Casio EX-S200 vs Samsung ST100
96 Imaging
37 Features
25 Overall
32
95 Imaging
36 Features
34 Overall
35
Casio EX-S200 vs Samsung ST100 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 50 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 27-108mm (F3.2-5.9) lens
- 132g - 100 x 55 x 18mm
- Revealed August 2010
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 35-175mm (F3.6-4.8) lens
- 155g - 100 x 60 x 20mm
- Launched January 2010
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Casio EX-S200 vs Samsung ST100 Overview
Below is a detailed assessment of the Casio EX-S200 and Samsung ST100, both Ultracompact digital cameras by companies Casio and Samsung. The sensor resolution of the EX-S200 (14MP) and the ST100 (14MP) is fairly similar and both cameras boast the same sensor size (1/2.3").
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe EX-S200 was brought out 7 months later than the ST100 which means that they are both of a similar age. Both cameras have the same body design (Ultracompact).
Before going right into a in-depth comparison, here is a short introduction of how the EX-S200 matches up versus the ST100 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Casio EX-S200 vs Samsung ST100 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pictures for Casio Exilim EX-S200 & Samsung ST100. The entire galleries are provided at Casio EX-S200 Gallery & Samsung ST100 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-S200 over the Samsung ST100
| EX-S200 | ST100 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | August 2010 |  | January 2010 | More recent by 7 months |
| Manual focus |  | Very exact focusing |
Reasons to pick Samsung ST100 over the Casio EX-S200
| ST100 | EX-S200 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display dimensions | 3.5" |  | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.8") |
| Display resolution | 1152k |  | 230k | Sharper display (+922k dot) |
| Touch friendly display |  | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Casio EX-S200 and Samsung ST100
| EX-S200 | ST100 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Lacking selfie screen |
Casio EX-S200 vs Samsung ST100 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is aiming to lug around your camera frequently, you should think about its weight and size. The Casio EX-S200 provides outer measurements of 100mm x 55mm x 18mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.7") along with a weight of 132 grams (0.29 lbs) while the Samsung ST100 has specifications of 100mm x 60mm x 20mm (3.9" x 2.4" x 0.8") along with a weight of 155 grams (0.34 lbs).
Contrast the Casio EX-S200 and Samsung ST100 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you are utilising at that time. Following is a front view sizing comparison of the EX-S200 and the ST100.
Factoring in size and weight, the portability score of the EX-S200 and ST100 is 96 and 95 respectively.
Casio EX-S200 vs Samsung ST100 Sensor Comparison
Generally, it's difficult to visualize the difference between sensor measurements purely by reviewing specs. The visual underneath should offer you a far better sense of the sensor sizing in the EX-S200 and ST100.
All in all, both of these cameras provide the same sensor dimensions and the same exact resolution therefore you can expect similar quality of files however you would want to take the launch date of the products into consideration. The younger EX-S200 provides a benefit in sensor innovation.
Casio EX-S200 vs Samsung ST100 Screen and ViewFinder
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsStreet Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesSports Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsTravel Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideLandscape Comparison
Photography GlossaryVlogging Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Casio EX-S200 vs Samsung ST100 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-S200 | Samsung ST100 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Casio | Samsung |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-S200 | Samsung ST100 |
| Type | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
| Revealed | 2010-08-03 | 2010-01-06 |
| Physical type | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | Exilim Engine 5.0 | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 4320 x 3240 |
| Highest native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Minimum native ISO | 50 | 80 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 27-108mm (4.0x) | 35-175mm (5.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/3.2-5.9 | f/3.6-4.8 |
| Macro focusing range | - | 5cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 2.7 inches | 3.5 inches |
| Resolution of display | 230k dots | 1,152k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 4 secs | 8 secs |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/1000 secs |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | - | 3.10 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, flash off, flash on, red eye reduction | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 × 720 (20 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 132g (0.29 pounds) | 155g (0.34 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 100 x 55 x 18mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.7") | 100 x 60 x 20mm (3.9" x 2.4" x 0.8") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | NP-120 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC, Internal | MicroSD/ MicroSDHC, Internal |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Cost at release | $0 | $250 |