Casio EX-H15 vs Samsung SL30
93 Imaging
37 Features
29 Overall
33
95 Imaging
33 Features
14 Overall
25
Casio EX-H15 vs Samsung SL30 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 24-240mm (F3.2-5.7) lens
- 161g - 101 x 60 x 28mm
- Introduced January 2010
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 38-114mm (F2.8-5.7) lens
- 140g - 94 x 61 x 23mm
- Revealed February 2009
- Alternate Name is ES15
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Casio EX-H15 vs Samsung SL30 Overview
On this page, we are analyzing the Casio EX-H15 and Samsung SL30, both Small Sensor Compact cameras by manufacturers Casio and Samsung. There is a sizeable difference among the image resolutions of the EX-H15 (14MP) and SL30 (10MP) but both cameras offer the same sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe EX-H15 was revealed 11 months after the SL30 and they are of a similar generation. Both cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before we go into a in-depth comparison, here is a quick overview of how the EX-H15 scores vs the SL30 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Casio EX-H15 vs Samsung SL30 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Casio Exilim EX-H15 and Samsung SL30. The full galleries are viewable at Casio EX-H15 Gallery and Samsung SL30 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-H15 over the Samsung SL30
| EX-H15 | SL30 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | January 2010 |  | February 2009 | More modern by 11 months |
| Manually focus |  | Very precise focus | ||
| Display dimensions | 3" |  | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.5") |
| Display resolution | 461k |  | 230k | Sharper display (+231k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung SL30 over the Casio EX-H15
| SL30 | EX-H15 |
|---|
Common features in the Casio EX-H15 and Samsung SL30
| EX-H15 | SL30 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither features selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | Neither features Touch display |
Casio EX-H15 vs Samsung SL30 Physical Comparison
In case you're going to carry around your camera regularly, you are going to need to factor in its weight and volume. The Casio EX-H15 enjoys outer dimensions of 101mm x 60mm x 28mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.1") having a weight of 161 grams (0.35 lbs) whilst the Samsung SL30 has sizing of 94mm x 61mm x 23mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 140 grams (0.31 lbs).
See the Casio EX-H15 and Samsung SL30 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you are utilizing at that time. The following is a front view physical size comparison of the EX-H15 compared to the SL30.
Factoring in size and weight, the portability rating of the EX-H15 and SL30 is 93 and 95 respectively.
Casio EX-H15 vs Samsung SL30 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it is very hard to visualize the contrast in sensor sizes only by going through technical specs. The picture below might give you a greater sense of the sensor sizes in the EX-H15 and SL30.
As you have seen, the 2 cameras provide the same sensor dimensions but different resolution. You should anticipate the Casio EX-H15 to produce greater detail because of its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution will allow you to crop photos more aggressively. The younger EX-H15 provides a benefit in sensor innovation.
Casio EX-H15 vs Samsung SL30 Screen and ViewFinder
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photography GlossaryStreet Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneSports Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesTravel Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthLandscape Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideVlogging Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
Casio EX-H15 vs Samsung SL30 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-H15 | Samsung SL30 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Casio | Samsung |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-H15 | Samsung SL30 |
| Also called as | - | ES15 |
| Type | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
| Introduced | 2010-01-06 | 2009-02-17 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixels | 10 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
| Maximum resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 3648 x 2736 |
| Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
| Minimum native ISO | 64 | 80 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detect autofocus | ||
| Contract detect autofocus | ||
| Phase detect autofocus | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 24-240mm (10.0x) | 38-114mm (3.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/3.2-5.7 | f/2.8-5.7 |
| Macro focusing distance | - | 5cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 3 inches | 2.5 inches |
| Display resolution | 461 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 8 secs |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/1500 secs |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | - | 4.60 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, flash off, flash on, red eye reduction | Auto, On, Off, Auto & Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync, Fill-in Flash, Flash Off, Red-Eye Fix |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 × 720 (30 fps) , 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 800 x 592 (20 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 640x480 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 161 grams (0.35 pounds) | 140 grams (0.31 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 101 x 60 x 28mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.1") | 94 x 61 x 23mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | NP-90 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | Yes |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/MMC/SDHC card, Internal |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Pricing at launch | $300 | $93 |