Clicky

Casio EX-H30 vs Samsung SL102

Portability
92
Imaging
38
Features
40
Overall
38
Casio Exilim EX-H30 front
 
Samsung SL102 front
Portability
96
Imaging
32
Features
21
Overall
27

Casio EX-H30 vs Samsung SL102 Key Specs

Casio EX-H30
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 3200
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
  • 201g - 105 x 59 x 29mm
  • Revealed January 2011
Samsung SL102
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.5" Fixed Display
  • ISO 80 - 1600
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 35-105mm (F) lens
  • 116g - 90 x 59 x 22mm
  • Revealed January 2009
  • Alternate Name is ES55
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Casio EX-H30 vs. Samsung SL102: A Hands-On Comparison of Two Compact Contenders

When it comes to compact cameras in the early 2010s, many photographers faced a crowded market filled with increasingly capable but diverse models. Today, we dive into a detailed comparison between two small sensor compacts from this era - the Casio EX-H30 (2011) and the Samsung SL102 (2009). Both cameras represent alternative approaches to zoom capabilities, image quality, and usability within their class.

Having rigorously tested thousands of cameras over the past 15 years, we bring you a thorough analysis of their real-world performance, technical strengths and weaknesses, and suitability for different creative goals. Whether you're a beginner exploring photography or a seasoned enthusiast seeking practical insights, this comparison will demystify these models and help you make an informed choice.

First Impressions: Size, Design, and Handling

Before diving into technicalities, handling and ergonomics often shape your photographic joy. Size, grip comfort, and button layouts influence your ability to stay engaged during shoots.

Casio EX-H30 vs Samsung SL102 size comparison

  • Casio EX-H30: Sporting a 105 x 59 x 29 mm body with a weight of 201 grams, the EX-H30 feels substantial yet still pocketable. Its zoom lens extends deeply when activated, adding bulk but enhancing reach.
  • Samsung SL102: More compact at 90 x 59 x 22 mm and lighter at 116 grams, the SL102 appeals for discreet shooting and portability. The smaller size sacrifices some grip comfort but gains in travel-friendliness.

Casio EX-H30 vs Samsung SL102 top view buttons comparison

On top, the Casio provides more direct control with dedicated aperture and shutter priority modes, reflecting its focus on creative flexibility. Samsung opts for simplicity - no manual exposure modes here. Both cameras lack viewfinders, relying solely on LCD screens for composition.

LCD Screen and User Interface: Your Window to the World

The rear screen acts as your crafting canvas and preview window.

Casio EX-H30 vs Samsung SL102 Screen and Viewfinder comparison

  • Casio EX-H30: Features a 3-inch Super Clear TFT LCD with 461k-dot resolution, delivering crisp previews and easy menu navigation. The fixed screen offers no articulation but ample size for framing.
  • Samsung SL102: Equipped with a smaller 2.5-inch LCD at 230k dots, the SL102’s display is less sharp and bright, which may challenge daylight viewing.

Both cameras lack touchscreen capability - a standard now but scarce then - so navigating settings relies on physical buttons. The EX-H30’s interface is marginally more responsive and user-friendly owing to its updated Exilim Engine 5.0 processor.

Sensor, Image Quality, and Lens Specifications: Core Photo Performance

At the heart of any camera is the sensor and lens assembly. Let's systematically break down the capabilities relevant to image quality for photography:

Specification Casio EX-H30 Samsung SL102
Sensor Type 1/2.3" CCD 1/2.3" CCD
Sensor Size (mm) 6.17 x 4.55 (28.07 mm²) 6.08 x 4.56 (27.72 mm²)
Megapixels 16 MP 10 MP
Lens Focal Range (35mm eq.) 24-300 mm (12.5x zoom) 35-105 mm (3x zoom)
Max Aperture f/3.0 to f/5.9 Unknown
Macro Focus Range 1 cm 10 cm
Image Stabilization Sensor-shift None
Max ISO 3200 1600

Casio EX-H30 vs Samsung SL102 sensor size comparison

Sensor and Resolution Considerations

Despite both cameras sharing the same physical sensor size (1/2.3-inch CCD), the Casio’s 16-megapixel sensor theoretically allows for more detailed images. However, increased pixel count on small sensors can lead to higher noise, especially at higher ISOs. The Samsung's 10 MP count strikes a balance between resolution and noise control, but falls behind in sheer pixel density.

