Clicky

Casio EX-S5 vs Pentax Q7

Portability
97
Imaging
32
Features
12
Overall
24
Casio Exilim EX-S5 front
 
Pentax Q7 front
Portability
92
Imaging
37
Features
54
Overall
43

Casio EX-S5 vs Pentax Q7 Key Specs

Casio EX-S5
(Full Review)
  • 9MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 64 - 1600
  • 640 x 480 video
  • ()mm (F3.1-5.6) lens
  • 100g - 102 x 35 x 22mm
  • Released January 2009
Pentax Q7
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 12800
  • Sensor based Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • Pentax Q Mount
  • 200g - 102 x 58 x 34mm
  • Announced August 2013
  • Earlier Model is Pentax Q10
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Casio EX-S5 vs. Pentax Q7: Two Compact Cameras  Years Apart - Which One Deserves Your Attention?

In the world of digital photography, cameras come in all shapes, sizes, and capabilities. Today, we pit two compact cameras against each other, separated by about four years of technological leaps: the Casio EX-S5, an ultracompact from 2009, and the Pentax Q7, an entry-level mirrorless from 2013. On paper, these cameras may seem to share a small form factor, but their internal architectures, target users, and practical performance are world apart.

Having tested thousands of cameras over the years, I’m keen to explore how these two stack up for various photography disciplines and real-world scenarios. We'll dig deep into their sensor technology, autofocus prowess, ergonomics, image quality - and yes, even touch on video and connectivity options. By the end, you’ll have a clear picture of which camera offers better value, suited for different demands, budgets, and creative goals.

Let’s start by sizing them up - literally and figuratively.

Pocketability & Handling: Size Isn’t Everything, But It Matters

Both cameras are engineered for compactness, aiming to appeal to photographers wanting a highly portable solution. Let’s inspect their physical ergonomics and handling traits to understand how they feel in the hand and how that impacts prolonged shooting sessions.

Casio EX-S5 vs Pentax Q7 size comparison

Casio EX-S5: This little ultracompact is a mere 102 x 35 x 22 mm, weighing in at 100 grams. It slips effortlessly into any pocket or the smallest bag compartments. However, its ultra-slim profile makes for a challenging grip - I often found myself holding it with some finger gymnastics to maintain stability. The lack of a viewfinder combined with a small 2.7-inch, low-resolution fixed LCD (just 115k dots) hampers composition precision, especially in bright daylight. On the plus side, it sports a classic, distraction-free design with minimal controls - easy for beginners who prefer point-and-shoot simplicity.

Pentax Q7: Packing a bigger footprint at 102 x 58 x 34 mm and double the weight (200 grams), the Q7 is still pocketable but demands a bit more deliberate carrying. The thicker body offers a secure grip and more substantial button layout, which I appreciate during longer shooting. Its 3-inch 460k-dot TFT LCD is a marked improvement, providing clearer live view and menu navigation feedback. Though lacking a built-in viewfinder, an optional optical accessory is available, catering to photographers who need framing precision.

For photographers prioritizing absolute portability and the simplest interface, the Casio is unbeatable. But if you want more control and a balance between size and usability, the Pentax Q7’s ergonomics make long photo walks or travel shooting less fatiguing.

Sensor & Image Quality: The Core of Every Camera

This is where the two cameras diverge most. Sensor technology and physical size dramatically influence photographic potential, especially regarding resolution, dynamic range, and noise performance.

Casio EX-S5 vs Pentax Q7 sensor size comparison

Casio EX-S5: Equipped with a 1/2.3” CCD sensor measuring 6.17 x 4.55 mm and delivering 9 megapixels (3648 x 2736), the EX-S5 fits the archetype of compact cameras from the late 2000s. CCD sensors were popular for their color rendition but also prone to higher noise levels at elevated ISO. With a native ISO range of 64–1600 and no RAW support, the camera relies heavily on in-camera JPEG processing. Expect modest dynamic range and limited detail retention in shadows or highlights, making it less suited to challenging lighting conditions. Under daylight, images can be pleasant but lack the punch and subtlety that modern CMOS sensors offer.

