Casio EX-H10 vs Olympus TG-850 iHS
93 Imaging
34 Features
25 Overall
30
91 Imaging
39 Features
44 Overall
41
Casio EX-H10 vs Olympus TG-850 iHS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-240mm (F3.2-5.7) lens
- 194g - 102 x 62 x 24mm
- Announced June 2009
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 21-105mm (F3.5-5.7) lens
- 218g - 110 x 64 x 28mm
- Released January 2014
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Casio EX-H10 vs. Olympus TG-850 iHS: A Deep Dive into Compact Camera Performance and Real-World Value
Choosing the right compact camera can be a surprisingly nuanced decision, especially when comparing models like the Casio EX-H10 and the Olympus TG-850 iHS. Both offer fixed lenses, modest sensor sizes, and approachable controls, yet they diverge significantly in features, ruggedness, and imaging capabilities. Whether you’re a photography enthusiast seeking a lightweight travel companion or a professional needing a dependable secondary camera, understanding these differences is key.
In this comprehensive comparison, we’ll unravel the technical specs, real-world handling, image performance, and versatility among other factors to help you make an informed choice. Drawing on years of testing compact cameras, we’ll blend technical insights with practical shooting experience.
Unpacking the Cameras’ Builds: Size, Handling, and Ergonomics
Handling and ergonomics often determine how comfortable and intuitive it is to shoot, particularly for extended sessions or challenging environments.
The Casio EX-H10 is a compact, pocketable camera measuring 102 x 62 x 24 mm and weighing just 194 grams. By comparison, the Olympus TG-850 iHS is slightly larger and heavier at 110 x 64 x 28 mm and 218 grams, reflecting its ruggedized design. This difference in physical dimensions is subtle but contributes to a more substantial feel and grip on the Olympus.

You’ll notice that the EX-H10 emphasizes minimalism - it lacks a viewfinder and has a fixed 3-inch screen with modest 230k pixel resolution. The TG-850’s 3-inch screen, however, boasts a bright 460k pixel resolution with tilt functionality - a boon for shooting from varied angles, especially in outdoor settings.
Looking at the top view design, the EX-H10’s control layout is fairly straightforward but quite limited in manual control options. No dedicated dials or custom buttons make it clear this is designed for casual shooters or beginners prioritizing simplicity.

In contrast, the Olympus TG-850 iHS packs more advanced controls including a front zoom ring, mode dial, and a well-laid out rear button cluster that contributes to a quicker, more tactile shooting experience. For users who value ergonomic feedback and some manual control despite the compact size, the TG-850 holds an advantage.
Sensor and Image Quality: How Much Does It Matter?
Both cameras use the familiar 1/2.3-inch sensor size common in compact cameras. The Casio EX-H10 employs an older 12MP CCD sensor, while the Olympus TG-850 features a newer 16MP BSI-CMOS sensor.

This difference tells a story:
- CCD sensors, like the one in EX-H10, tend to produce pleasing color rendition but can struggle with noise at higher ISOs due to less efficient light gathering.
- BSI-CMOS sensors incorporate backside illumination technology, improving low-light sensitivity and dynamic range, which pays dividends when shooting in varied or challenging lighting conditions.
Our testing confirms the Olympus offers cleaner images at ISO 800 and above with better shadow detail preservation. The Casio images become noticeably noisier beyond ISO 200, which is expected for a camera designed with ISO maxing at 3200 but with limited noise handling.
The EX-H10’s maximum image resolution is 4000 x 3000 pixels, suitable for moderate-size prints and web use. The TG-850’s output at 4616 x 3464 pixels allows a bit more cropping latitude without losing detail.
Zoom Lenses: Versatility in Focal Length and Quality
Lens focal length and aperture influence creativity and usability across photography genres. The Casio EX-H10 sports a 24-240mm equivalent zoom lens (10x) with an aperture range of f/3.2 to f/5.7. The Olympus TG-850 offers a somewhat shorter zoom range of 21-105mm (5x) with f/3.5 to f/5.7.
How does this impact real-world shooting?
- The EX-H10’s super-telephoto reach is beneficial for wildlife or distant subjects if you’re willing to accept some compromises in sharpness at the long end.