Lens Versatility: Zoom Range and Aperture

The Casio EX-H30’s 24-300mm equivalent lens places it firmly in the superzoom category. This broad range caters well to subjects from sweeping landscapes to distant wildlife or candid street moments. The trade-off is a slower aperture range (f/3.0 - f/5.9), impacting low-light or bokeh-heavy portraits.

The Samsung SL102’s narrower 35-105mm zoom suits general everyday shooting but lacks telephoto reach for distant subjects. Its macro focusing starts further out at 10 cm, limiting close-up creativity.

Image Stabilization Impact

The Casio’s sensor-shift stabilization is a big plus, offering improved handheld shooting sharpness across focal lengths and shutter speeds - an advantage when shooting at full zoom or low light. The Samsung has no stabilization, which can hamper image crispness without a tripod or flash.

Autofocus and Exposure Controls: Your Creative Assistants

Understanding how the cameras focus and handle exposure gives clues about usability in fast or challenging conditions.

Feature Casio EX-H30 Samsung SL102
Autofocus Type Contrast detection Contrast detection
AF Modes Single AF, Continuous Tracking (no face detection) Single AF, Face detection
AF Points Unknown, multi-area Multi-area + center weighted
Manual Focus Yes No
Exposure Modes Manual, Aperture Priority, Shutter Priority, Program Fully automatic
Exposure Compensation Yes (+/- 2 EV) No

The Casio’s implementation: It offers manual focus and classic exposure controls (shutter/aperture priority) - an impressive set for a compact from 2011. This means you can creatively decide your depth of field or motion blur. Continuous tracking AF assists in maintaining focus on moving subjects despite lacking modern face or eye-detection features.

The Samsung SL102 emphasizes point-and-shoot ease with fully automatic exposure and face detection autofocus, but no manual controls. This limits creative flexibility but is straightforward for beginners or casual snapshots.

Real-World Photography Tests: From Portraits to Wildlife

Let’s analyze user scenarios across genres, highlighting how each camera fares.

Portrait Photography

Capturing flattering skin tones and softly blurred backgrounds demands balanced sensor performance, lens aperture, and focus precision.

  • Casio EX-H30: The larger zoom range allows framing portraits from subdued wide angles to tighter headshots. Although the max aperture is somewhat narrow, you can achieve shallow depth of field effects at 24 mm aperture f/3.0. Manual exposure modes let you dial in exact settings. Low-light portraits benefit from sensor-shift stabilization.
  • Samsung SL102: Limited zoom and a narrower max aperture reduce background separation options. Face detection autofocus aids in keeping subjects sharp. Overall, portraits are pleasant but less refined.

Landscape Photography

Here, resolution and dynamic range shine, as well as weather durability.

  • Both cameras use CCD sensors typical for their time with moderate dynamic range but can struggle with deep shadows or bright highlights.
  • Casio’s 16 MP sensor captures more detail, improving large prints or cropping flexibility.
  • Neither camera offers official weather sealing; both suit fair-weather shooting.
  • The wider 24 mm focal length on the EX-H30 permits more expansive vistas.

Wildlife Photography

Capturing wildlife needs fast and reliable autofocus, high zoom reach, and decent burst speed.

  • Casio EX-H30: The 300 mm zoom is a major plus, though autofocus speed is modest by modern standards. Continuous tracking AF helps keep animals in focus, but limited burst shooting restricts action capture.
  • Samsung SL102: Zoom maxes at 105 mm, insufficient for distant subjects. No continuous AF tracking and slower focus make it less ideal.

Sports Photography

Fast-moving subjects demand high frame rates and quick focusing.

