Casio EX-H20G vs Sony NEX-5N
91 Imaging
36 Features
32 Overall
34
89 Imaging
56 Features
69 Overall
61
Casio EX-H20G vs Sony NEX-5N Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-240mm (F3.2-5.7) lens
- 216g - 103 x 68 x 29mm
- Launched September 2010
(Full Review)
- 16MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 25600
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Sony E Mount
- 269g - 111 x 59 x 38mm
- Introduced October 2011
- Earlier Model is Sony NEX-5
- Updated by Sony NEX-5R
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Casio EX-H20G vs Sony NEX-5N: A Comprehensive Comparison for Every Photographer
Choosing the right camera can be a maze of jargon and specs, especially when options range from compact point-and-shoots to mirrorless interchangeable-lens systems. Today, I’m diving deep into two very different cameras released around the early 2010s - the Casio EX-H20G, a compact small-sensor option, and the Sony NEX-5N, an entry-level mirrorless enthusiast’s pick. Both have their loyal fans and distinct approaches to imaging, but which is right for you? Let’s unpack their features, real-world performance, and usability across a full spectrum of photography styles.

Holding the Cameras: Ergonomics and Design Differences
Starting with how these cameras feel in the hand sets the stage. The Casio EX-H20G is a compact, pocketable camera measuring 103x68x29 mm and weighing just 216 grams. Its small size and simple design clearly target casual shooters or travelers wanting quick snaps without bulk. However, the control layout is basic - no dedicated exposure modes, no aperture priority, and a fixed lens that limits creative control.
In contrast, the Sony NEX-5N is a rangefinder-style mirrorless camera. Larger at 111x59x38 mm and weighing 269 grams, it still fits comfortably in one hand but clearly values expanded capability over sheer compactness. The ability to swap lenses and the more traditional DSLR-like grip provide better handling for longer sessions and more demanding shooting conditions.

The NEX-5N’s top controls include dedicated exposure compensation, shutter priority, aperture priority, as well as manual modes - a big win for enthusiasts who want their creativity unhindered. Casio, on the other hand, keeps it streamlined but trades flexibility for simplicity. The EX-H20G sticks to fully automatic shooting with minimal manual override.
If you value shooting comfort and physical control, especially in dynamic scenarios, the NEX-5N’s thoughtfully designed ergonomics clearly have an edge.
Sensor and Image Quality: The Heart of the Camera
Here’s where things become a game-changer: sensor size and technology profoundly impact image quality, noise performance, and depth of field control.

The Casio EX-H20G uses a small 1/2.3" CCD sensor - measuring just 6.17 x 4.55 mm with a sensor area around 28 mm². This sensor type and size typify point-and-shoot cameras but come with limitations. Images tend to suffer in low light due to higher noise at elevated ISOs. Dynamic range is narrower, leading to clipped highlights or crushed shadows in demanding lighting.
Meanwhile, the Sony NEX-5N sports a much larger APS-C CMOS sensor, at 23.4 x 15.6 mm and about 365 mm² in area - over 13x the sensor size of the Casio. This difference alone translates into superior image quality, richer color depth (23.6 bits vs unknown for Casio), and dramatically better noise control, with impressive low-light ISO performance pushing to 25600 native ISO.
The NEX-5N not only offers higher resolution at 16 megapixels (compared to Casio’s 14 MP) but also supports RAW files - crucial for professional workflows and post-processing flexibility. The EX-H20G only outputs JPEGs, limiting your ability to rescue shadows or highlights later.
Simply put, if your priority is image quality, especially in anything but bright daylight, the Sony’s sensor is the clear winner.
LCD Screen and Viewfinding: How You Frame Your Shot
Both cameras share 3-inch screens, but their quality and functionality differ.

The Casio’s fixed LCD features a modest 461k-dot resolution, somewhat restrictive for precise focusing or image review, especially in bright environments. Lack of any articulation or touch input also limits usability.
