Casio EX-H15 vs Kodak C140
93 Imaging
37 Features
29 Overall
33
94 Imaging
31 Features
10 Overall
22
Casio EX-H15 vs Kodak C140 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 24-240mm (F3.2-5.7) lens
- 161g - 101 x 60 x 28mm
- Released January 2010
(Full Review)
- 8MP - 1/2.5" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1000
- 640 x 480 video
- 36-108mm (F2.7-4.8) lens
- 160g - 92 x 63 x 22mm
- Revealed January 2009
Photography Glossary Casio EX-H15 vs Kodak C140 Overview
Lets take a deeper look at the Casio EX-H15 versus Kodak C140, both Small Sensor Compact cameras by rivals Casio and Kodak. There is a substantial difference among the sensor resolutions of the EX-H15 (14MP) and C140 (8MP) and the EX-H15 (1/2.3") and C140 (1/2.5") posses different sensor sizes.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe EX-H15 was launched 13 months later than the C140 which makes them a generation apart from each other. Both of these cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before we go right into a in depth comparison, here is a short view of how the EX-H15 grades versus the C140 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Casio EX-H15 vs Kodak C140 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Casio Exilim EX-H15 & Kodak EasyShare C140. The complete galleries are provided at Casio EX-H15 Gallery & Kodak C140 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-H15 over the Kodak C140
| EX-H15 | C140 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | January 2010 |  | January 2009 | Fresher by 13 months |
| Manually focus |  | More exact focusing | ||
| Screen size | 3" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
| Screen resolution | 461k |  | 230k | Crisper screen (+231k dot) |
Reasons to pick Kodak C140 over the Casio EX-H15
| C140 | EX-H15 |
|---|
Common features in the Casio EX-H15 and Kodak C140
| EX-H15 | C140 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Lacking selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Lacking Touch screen |
Casio EX-H15 vs Kodak C140 Physical Comparison
In case you're going to carry your camera regularly, you will need to factor its weight and volume. The Casio EX-H15 provides outer dimensions of 101mm x 60mm x 28mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.1") along with a weight of 161 grams (0.35 lbs) whilst the Kodak C140 has sizing of 92mm x 63mm x 22mm (3.6" x 2.5" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 160 grams (0.35 lbs).
Analyze the Casio EX-H15 versus Kodak C140 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you are employing at that moment. Here is a front view overall size comparison of the EX-H15 vs the C140.
Taking into account size and weight, the portability score of the EX-H15 and C140 is 93 and 94 respectively.
Casio EX-H15 vs Kodak C140 Sensor Comparison
Usually, it is tough to imagine the contrast in sensor sizing merely by viewing technical specs. The visual here may give you a more clear sense of the sensor dimensions in the EX-H15 and C140.
As you have seen, both of these cameras feature different megapixel count and different sensor sizing. The EX-H15 featuring a bigger sensor is going to make getting shallow DOF simpler and the Casio EX-H15 will provide you with greater detail utilizing its extra 6MP. Higher resolution will also make it easier to crop shots way more aggressively. The younger EX-H15 should have a benefit in sensor technology.
Casio EX-H15 vs Kodak C140 Screen and ViewFinder
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealingStreet Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsSports Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneTravel Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsLandscape Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banVlogging Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Casio EX-H15 vs Kodak C140 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-H15 | Kodak EasyShare C140 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Casio | Kodak |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-H15 | Kodak EasyShare C140 |
| Type | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
| Released | 2010-01-06 | 2009-01-08 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.5" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 5.744 x 4.308mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 24.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixel | 8 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 3264 x 2448 |
| Highest native ISO | 3200 | 1000 |
| Lowest native ISO | 64 | 80 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detect autofocus | ||
| Contract detect autofocus | ||
| Phase detect autofocus | ||
| Total focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 24-240mm (10.0x) | 36-108mm (3.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/3.2-5.7 | f/2.7-4.8 |
| Macro focusing range | - | 13cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 6.3 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 3 inch | 2.7 inch |
| Resolution of display | 461k dots | 230k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 4 seconds | 4 seconds |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/1400 seconds |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | - | 3.00 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, flash off, flash on, red eye reduction | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 × 720 (30 fps) , 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 640x480 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 161g (0.35 lbs) | 160g (0.35 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 101 x 60 x 28mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.1") | 92 x 63 x 22mm (3.6" x 2.5" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | NP-90 | 2 x AA |
| Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Pricing at release | $300 | $80 |
