Casio EX-H20G vs Nikon P7800
91 Imaging
37 Features
32 Overall
35
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/76393/7639345edb59e3ad89924509e09513679161f6b4" alt="Casio Exilim EX-H20G front Casio Exilim EX-H20G front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b5865/b58658982e8e01305c4ba522531ad542256781ca" alt="Nikon Coolpix P7800 front Nikon Coolpix P7800 front"
82 Imaging
37 Features
73 Overall
51
Casio EX-H20G vs Nikon P7800 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-240mm (F3.2-5.7) lens
- 216g - 103 x 68 x 29mm
- Launched September 2010
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600 (Raise to 6400)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-200mm (F2.0-4.0) lens
- 399g - 119 x 78 x 50mm
- Introduced November 2013
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Casio EX-H20G vs Nikon P7800 Overview
Here, we will be analyzing the Casio EX-H20G versus Nikon P7800, both Small Sensor Compact digital cameras by companies Casio and Nikon. The sensor resolution of the EX-H20G (14MP) and the P7800 (12MP) is relatively well matched but the EX-H20G (1/2.3") and P7800 (1/1.7") have totally different sensor measurements.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
The EX-H20G was launched 4 years prior to the P7800 which is quite a significant gap as far as technology is concerned. The two cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before we go straight to a complete comparison, here is a simple overview of how the EX-H20G matches up versus the P7800 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Casio EX-H20G vs Nikon P7800 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Casio Exilim EX-H20G and Nikon Coolpix P7800. The complete galleries are provided at Casio EX-H20G Gallery and Nikon P7800 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-H20G over the Nikon P7800
EX-H20G | P7800 |
---|
Reasons to pick Nikon P7800 over the Casio EX-H20G
P7800 | EX-H20G | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | November 2013 | ![]() | September 2010 | Newer by 38 months |
Screen type | Fully Articulated | ![]() | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen |
Screen resolution | 921k | ![]() | 461k | Sharper screen (+460k dot) |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Take selfies |
Common features in the Casio EX-H20G and Nikon P7800
EX-H20G | P7800 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | Dial exact focusing | ||
Screen size | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Same screen measurements |
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Lacking Touch friendly screen |
Casio EX-H20G vs Nikon P7800 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is aiming to travel with your camera often, you will want to factor in its weight and dimensions. The Casio EX-H20G features physical measurements of 103mm x 68mm x 29mm (4.1" x 2.7" x 1.1") and a weight of 216 grams (0.48 lbs) whilst the Nikon P7800 has dimensions of 119mm x 78mm x 50mm (4.7" x 3.1" x 2.0") along with a weight of 399 grams (0.88 lbs).
Check the Casio EX-H20G versus Nikon P7800 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you use during that time. Following is a front view size comparison of the EX-H20G against the P7800.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a1c5b/a1c5b876a337b0ed0fa4f7d9c9f2fd330b3d6714" alt="Casio EX-H20G vs Nikon P7800 size comparison Casio EX-H20G vs Nikon P7800 size comparison"
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability score of the EX-H20G and P7800 is 91 and 82 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f2946/f29461b49b569c4bbe16478bff0029c1fb731362" alt="Casio EX-H20G vs Nikon P7800 top view buttons comparison Casio EX-H20G vs Nikon P7800 top view buttons comparison"
Casio EX-H20G vs Nikon P7800 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it can be tough to envision the contrast between sensor dimensions purely by reading through a spec sheet. The image here should give you a stronger sense of the sensor sizing in the EX-H20G and P7800.
As you can see, each of the cameras come with different megapixels and different sensor dimensions. The EX-H20G due to its tinier sensor will make shooting bokeh more difficult and the Casio EX-H20G will give more detail utilizing its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also help you crop pictures a good deal more aggressively. The more aged EX-H20G is going to be behind with regard to sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8556d/8556d47ebea0d8814ee5ea56fe2c4033d86de2d6" alt="Casio EX-H20G vs Nikon P7800 sensor size comparison Casio EX-H20G vs Nikon P7800 sensor size comparison"
Casio EX-H20G vs Nikon P7800 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/31022/310224f59729e4039931d05ee2ec3edcf20645c4" alt="Casio EX-H20G vs Nikon P7800 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Casio EX-H20G vs Nikon P7800 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Casio EX-H20G vs Nikon P7800 Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-H20G | Nikon Coolpix P7800 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Casio | Nikon |
Model type | Casio Exilim EX-H20G | Nikon Coolpix P7800 |
Type | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
Launched | 2010-09-20 | 2013-11-25 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | Exilim Engine HS | - |
Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/1.7" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 7.44 x 5.58mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 41.5mm² |
Sensor resolution | 14 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 4000 x 3000 |
Highest native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
Highest enhanced ISO | - | 6400 |
Min native ISO | 64 | 80 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Total focus points | - | 99 |
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 24-240mm (10.0x) | 28-200mm (7.1x) |
Maximum aperture | f/3.2-5.7 | f/2.0-4.0 |
Macro focusing distance | 7cm | 5cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 4.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fully Articulated |
Screen sizing | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of screen | 461 thousand dot | 921 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 921 thousand dot |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100% |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 4 seconds | 60 seconds |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
Continuous shutter speed | - | 8.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | - | 10.00 m |
Flash settings | Auto, flash off, flash on, red eye reduction | - |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (25p, 30p), 1280 x 720 (30p); high-speed: 1920 x 1080 (15 fps), 1280 x 720 (60 fps), 640 x 480 (120 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Optional |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | BuiltIn | Optional |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 216g (0.48 lbs) | 399g (0.88 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 103 x 68 x 29mm (4.1" x 2.7" x 1.1") | 119 x 78 x 50mm (4.7" x 3.1" x 2.0") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | 54 |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 21.2 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 11.7 |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | 200 |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 350 shots |
Battery format | - | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | NP-90 | EN-EL14 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple) | Yes (10 or 2 seconds) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Launch cost | $300 | $550 |