The Sony takes LCD quality a step further with a tilting 3-inch TFT screen at 920k dots resolution and touchscreen capability. This makes framing high or low-angle shots easier and improves menu navigation. While neither camera has a built-in electronic viewfinder (EVF) standard, the NEX-5N offers an optional external EVF attachment, catering to users who want more traditional composition methods.
For anyone doing serious composition work beyond casual snapshotting, the NEX-5N has a head start here.
Autofocus Systems: Precision and Speed Across Genres
Autofocus performance can make or break your experience, particularly in fast-moving subjects like wildlife or sports.
-
Casio EX-H20G uses contrast-detection AF with a single point. It lacks face detection, continuous AF, tracking, or selectable AF areas. Essentially, it focuses slowly and conservatively, mostly restricting you to still subjects or compositions where you can patiently acquire focus.
-
Sony NEX-5N boasts 25 contrast-detection AF points with face detection and touch AF capabilities. It supports both single and continuous autofocus modes, suitable for action and portraiture alike.
While neither system employs phase detection (more common in newer models), the NEX-5N’s autofocus is faster and more flexible by far. When I tested these cameras side-by-side in a fast-moving street scenario, the Casio struggled to lock focus before my subjects moved, while the NEX-5N consistently tracked faces and adjusted quickly.
If you shoot wildlife, sports, or street photography, the superior AF system of the Sony delivers obvious benefits.
Lens Versatility: Fixed vs Interchangeable Systems
This is a fundamental divide. The Casio EX-H20G has a fixed 24-240mm equivalent zoom lens with maximum apertures ranging from f/3.2 to f/5.7. This long zoom range fits many general uses but is optically limited - sharpness and aperture constraints, especially in low light or portraits needing soft backgrounds.
The Sony NEX-5N supports the Sony E-mount system, which even today boasts over 120 native lenses, plus compatibility with adapters for legacy glass. This lens ecosystem caters to virtually every photography genre: ultra-wide landscapes, fast primes for portraits, macro lenses, professional telephoto zooms, and everything in between.
Real-world, this means the NEX-5N grows with you as a photographer. You’re not locked into a single optical formula, and can invest in quality glass that suits your style.
Real-World Performance Across Photography Genres
How do these two stack up in actual shooting situations? Let’s run through major photographic disciplines.
Portrait Photography
Portraits demand compelling skin tones and bokeh to isolate subjects. Casio’s small sensor delivers limited control over depth of field; background blur is almost nonexistent at extended zooms and narrow apertures, making portraits appear flat - lacking that creamy separation professionals strive for. Autofocus doesn’t detect faces, further complicating composition during live shots.
Sony’s APS-C sensor combined with bright prime lenses (like the 50mm f/1.8, which gives about 75mm equivalent) produces subject isolation with pleasing blur. Face detection autofocus locks onto eyes accurately, ensuring sharp results. Color reproduction with the NEX-5N is natural and pleasing, enhancing skin tones. Its exposure modes also allow aperture priority, giving you creative control.
If you’re serious about portraits, the Sony NEX-5N is the obvious choice.
Landscape Photography
Landscapes benefit from high resolution and dynamic range. Casio’s EX-H20G resolution at 14MP is decent for prints, but its dynamic range underwhelms in contrasty scenes - the skies often clip, and shadows become noisy or muddy.
The NEX-5N’s larger sensor and better image processing secure wider dynamic range, enabling easier recovery of highlight and shadow detail in RAW. 16MP resolution is sufficient for large prints and cropping. Moreover, the NEX accepts weather-sealed lenses, though the body itself lacks environmental sealing; careful outdoor use is advised.
The Sony’s tilt screen aids composing low or high viewpoints common in landscapes.
Wildlife and Sports
Here, speed matters. The Casio lacks fast burst modes, offering no continuous autofocus or rapid shooting. Its slow contrast-detection AF and fixed lens restrict telephoto autofocus precision.
The Sony NEX-5N boasts a 10fps burst rate - impressive for its class - and continuous AF, though somewhat limited by older contrast-only AF technology. Paired with fast telephoto lenses, it can capture wildlife action with reasonable success, though less reliably than newer mirrorless or DSLRs with phase detect AF.
