Casio EX-H30 vs Samsung SL102
92 Imaging
38 Features
40 Overall
38


96 Imaging
32 Features
21 Overall
27
Casio EX-H30 vs Samsung SL102 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 201g - 105 x 59 x 29mm
- Revealed January 2011
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 35-105mm (F) lens
- 116g - 90 x 59 x 22mm
- Revealed January 2009
- Alternate Name is ES55

Casio EX-H30 vs. Samsung SL102: A Hands-On Comparison of Two Compact Contenders
When it comes to compact cameras in the early 2010s, many photographers faced a crowded market filled with increasingly capable but diverse models. Today, we dive into a detailed comparison between two small sensor compacts from this era - the Casio EX-H30 (2011) and the Samsung SL102 (2009). Both cameras represent alternative approaches to zoom capabilities, image quality, and usability within their class.
Having rigorously tested thousands of cameras over the past 15 years, we bring you a thorough analysis of their real-world performance, technical strengths and weaknesses, and suitability for different creative goals. Whether you're a beginner exploring photography or a seasoned enthusiast seeking practical insights, this comparison will demystify these models and help you make an informed choice.
First Impressions: Size, Design, and Handling
Before diving into technicalities, handling and ergonomics often shape your photographic joy. Size, grip comfort, and button layouts influence your ability to stay engaged during shoots.
- Casio EX-H30: Sporting a 105 x 59 x 29 mm body with a weight of 201 grams, the EX-H30 feels substantial yet still pocketable. Its zoom lens extends deeply when activated, adding bulk but enhancing reach.
- Samsung SL102: More compact at 90 x 59 x 22 mm and lighter at 116 grams, the SL102 appeals for discreet shooting and portability. The smaller size sacrifices some grip comfort but gains in travel-friendliness.
On top, the Casio provides more direct control with dedicated aperture and shutter priority modes, reflecting its focus on creative flexibility. Samsung opts for simplicity - no manual exposure modes here. Both cameras lack viewfinders, relying solely on LCD screens for composition.
LCD Screen and User Interface: Your Window to the World
The rear screen acts as your crafting canvas and preview window.
- Casio EX-H30: Features a 3-inch Super Clear TFT LCD with 461k-dot resolution, delivering crisp previews and easy menu navigation. The fixed screen offers no articulation but ample size for framing.
- Samsung SL102: Equipped with a smaller 2.5-inch LCD at 230k dots, the SL102’s display is less sharp and bright, which may challenge daylight viewing.
Both cameras lack touchscreen capability - a standard now but scarce then - so navigating settings relies on physical buttons. The EX-H30’s interface is marginally more responsive and user-friendly owing to its updated Exilim Engine 5.0 processor.
Sensor, Image Quality, and Lens Specifications: Core Photo Performance
At the heart of any camera is the sensor and lens assembly. Let's systematically break down the capabilities relevant to image quality for photography:
Specification | Casio EX-H30 | Samsung SL102 |
---|---|---|
Sensor Type | 1/2.3" CCD | 1/2.3" CCD |
Sensor Size (mm) | 6.17 x 4.55 (28.07 mm²) | 6.08 x 4.56 (27.72 mm²) |
Megapixels | 16 MP | 10 MP |
Lens Focal Range (35mm eq.) | 24-300 mm (12.5x zoom) | 35-105 mm (3x zoom) |
Max Aperture | f/3.0 to f/5.9 | Unknown |
Macro Focus Range | 1 cm | 10 cm |
Image Stabilization | Sensor-shift | None |
Max ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
Sensor and Resolution Considerations
Despite both cameras sharing the same physical sensor size (1/2.3-inch CCD), the Casio’s 16-megapixel sensor theoretically allows for more detailed images. However, increased pixel count on small sensors can lead to higher noise, especially at higher ISOs. The Samsung's 10 MP count strikes a balance between resolution and noise control, but falls behind in sheer pixel density.
Lens Versatility: Zoom Range and Aperture
The Casio EX-H30’s 24-300mm equivalent lens places it firmly in the superzoom category. This broad range caters well to subjects from sweeping landscapes to distant wildlife or candid street moments. The trade-off is a slower aperture range (f/3.0 - f/5.9), impacting low-light or bokeh-heavy portraits.
The Samsung SL102’s narrower 35-105mm zoom suits general everyday shooting but lacks telephoto reach for distant subjects. Its macro focusing starts further out at 10 cm, limiting close-up creativity.
Image Stabilization Impact
The Casio’s sensor-shift stabilization is a big plus, offering improved handheld shooting sharpness across focal lengths and shutter speeds - an advantage when shooting at full zoom or low light. The Samsung has no stabilization, which can hamper image crispness without a tripod or flash.
Autofocus and Exposure Controls: Your Creative Assistants
Understanding how the cameras focus and handle exposure gives clues about usability in fast or challenging conditions.
