Clicky

Casio EX-H10 vs Ricoh CX2

Portability
93
Imaging
35
Features
25
Overall
31
Casio Exilim EX-H10 front
 
Ricoh CX2 front
Portability
93
Imaging
32
Features
35
Overall
33

Casio EX-H10 vs Ricoh CX2 Key Specs

Casio EX-H10
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 64 - 3200
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 24-240mm (F3.2-5.7) lens
  • 194g - 102 x 62 x 24mm
  • Announced June 2009
Ricoh CX2
(Full Review)
  • 9MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 1600
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 28-300mm (F3.5-5.6) lens
  • 185g - 102 x 58 x 29mm
  • Launched August 2009
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Casio EX-H10 vs Ricoh CX2 Overview

Following is a in depth analysis of the Casio EX-H10 vs Ricoh CX2, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by brands Casio and Ricoh. There is a substantial difference among the image resolutions of the EX-H10 (12MP) and CX2 (9MP) but both cameras boast the identical sensor sizes (1/2.3").

Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

The EX-H10 was introduced 2 months prior to the CX2 so they are of a similar age. Both cameras feature the same body design (Compact).

Before we go right into a in-depth comparison, here is a short highlight of how the EX-H10 scores against the CX2 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
	
	

Reasons to pick Casio EX-H10 over the Ricoh CX2

 EX-H10 CX2 

Reasons to pick Ricoh CX2 over the Casio EX-H10

 CX2 EX-H10 
Screen resolution920k230kSharper screen (+690k dot)

Common features in the Casio EX-H10 and Ricoh CX2

 EX-H10 CX2 
LaunchedJune 2009August 2009Same age
Manual focus Dial precise focus
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Screen size3"3"Same screen dimensions
Selfie screen Neither contains selfie screen
Touch screen Neither contains Touch screen

Casio EX-H10 vs Ricoh CX2 Physical Comparison

For those who are aiming to carry around your camera often, you will need to factor in its weight and volume. The Casio EX-H10 has got exterior dimensions of 102mm x 62mm x 24mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 0.9") along with a weight of 194 grams (0.43 lbs) while the Ricoh CX2 has sizing of 102mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 185 grams (0.41 lbs).

Take a look at the Casio EX-H10 vs Ricoh CX2 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Remember, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you are using at that moment. Underneath is a front view scale comparison of the EX-H10 versus the CX2.

Casio EX-H10 vs Ricoh CX2 size comparison

Using size and weight, the portability score of the EX-H10 and CX2 is 93 and 93 respectively.

Casio EX-H10 vs Ricoh CX2 top view buttons comparison

Casio EX-H10 vs Ricoh CX2 Sensor Comparison

Often, it is tough to envision the difference in sensor sizes purely by looking through technical specs. The pic below will help give you a much better sense of the sensor sizes in the EX-H10 and CX2.

As you have seen, both cameras feature the identical sensor size albeit not the same resolution. You can count on the Casio EX-H10 to result in more detail using its extra 3MP. Higher resolution will allow you to crop shots way more aggressively.

Casio EX-H10 vs Ricoh CX2 sensor size comparison

Casio EX-H10 vs Ricoh CX2 Screen and ViewFinder

Casio EX-H10 vs Ricoh CX2 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Portrait photography with Casio EX-H10
Portrait photography with Ricoh CX2
27
focusing manually
lack of manual exposure
external flash not possible
sensor resolution not great (12MP)
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
lacks RAW support
25
has manual focus
lack of manual mode
external flash not possible
megapixel count low (9 megapixels)
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW files
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Street Comparison

Casio EX-H10 Street photography advice
Ricoh CX2 Street photography advice
56
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
fixed screen
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
lacks RAW support
61
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lighter than average in class (185 grams)
screen is fixed
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW files
Photography Glossary

Sports Comparison

Casio EX-H10 Sports photography info
Ricoh CX2 Sports photography info
25
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
slow fps (4.0 fps)
no shutter priority
sensor resolution not great (12 megapixels)
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
lacks phase detect autofocus
26
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
no shutter priority
megapixel count low (9 megapixels)
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
doesn't have phase detect auto focus
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Travel Comparison

Travel photography with Casio EX-H10
Travel photography with Ricoh CX2
57
flash built-in
rather wide (24mm)
lack of Timelapse function
sensor resolution not great (12 megapixels)
screen isn't selfie friendly
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.2)
66
lighter than average in class (185 grams)
has built in flash
decently wide (28mm)
very long zoom (300mm)
megapixel count low (9 megapixels)
does not contain selfie friendly display
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.5)
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Landscape Comparison

Landscape photography with Casio EX-H10
Landscape photography with Ricoh CX2
41
focusing manually
rather wide (24mm)
screen is a decent size (3")
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.2)
lack of manual exposure
sensor resolution not great (12 megapixels)
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
lacks RAW support
lack of Timelapse function
42
has manual focus
decently wide (28mm)
screen size is good (3")
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.5)
lack of manual mode
megapixel count low (9 megapixels)
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW files
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Vlogging Comparison

Casio EX-H10 as a Vlogging camera
Ricoh CX2 as a Vlogging camera
28
rather wide (24mm)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.2)
screen isn't selfie friendly
low video resolution (1280 x 720 resolution)
lack of external microphone socket
30
decently wide (28mm)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lighter than average in class (185g)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.5)
does not contain selfie friendly display
low video resolution (640 x 480 resolution)
doesn't have external mic port
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Casio EX-H10 vs Ricoh CX2 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Casio EX-H10 and Ricoh CX2
 Casio Exilim EX-H10Ricoh CX2
General Information
Brand Name Casio Ricoh
Model Casio Exilim EX-H10 Ricoh CX2
Class Small Sensor Compact Small Sensor Superzoom
Announced 2009-06-11 2009-08-20
Body design Compact Compact
Sensor Information
Chip - Smooth Imaging Engine IV
Sensor type CCD CMOS
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 6.17 x 4.55mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 28.1mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 12MP 9MP
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2
Peak resolution 4000 x 3000 3456 x 2592
Highest native ISO 3200 1600
Minimum native ISO 64 80
RAW photos
Autofocusing
Focus manually
AF touch
AF continuous
AF single
Tracking AF
AF selectice
AF center weighted
Multi area AF
Live view AF
Face detect focusing
Contract detect focusing
Phase detect focusing
Lens
Lens mounting type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 24-240mm (10.0x) 28-300mm (10.7x)
Highest aperture f/3.2-5.7 f/3.5-5.6
Macro focus range 7cm 1cm
Crop factor 5.8 5.8
Screen
Display type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display sizing 3 inches 3 inches
Resolution of display 230k dot 920k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch friendly
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None None
Features
Min shutter speed 4 seconds 8 seconds
Max shutter speed 1/2000 seconds 1/2000 seconds
Continuous shutter speed 4.0 frames/s -
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Set WB
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash range 3.60 m 3.00 m (ISO 400)
Flash settings Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync
Hot shoe
Auto exposure bracketing
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps)
Highest video resolution 1280x720 640x480
Video format Motion JPEG Motion JPEG
Mic jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless Eye-Fi Connected None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 194g (0.43 pounds) 185g (0.41 pounds)
Physical dimensions 102 x 62 x 24mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 0.9") 102 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery model NP-90 DB-70
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple) Yes (2, 10 or Custom)
Time lapse feature
Storage media SD/SDHC card, Internal SD/SDHC card, Internal
Storage slots Single Single
Cost at release $300 $341