions only by checking specifications. The image underneath might give you a clearer sense of the sensor measurements in the EX-FS10 and HZ10W.
To sum up, both cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing albeit different resolution. You can expect the Samsung HZ10W to resolve greater detail due to its extra 1 Megapixels. Higher resolution will help you crop photographs a little more aggressively.
Casio EX-FS10 vs Samsung HZ10W Screen and ViewFinder
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoStreet Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesSports Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesTravel Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealingVlogging Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
Casio EX-FS10 vs Samsung HZ10W Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-FS10 | Samsung HZ10W | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Casio | Samsung |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-FS10 | Samsung HZ10W |
| Other name | - | WB500 |
| Category | Ultracompact | Small Sensor Compact |
| Introduced | 2009-01-08 | 2009-05-14 |
| Physical type | Ultracompact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 9 megapixel | 10 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 |
| Peak resolution | 3456 x 2592 | 3648 x 2432 |
| Highest native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detect autofocus | ||
| Contract detect autofocus | ||
| Phase detect autofocus | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 38-114mm (3.0x) | 24-240mm (10.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/3.9-7.1 | f/3.3-5.8 |
| Macro focusing range | - | 5cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 2.5 inch | 2.7 inch |
| Resolution of display | 230k dots | 230k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 1s | 16s |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/1250s | 1/1500s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash settings | - | Auto, Auto & Red-eye reduction, Fill-in flash, Slow sync, Flash off, Red eye fix |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 448 x 336 (30, 240 fps), 640 x 480 (120 fps), 448 x 336 (240 fps), 224 x 168 (420 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30, 15 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 121 grams (0.27 pounds) | 249 grams (0.55 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 102 x 55 x 20mm (4.0" x 2.2" x 0.8") | 105 x 61 x 37mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.5") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | NP-80 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | Yes (10 sec, 2 sec, Double, Motion Timer) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SDHC Memory Card, SD Memory Card, Eye-Fi Wireless Card compatible | SC/SDHC/MMC/MMCplus, internal |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Price at release | $200 | $300 |
