Casio EX-H10 vs Ricoh WG-M1
93 Imaging
35 Features
25 Overall
31
91 Imaging
39 Features
22 Overall
32
Casio EX-H10 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-240mm (F3.2-5.7) lens
- 194g - 102 x 62 x 24mm
- Released June 2009
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 1.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 800
- 1920 x 1080 video
- (1×)mm (F2.8) lens
- 190g - 66 x 43 x 89mm
- Launched September 2014
Photography Glossary Casio EX-H10 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Overview
Below, we are reviewing the Casio EX-H10 and Ricoh WG-M1, one being a Small Sensor Compact and the other is a Waterproof by rivals Casio and Ricoh. The resolution of the EX-H10 (12MP) and the WG-M1 (14MP) is fairly well matched and they enjoy the exact same sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe EX-H10 was announced 6 years earlier than the WG-M1 and that is quite a sizable gap as far as tech is concerned. The two cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before going in to a step-by-step comparison, below is a brief overview of how the EX-H10 grades vs the WG-M1 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Casio EX-H10 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Casio Exilim EX-H10 and Ricoh WG-M1. The whole galleries are viewable at Casio EX-H10 Gallery and Ricoh WG-M1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-H10 over the Ricoh WG-M1
| EX-H10 | WG-M1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | Dial accurate focus | ||
| Display dimension | 3" |  | 1.5" | Larger display (+1.5") |
| Display resolution | 230k |  | 115k | Sharper display (+115k dot) |
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-M1 over the Casio EX-H10
| WG-M1 | EX-H10 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | September 2014 |  | June 2009 | More recent by 63 months |
Common features in the Casio EX-H10 and Ricoh WG-M1
| EX-H10 | WG-M1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Lacking selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | Lacking Touch display |
Casio EX-H10 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Physical Comparison
For those who are going to lug around your camera frequently, you are going to need to think about its weight and proportions. The Casio EX-H10 provides exterior measurements of 102mm x 62mm x 24mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 194 grams (0.43 lbs) while the Ricoh WG-M1 has measurements of 66mm x 43mm x 89mm (2.6" x 1.7" x 3.5") with a weight of 190 grams (0.42 lbs).
Check out the Casio EX-H10 and Ricoh WG-M1 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you have chosen at that time. Underneath is the front view dimension comparison of the EX-H10 vs the WG-M1.
Factoring in size and weight, the portability grade of the EX-H10 and WG-M1 is 93 and 91 respectively.
Casio EX-H10 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Sensor Comparison
Generally, it is very tough to visualize the contrast between sensor measurements just by reading through specifications. The graphic here will give you a more clear sense of the sensor measurements in the EX-H10 and WG-M1.
Plainly, the 2 cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements but different MP. You should anticipate the Ricoh WG-M1 to resolve greater detail with its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also let you crop images somewhat more aggressively. The older EX-H10 is going to be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor tech.
Casio EX-H10 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Screen and ViewFinder
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsStreet Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsSports Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoTravel Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesLandscape Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banVlogging Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Casio EX-H10 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-H10 | Ricoh WG-M1 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Casio | Ricoh |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-H10 | Ricoh WG-M1 |
| Category | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
| Released | 2009-06-11 | 2014-09-12 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4320 x 3240 |
| Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 800 |
| Min native ISO | 64 | 100 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 24-240mm (10.0x) | (1×) |
| Maximal aperture | f/3.2-5.7 | f/2.8 |
| Macro focusing range | 7cm | - |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 3 inch | 1.5 inch |
| Resolution of screen | 230 thousand dot | 115 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 4 secs | - |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | - |
| Continuous shutter speed | 4.0 frames/s | 10.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 3.60 m | no built-in flash |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft | no built-in flash |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 960 (50p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p), 848 x 480 (60p, 120p) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | H.264 |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 194g (0.43 lb) | 190g (0.42 lb) |
| Dimensions | 102 x 62 x 24mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 0.9") | 66 x 43 x 89mm (2.6" x 1.7" x 3.5") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 350 images |
| Type of battery | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | NP-90 | DB-65 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple) | - |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC card, Internal | microSD/microSDHC, internal |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Price at release | $300 | $2,000 |