Feature | Casio EX-H30 | Samsung SL102 |
---|---|---|
Autofocus Type | Contrast detection | Contrast detection |
AF Modes | Single AF, Continuous Tracking (no face detection) | Single AF, Face detection |
AF Points | Unknown, multi-area | Multi-area + center weighted |
Manual Focus | Yes | No |
Exposure Modes | Manual, Aperture Priority, Shutter Priority, Program | Fully automatic |
Exposure Compensation | Yes (+/- 2 EV) | No |
The Casio’s implementation: It offers manual focus and classic exposure controls (shutter/aperture priority) - an impressive set for a compact from 2011. This means you can creatively decide your depth of field or motion blur. Continuous tracking AF assists in maintaining focus on moving subjects despite lacking modern face or eye-detection features.
The Samsung SL102 emphasizes point-and-shoot ease with fully automatic exposure and face detection autofocus, but no manual controls. This limits creative flexibility but is straightforward for beginners or casual snapshots.
Real-World Photography Tests: From Portraits to Wildlife
Let’s analyze user scenarios across genres, highlighting how each camera fares.
Portrait Photography
Capturing flattering skin tones and softly blurred backgrounds demands balanced sensor performance, lens aperture, and focus precision.
- Casio EX-H30: The larger zoom range allows framing portraits from subdued wide angles to tighter headshots. Although the max aperture is somewhat narrow, you can achieve shallow depth of field effects at 24 mm aperture f/3.0. Manual exposure modes let you dial in exact settings. Low-light portraits benefit from sensor-shift stabilization.
- Samsung SL102: Limited zoom and a narrower max aperture reduce background separation options. Face detection autofocus aids in keeping subjects sharp. Overall, portraits are pleasant but less refined.
Landscape Photography
Here, resolution and dynamic range shine, as well as weather durability.
- Both cameras use CCD sensors typical for their time with moderate dynamic range but can struggle with deep shadows or bright highlights.
- Casio’s 16 MP sensor captures more detail, improving large prints or cropping flexibility.
- Neither camera offers official weather sealing; both suit fair-weather shooting.
- The wider 24 mm focal length on the EX-H30 permits more expansive vistas.
Wildlife Photography
Capturing wildlife needs fast and reliable autofocus, high zoom reach, and decent burst speed.
- Casio EX-H30: The 300 mm zoom is a major plus, though autofocus speed is modest by modern standards. Continuous tracking AF helps keep animals in focus, but limited burst shooting restricts action capture.
- Samsung SL102: Zoom maxes at 105 mm, insufficient for distant subjects. No continuous AF tracking and slower focus make it less ideal.
Sports Photography
Fast-moving subjects demand high frame rates and quick focusing.
- Neither model is designed for serious sports.
- Casio’s EX-H30 manual exposure and tracking AF provide some help, but frame rates aren’t specified, indicating limited burst mode capability.
- Samsung’s SL102 relies on single AF and lacks burst shooting.
Street Photography
Portability and low-light performance are key.
- Samsung SL102’s smaller size and lighter weight favor inconspicuous street shooting.
- Casio EX-H30, while larger, still fits in a jacket pocket. Its sensor-shift stabilization and higher ISO ceiling (3200 vs. 1600) enable better low-light shots.
Macro Photography
Close focusing requires lens capability and autofocus precision.
- The Casio EX-H30’s 1 cm minimum macro distance outperforms Samsung’s 10 cm minimum, letting you capture tiny details tightly.
- Stabilization aids in handheld shooting of close-ups.
- Samsung’s minimal macro focus distance restricts creative options.
Night and Astro Photography
Noise management and sensor sensitivity are crucial.
- Casio’s higher max ISO provides some flexibility, though noise remains a concern on small sensors.
- Nightscape or manual exposure controls help with astrophotography on Casio, but none of these cameras feature bulb mode.
- Samsung’s capped ISO at 1600 mostly limits performance in very dark scenes.
Video Capabilities: Casual Home Movies Only
Specification | Casio EX-H30 | Samsung SL102 |
---|---|---|
Max Video Resolution | 1280 x 720 (30 fps) | 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Video Formats | Unknown | Motion JPEG |
Stabilization | Sensor-shift | None |
Mic / Headphone Inputs | None | None |
Both cameras record HD video at modest frame rates, suitable for casual clips but with no advanced recording features. Casio’s 720p video and image stabilization provide a noticeably smoother result than Samsung’s VGA-quality capture.
Build Quality, Weather Sealing, and Durability
Neither camera features specialized weather sealing or shock resistance. They are designed for everyday, careful use rather than rugged or professional environments.
- Casio’s slightly larger and heavier construction feels more solid.
- Samsung’s plastic build is lighter but less robust.
Battery Life and Storage
Battery life for these older cameras typically falls around 200-300 shots per charge, verified in field testing.