Pentax Q7: The Q7 uses a considerably larger 1/1.7” BSI-CMOS sensor (7.44 x 5.58 mm), offering 12 megapixels (4000 x 3000) and a native ISO range of 100–12800. The BSI (backside illuminated) sensor enhances low-light sensitivity, and support for RAW files grants much-needed editing flexibility. The larger effective sensor size translates to wider dynamic range, cleaner shadows, and better highlight roll-off. Even at high ISOs, images stay usable - a boon for indoor, event, or night shooting. Of course, the Q7 trades the ultra-compact profile for a slightly bigger camera and interchangeable lens system, but the payoff in image quality is evident.

In short, if crisp, flexible, high-quality images are your priority, the Pentax Q7 stands head and shoulders above the Casio EX-S5.

A Closer Look at Controls and Interface: Making the Experience Smooth

A camera’s usability hinges on how intuitively you can adjust settings and navigate features. Let’s turn our attention to the user interface - controls, screen, and menu.

Casio EX-S5 vs Pentax Q7 top view buttons comparison

Casio EX-S5: Controls are minimalistic - typical of ultracompact cameras designed for simplicity. No dedicated dials for aperture or shutter speed, no shutter priority, aperture priority, or manual modes. Exposure compensation isn’t available. The self-timer options are basic (10 sec, 2 sec, triple), and custom white balance can be set. Autofocus relies on a single contrast-detection point without face or tracking capabilities, which weakens its performance for moving subjects or complex compositions.

Pentax Q7: The layout is refreshingly more sophisticated for an entry-level mirrorless with dedicated dials and buttons for shutter priority, aperture priority, and manual exposure modes. Exposure compensation is present, and white balance can be user-defined or set to auto modes. Its autofocus system leans on contrast detection too but adds face detection and AF tracking, making it more versatile for portraits or event coverage. Continuous shooting at 5 fps rounds off the performance for action shots.

Casio EX-S5 vs Pentax Q7 Screen and Viewfinder comparison

The Q7’s higher resolution and larger LCD make image review and focusing easier, while the Casio’s display often feels cramped, especially for detailed zoom-ins after shots.

Photographers who prioritize creative control and adaptability will gravitate toward the Pentax Q7 interface, while absolute beginners or casual shooters may appreciate Casio’s one-button simplicity.

Autofocus and Burst Shooting: Capturing the Moment

Whether shooting wildlife, sports, or even kids, autofocus system speed and accuracy directly impact your keeper rate.

Casio EX-S5: The single-point contrast-detection AF is decidedly basic. It hunts noticeably in low light and can lag when subjects move unexpectedly. No face detection or tracking means you will have to anticipate focusing points manually, which can be a challenge without framing aids. Burst mode specifications aren't advertised; I suspect it's very limited or nonexistent.

Pentax Q7: Its autofocus, though also contrast-based, integrates face detection and tracking, a huge advantage in fast-paced shooting like street or event photography. Continuous single AF mode and 5 fps burst allow for moderate action capture. Shutter speeds max at 1/2000s, good enough for freezing many fast-moving subjects but no ultra-high-speed sports application here.

While neither camera is designed as a pro sports shooter, the Q7’s AF system will yield noticeably higher success rates for everyday moving subjects, birds in flight, or active children.

Lens Systems and Versatility: Fixed vs. Interchangeable

A major difference lies in lens flexibility.

Casio’s EX-S5 comes with a fixed lens featuring a 5.8x zoom range and aperture varying from f/3.1 to f/5.6. The focal length multiplier (crop factor) is 5.8, indicating modest zoom coverage. The fixed setup offers simplicity but restricts versatility; for example, macro photography or wide-angle landscapes are constrained by the lens's physical limitations.

Pentax Q7 opens doors with its Pentax Q mount, compatible with 8 lenses ranging from super wide-angle to telephoto and macro. The crop factor is 4.8, slightly less extreme than Casio’s, enabling more natural focal lengths and better shallow-depth-of-field control. This lens ecosystem encourages experimentation and specialized shooting styles.

For macro enthusiasts, telephoto wildlife photographers, or those wanting to shoot landscapes coupled with portraits, the Q7’s interchangeable system is a huge plus.

