Casio EX-S200 vs Kodak M575
96 Imaging
37 Features
25 Overall
32
95 Imaging
37 Features
24 Overall
31
Casio EX-S200 vs Kodak M575 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 50 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 27-108mm (F3.2-5.9) lens
- 132g - 100 x 55 x 18mm
- Introduced August 2010
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1000
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F) lens
- 152g - 99 x 58 x 19mm
- Revealed January 2010
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Casio EX-S200 vs Kodak M575 Overview
Lets look more closely at the Casio EX-S200 vs Kodak M575, both Ultracompact digital cameras by competitors Casio and Kodak. The image resolution of the EX-S200 (14MP) and the M575 (14MP) is relatively well matched and they come with the exact same sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe EX-S200 was announced 7 months later than the M575 so they are both of a similar generation. Both cameras come with the identical body type (Ultracompact).
Before delving in to a more detailed comparison, below is a simple highlight of how the EX-S200 matches up versus the M575 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Casio EX-S200 vs Kodak M575 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery photos for Casio Exilim EX-S200 and Kodak EasyShare M575. The whole galleries are provided at Casio EX-S200 Gallery and Kodak M575 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-S200 over the Kodak M575
| EX-S200 | M575 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | August 2010 |  | January 2010 | Fresher by 7 months |
| Focus manually |  | Dial accurate focus |
Reasons to pick Kodak M575 over the Casio EX-S200
| M575 | EX-S200 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen dimension | 3" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
Common features in the Casio EX-S200 and Kodak M575
| EX-S200 | M575 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen resolution | 230k |  | 230k | Exact same screen resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither contains selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | No Touch friendly screen |
Casio EX-S200 vs Kodak M575 Physical Comparison
In case you're going to carry your camera, you should take into account its weight and size. The Casio EX-S200 has got exterior dimensions of 100mm x 55mm x 18mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.7") having a weight of 132 grams (0.29 lbs) while the Kodak M575 has specifications of 99mm x 58mm x 19mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7") along with a weight of 152 grams (0.34 lbs).
Analyze the Casio EX-S200 vs Kodak M575 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you are working with during that time. Underneath is the front view over all size comparison of the EX-S200 and the M575.
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the EX-S200 and M575 is 96 and 95 respectively.
Casio EX-S200 vs Kodak M575 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it's hard to see the contrast between sensor sizing only by looking at a spec sheet. The photograph underneath should offer you a more clear sense of the sensor dimensions in the EX-S200 and M575.
As you can see, each of these cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements and the identical resolution so you should expect similar quality of images but you really should consider the production date of the products into consideration. The fresher EX-S200 is going to have an advantage with regard to sensor technology.
Casio EX-S200 vs Kodak M575 Screen and ViewFinder
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsStreet Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesSports Comparison
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealingTravel Comparison
Photography GlossaryLandscape Comparison
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixelsVlogging Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Casio EX-S200 vs Kodak M575 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-S200 | Kodak EasyShare M575 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Casio | Kodak |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-S200 | Kodak EasyShare M575 |
| Type | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
| Introduced | 2010-08-03 | 2010-01-05 |
| Body design | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | Exilim Engine 5.0 | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 4288 x 3216 |
| Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 1000 |
| Lowest native ISO | 50 | 80 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 27-108mm (4.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/3.2-5.9 | - |
| Macro focusing distance | - | 10cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 2.7 inches | 3 inches |
| Resolution of screen | 230 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 8 secs |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/1400 secs |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | - | 3.50 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, flash off, flash on, red eye reduction | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 × 720 (20 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 132 grams (0.29 lb) | 152 grams (0.34 lb) |
| Dimensions | 100 x 55 x 18mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.7") | 99 x 58 x 19mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | NP-120 | KLIC-7006 |
| Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC, Internal | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Launch price | $0 | $139 |
