Casio EX-H10 vs Olympus TG-850 iHS
93 Imaging
35 Features
25 Overall
31
91 Imaging
40 Features
44 Overall
41
Casio EX-H10 vs Olympus TG-850 iHS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-240mm (F3.2-5.7) lens
- 194g - 102 x 62 x 24mm
- Announced June 2009
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 21-105mm (F3.5-5.7) lens
- 218g - 110 x 64 x 28mm
- Released January 2014
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Casio EX-H10 vs Olympus TG-850 iHS Overview
Below, we are comparing the Casio EX-H10 versus Olympus TG-850 iHS, one is a Small Sensor Compact and the other is a Waterproof by rivals Casio and Olympus. There exists a sizeable gap among the resolutions of the EX-H10 (12MP) and TG-850 iHS (16MP) but they enjoy the exact same sensor size (1/2.3").
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe EX-H10 was released 5 years prior to the TG-850 iHS which is a fairly large gap as far as camera technology is concerned. The two cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before getting through a in-depth comparison, below is a short summation of how the EX-H10 matches up versus the TG-850 iHS with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Casio EX-H10 vs Olympus TG-850 iHS Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Casio Exilim EX-H10 and Olympus Stylus Tough TG-850 iHS. The complete galleries are provided at Casio EX-H10 Gallery and Olympus TG-850 iHS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-H10 over the Olympus TG-850 iHS
| EX-H10 | TG-850 iHS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | Dial accurate focusing |
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-850 iHS over the Casio EX-H10
| TG-850 iHS | EX-H10 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | January 2014 |  | June 2009 | Newer by 56 months |
| Display type | Tilting |  | Fixed | Tilting display |
| Display resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Sharper display (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-H10 and Olympus TG-850 iHS
| EX-H10 | TG-850 iHS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display dimension | 3" |  | 3" | Identical display size |
| Selfie screen |  | Lack of selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | Lack of Touch friendly display |
Casio EX-H10 vs Olympus TG-850 iHS Physical Comparison
For those who are looking to travel with your camera, you should take into account its weight and size. The Casio EX-H10 has got outside measurements of 102mm x 62mm x 24mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 0.9") along with a weight of 194 grams (0.43 lbs) while the Olympus TG-850 iHS has specifications of 110mm x 64mm x 28mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.1") with a weight of 218 grams (0.48 lbs).
Check the Casio EX-H10 versus Olympus TG-850 iHS in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you are using during that time. Below is the front view measurements comparison of the EX-H10 versus the TG-850 iHS.
Using dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the EX-H10 and TG-850 iHS is 93 and 91 respectively.
Casio EX-H10 vs Olympus TG-850 iHS Sensor Comparison
Normally, its difficult to visualize the contrast in sensor dimensions just by going through specs. The image below will help offer you a much better sense of the sensor sizing in the EX-H10 and TG-850 iHS.
As you can plainly see, both of the cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements but different megapixels. You should anticipate the Olympus TG-850 iHS to show more detail as a result of its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also help you crop pics somewhat more aggressively. The more aged EX-H10 will be behind in sensor tech.
Casio EX-H10 vs Olympus TG-850 iHS Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Glossary Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsStreet Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneSports Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banTravel Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesLandscape Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesVlogging Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
Casio EX-H10 vs Olympus TG-850 iHS Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-H10 | Olympus Stylus Tough TG-850 iHS | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Casio | Olympus |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-H10 | Olympus Stylus Tough TG-850 iHS |
| Class | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
| Announced | 2009-06-11 | 2014-01-29 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | - | TruePic VII |
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
| Max resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4616 x 3464 |
| Max native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
| Min native ISO | 64 | 125 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detect autofocus | ||
| Contract detect autofocus | ||
| Phase detect autofocus | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 24-240mm (10.0x) | 21-105mm (5.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/3.2-5.7 | f/3.5-5.7 |
| Macro focusing distance | 7cm | - |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Fixed Type | Tilting |
| Display size | 3" | 3" |
| Display resolution | 230 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Display tech | - | TFT LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 4s | 1/2s |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shutter rate | 4.0 frames per sec | 7.0 frames per sec |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 3.60 m | - |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft | - |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60p, 30p), 1280 x 720 (60p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | H.264, Motion JPEG |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Yes |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 194g (0.43 lbs) | 218g (0.48 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 102 x 62 x 24mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 0.9") | 110 x 64 x 28mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 330 photographs |
| Battery type | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | NP-90 | LI-50B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple) | Yes (2 sec, 12 sec, Custom Self-Timer (1-30 sec start timer, 1-10 pictures, 1-3 sec interval)) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD, SDHC, SDXC, Internal Memory |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Pricing at release | $300 | $250 |