Casio EX-H10 vs Samsung HZ35W
93 Imaging
35 Features
25 Overall
31
91 Imaging
35 Features
42 Overall
37
Casio EX-H10 vs Samsung HZ35W Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-240mm (F3.2-5.7) lens
- 194g - 102 x 62 x 24mm
- Announced June 2009
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-360mm (F3.2-5.8) lens
- 245g - 107 x 61 x 28mm
- Released June 2010
- Alternative Name is WB650
Photography Glossary Casio EX-H10 vs Samsung HZ35W Overview
Following is a thorough review of the Casio EX-H10 and Samsung HZ35W, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by brands Casio and Samsung. The image resolution of the EX-H10 (12MP) and the HZ35W (12MP) is relatively similar and they come with the exact same sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealingThe EX-H10 was announced 12 months prior to the HZ35W and they are of a similar age. Both of the cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before delving straight into a complete comparison, below is a quick summary of how the EX-H10 scores vs the HZ35W in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Supernova astonishes astronomers in ancient 12th century observations Casio EX-H10 vs Samsung HZ35W Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Casio Exilim EX-H10 & Samsung HZ35W. The whole galleries are viewable at Casio EX-H10 Gallery & Samsung HZ35W Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-H10 over the Samsung HZ35W
| EX-H10 | HZ35W |
|---|
Reasons to pick Samsung HZ35W over the Casio EX-H10
| HZ35W | EX-H10 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | June 2010 |  | June 2009 | More modern by 12 months |
| Screen resolution | 614k |  | 230k | Sharper screen (+384k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-H10 and Samsung HZ35W
| EX-H10 | HZ35W | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | Very precise focus | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen dimension | 3" |  | 3" | Identical screen measurement |
| Selfie screen |  | Lack of selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Lack of Touch screen |
Casio EX-H10 vs Samsung HZ35W Physical Comparison
In case you're intending to carry around your camera, you will need to consider its weight and measurements. The Casio EX-H10 features outer measurements of 102mm x 62mm x 24mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 0.9") along with a weight of 194 grams (0.43 lbs) whilst the Samsung HZ35W has proportions of 107mm x 61mm x 28mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.1") along with a weight of 245 grams (0.54 lbs).
Check out the Casio EX-H10 and Samsung HZ35W in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you are utilising during that time. Following is the front view physical size comparison of the EX-H10 against the HZ35W.
Using size and weight, the portability rating of the EX-H10 and HZ35W is 93 and 91 respectively.
Casio EX-H10 vs Samsung HZ35W Sensor Comparison
Usually, it's hard to envision the difference between sensor sizes purely by reading technical specs. The pic below may provide you a far better sense of the sensor sizing in the EX-H10 and HZ35W.
As you can tell, both of these cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements and the exact same resolution and you can expect similar quality of files but you would want to consider the age of the products into consideration. The more aged EX-H10 is going to be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor innovation.
Casio EX-H10 vs Samsung HZ35W Screen and ViewFinder
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthStreet Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoSports Comparison
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixelsTravel Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsLandscape Comparison
YouTube trialing AI that fast-forwards to the best video segmentsVlogging Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
Casio EX-H10 vs Samsung HZ35W Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-H10 | Samsung HZ35W | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Casio | Samsung |
| Model | Casio Exilim EX-H10 | Samsung HZ35W |
| Otherwise known as | - | WB650 |
| Category | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Announced | 2009-06-11 | 2010-06-16 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12MP | 12MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Min native ISO | 64 | 80 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 24-240mm (10.0x) | 24-360mm (15.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/3.2-5.7 | f/3.2-5.8 |
| Macro focus range | 7cm | 3cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Screen resolution | 230k dot | 614k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 4s | 16s |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shutter speed | 4.0 frames per second | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 3.60 m | 5.00 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | BuiltIn |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 194 grams (0.43 lb) | 245 grams (0.54 lb) |
| Dimensions | 102 x 62 x 24mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 0.9") | 107 x 61 x 28mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | NP-90 | SLB-11A |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double, Motion) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Launch pricing | $300 | $300 |
