Clicky

Casio EX-S7 vs Kodak M320

Portability
96
Imaging
35
Features
14
Overall
26
Casio Exilim EX-S7 front
 
Kodak EasyShare M320 front
Portability
95
Imaging
32
Features
10
Overall
23

Casio EX-S7 vs Kodak M320 Key Specs

Casio EX-S7
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Display
  • ISO 64 - 1600
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 36-107mm (F3.1-5.6) lens
  • 121g - 97 x 57 x 20mm
  • Announced February 2010
Kodak M320
(Full Review)
  • 9MP - 1/2.5" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Display
  • ISO 80 - 1600
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 34-102mm (F2.8-5.1) lens
  • 155g - 97 x 60 x 21mm
  • Revealed January 2009
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Casio EX-S7 vs Kodak M320 Overview

Following is a complete analysis of the Casio EX-S7 vs Kodak M320, both Ultracompact cameras by brands Casio and Kodak. There exists a big gap among the sensor resolutions of the EX-S7 (12MP) and M320 (9MP) and the EX-S7 (1/2.3") and M320 (1/2.5") enjoy different sensor size.

Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

The EX-S7 was unveiled 14 months after the M320 making the cameras a generation away from one another. Each of these cameras come with the identical body type (Ultracompact).

Before delving straight into a in depth comparison, below is a concise summary of how the EX-S7 scores vs the M320 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
	
	

Reasons to pick Casio EX-S7 over the Kodak M320

 EX-S7 M320 
RevealedFebruary 2010January 2009More modern by 14 months
Focus manually Very precise focus

Reasons to pick Kodak M320 over the Casio EX-S7

 M320 EX-S7 

Common features in the Casio EX-S7 and Kodak M320

 EX-S7 M320 
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Display dimension2.7"2.7"Identical display size
Display resolution230k230kIdentical display resolution
Selfie screen Neither contains selfie screen
Touch display Neither contains Touch display

Casio EX-S7 vs Kodak M320 Physical Comparison

For those who are intending to carry around your camera frequently, you're going to have to take into account its weight and size. The Casio EX-S7 has got outside dimensions of 97mm x 57mm x 20mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.8") having a weight of 121 grams (0.27 lbs) whilst the Kodak M320 has specifications of 97mm x 60mm x 21mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 0.8") along with a weight of 155 grams (0.34 lbs).

Take a look at the Casio EX-S7 vs Kodak M320 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you are utilising at the time. Below is the front view dimensions comparison of the EX-S7 compared to the M320.

Casio EX-S7 vs Kodak M320 size comparison

Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the EX-S7 and M320 is 96 and 95 respectively.

Casio EX-S7 vs Kodak M320 top view buttons comparison

Casio EX-S7 vs Kodak M320 Sensor Comparison

Typically, its hard to imagine the difference in sensor sizes simply by researching specifications. The pic underneath will provide you a clearer sense of the sensor dimensions in the EX-S7 and M320.

To sum up, both of the cameras posses different megapixels and different sensor sizes. The EX-S7 having a larger sensor is going to make shooting bokeh simpler and the Casio EX-S7 will provide you with extra detail having an extra 3 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also make it easier to crop images somewhat more aggressively. The more recent EX-S7 should have an advantage in sensor innovation.

Casio EX-S7 vs Kodak M320 sensor size comparison

Casio EX-S7 vs Kodak M320 Screen and ViewFinder

Casio EX-S7 vs Kodak M320 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Portrait photography with Casio EX-S7
Portrait photography with Kodak M320
27
you can focus manually
no manual mode
no external flash support
MP count low (12 megapixels)
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW support
19
lack of manual focus
no manual exposure
can't use external flash
resolution not great (9MP)
tiny sensor size (1/2.5")
lacks RAW files
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Street Comparison

Casio EX-S7 Street photography features
Kodak M320 Street photography features
48
screen is fixed
lack of image stabilization
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW support
47
no moving screen
lack of image stabilization
tiny sensor size (1/2.5")
lacks RAW files
heavier than others (155 grams)
Photography Glossary

