Casio EX-S200 vs Olympus VG-145
96 Imaging
37 Features
25 Overall
32
96 Imaging
37 Features
24 Overall
31
Casio EX-S200 vs Olympus VG-145 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 50 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 27-108mm (F3.2-5.9) lens
- 132g - 100 x 55 x 18mm
- Released August 2010
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 1280 x 720 video
- 26-130mm (F2.8-6.5) lens
- 120g - 96 x 57 x 19mm
- Introduced July 2011
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Casio EX-S200 vs Olympus VG-145 Overview
The following is a extended comparison of the Casio EX-S200 and Olympus VG-145, both Ultracompact digital cameras by rivals Casio and Olympus. The image resolution of the EX-S200 (14MP) and the VG-145 (14MP) is fairly well matched and they use the same exact sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe EX-S200 was manufactured 11 months prior to the VG-145 and they are of a similar age. Both of the cameras offer the identical body type (Ultracompact).
Before delving straight into a thorough comparison, below is a simple view of how the EX-S200 scores vs the VG-145 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Photography Glossary Casio EX-S200 vs Olympus VG-145 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Casio Exilim EX-S200 & Olympus VG-145. The entire galleries are available at Casio EX-S200 Gallery & Olympus VG-145 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-S200 over the Olympus VG-145
| EX-S200 | VG-145 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | Very precise focusing |
Reasons to pick Olympus VG-145 over the Casio EX-S200
| VG-145 | EX-S200 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | July 2011 |  | August 2010 | Newer by 11 months |
| Display sizing | 3" |  | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
Common features in the Casio EX-S200 and Olympus VG-145
| EX-S200 | VG-145 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display resolution | 230k |  | 230k | Identical display resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | No selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | No Touch display |
Casio EX-S200 vs Olympus VG-145 Physical Comparison
When you are looking to travel with your camera frequently, you're going to have to think about its weight and measurements. The Casio EX-S200 enjoys physical measurements of 100mm x 55mm x 18mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.7") accompanied by a weight of 132 grams (0.29 lbs) and the Olympus VG-145 has proportions of 96mm x 57mm x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") having a weight of 120 grams (0.26 lbs).
Look at the Casio EX-S200 and Olympus VG-145 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you have attached at that moment. The following is the front view proportions comparison of the EX-S200 vs the VG-145.
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the EX-S200 and VG-145 is 96 and 96 respectively.
Casio EX-S200 vs Olympus VG-145 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it can be hard to envision the gap between sensor dimensions simply by checking technical specs. The pic here might provide you a stronger sense of the sensor measurements in the EX-S200 and VG-145.
As you can tell, both the cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing and the same megapixels and you can expect similar quality of files however you would want to take the launch date of the products into consideration. The more aged EX-S200 is going to be behind when it comes to sensor technology.
Casio EX-S200 vs Olympus VG-145 Screen and ViewFinder
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneStreet Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsSports Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesTravel Comparison
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealingLandscape Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoVlogging Comparison
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixels
Casio EX-S200 vs Olympus VG-145 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-S200 | Olympus VG-145 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Casio | Olympus |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-S200 | Olympus VG-145 |
| Category | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
| Released | 2010-08-03 | 2011-07-27 |
| Body design | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | Exilim Engine 5.0 | TruePic III |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 |
| Full resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 4288 x 3216 |
| Max native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
| Lowest native ISO | 50 | 80 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 27-108mm (4.0x) | 26-130mm (5.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/3.2-5.9 | f/2.8-6.5 |
| Macro focusing range | - | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 2.7 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of screen | 230k dot | 230k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Screen technology | - | TFT Color LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 4 seconds |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | - | 4.40 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, flash off, flash on, red eye reduction | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 × 720 (20 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
| Max video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 132 grams (0.29 lb) | 120 grams (0.26 lb) |
| Dimensions | 100 x 55 x 18mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.7") | 96 x 57 x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 160 photos |
| Battery form | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | NP-120 | LI-70B |
| Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC, Internal | SD/SDHC |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Launch pricing | $0 | $0 |
