Casio EX-S200 vs Kodak M320
96 Imaging
37 Features
25 Overall
32
95 Imaging
32 Features
10 Overall
23
Casio EX-S200 vs Kodak M320 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 50 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 27-108mm (F3.2-5.9) lens
- 132g - 100 x 55 x 18mm
- Introduced August 2010
(Full Review)
- 9MP - 1/2.5" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 34-102mm (F2.8-5.1) lens
- 155g - 97 x 60 x 21mm
- Released January 2009
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Casio EX-S200 vs Kodak M320 Overview
Here is a extensive assessment of the Casio EX-S200 versus Kodak M320, both Ultracompact digital cameras by competitors Casio and Kodak. There exists a large gap between the image resolutions of the EX-S200 (14MP) and M320 (9MP) and the EX-S200 (1/2.3") and M320 (1/2.5") use different sensor measurements.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe EX-S200 was launched 20 months later than the M320 making the cameras a generation apart from one another. Both of these cameras come with the identical body type (Ultracompact).
Before going through a thorough comparison, below is a brief view of how the EX-S200 grades against the M320 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixels Casio EX-S200 vs Kodak M320 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pictures for Casio Exilim EX-S200 & Kodak EasyShare M320. The complete galleries are provided at Casio EX-S200 Gallery & Kodak M320 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-S200 over the Kodak M320
| EX-S200 | M320 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | August 2010 |  | January 2009 | Fresher by 20 months |
| Focus manually |  | Dial accurate focusing |
Reasons to pick Kodak M320 over the Casio EX-S200
| M320 | EX-S200 |
|---|
Common features in the Casio EX-S200 and Kodak M320
| EX-S200 | M320 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display dimension | 2.7" |  | 2.7" | Identical display measurements |
| Display resolution | 230k |  | 230k | The same display resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither provides selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | Neither provides Touch friendly display |
Casio EX-S200 vs Kodak M320 Physical Comparison
If you're looking to carry your camera frequently, you'll need to think about its weight and proportions. The Casio EX-S200 provides physical dimensions of 100mm x 55mm x 18mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.7") accompanied by a weight of 132 grams (0.29 lbs) whilst the Kodak M320 has measurements of 97mm x 60mm x 21mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 0.8") with a weight of 155 grams (0.34 lbs).
See the Casio EX-S200 versus Kodak M320 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you are employing during that time. Below is the front view physical size comparison of the EX-S200 and the M320.
Using dimensions and weight, the portability score of the EX-S200 and M320 is 96 and 95 respectively.
Casio EX-S200 vs Kodak M320 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it can be difficult to imagine the contrast between sensor sizing merely by reading specs. The visual below may offer you a greater sense of the sensor dimensions in the EX-S200 and M320.
All in all, the 2 cameras posses different resolutions and different sensor sizing. The EX-S200 due to its larger sensor is going to make achieving shallow depth of field less difficult and the Casio EX-S200 will deliver extra detail utilizing its extra 5MP. Greater resolution can also enable you to crop pics somewhat more aggressively. The newer EX-S200 should have an advantage when it comes to sensor innovation.
Casio EX-S200 vs Kodak M320 Screen and ViewFinder
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsStreet Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneSports Comparison
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealingTravel Comparison
Photography GlossaryLandscape Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesVlogging Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
Casio EX-S200 vs Kodak M320 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-S200 | Kodak EasyShare M320 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Casio | Kodak |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-S200 | Kodak EasyShare M320 |
| Class | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
| Introduced | 2010-08-03 | 2009-01-08 |
| Physical type | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | Exilim Engine 5.0 | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.5" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 5.744 x 4.308mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 24.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14MP | 9MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 3472 x 2604 |
| Highest native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
| Lowest native ISO | 50 | 80 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Total focus points | - | 25 |
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 27-108mm (4.0x) | 34-102mm (3.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/3.2-5.9 | f/2.8-5.1 |
| Macro focusing range | - | 10cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 6.3 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 2.7 inch | 2.7 inch |
| Screen resolution | 230 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 4 secs | 4 secs |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/1400 secs |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | - | 3.00 m |
| Flash options | Auto, flash off, flash on, red eye reduction | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 × 720 (20 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 640x480 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 132 gr (0.29 lbs) | 155 gr (0.34 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 100 x 55 x 18mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.7") | 97 x 60 x 21mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 0.8") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | NP-120 | KLIC-7001 |
| Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC, Internal | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Price at release | $0 | $39 |