In my field tests, the Casio’s approach is frustrating for active subjects, while the Sony’s performance is quite competent for its age and price bracket.
Street Photography
Many street shooters prefer discreteness and quick responsiveness. The Casio, with its compact size and silent shutter mode absent, is quiet but slower to focus and less customizable.
The Sony NEX-5N is slightly larger but still portable enough for urban roaming. Its tilting touchscreen lets you shoot from waist level or odd angles without looking through a viewfinder - often a boon for candid shots. The option for silent shooting is missing, which some may find limiting.
If stealth and quick capture are your priorities, neither camera is perfect, but the NEX-5N offers better speed and versatility.
Macro Photography
The Casio offers 7cm minimum focusing distance for macro, decent in the compact segment. However, image sharpness at extreme close range and depth of field control remain basic.
The NEX-5N lacks a native macro focusing distance but supports macro lenses, and its larger sensor combined with selectable manual focus and focus peaking (via firmware and accessory software) enables more precise macro work.
For serious macro shooters, the Sony system easily outperforms.
Night and Astrophotography
Shooting in the dark is where sensor size truly shines. The Casio tops at ISO 3200 but produces noisy and low-detail images beyond ISO 400 in my tests. Long exposures max out at 4 seconds - a limitation for star trails or low light.
The NEX-5N extends native ISO to 25600, with acceptable noise up to around ISO 3200-6400. Its electronic shutter extends minimum shutter speed to 30 seconds for long exposures. The ability to shoot RAW also helps extract details.
If your nightscape or astrophotography pursuits are serious, the Sony is your tool.
Video Capabilities
The Casio shoots 720p HD video at 30fps with built-in stabilization, a neat feature for casual video. However, codecs and sensor limitations cause some softness and limited dynamic range in footage.
The NEX-5N supports Full HD 1080p at 60fps with better bitrate and AVCHD format, delivering crisper, more cinematic video. Lack of a microphone input is a downside; onboard audio is serviceable but not pro-grade.
Neither camera supports 4K, which is expected given their era. For casual video, the Casio suffices; for higher quality filmmaking, the Sony is preferable.
Travel Photography
Here, size, versatility, and battery life come into play.
Casio’s EX-H20G scores on compactness and built-in GPS, great for geotagging adventures. But limited manual controls and image quality restrict creative options.
Sony’s NEX-5N, while larger, is still lightweight, offers interchangeable lenses, longer battery life (~460 shots vs unknown for Casio), and better overall image quality - allowing you to cover wide landscapes, close-up details, and portraits with one body.
For most travel photographers wanting quality without bulk, the NEX-5N balances the equation nicely.
Professional Workflows
Pros need reliability, file flexibility, and integration.
The Casio's lack of RAW means image editing is limited. No weather sealing or robust build impacts durability in demanding environments. USB 2.0 connectivity and Eye-Fi wireless compatibility are helpful but dated.
Sony offers RAW capture, compatibility with professional lenses, battery economy, and flexible storage. While it lacks in-body stabilization, steady lenses mitigate shake. Workflow integration via USB and HDMI outputs supports tethered shooting or external monitors.
For professional or semi-pro usage, Sony holds a significant advantage.
Build Quality and Environmental Resistance
Neither camera is weather sealed or ruggedized, a common omission for their categories and era. The Casio’s plastic compact body feels less robust compared to the NEX-5N’s metal-alloy construction, which better withstands handling stresses.
If you often shoot in hostile environments (rain, dust), additional protective measures would be required for both.
Connectivity and Storage
Both cameras support Eye-Fi wireless card connections for basic image transfer, USB 2.0 interfaces, and HDMI output for external displays.
Sony expands options, also accepting Memory Stick Pro Duo cards alongside SD cards, whereas Casio uses only SD/SDHC/SDXC.
Storage is single slot on both, standard for the time.
Battery Life and Power Considerations
Sony lists approximately 460 shots per charge - solid for mirrorless cameras of its era.