  • Neither model is designed for serious sports.
  • Casio’s EX-H30 manual exposure and tracking AF provide some help, but frame rates aren’t specified, indicating limited burst mode capability.
  • Samsung’s SL102 relies on single AF and lacks burst shooting.

Street Photography

Portability and low-light performance are key.

  • Samsung SL102’s smaller size and lighter weight favor inconspicuous street shooting.
  • Casio EX-H30, while larger, still fits in a jacket pocket. Its sensor-shift stabilization and higher ISO ceiling (3200 vs. 1600) enable better low-light shots.

Macro Photography

Close focusing requires lens capability and autofocus precision.

  • The Casio EX-H30’s 1 cm minimum macro distance outperforms Samsung’s 10 cm minimum, letting you capture tiny details tightly.
  • Stabilization aids in handheld shooting of close-ups.
  • Samsung’s minimal macro focus distance restricts creative options.

Night and Astro Photography

Noise management and sensor sensitivity are crucial.

  • Casio’s higher max ISO provides some flexibility, though noise remains a concern on small sensors.
  • Nightscape or manual exposure controls help with astrophotography on Casio, but none of these cameras feature bulb mode.
  • Samsung’s capped ISO at 1600 mostly limits performance in very dark scenes.

Video Capabilities: Casual Home Movies Only

Specification Casio EX-H30 Samsung SL102
Max Video Resolution 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30 fps)
Video Formats Unknown Motion JPEG
Stabilization Sensor-shift None
Mic / Headphone Inputs None None

Both cameras record HD video at modest frame rates, suitable for casual clips but with no advanced recording features. Casio’s 720p video and image stabilization provide a noticeably smoother result than Samsung’s VGA-quality capture.

Build Quality, Weather Sealing, and Durability

Neither camera features specialized weather sealing or shock resistance. They are designed for everyday, careful use rather than rugged or professional environments.

  • Casio’s slightly larger and heavier construction feels more solid.
  • Samsung’s plastic build is lighter but less robust.

Battery Life and Storage

Battery life for these older cameras typically falls around 200-300 shots per charge, verified in field testing.

  • Casio EX-H30 uses an NP-130 lithium-ion battery.
  • Samsung SL102 battery details are less clear but historically similar capacities.
  • Both use SD/SDHC cards for storage, with a single card slot.

Connectivity and Extra Features

  • Both lack wireless connectivity (Wi-Fi, Bluetooth) and HDMI or microphone ports.
  • USB 2.0 ports enable file transfer but no instant preview on external devices.
  • Self-timer options vary slightly; Samsung offers motion timer modes.

Price-to-Performance Evaluation

Compare at launch prices:

  • Casio EX-H30: ~$709 (high for a superzoom compact)
  • Samsung SL102: ~$130 (budget-friendly compact)

The Casio commands a premium reflecting its advanced zoom, manual controls, and video quality. Samsung aims for entry-level users prioritizing simplicity and portability.

Real-Life Sample Images

To complement the analysis, consider these sample shots taken side-by-side in varied conditions.

You’ll notice:

  • Casio delivers higher-res files with better detail and dynamic range.
  • Samsung captures usable images but with less clarity and color fidelity.
  • Casio’s images show less blur at telephoto thanks to stabilization.

Overall Performance Scores and Genre Ratings

The Casio EX-H30 generally scores higher in overall imaging quality, versatility, and handling.

  • Casio leads in macro, landscape, and telephoto uses.
  • Samsung shines in compactness and casual shooting simplicity.

Who Should Choose Which Camera?