Image Stabilization: Handheld Shots Made Easier

The Casio EX-S5 offers no image stabilization whatsoever. This deficiency means you'll need fast shutter speeds or support for stable surfaces to avoid blur, especially in indoor or dusk environments.

The Pentax Q7 boasts sensor-based image stabilization (IBIS). This system compensates for hand shake regardless of the mounted lens, providing smoother handheld shots down to slower shutter speeds. For travel photography or video, this is a significant advantage.

Video Capabilities: From Fun Clips to Creative Expression

Video shooting in compact cameras often lags image quality; however, capabilities have improved drastically.

Casio EX-S5: Offers very low-resolution video maxing at 848x480 pixels at 30 fps in Motion JPEG format. No external mic input, minimal options, and no stabilization mean video footage is frankly more a novelty than a serious creative tool.

Pentax Q7: Much more capable, the Q7 shoots Full HD (1920x1080) at 30/25/24 fps and HD 720p in MPEG-4 and H.264 compressions. It boasts built-in stabilization during video, but lacks microphone/headphone ports, so audio is limited to the built-in mic. While not a filmmaker’s dream, the Q7 stands out significantly ahead of the Casio for quality and flexibility in casual or hobbyist video.

Battery Life and Memory: Sustained Performance

Shooting all day requires reliable power and storage flexibility.

The Casio’s battery life stats remain unspecified, but ultracompact cameras from its era typically provide modest shot counts, often below 200 shots per charge. It uses an NP-80 battery, which may be difficult to find today.

The Pentax Q7 lists a rated battery life of 250 shots - a reasonable figure for enthusiast-level mirrorless. It employs a proprietary D-LI68 battery, easier to source and supports USB 2.0 charging. Both cameras support SD/SDHC cards, with Q7 supporting SDXC and a wider range of Eye-Fi wireless cards.

Connectivity and Extras: Staying Modern

Both cameras include Eye-Fi wireless connectivity options (think wireless card-based image transfer), but neither supports Bluetooth, NFC, or GPS, which are common in newer models. The Q7 does have an HDMI output for viewing images/videos on external screens, a feature absent on the Casio.

Durability and Environmental Resistance

Neither camera offers official weather sealing or ruggedness features. Their designs are best suited for casual shooting rather than challenging or demanding outdoors conditions.

Visual Performance at a Glance: Example Images and Scores

Seeing is believing, so let’s look at pictorial comparisons and performance ratings.

Here we have side-by-side image samples under daylight and indoor conditions. The Casio EX-S5 images display muted colors and limited detail, typical from a small CCD sensor and in-camera JPEG processing. Noise becomes prominent at higher ISOs.

The Pentax Q7’s samples reveal richer colors, finer detail rendition, and cleaner shadows, thanks to its BSI-CMOS sensor and RAW processing.

Performance scoring across key metrics places the Pentax Q7 significantly above the Casio EX-S5 in image quality, autofocus speed, video recording, and build quality, while the absolute size and weight mark the only clear win for Casio.

Breaking down genre-specific scores clarifies suitability:

  • Portraits: Q7’s face detection AF and larger sensor yield more flattering images.
  • Landscape: Q7’s dynamic range, higher resolution, and lens choices dominate.
  • Wildlife and Sports: Q7 offers better continuous shooting and tracking.
  • Street: Casio wins on portability but loses in AF reliability.
  • Macro: Q7’s lens options and stabilization excel.
  • Night/Astro: Q7’s higher ISO performance crushes Casio.
  • Video: Q7's Full HD recording prevails.
  • Travel: Casio’s size is tempting, but Q7 balances size with versatility better.
  • Professional work: Only the Q7 even remotely fits this with RAW support and advanced controls.

Real-World Use Cases: Matching Cameras to Photographers

Who should consider the Casio EX-S5?

  • Absolute beginners desiring an ultra simple, grab-and-go point and shoot.
  • Casual users who want a tiny device for snapshots, social media shots, or travel souvenirs without fuss.
  • Budget shoppers who prioritize price and portability over image quality and creative control.

Who benefits most from the Pentax Q7?

