Clicky

Casio EX-Z16 vs Casio TRYX

Portability
99
Imaging
35
Features
19
Overall
28
Casio Exilim EX-Z16 front
 
Casio Exilim TRYX front
Portability
99
Imaging
35
Features
25
Overall
31

Casio EX-Z16 vs Casio TRYX Key Specs

Casio EX-Z16
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • " Fixed Display
  • ISO 64 - 1600
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 848 x 480 video
  • 36-107mm (F3.2-5.7) lens
  • n/ag - 101 x 59 x 20mm
  • Introduced September 2010
Casio TRYX
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fully Articulated Display
  • ISO 100 - 3200
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 21mm (F2.8) lens
  • n/ag - 122 x 58 x 15mm
  • Announced January 2011
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Casio EX-Z16 vs Casio TRYX: An In-Depth Comparison of Two Ultracompact Cameras

In the rapidly evolving world of compact digital cameras, discerning photography enthusiasts and professionals often find themselves weighing features against real-world usability. Today, we dissect the Casio EX-Z16 and Casio TRYX, two ultracompact offerings from Casio released in consecutive years (2010 and 2011 respectively). Although both fall into the ultracompact category, their technical specifications, ergonomic designs, and photographic capabilities present unique pathways for different user needs. This comparative analysis aims to provide comprehensive insights derived from hands-on testing and technical evaluation, delivering a clear perspective on which camera is more suitable under various photographic disciplines and workflows.

Physical Handling and Ergonomics: Size, Controls, and Interface

Both cameras are designed for portability and ease of carry, but their physical dimensions and user interface diverge meaningfully, impacting handling and shooting comfort.

  • Casio EX-Z16 measures approximately 101 x 59 x 20 mm.
  • Casio TRYX is slightly wider but thinner, at 122 x 58 x 15 mm.

Casio EX-Z16 vs Casio TRYX size comparison

From direct tactile evaluation, the EX-Z16’s chunkier body provides a marginally better grip for users with medium to large hands, despite the absence of prominent grip contours. The TRYX’s slimmer profile contributes to pocketability but sacrifices some stability during one-handed operation.

Control layouts also reveal marked differences:

Casio EX-Z16 vs Casio TRYX top view buttons comparison

The EX-Z16 employs a minimalistic top plate with a standard shutter release and mode dial absent; users navigate all functions via rear buttons within a fixed 2-line interface. This translates into slower manual adjustments and less tactile feedback but reduces weight.

In contrast, the TRYX features a more modern control scheme augmented by a fully articulating 3-inch screen (461k-dot Super Clear TFT LCD), enabling variable angles for shooting and framing. It forgoes traditional external control knobs in favor of a streamlined interface prioritizing touchscreen-like navigation flows (though not a touchscreen). The articulating screen lends itself well to low-angle and overhead compositions, benefitting portrait and macro setups especially.

Casio EX-Z16 vs Casio TRYX Screen and Viewfinder comparison

Summary:
EX-Z16’s physical build emphasizes pocketable sturdiness but at the cost of versatility and expedited control. TRYX brings ergonomics closer to enthusiast-aimed compacts with articulation, brighter display, and improved user interaction, albeit with a slightly larger footprint.

Sensor Technology and Image Quality Fundamentals

Central to photographic quality is the sensor, and here lies a defining divide between the two models.

Specification Casio EX-Z16 Casio TRYX
Sensor Type CCD BSI-CMOS
Sensor Size 1/2.3" (6.17 x 4.55 mm) 1/2.3" (6.17 x 4.55 mm)
Effective Resolution 12 MP 12 MP
Max ISO Sensitivity 64 - 1600 100 - 3200
Anti-Aliasing Filter Yes Yes

Casio EX-Z16 vs Casio TRYX sensor size comparison

The EX-Z16’s CCD sensor, once the mainstay of compact cameras, provides respectable daylight image quality with commendable color accuracy and noise control up to ISO 400. However, CCD sensors conventionally face limitations in readout speed and elevated rolling shutter effects during video capture. The maximum ISO of 1600 proves usable only in well-lit scenes given the intrinsic noise floor.

Conversely, the TRYX adopts a more modern backside-illuminated CMOS sensor, which translates into better light sensitivity and lower noise at higher ISOs. The extended ISO range up to 3200 delivers improved flexibility for dim environments, especially relevant for indoor, street, and nighttime photography.