Sports Comparison

Casio EX-S7 as a Sports photography camera
Kodak M320 as a Sports photography camera
17
no shutter priority mode
lack of image stabilization
MP count low (12MP)
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
doesn't have phase detect AF
16
low maximum shutter speed (1/1,400s)
no shutter priority mode
lack of image stabilization
resolution not great (9MP)
tiny sensor size (1/2.5")
lacks phase detect autofocus
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Travel Comparison

Casio EX-S7 Travel photography details
Kodak M320 Travel photography details
52
has built in flash
missing Time Lapse function
MP count low (12 megapixels)
display isn't selfie friendly
wide angle not good (36mm)
slow max aperture (f3.1)
50
has built in flash
does not have Time Lapse function
heavier than others (155 grams)
resolution not great (9 megapixels)
display is not selfie friendly
wide angle not the best (34mm)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Landscape Comparison

Casio EX-S7 Landscape photography advice
Kodak M320 Landscape photography advice
28
you can focus manually
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
wide angle not good (36mm)
slow max aperture (f3.1)
small screen (2.7")
no manual mode
lack of image stabilization
MP count low (12MP)
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW support
missing Time Lapse function
22
lack of manual focus
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
wide angle not the best (34mm)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
tiny screen (2.7 inches)
no manual exposure
lack of image stabilization
resolution not great (9 megapixels)
tiny sensor size (1/2.5")
lacks RAW files
does not have Time Lapse function
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Vlogging Comparison

Casio EX-S7 Vlogging highlights
Kodak M320 Vlogging highlights
22
wide angle not good (36mm)
slow max aperture (f3.1)
display isn't selfie friendly
lack of image stabilization
low res video (1280 x 720 resolution)
missing mic port
22
wide angle not the best (34mm)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
display is not selfie friendly
lack of image stabilization
low quality video (640 x 480 pxls)
does not have external mic port
heavier than others (155g)
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Casio EX-S7 vs Kodak M320 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Casio EX-S7 and Kodak M320
 Casio Exilim EX-S7Kodak EasyShare M320
General Information
Manufacturer Casio Kodak
Model type Casio Exilim EX-S7 Kodak EasyShare M320
Category Ultracompact Ultracompact
Announced 2010-02-21 2009-01-08
Body design Ultracompact Ultracompact
Sensor Information
Powered by Exilim Engine 5.0 -
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.5"
Sensor dimensions 6.17 x 4.55mm 5.744 x 4.308mm
Sensor surface area 28.1mm² 24.7mm²
Sensor resolution 12 megapixels 9 megapixels
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Maximum resolution 4000 x 3000 3472 x 2604
Maximum native ISO 1600 1600
Min native ISO 64 80
RAW data
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch focus
Continuous autofocus
Single autofocus
Tracking autofocus
Selective autofocus
Center weighted autofocus
Autofocus multi area
Autofocus live view
Face detect autofocus
Contract detect autofocus
Phase detect autofocus
Total focus points - 25
Lens
Lens support fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 36-107mm (3.0x) 34-102mm (3.0x)
Largest aperture f/3.1-5.6 f/2.8-5.1
Macro focusing distance 10cm 10cm
Crop factor 5.8 6.3
Screen
Range of display Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display size 2.7 inch 2.7 inch
Display resolution 230 thousand dot 230 thousand dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch functionality
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None None
Features
Slowest shutter speed 4 secs 4 secs
Maximum shutter speed 1/2000 secs 1/1400 secs
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Set white balance
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash distance 3.20 m 3.00 m
Flash options Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off
Hot shoe
AE bracketing
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Video resolutions 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (15 fps) 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps)
Maximum video resolution 1280x720 640x480
Video format Motion JPEG Motion JPEG
Mic jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment seal
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 121 gr (0.27 pounds) 155 gr (0.34 pounds)
Dimensions 97 x 57 x 20mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.8") 97 x 60 x 21mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 0.8")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery ID NP-80 KLIC-7001
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple Self-timer) Yes (2 or 10 sec)
Time lapse recording
Type of storage SD/SDHC card, Internal SD/SDHC card, Internal
Storage slots One One
Pricing at launch $140 $39