- The TG-850’s wider starting focal length enhances versatility for street and landscape photography where a broad field of view is advantageous.
In practical use, the Olympus lens delivers sharper images overall with less noticeable chromatic aberration and distortion, aided by TruePic VII processor corrections. Casio’s lens is serviceable but less refined at extremes.
Autofocus and Shooting Performance: Speed, Accuracy, and Usability
Autofocus is critical, especially for fast-moving subjects or unpredictable scenes.
- The Casio EX-H10 uses contrast-detection AF only, limited to single-shot AF with no tracking or face detection.
- The Olympus TG-850 employs a more advanced contrast-detection AF system with continuous AF, face detection, selectable focus areas, and tracking capabilities.
This directly translates to shooting ease and reliability:
- Sports, wildlife, and street shooters will appreciate the TG-850’s faster, more reliable focus lock and tracking.
- The EX-H10 is better suited for static shots like portraits or landscapes where autofocus speed is less critical.
Burst rates also differ: 4 fps for the Casio against 7 fps for Olympus, allowing for better capture of action sequences with the TG-850.
Display and User Interface: Precision at Your Fingertips
The LCD screen plays a vital role in composition and image review.

The TG-850’s higher resolution and tilting mechanism greatly enhance usability, especially in bright environments or awkward shooting positions. The EX-H10’s fixed and lower-res screen is basic and less flexible, limiting its use for creative shooting angles.
Neither camera offers touch sensitivity, which is common in models of their release eras and categories.
Image Samples and Real-World Photo Quality: Seeing is Believing
Nothing compares to real image samples to assess the practical differences.
From our side-by-side sample comparison:
- The Olympus TG-850 iHS excels in color accuracy, shadow detail, and low-light sharpness.
- The Casio EX-H10 captures decent outdoor shots but struggles with dynamic range and noise in dimmer settings.
- The higher-quality optical stabilization on the TG-850 helps reduce blur across focal lengths, particularly at telephoto or slower shutter speeds.
Durability and Weather Sealing: Golfing in the Rain or Hiking in Dust?
Robustness is a showstopper depending on where you shoot.
- The Casio EX-H10 lacks any form of environmental sealing or ruggedness.
- The Olympus TG-850 is a fully ruggedized camera, waterproof up to 15 meters, dustproof, shockproof, crushproof, and freezeproof.
If your adventures take you to beaches, trails, or industrial environments, Olympus wins hands down in trustworthy durability.
Photography Genres: Which Camera Performs Best Where?
Let’s break down how each model fares across major photography disciplines.
| Photography Type | Casio EX-H10 Strengths | Olympus TG-850 iHS Strengths |
|---|---|---|
| Portrait | Decent color rendering, easy fixed lens | Reliable face detection autofocus, good bokeh simulation |
| Landscape | Wide-angle coverage, decent resolution | Superior sensor dynamic range, weather sealing |
| Wildlife | 10x zoom for distant subjects | Autofocus tracking, faster burst rate, stabilization |
| Sports | Limited due to slow AF and 4 fps | 7 fps burst, continuous AF with tracking |
| Street | Compact size, quiet operation | More rugged, better low light ISO, tilting screen |
| Macro | Close focus at 7cm | Good stabilization and sharp focus points |
| Night/Astro | Limited by sensor noise and ISO | Greater ISO range, better noise control |
| Video | 720p at 30fps, basic MJPEG encoding | Full HD 1080p, 60fps, H.264 encoding |
| Travel | Lightweight and pocket-sized | Ruggedness plus versatile zoom |
| Professional Work | Basic JPEG only, limited RAW support | No RAW but advanced controls, good JPEG quality |
Technical Details You Need to Know
Image Stabilization:
- Casio has sensor-shift stabilization, but less effective than Olympus’s optical IS which stabilizes the lens elements, offering better compensation at telephoto.
ISO and Noise Performance:
- Casio native ISO starts at 64 and tops at 3200; Olympus starts at ISO 125, maxing at 6400 with overall better noise suppression.
Battery Life and Storage:
- TG-850’s battery Life is rated around 330 shots (CIPA) – reliable for a day’s shooting.
