Casio EX-H10 vs Sigma SD14
93 Imaging
35 Features
25 Overall
31
59 Imaging
43 Features
30 Overall
37
Casio EX-H10 vs Sigma SD14 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-240mm (F3.2-5.7) lens
- 194g - 102 x 62 x 24mm
- Revealed June 2009
(Full Review)
- 5MP - APS-C Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 800 (Push to 1600)
- No Video
- Sigma SA Mount
- 750g - 144 x 107 x 81mm
- Launched September 2006
- Previous Model is Sigma SD10
- Replacement is Sigma SD15
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Casio EX-H10 vs Sigma SD14 Overview
Below, we will be evaluating the Casio EX-H10 vs Sigma SD14, one is a Small Sensor Compact and the latter is a Advanced DSLR by competitors Casio and Sigma. There exists a huge gap between the resolutions of the EX-H10 (12MP) and SD14 (5MP) and the EX-H10 (1/2.3") and SD14 (APS-C) use totally different sensor sizes.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe EX-H10 was announced 2 years after the SD14 which is quite a significant gap as far as technology is concerned. Both of the cameras come with different body type with the Casio EX-H10 being a Compact camera and the Sigma SD14 being a Mid-size SLR camera.
Before going straight into a step-by-step comparison, below is a brief highlight of how the EX-H10 scores against the SD14 for portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing Casio EX-H10 vs Sigma SD14 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery images for Casio Exilim EX-H10 and Sigma SD14. The whole galleries are available at Casio EX-H10 Gallery and Sigma SD14 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-H10 over the Sigma SD14
| EX-H10 | SD14 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | June 2009 |  | September 2006 | Newer by 33 months |
| Screen dimension | 3" |  | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.5") |
| Screen resolution | 230k |  | 150k | Clearer screen (+80k dot) |
Reasons to pick Sigma SD14 over the Casio EX-H10
| SD14 | EX-H10 |
|---|
Common features in the Casio EX-H10 and Sigma SD14
| EX-H10 | SD14 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | Very exact focus | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Lack of selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Neither includes Touch screen |
Casio EX-H10 vs Sigma SD14 Physical Comparison
For those who are going to travel with your camera frequently, you have to take into account its weight and dimensions. The Casio EX-H10 features outside measurements of 102mm x 62mm x 24mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 0.9") with a weight of 194 grams (0.43 lbs) and the Sigma SD14 has dimensions of 144mm x 107mm x 81mm (5.7" x 4.2" x 3.2") having a weight of 750 grams (1.65 lbs).
Check out the Casio EX-H10 vs Sigma SD14 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you have chosen at the time. Following is the front view dimensions comparison of the EX-H10 versus the SD14.
Using dimensions and weight, the portability score of the EX-H10 and SD14 is 93 and 59 respectively.
Casio EX-H10 vs Sigma SD14 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it can be difficult to see the contrast between sensor dimensions just by reading technical specs. The picture here will help give you a far better sense of the sensor sizing in the EX-H10 and SD14.
As you can tell, both cameras have got different megapixels and different sensor dimensions. The EX-H10 with its tinier sensor will make shooting bokeh harder and the Casio EX-H10 will offer more detail with its extra 7 Megapixels. Higher resolution will make it easier to crop shots much more aggressively. The more recent EX-H10 will have an advantage with regard to sensor technology.
Casio EX-H10 vs Sigma SD14 Screen and ViewFinder
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesStreet Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneSports Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsTravel Comparison
Photography GlossaryLandscape Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoVlogging Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Casio EX-H10 vs Sigma SD14 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-H10 | Sigma SD14 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Casio | Sigma |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-H10 | Sigma SD14 |
| Type | Small Sensor Compact | Advanced DSLR |
| Revealed | 2009-06-11 | 2006-09-26 |
| Physical type | Compact | Mid-size SLR |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS (Foveon X3) |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 20.7 x 13.8mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 285.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12MP | 5MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 3:2 |
| Peak resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 2640 x 1760 |
| Highest native ISO | 3200 | 800 |
| Highest enhanced ISO | - | 1600 |
| Min native ISO | 64 | 100 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | Sigma SA |
| Lens zoom range | 24-240mm (10.0x) | - |
| Largest aperture | f/3.2-5.7 | - |
| Macro focusing distance | 7cm | - |
| Available lenses | - | 76 |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 1.7 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3 inches | 2.5 inches |
| Resolution of screen | 230k dots | 150k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | Optical (pentaprism) |
| Viewfinder coverage | - | 98 percent |
| Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.6x |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 4 secs | 30 secs |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
| Continuous shutter rate | 4.0fps | 3.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 3.60 m | - |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft | - |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Max flash synchronize | - | 1/180 secs |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | - |
| Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | None |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | - |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 194g (0.43 pounds) | 750g (1.65 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 102 x 62 x 24mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 0.9") | 144 x 107 x 81mm (5.7" x 4.2" x 3.2") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | NP-90 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple) | Yes (10 sec) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC card, Internal | Compact Flash Type I or II |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Launch cost | $300 | $198 |
