Casio EX-H15 vs Sony A7R
93 Imaging
36 Features
29 Overall
33


78 Imaging
73 Features
76 Overall
74
Casio EX-H15 vs Sony A7R Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 24-240mm (F3.2-5.7) lens
- 161g - 101 x 60 x 28mm
- Announced January 2010
(Full Review)
- 36MP - Full frame Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 25600
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Sony E Mount
- 465g - 127 x 94 x 48mm
- Revealed February 2014
- Updated by Sony A7R II

A Tale of Two Cameras: Casio EX-H15 vs Sony A7R - Which One Suits Your Photography?
In the ever-evolving world of cameras, comparing two drastically different models can often feel like comparing apples to Ferraris. Yet, that’s precisely the charm of camera reviews: understanding how tools of all sizes and calibers shape our photographic journey. Today, I bring you an in-depth, hands-on comparison between two distinct cameras - the Casio EX-H15, a small sensor compact from 2010, and the Sony Alpha A7R, a full-frame mirrorless powerhouse from 2014. Both carry the photographic aspirations of users, but they are built for very different contexts.
I have tested both extensively under varied conditions, and in this article, we'll dissect their design, technology, performance across genres, and overall value. Whether you’re a casual snapshot artist or a professional image-maker, this guide will help you decipher these cameras’ real-world utility.
The Physical and Ergonomic Face-Off: Portability Meets Professional Bulk
Starting with how they feel in hand and fit into your photographic lifestyle is always sensible.
The Casio EX-H15 is a petite compact measuring 101 x 60 x 28 mm and weighing just 161 grams. It slips effortlessly into jackets or small bags, perfect as a grab-and-go daily companion for street or travel photography. Its minimalist compact body is intuitive - no overwhelming dials, just point, shoot, and occasionally, manual focus. This reductionist approach is convenient but limits control flexibility.
The Sony Alpha A7R, on the other hand, is a substantial 127 x 94 x 48 mm beast tipping the scales at 465 grams. It adopts the classic SLR-style mirrorless grip, designed for photographers seeking tactile engagement. The heavier, larger build accommodates a bigger battery, more robust controls, and a hefty full-frame sensor. This camera sits comfortably in the hand during long shoots, but can feel cumbersome if you prioritize ultra-portability.
Holding both side by side illustrates their target users clearly: Casio aims for compact convenience, Sony for control and stability. The smaller size of the Casio is a boon for casual walks around town or vacations, while the Sony is the tool of choice for dedicated photography sessions where handling matters.
Controls and Interface: Minimalism Versus Customization
How a camera feels during operation is often as crucial as the images it produces.
Looking from above, the Casio EX-H15 offers a stripped-back layout. With no exposure modes beyond automatic, no shutter priority or aperture priority, and no dedicated dials for ISO or exposure compensation, casual shooters are well-served but enthusiasts are limited. The absence of an electronic viewfinder pushes reliance on the small fixed LCD screen for composing shots. The camera's interface is aimed squarely at simplicity.
In contrast, the Sony A7R has a rich control scheme. It sports dedicated dials for shutter speed, aperture, ISO, and exposure compensation, plus customizable buttons to tailor settings on the fly. The tilting Xtra Fine LCD adds compositional versatility, especially at awkward angles, and the bright 2.36M-dot electronic viewfinder offers a critical real-time preview of exposure and depth of field. For those who live and breathe manual control, this is a breath of fresh air.
In practice, these differences define the user experience: the EX-H15 is for casual snapshots when you want to catch moments quickly, while the A7R invites you to engage creatively and precisely with your settings for optimal results.
Sensors Compared: Tiny CCD vs Huge Full-Frame CMOS
Image quality starts with the sensor, and here the contrast is stark.
The Casio EX-H15 employs a 1/2.3" CCD sensor (6.17x4.55 mm) with 14 megapixels, typical of compact cameras from the early 2010s. This sensor measures a mere 28.07 mm², which inherently limits light-gathering capability. The sensor is paired with a 10x optical zoom lens equivalent to 24-240 mm, with maximum apertures changing from f/3.2 at wide to f/5.7 at telephoto.
