Casio EX-S200 vs Samsung ST95
96 Imaging
37 Features
25 Overall
32
99 Imaging
39 Features
19 Overall
31
Casio EX-S200 vs Samsung ST95 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 50 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 27-108mm (F3.2-5.9) lens
- 132g - 100 x 55 x 18mm
- Announced August 2010
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 0 - 0
- 1280 x 720 video
- ()mm (F) lens
- n/ag - 92 x 53 x 17mm
- Revealed January 2011
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Casio EX-S200 vs Samsung ST95 Overview
Lets examine more in depth at the Casio EX-S200 vs Samsung ST95, both Ultracompact cameras by competitors Casio and Samsung. The image resolution of the EX-S200 (14MP) and the ST95 (16MP) is very comparable and they possess the same exact sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe EX-S200 was released 5 months earlier than the ST95 so they are both of a similar age. Both of these cameras offer the identical body type (Ultracompact).
Before getting through a complete comparison, below is a brief summation of how the EX-S200 scores vs the ST95 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Casio EX-S200 vs Samsung ST95 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pics for Casio Exilim EX-S200 & Samsung ST95. The complete galleries are provided at Casio EX-S200 Gallery & Samsung ST95 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-S200 over the Samsung ST95
| EX-S200 | ST95 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | More accurate focusing |
Reasons to pick Samsung ST95 over the Casio EX-S200
| ST95 | EX-S200 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display sizing | 3" |  | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
| Display resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Sharper display (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-S200 and Samsung ST95
| EX-S200 | ST95 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | August 2010 |  | January 2011 | Same age |
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Absent selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | Absent Touch display |
Casio EX-S200 vs Samsung ST95 Physical Comparison
If you are going to carry your camera often, you'll have to think about its weight and size. The Casio EX-S200 offers outside dimensions of 100mm x 55mm x 18mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.7") accompanied by a weight of 132 grams (0.29 lbs) whilst the Samsung ST95 has specifications of 92mm x 53mm x 17mm (3.6" x 2.1" x 0.7") accompanied by a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs).
See the Casio EX-S200 vs Samsung ST95 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you have at that time. Underneath is the front view proportions comparison of the EX-S200 against the ST95.
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the EX-S200 and ST95 is 96 and 99 respectively.
Casio EX-S200 vs Samsung ST95 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it can be hard to imagine the difference in sensor sizing just by checking out specifications. The photograph here should provide you a clearer sense of the sensor sizes in the EX-S200 and ST95.
Plainly, both the cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing but different MP. You can expect to see the Samsung ST95 to produce more detail as a result of its extra 2MP. Greater resolution will enable you to crop photos a little more aggressively.
Casio EX-S200 vs Samsung ST95 Screen and ViewFinder
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesStreet Comparison
Photography GlossarySports Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsTravel Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideLandscape Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneVlogging Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Casio EX-S200 vs Samsung ST95 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-S200 | Samsung ST95 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Casio | Samsung |
| Model | Casio Exilim EX-S200 | Samsung ST95 |
| Category | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
| Announced | 2010-08-03 | 2011-01-19 |
| Physical type | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | Exilim Engine 5.0 | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.16 x 4.62mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.5mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14MP | 16MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
| Max resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Max native ISO | 3200 | - |
| Min native ISO | 50 | - |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 27-108mm (4.0x) | () |
| Maximum aperture | f/3.2-5.9 | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 2.7" | 3" |
| Screen resolution | 230 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 4s | 8s |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash settings | Auto, flash off, flash on, red eye reduction | - |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 × 720 (20 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 |
| Max video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | - |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | none |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 132g (0.29 lb) | - |
| Dimensions | 100 x 55 x 18mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.7") | 92 x 53 x 17mm (3.6" x 2.1" x 0.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | NP-120 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | - |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC, Internal | - |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Launch cost | $0 | $145 |