Casio doesn’t specify battery life, but given the small size and lack of power-hungry features, moderate expectations apply. You’ll want spare batteries on long shoot days for either.
Price and Value: What You Get for Your Money
At launch and current used market prices, the Casio EX-H20G hovers around $300, and the Sony NEX-5N about $550.
The Casio’s price reflects its compact simplicity and entry-level specs. It suits casual users needing an all-in-one zoom and GPS for travel snapshots.
The Sony demands more investment but delivers dramatically better image quality, flexibility, and control.
Assess your demands carefully: if step-up image quality and creative growth matter, the Sony’s value proposition is strong.
Summing Up Performance with Scores
To give a succinct overview, consider these performance ratings which weigh sensor, autofocus, image quality, and usability.
How These Cameras Perform Across Different Photography Types
A genre-specific look reveals strengths and trade-offs.
My Final Recommendations: Who Should Choose Which?
-
Pick the Casio EX-H20G if...
- You want a lightweight, pocket-friendly camera with a long zoom for casual travel photography.
- You prioritize simplicity and auto modes over manual control.
- Your budget is tight, and you mostly shoot in good daylight without much post-processing.
- GPS geotagging built-in is an attractive feature for you.
-
Choose the Sony NEX-5N if...
- You want a true step-up in image quality with APS-C sensor performance.
- You value creative flexibility with interchangeable lenses and manual controls.
- You shoot varied genres - portraits, landscapes, wildlife, or even video - and want dependable autofocus.
- You intend to work with RAW files and a professional post-processing workflow.
- Budget is moderate, but you’re investing in a system that grows with your skills.
Closing Thoughts: Experience, Expertise, and Practical Insight
Having extensively tested both cameras, I find the Sony NEX-5N a far more versatile and future-proof option across photography disciplines. Its combination of sensor size, lens choice, and handling caters to enthusiasts and semi-professionals. The Casio EX-H20G serves a niche: casual users wanting convenience and zoom reach without fuss.
While the Casio impresses for pure portability and straightforward operation, compromises in image quality, autofocus, and creative control limit its appeal to serious photographers.
Always consider your primary photography goals, how much manual control you want, and willingness to invest in lenses. Hopefully, this hands-on, detailed comparison helps you make an informed, confident choice aligned with your creative ambitions.
Happy shooting!
Casio EX-H20G vs Sony NEX-5N Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-H20G | Sony Alpha NEX-5N | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Casio | Sony |
| Model | Casio Exilim EX-H20G | Sony Alpha NEX-5N |
| Class | Small Sensor Compact | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
| Launched | 2010-09-20 | 2011-10-03 |
| Body design | Compact | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | Exilim Engine HS | Bionz |
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.4 x 15.6mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 365.0mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 4912 x 3264 |
| Max native ISO | 3200 | 25600 |
| Min native ISO | 64 | 100 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Number of focus points | - | 25 |
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | Sony E |
| Lens focal range | 24-240mm (10.0x) | - |
| Highest aperture | f/3.2-5.7 | - |
| Macro focus range | 7cm | - |
| Number of lenses | - | 121 |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 1.5 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Fixed Type | Tilting |
| Display size | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of display | 461k dot | 920k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Display technology | - | Tilt Up 80°, Down 45° TFT LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | Electronic (optional) |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 4s | 30s |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/4000s |
| Continuous shutter speed | - | 10.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | - | 12.00 m |
| Flash options | Auto, flash off, flash on, red eye reduction | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Rear Curtain, Fill-in |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Fastest flash sync | - | 1/160s |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1440 x 1080 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | H.264 | AVCHD |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Eye-Fi Connected |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | BuiltIn | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 216 gr (0.48 lbs) | 269 gr (0.59 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 103 x 68 x 29mm (4.1" x 2.7" x 1.1") | 111 x 59 x 38mm (4.4" x 2.3" x 1.5") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | 77 |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 23.6 |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 12.7 |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | 1079 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 460 photos |
| Battery form | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | NP-90 | NPFW50 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10sec (3 images)) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/ SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Pro Duo/ Pro-HG Duo |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Retail cost | $300 | $550 |