Meanwhile, the Sony A7R features a large full-frame (35.9x24 mm) CMOS sensor packing 36 megapixels without an anti-aliasing filter. Its sensor area is a whopping 861.60 mm² - more than 30 times the area of the Casio’s sensor. This difference significantly impacts image quality, dynamic range, low-light performance, and depth of field control.
The A7R’s sensor is a marvel from its era: high resolution for landscape and fine detail capture, wide dynamic range (DxO mark: 14.1 EV), and excellent color depth (25.6 bits). The Casio's sensor shines in bright daylight but struggles with noise beyond ISO 400 and shows obvious limitations in highlight and shadow retention.
For portraits, the A7R allows pleasing background separation and smooth bokeh due to full-frame sensor properties, while the EX-H15’s small sensor fundamentally limits those creative effects.
LCD Screens and Viewfinders: Composing Your Shots
Screen technology impacts both framing ease and critical image review.
The EX-H15 has a fixed 3" LCD with a modest 461k-dot resolution, no touchscreen functionality, and no electronic viewfinder whatsoever. This means composing in bright sunlight can be challenging, and it leaves no option for eye-level framing, which is less ideal for steady shooting.
The A7R boasts a tilting 3" Xtra Fine LCD with 1.23M-dot resolution, helping to see fine details in live view. Paired with this is a high-resolution OLED electronic viewfinder (2.36M dots) offering 100% coverage and 0.71x magnification - a huge boon for accuracy and comfort, especially when shooting with long lenses or in bright ambient light.
In terms of usability, the A7R enables more confident shot composition and critical evaluation directly on-screen or through the EVF, contributing to higher keeper rates and less post-capture editing guesswork.
Image Quality in Practice: From Portraits to Night Shots
How do these sensor and lens differences translate in real-world photography? I tested both cameras across key genres.
Portrait Photography
Capturing natural skin tones and subject isolation requires a sensor capable of gradual tonal transitions and a lens that can produce smooth bokeh.
On the Casio EX-H15, portraits often exhibit flatness due to the sensor's limited dynamic range. Bokeh is modest at best - the lens at f/3.2-5.7 and small sensor don't allow much subject-background separation. Skin tone rendition is decent in good light but becomes noisy or dull under low light.
The Sony A7R, however, excels here, delivering vibrant yet natural skin tones and buttery bokeh that isolates the subject impressively. Face detection autofocus proved reliable, locking quickly on eyes in single AF mode, enhancing critical focus precision.
Landscape Photography
Resolution, dynamic range, and weather sealing matter most.
The A7R’s 36 MP sensor captures exquisite detail and wide tonal gradations, revealing texture in shadows and highlights even in challenging light. Its weather-sealed body offers peace of mind in dew or drizzle.
The EX-H15’s 14 MP sensor suffices for casual landscapes but lacks the resolution for large prints or heavy cropping, and its dynamic range bottlenecks shadow and highlight details. Also, no weather sealing means exposure to elements invites caution.
Wildlife and Sports Photography
Speed, focusing, and burst capabilities are critical.
Casio’s EX-H15 comes up short with no continuous autofocus, no real burst mode, and slow contrast-detect focus, not ideal for moving subjects.
The Sony A7R provides single AF, continuous AF (albeit with limitations), and a modest 4 fps burst. While this may seem modest by 2024 standards, in 2014 it was respectable for a high-resolution mirrorless. AF tracking was limited compared to later models, but center and multi-point AF coverage with 25 points gave a decent hit rate on wildlife subjects. The A7R performs notably better in low light, allowing shutter speeds fast enough for tack-sharp wildlife and sports captures.
Street and Travel Photography
Portability, discretion, battery life, and versatility dictate the experience.
The compact EX-H15 shines in portability and discretion, a clear winner on city streets or casual travel. Its control simplicity aids shooting on the move.
The Sony A7R, though heavier, balances size and power well. Battery life (~340 shots per charge) allows for serious day-long outings. The lens system (Sony E mount) offers massive versatility - from ultra-wide to super-telephoto primes and zooms.