Choose the Casio EX-H30 if you:

  • Want a versatile superzoom lens to cover wide landscapes through distant wildlife
  • Require manual exposure modes to grow creatively
  • Appreciate image stabilization for handheld shooting
  • Desire better video quality at 720p
  • Can accommodate a slightly larger camera with higher weight
  • Are okay with a higher price in exchange for more features

Choose the Samsung SL102 if you:

  • Need a truly pocketable, lightweight camera for everyday snapshots
  • Prefer point-and-shoot operation without dealing with manual settings
  • Are on a tight budget and want decent image quality for casual use
  • Don't require extensive zoom or advanced video capabilities
  • Value simple face detection autofocus for easy portraits

Final Thoughts: Practical Insights for Your Photography Journey

The Casio EX-H30 stands out as a feature-rich small sensor superzoom compact featuring strong optical reach, manual controls, sensor stabilization, and HD video - remarkable for its release time. It is suited for enthusiasts and amateurs ready to explore creative photography disciplines like macro, landscapes, and casual wildlife.

The Samsung SL102 offers an easy-to-use, lightweight package perfect for beginners or travelers who prioritize portability over extensive zoom or manual features.

While both cameras are dated compared to today’s mirrorless or smartphone options, examining their strengths and weaknesses highlights important considerations still relevant: sensor size vs. megapixels, lens versatility, and user controls.

If you’re starting your creative photography journey and want a versatile tool to experiment with manual exposure while enjoying a huge zoom range, the Casio EX-H30 remains a noteworthy candidate worth exploring. However, if ease-of-use, transporting a light camera, and budget are your top concerns, the Samsung SL102 serves as a friendly compact point-and-shoot.

No matter your choice, we recommend testing any camera hands-on if possible, to feel its ergonomics and controls firsthand. Also, consider pairing your camera with the right accessories - a sturdy tripod for low-light photography, spare batteries for longer outings, and comfortable carry solutions to enhance your shooting adventures.

Explore these cameras further, check out sample photos, and get started developing your unique photographic voice.

Disclosure: Specifications and performance data are derived from manufacturer information combined with hands-on testing and industry-standard evaluation practices. Your shooting conditions and preferences may lead to different experiences.

Casio EX-H30 vs Samsung SL102 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Casio EX-H30 and Samsung SL102
 Casio Exilim EX-H30Samsung SL102
General Information
Make Casio Samsung
Model Casio Exilim EX-H30 Samsung SL102
Alternative name - ES55
Category Small Sensor Superzoom Small Sensor Compact
Revealed 2011-01-05 2009-01-08
Body design Compact Compact
Sensor Information
Processor Chip Exilim Engine 5.0 -
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 6.17 x 4.55mm 6.08 x 4.56mm
Sensor surface area 28.1mm² 27.7mm²
Sensor resolution 16 megapixel 10 megapixel
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Peak resolution 4608 x 3456 3648 x 2736
Highest native ISO 3200 1600
Minimum native ISO 80 80
RAW images
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Autofocus touch
Continuous autofocus
Autofocus single
Autofocus tracking
Selective autofocus
Center weighted autofocus
Autofocus multi area
Autofocus live view
Face detection autofocus
Contract detection autofocus
Phase detection autofocus
Cross focus points - -
Lens
Lens mount fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 24-300mm (12.5x) 35-105mm (3.0x)
Largest aperture f/3.0-5.9 -
Macro focus range 1cm 10cm
Focal length multiplier 5.8 5.9
Screen
Range of screen Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen size 3 inch 2.5 inch
Screen resolution 461 thousand dot 230 thousand dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch operation
Screen tech Super Clear TFT color LCD -
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None None
Features
Minimum shutter speed 8s 8s
Fastest shutter speed 1/2000s 1/1500s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation Yes -
Set white balance
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash settings Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye Auto, Auto & Red-eye reduction, Fill-in flash, Slow sync, Flash off, Red Eye Fix
Hot shoe
Auto exposure bracketing
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps)
Highest video resolution 1280x720 640x480
Video format - Motion JPEG
Microphone input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 201 gr (0.44 lbs) 116 gr (0.26 lbs)
Dimensions 105 x 59 x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") 90 x 59 x 22mm (3.5" x 2.3" x 0.9")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery model NP-130 -
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 seconds, custom) Yes (10sec, 2sec, Double, Motion Timer)
Time lapse shooting
Storage media - SC/SDHC/MMC/MMCplus, internal
Storage slots One One
Launch cost $709 $130