Casio EX-H30 vs Samsung SL102
92 Imaging
39 Features
40 Overall
39
96 Imaging
33 Features
21 Overall
28
Casio EX-H30 vs Samsung SL102 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 201g - 105 x 59 x 29mm
- Revealed January 2011
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 35-105mm (F) lens
- 116g - 90 x 59 x 22mm
- Revealed January 2009
- Alternate Name is ES55
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Casio EX-H30 vs Samsung SL102 Overview
In this article, we are comparing the Casio EX-H30 versus Samsung SL102, former is a Small Sensor Superzoom while the other is a Small Sensor Compact by companies Casio and Samsung. There exists a substantial gap among the sensor resolutions of the EX-H30 (16MP) and SL102 (10MP) but they feature the same exact sensor sizing (1/2.3").
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe EX-H30 was launched 2 years after the SL102 which is a fairly big difference as far as camera technology is concerned. The two cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before going straight into a step-by-step comparison, below is a short highlight of how the EX-H30 matches up versus the SL102 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Casio EX-H30 vs Samsung SL102 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pics for Casio Exilim EX-H30 & Samsung SL102. The complete galleries are available at Casio EX-H30 Gallery & Samsung SL102 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-H30 over the Samsung SL102
| EX-H30 | SL102 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | January 2011 |  | January 2009 | Newer by 25 months |
| Focus manually |  | More accurate focusing | ||
| Display sizing | 3" |  | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.5") |
| Display resolution | 461k |  | 230k | Clearer display (+231k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung SL102 over the Casio EX-H30
| SL102 | EX-H30 |
|---|
Common features in the Casio EX-H30 and Samsung SL102
| EX-H30 | SL102 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Lacking selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | Lacking Touch display |
Casio EX-H30 vs Samsung SL102 Physical Comparison
For those who are intending to travel with your camera, you have to factor in its weight and proportions. The Casio EX-H30 provides exterior dimensions of 105mm x 59mm x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") having a weight of 201 grams (0.44 lbs) while the Samsung SL102 has measurements of 90mm x 59mm x 22mm (3.5" x 2.3" x 0.9") and a weight of 116 grams (0.26 lbs).
Compare the Casio EX-H30 versus Samsung SL102 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you have at that time. Below is the front view dimension comparison of the EX-H30 and the SL102.
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the EX-H30 and SL102 is 92 and 96 respectively.
Casio EX-H30 vs Samsung SL102 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it can be tough to see the contrast in sensor dimensions merely by seeing technical specs. The picture below will provide you a more clear sense of the sensor sizes in the EX-H30 and SL102.
As you have seen, the 2 cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing but not the same megapixels. You can expect to see the Casio EX-H30 to provide extra detail utilizing its extra 6MP. Greater resolution will also enable you to crop images a little more aggressively. The more modern EX-H30 will have a benefit when it comes to sensor technology.
Casio EX-H30 vs Samsung SL102 Screen and ViewFinder
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesStreet Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoSports Comparison
Photography GlossaryTravel Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthLandscape Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsVlogging Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
Casio EX-H30 vs Samsung SL102 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-H30 | Samsung SL102 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Casio | Samsung |
| Model | Casio Exilim EX-H30 | Samsung SL102 |
| Alternative name | - | ES55 |
| Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Compact |
| Revealed | 2011-01-05 | 2009-01-08 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | Exilim Engine 5.0 | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 10 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3648 x 2736 |
| Highest native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
| Minimum native ISO | 80 | 80 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 24-300mm (12.5x) | 35-105mm (3.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/3.0-5.9 | - |
| Macro focus range | 1cm | 10cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 3 inch | 2.5 inch |
| Screen resolution | 461 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Screen tech | Super Clear TFT color LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 8s | 8s |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/1500s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | Auto, Auto & Red-eye reduction, Fill-in flash, Slow sync, Flash off, Red Eye Fix |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 640x480 |
| Video format | - | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 201 gr (0.44 lbs) | 116 gr (0.26 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 105 x 59 x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 90 x 59 x 22mm (3.5" x 2.3" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | NP-130 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, custom) | Yes (10sec, 2sec, Double, Motion Timer) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage media | - | SC/SDHC/MMC/MMCplus, internal |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Launch cost | $709 | $130 |