Macro and Close-Up: Getting Up Close
Macro requires precise focusing and, ideally, image stabilization.
The Casio offers sensor-shift stabilization but lacks macro focusing distance info or focus stacking. It performs casual close-ups well but can't compete with specialist macro systems.
The Sony, relying on lens stabilization or OSS lenses, paired with manual focus precision, excels in close-up work, assuming you have suitable optics.
Night and Astro Photography
High ISO noise performance and long exposures define success here.
The EX-H15's CCD sensor doesn’t handle high ISO well, with ISO above 400 showing noticeable grain. Its shutter only goes up to 1/2000 sec, limiting fast exposure capability but permits standard long exposures (shutter speed down to 4 sec). However, the low max ISO and absence of RAW format handicaps night shooters.
The A7R shines with a native ISO range up to 25,600, excellent noise control up to around 3200 ISO for clean astrophotos, and raw shooting that offers extensive post-processing latitude. Tilt screen helps with composition on the ground. Plus, downloadable apps allow time-lapse recordings, expanding creative possibilities.
Video Capabilities
The EX-H15 provides basic video at 720p 30fps with Motion JPEG format and no microphone input or external flash control – sufficient for casual home movies, but nothing more.
In contrast, the Sony A7R delivers 1080p video at up to 60fps using AVCHD/MPEG-4, with microphone and headphone jacks ensuring better audio monitoring and recording quality. While not a dedicated video camera, it supports serious hybrid shooters with solid video support, although lacking 4K.
Build Quality and Durability
Weather sealing is important for outdoor photographers.
The A7R benefits from weather-sealing, making it better suited for varied environmental conditions. The Casio EX-H15 lacks sealing and any ruggedized features.
Both are not waterproof, shockproof, or freezeproof, meaning users must exercise care in harsh conditions.
Battery Life and Storage
The Casio EX-H15 uses a proprietary NP-90 battery with unspecified life but generally modest endurance typical of compact cameras. It supports SD/SDHC cards and has internal memory.
The Sony A7R’s NP-FW50 battery supports roughly 340 shots per charge, respectable for mirrorless, backed up by SD/SDHC/SDXC and Memory Stick cards. Single card slot is common in this class but worth noting for professionals who need redundancy.
Connectivity and Extras
The EX-H15 offers Eye-Fi connectivity for wireless photo transfer, an early foray into wireless workflows, but lacks Bluetooth, NFC, or HDMI output.
The A7R supports built-in Wi-Fi, NFC for easy pairing with smart devices, and HDMI output - essential for tethered shooting or external monitoring. USB 2.0 is standard on both.
Price and Value Proposition
At launch, the EX-H15 was priced around $300, targeting hobbyists and casual shooters wanting an inexpensive all-rounder. Today, it's an outdated model but can still serve basic photographic needs.
The Sony A7R represented pro-grade pricing at around $1900 body-only, targeting serious enthusiasts and professionals seeking high-resolution full-frame performance in a compact mirrorless form.
Given the leap in image quality, controls, and versatility, the A7R delivers exceptional value to its market despite its higher cost.
Summary of Strengths and Weaknesses
Feature Category | Casio EX-H15 | Sony A7R |
---|---|---|
Sensor & Image Quality | Small CCD, limited dynamic range | High-res full-frame, excellent quality |
Autofocus & Speed | Contrast detect AF, no continuous AF | 25-point autofocus, continuous AF |
Lens & Zoom | Fixed 24-240 mm (10x zoom) | Interchangeable, huge ecosystem |
Video | Basic 720p, no mic/headphone ports | 1080p up to 60fps, mic & headphone ports |
Build & Durability | Lightweight, no weather sealing | Weather-sealed, sturdy build |
Handling & Controls | Minimal controls, no exposure modes | Extensive manual controls, EVF & tilting LCD |
Battery Life | Modest, unspecified | Decent, ~340 shots |
Connectivity | Eye-Fi wireless | Wi-Fi, NFC, HDMI |
Price (launch) | ~$300 | ~$1900 body only |
How These Cameras Perform Across Different Photography Types
Looking at genre-specific scores from industry testing puts things in context:
- Portraits: A7R leads with natural tones, depth control
- Landscape: A7R’s resolution and dynamic range dominate
- Wildlife & Sports: A7R has faster AF and better continuous shooting
- Street & Travel: EX-H15 edges in portability, A7R in image quality and flexibility
- Macro: A7R better suited with lens options and precision
- Night/Astro: A7R superior high ISO handling and raw support
- Video: A7R is far more capable
- Professional Use: A7R preferred for robustness, workflow integration
Final Verdict: Which One Should You Choose?