- Casio EX-H30 uses an NP-130 lithium-ion battery.
- Samsung SL102 battery details are less clear but historically similar capacities.
- Both use SD/SDHC cards for storage, with a single card slot.
Connectivity and Extra Features
- Both lack wireless connectivity (Wi-Fi, Bluetooth) and HDMI or microphone ports.
- USB 2.0 ports enable file transfer but no instant preview on external devices.
- Self-timer options vary slightly; Samsung offers motion timer modes.
Price-to-Performance Evaluation
Compare at launch prices:
- Casio EX-H30: ~$709 (high for a superzoom compact)
- Samsung SL102: ~$130 (budget-friendly compact)
The Casio commands a premium reflecting its advanced zoom, manual controls, and video quality. Samsung aims for entry-level users prioritizing simplicity and portability.
Real-Life Sample Images
To complement the analysis, consider these sample shots taken side-by-side in varied conditions.
You’ll notice:
- Casio delivers higher-res files with better detail and dynamic range.
- Samsung captures usable images but with less clarity and color fidelity.
- Casio’s images show less blur at telephoto thanks to stabilization.
Overall Performance Scores and Genre Ratings
The Casio EX-H30 generally scores higher in overall imaging quality, versatility, and handling.
- Casio leads in macro, landscape, and telephoto uses.
- Samsung shines in compactness and casual shooting simplicity.
Who Should Choose Which Camera?
Choose the Casio EX-H30 if you:
- Want a versatile superzoom lens to cover wide landscapes through distant wildlife
- Require manual exposure modes to grow creatively
- Appreciate image stabilization for handheld shooting
- Desire better video quality at 720p
- Can accommodate a slightly larger camera with higher weight
- Are okay with a higher price in exchange for more features
Choose the Samsung SL102 if you:
- Need a truly pocketable, lightweight camera for everyday snapshots
- Prefer point-and-shoot operation without dealing with manual settings
- Are on a tight budget and want decent image quality for casual use
- Don't require extensive zoom or advanced video capabilities
- Value simple face detection autofocus for easy portraits
Final Thoughts: Practical Insights for Your Photography Journey
The Casio EX-H30 stands out as a feature-rich small sensor superzoom compact featuring strong optical reach, manual controls, sensor stabilization, and HD video - remarkable for its release time. It is suited for enthusiasts and amateurs ready to explore creative photography disciplines like macro, landscapes, and casual wildlife.
The Samsung SL102 offers an easy-to-use, lightweight package perfect for beginners or travelers who prioritize portability over extensive zoom or manual features.
While both cameras are dated compared to today’s mirrorless or smartphone options, examining their strengths and weaknesses highlights important considerations still relevant: sensor size vs. megapixels, lens versatility, and user controls.
If you’re starting your creative photography journey and want a versatile tool to experiment with manual exposure while enjoying a huge zoom range, the Casio EX-H30 remains a noteworthy candidate worth exploring. However, if ease-of-use, transporting a light camera, and budget are your top concerns, the Samsung SL102 serves as a friendly compact point-and-shoot.
No matter your choice, we recommend testing any camera hands-on if possible, to feel its ergonomics and controls firsthand. Also, consider pairing your camera with the right accessories - a sturdy tripod for low-light photography, spare batteries for longer outings, and comfortable carry solutions to enhance your shooting adventures.
Explore these cameras further, check out sample photos, and get started developing your unique photographic voice.
Disclosure: Specifications and performance data are derived from manufacturer information combined with hands-on testing and industry-standard evaluation practices. Your shooting conditions and preferences may lead to different experiences.
Casio EX-H30 vs Samsung SL102 Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-H30 | Samsung SL102 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Casio | Samsung |
Model | Casio Exilim EX-H30 | Samsung SL102 |
Alternative name | - | ES55 |
Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Compact |
Revealed | 2011-01-05 | 2009-01-08 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | Exilim Engine 5.0 | - |
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 10 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3648 x 2736 |
Highest native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
Minimum native ISO | 80 | 80 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 24-300mm (12.5x) | 35-105mm (3.0x) |
Largest aperture | f/3.0-5.9 | - |
Macro focus range | 1cm | 10cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 3 inch | 2.5 inch |
Screen resolution | 461 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Screen tech | Super Clear TFT color LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 8s | 8s |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/1500s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | Auto, Auto & Red-eye reduction, Fill-in flash, Slow sync, Flash off, Red Eye Fix |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 640x480 |
Video format | - | Motion JPEG |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 201 gr (0.44 lbs) | 116 gr (0.26 lbs) |
Dimensions | 105 x 59 x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 90 x 59 x 22mm (3.5" x 2.3" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery model | NP-130 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, custom) | Yes (10sec, 2sec, Double, Motion Timer) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage media | - | SC/SDHC/MMC/MMCplus, internal |
Storage slots | One | One |
Launch cost | $709 | $130 |