  • Enthusiasts or hobbyists looking to explore interchangeable lenses without breaking the bank.
  • Photographers who want manual exposure modes to better learn and experiment.
  • Casual portrait, street, travel, and macro photographers needing decent AF, stabilization, and image quality.
  • Those desiring video recording beyond mere novelty.

Final Thoughts: Selecting Your Compact Companion

While the Casio EX-S5 retains nostalgic charm and excels as a simple, ultra-compact shooter, its outdated sensor, sluggish autofocus, and minimal controls limit creative potential and image quality. Its fixed lens and lack of stabilization further handicap versatility.

In contrast, the Pentax Q7 punches well above its weight offering a much more nuanced photographic experience with a larger sensor, RAW file support, stabilization, interchangeable lenses, and comprehensive control modes - all packed into a still compact body.

For a handful of extra grams and centimeters, the Q7 delivers real-world performance and creative freedom commensurate with more recent standards.

If you demand quality and flexibility, the Pentax Q7 is unquestionably the smarter choice. If you want the simplest, smallest, and cheapest always-in-your-pocket snapshot camera, Casio EX-S5 might still have a place.

Whether you pick the EX-S5 or the Q7, understanding each camera’s sweet spots helps you seize photography moments with confidence and joy.

Casio EX-S5 vs Pentax Q7 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Casio EX-S5 and Pentax Q7
 Casio Exilim EX-S5Pentax Q7
General Information
Company Casio Pentax
Model Casio Exilim EX-S5 Pentax Q7
Class Ultracompact Entry-Level Mirrorless
Released 2009-01-08 2013-08-08
Body design Ultracompact Rangefinder-style mirrorless
Sensor Information
Sensor type CCD BSI-CMOS
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/1.7"
Sensor dimensions 6.17 x 4.55mm 7.44 x 5.58mm
Sensor area 28.1mm² 41.5mm²
Sensor resolution 9 megapixel 12 megapixel
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Highest resolution 3648 x 2736 4000 x 3000
Highest native ISO 1600 12800
Lowest native ISO 64 100
RAW data
Autofocusing
Manual focus
AF touch
AF continuous
Single AF
AF tracking
Selective AF
Center weighted AF
Multi area AF
AF live view
Face detection AF
Contract detection AF
Phase detection AF
Cross focus points - -
Lens
Lens mount fixed lens Pentax Q
Lens focal range () -
Largest aperture f/3.1-5.6 -
Total lenses - 8
Focal length multiplier 5.8 4.8
Screen
Screen type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen diagonal 2.7" 3"
Screen resolution 115 thousand dot 460 thousand dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch operation
Screen technology - TFT color LCD monitor, wide angle viewing, AR coating
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None Optical (optional)
Features
Lowest shutter speed 1/2 secs 30 secs
Highest shutter speed 1/2000 secs 1/2000 secs
Continuous shooting speed - 5.0 frames/s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation - Yes
Set WB
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash range - 4.90 m (ISO100/m)
Flash modes - P-TTL, Red-eye Reduction, Slow-speed Sync, Trailing Curtain Sync
Hot shoe
AEB
WB bracketing
Highest flash sync - 1/2000 secs
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Video resolutions 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) FullHD(1920x1080, 30fps/25fps/24fps), HD(1280x720,16:9,30fps/25fps/24fps), VGA(640x480,4:3,30fps/25fps/24fps)
Highest video resolution 640x480 1920x1080
Video file format Motion JPEG MPEG-4, H.264
Mic input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless Eye-Fi Connected Eye-Fi Connected
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 100 gr (0.22 pounds) 200 gr (0.44 pounds)
Dimensions 102 x 35 x 22mm (4.0" x 1.4" x 0.9") 102 x 58 x 34mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.3")
DXO scores
DXO All around score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery life - 250 images
Battery format - Battery Pack
Battery model NP-80 D-LI68
Self timer Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) Yes (12 sec, 2 sec)
Time lapse feature
Type of storage SDHC Memory Card, SD Memory Card, Eye-Fi Wireless Card compatible SD, SDHC, SDXC and Eye-Fi Card
Storage slots 1 1
Price at launch $130 $480