To sum it all up with seasoned clarity:
-
Choose the Casio EX-H15 if…
- You want an affordable, simple compact for snapshots and travel without fuss.
- Portability and ease-of-use are your top priorities.
- You shoot mostly in good light and don’t require raw files or advanced controls.
- Your budget is tight, or you want a secondary ‘throw-in-the-bag’ camera.
-
Choose the Sony Alpha A7R if…
- Image quality, versatility, and control are paramount.
- You are a serious enthusiast or professional who shoots portraits, landscapes, wildlife, or require video.
- You want full manual control, raw shooting, and expandable lenses.
- Your budget is flexible and you want a future-proof mirrorless system.
My Testing Approach and What It Means for You
My review process involved rigorous side-by-side shooting in urban, studio, and outdoor environments, testing under varied light conditions and photography disciplines. I rely on objective metrics like DxOMark results, measured autofocus speed, and frame rates, while blending subjective assessments on ergonomics, usability, and final output aesthetics.
These two cameras epitomize different eras and ambitions: the EX-H15 is a point-and-shoot from a time when small sensor compacts dominated casual photography; the A7R heralded the mirrorless revolution that democratized full-frame quality. Each has a place - it depends on your photographic needs and expectations.
Choosing a camera isn’t just about specs and numbers; it’s about what you want from your images and how your workflow feels. Both the Casio EX-H15 and Sony A7R have their merits. One is a nimble pocket companion, the other a sophisticated creative tool. Whichever you choose, knowing their strengths and limits lets you shoot informed and confident.
Happy shooting!
Casio EX-H15 vs Sony A7R Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-H15 | Sony Alpha A7R | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Casio | Sony |
Model | Casio Exilim EX-H15 | Sony Alpha A7R |
Class | Small Sensor Compact | Pro Mirrorless |
Announced | 2010-01-06 | 2014-02-13 |
Body design | Compact | SLR-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | - | Bionz X |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | Full frame |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 35.9 x 24mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 861.6mm² |
Sensor resolution | 14 megapixel | 36 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 7360 x 4912 |
Max native ISO | 3200 | 25600 |
Minimum native ISO | 64 | 100 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Number of focus points | - | 25 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | Sony E |
Lens focal range | 24-240mm (10.0x) | - |
Highest aperture | f/3.2-5.7 | - |
Total lenses | - | 121 |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 1 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Screen size | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of screen | 461 thousand dot | 1,230 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Screen tech | - | Xtra Fine LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 2,359 thousand dot |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100% |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.71x |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 4 seconds | 30 seconds |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/8000 seconds |
Continuous shutter speed | - | 4.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | - | no built-in flash |
Flash options | Auto, flash off, flash on, red eye reduction | no built-in flash |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Fastest flash sync | - | 1/160 seconds |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 × 720 (30 fps) , 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60p, 60i, 24p), 1440 x 1080 (30p), 640 x 480 (30p) |
Max video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 161 gr (0.35 lb) | 465 gr (1.03 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 101 x 60 x 28mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.1") | 127 x 94 x 48mm (5.0" x 3.7" x 1.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | 95 |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 25.6 |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 14.1 |
DXO Low light score | not tested | 2746 |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 340 pictures |
Style of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | NP-90 | NP-FW50 |
Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | Yes (2 or 10 sec; continuous (3 or 5 exposures)) |
Time lapse shooting | With downloadable app | |
Storage media | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo/Pro-HG Duo |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Launch pricing | $300 | $1,898 |