Casio EX-H20G vs Olympus 9000
91 Imaging
37 Features
32 Overall
35
92 Imaging
35 Features
20 Overall
29
Casio EX-H20G vs Olympus 9000 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-240mm (F3.2-5.7) lens
- 216g - 103 x 68 x 29mm
- Introduced September 2010
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 50 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-280mm (F3.2-5.9) lens
- 225g - 96 x 60 x 31mm
- Released May 2009
- Additionally Known as mju 9000
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Casio EX-H20G vs Olympus 9000 Overview
Let's look a little more closely at the Casio EX-H20G versus Olympus 9000, both Small Sensor Compact digital cameras by manufacturers Casio and Olympus. The sensor resolution of the EX-H20G (14MP) and the 9000 (12MP) is fairly well matched and they come with the exact same sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealingThe EX-H20G was manufactured 17 months later than the 9000 making the cameras a generation apart from each other. Both of the cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before getting through a comprehensive comparison, below is a short view of how the EX-H20G grades against the 9000 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Casio EX-H20G vs Olympus 9000 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pictures for Casio Exilim EX-H20G & Olympus Stylus 9000. The entire galleries are available at Casio EX-H20G Gallery & Olympus 9000 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-H20G over the Olympus 9000
| EX-H20G | 9000 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | September 2010 |  | May 2009 | Fresher by 17 months |
| Manual focus |  | Dial precise focusing | ||
| Display dimension | 3" |  | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
| Display resolution | 461k |  | 230k | Sharper display (+231k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus 9000 over the Casio EX-H20G
| 9000 | EX-H20G |
|---|
Common features in the Casio EX-H20G and Olympus 9000
| EX-H20G | 9000 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | No selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | Neither has Touch friendly display |
Casio EX-H20G vs Olympus 9000 Physical Comparison
If you're going to carry your camera frequently, you will have to consider its weight and measurements. The Casio EX-H20G has outer dimensions of 103mm x 68mm x 29mm (4.1" x 2.7" x 1.1") along with a weight of 216 grams (0.48 lbs) and the Olympus 9000 has proportions of 96mm x 60mm x 31mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") and a weight of 225 grams (0.50 lbs).
Take a look at the Casio EX-H20G versus Olympus 9000 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you are employing during that time. Following is the front view scale comparison of the EX-H20G vs the 9000.
Looking at size and weight, the portability rating of the EX-H20G and 9000 is 91 and 92 respectively.
Casio EX-H20G vs Olympus 9000 Sensor Comparison
Often, it's difficult to picture the contrast between sensor sizing simply by reading through specs. The photograph below should offer you a stronger sense of the sensor sizes in the EX-H20G and 9000.
All in all, the two cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements but different resolution. You can anticipate the Casio EX-H20G to give you more detail due to its extra 2MP. Greater resolution can also help you crop pics somewhat more aggressively. The more recent EX-H20G should have a benefit with regard to sensor technology.
Casio EX-H20G vs Olympus 9000 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Glossary Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsStreet Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneSports Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesTravel Comparison
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixelsLandscape Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoVlogging Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Casio EX-H20G vs Olympus 9000 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-H20G | Olympus Stylus 9000 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Casio | Olympus |
| Model | Casio Exilim EX-H20G | Olympus Stylus 9000 |
| Also called as | - | mju 9000 |
| Type | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
| Introduced | 2010-09-20 | 2009-05-14 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | Exilim Engine HS | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14MP | 12MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 |
| Peak resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 3968 x 2976 |
| Highest native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
| Minimum native ISO | 64 | 50 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 24-240mm (10.0x) | 28-280mm (10.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/3.2-5.7 | f/3.2-5.9 |
| Macro focus range | 7cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 3 inch | 2.7 inch |
| Screen resolution | 461 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 4 secs | 4 secs |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | - | 5.00 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, flash off, flash on, red eye reduction | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off, On |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 640x480 |
| Video file format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | BuiltIn | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 216g (0.48 lb) | 225g (0.50 lb) |
| Dimensions | 103 x 68 x 29mm (4.1" x 2.7" x 1.1") | 96 x 60 x 31mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | NP-90 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple) | Yes (12 seconds) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | xD Picture Card, microSD Card, Internal |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Pricing at release | $300 | $300 |