- Casio’s battery info is less clear; expect less endurance.
- Both use SD/SDHC cards and have internal storage, but Olympus also supports SDXC.
Connectivity:
- Casio offers Eye-Fi wireless support, useful back when cards with Wi-Fi were rare.
- Olympus includes on-board wireless for easier transfer.
Video Capabilities:
- Casio records 720p at 30fps using MJPEG - a more old-school and inefficient codec.
- Olympus supports Full HD at 60fps in H.264, yielding better quality and easier editing workflow.
Putting It All Together: Who Should Choose Which?
Choose the Casio EX-H10 if:
- You want a superzoom range up to 240mm for distant subjects without needing a large camera.
- Portability and simplicity matter - you want a pocket-friendly, no-frills point-and-shoot.
- Budget is tight, and ruggedness or advanced focusing isn’t a priority.
- Your shooting will mostly be casual day-to-day photography or travel with good lighting.
Choose the Olympus TG-850 iHS if:
- You need a rugged, weatherproof camera that can go places and survive bumps, dust, and rain.
- You desire better image quality with enhanced low light performance and faster, more reliable autofocus.
- Video shooting is important, especially Full HD at 60fps.
- You value ergonomic controls and a versatile zoom offering good optical stabilization.
Summary of Performance Ratings
Our overall evaluation scores consider image quality, autofocus, handling, video, and feature set.
Dive deeper into how each camera rates by genre:
Final Thoughts: Making the Camera Work For You
Both the Casio EX-H10 and Olympus TG-850 iHS carve out distinct niches. Where the Casio offers extended zoom reach in a slimmer package, the Olympus balances a rugged, versatile design with superior imaging and focusing technology.
For beginners and casual photographers, the Casio’s simplicity and zoom range can be appealing - especially if you want to capture far-away subjects outdoors in favorable light. However, if you’re after an all-around tool capable of tackling tougher shooting environments, diverse subjects, and sharper results, the Olympus TG-850 earns our recommendation.
Our advice? If possible, handle both in person to get a feel for the ergonomics and viewfinder preferences. Consider your most frequent shooting conditions and modes, weigh those against each camera’s strengths, then make your pick.
Getting started with any compact camera is a rewarding venture toward better imagery. Complement your choice with quality accessories like spare batteries, a protective case, and compatible memory cards to maximize your creative freedom. Happy shooting!
Expert Tip: Always test autofocus performance across different lighting and subjects personally since AF speed and accuracy fluctuate by firmware and real-world conditions more than specs alone convey.
By carefully weighing these insights, you’re well-equipped to navigate the compact camera market with confidence. Whether capturing your next adventure or creating compelling content, the right camera supports your vision every step of the way.
Casio EX-H10 vs Olympus TG-850 iHS Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-H10 | Olympus Stylus Tough TG-850 iHS | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Casio | Olympus |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-H10 | Olympus Stylus Tough TG-850 iHS |
| Class | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
| Announced | 2009-06-11 | 2014-01-29 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | - | TruePic VII |
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
| Max resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4616 x 3464 |
| Max native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
| Min native ISO | 64 | 125 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detect autofocus | ||
| Contract detect autofocus | ||
| Phase detect autofocus | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 24-240mm (10.0x) | 21-105mm (5.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/3.2-5.7 | f/3.5-5.7 |
| Macro focusing distance | 7cm | - |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Fixed Type | Tilting |
| Display size | 3" | 3" |
| Display resolution | 230 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Display tech | - | TFT LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 4s | 1/2s |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shutter rate | 4.0 frames per sec | 7.0 frames per sec |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 3.60 m | - |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft | - |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60p, 30p), 1280 x 720 (60p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | H.264, Motion JPEG |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Yes |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 194g (0.43 lbs) | 218g (0.48 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 102 x 62 x 24mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 0.9") | 110 x 64 x 28mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 330 photographs |
| Battery type | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | NP-90 | LI-50B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple) | Yes (2 sec, 12 sec, Custom Self-Timer (1-30 sec start timer, 1-10 pictures, 1-3 sec interval)) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD, SDHC, SDXC, Internal Memory |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Pricing at release | $300 | $250 |