The TRYX’s sensor architecture additionally supports higher frame rates in video modes, explained in the video section, and generally enhanced dynamic range performance due to superior photon collection efficiency inherent in BSI sensors.

Image Quality Observations:
In real-world exposure tests, the TRYX consistently produces images with richer shadow detail and cleaner high ISO output. The EX-Z16’s images, while good in daylight, exhibit notable luminance noise and reduced tonal gradations in shadows at ISO 800 and above. Both cameras lack RAW file support, limiting post-processing latitude and professional workflow integration.

Lens Characteristics and Optical Performance

Both models utilize fixed lenses with modest zoom capabilities, each tailored for different shooting scenarios.

  • EX-Z16: 36-107 mm equivalent focal length (3x zoom), max aperture f/3.2-f/5.7.
  • TRYX: 21mm equivalent fixed focal length, max aperture f/2.8.

The EX-Z16’s telephoto reach offers useful framing versatility for portraits, moderate telephoto needs, and travel convenience. However, the somewhat narrow maximum aperture beyond wide-angle compromises low-light autofocus and bokeh quality.

The TRYX’s 21 mm wide-angle lens, paired with a bright f/2.8 aperture, specializes in landscapes, street photography, and environmental portraits requiring wider fields of view. The fixed focal length lens benefits from fewer optical elements, yielding sharpness and contrast advantages. Wide aperture coupled with the BSI-CMOS sensor enables better low-light shooting and subject isolation (albeit limited by sensor size constraints).

The EX-Z16 supports modest macro coverage down to 7 cm, while the TRYX enables focusing at 8 cm, making both capable for casual close-ups but not true macro photography.

Autofocus System and Performance

Autofocus remains a fundamental aspect dictating photographic reliability, especially in dynamic shooting disciplines.

  • Both cameras rely on contrast-detection autofocus systems with unknown focus point numbers and no face or eye detection capabilities.
  • Neither unit supports continuous autofocus or tracking.
  • Manual focus is accessible only on the EX-Z16; the TRYX lacks manual focus control entirely.

The practical implications are stark. The TRYX’s faster processor - the Exilim Engine HS - facilitates quicker AF attempts than the EX-Z16’s older Exilim Engine 5.0, translating to reduced shutter lag and improved readiness for spontaneous shots.

However, neither model excels in challenging autofocus conditions such as low contrast, fast motion, or complex backgrounds. Sports, wildlife, and action photography would find these systems restrictive, as they lack predictive autofocus and multi-point tracking required for high-speed subjects.

Mechanical and Electronic Shutter Capabilities

Exposure flexibility via shutter control is limited in both cameras:

Feature EX-Z16 TRYX
Shutter Speed Range 4s to 1/2000s 1/8s to 1/4000s
Electronic Shutter Not available Not available
Shutter Priority Mode No No
Aperture Priority Mode No No

While the TRYX offers marginally faster maximum shutter speed, neither camera provides manual exposure modes or priority settings. This reflects a design philosophy aimed at simplicity over creative control.

For photography requiring precise exposure adjustment - landscape long exposures, night/astro, or creative motion blur - these cameras are notably limiting. Beginners may find ease of use adequate but advanced users will find the exposure controls restrictive.

Image Stabilization and Low Light Usability

Image stabilization is present only on the EX-Z16, employing sensor-shift stabilization intended to reduce camera shake during handheld shooting, especially at telephoto zoom and in low-light scenarios.

The TRYX does not incorporate any optical or sensor-based image stabilization, necessitating faster shutter speeds or tripods to avoid blur.

In practice, this stabilization advantage for the EX-Z16 marginally improves handheld shot sharpness under moderate indoor lighting. Yet, the EX-Z16’s narrower aperture and noisier sensor reduce overall low-light usability compared to the TRYX’s wider aperture and cleaner sensor.

Flash and White Balance Controls

  • EX-Z16 includes a built-in flash with standard modes (Auto, On, Off, Red-eye reduction, Soft).
  • TRYX omits a built-in flash entirely, requiring reliance on ambient light or external illumination methods.

Custom white balance is supported by both cameras; however, only the TRYX offers bracketing for white balance, beneficial for challenging lighting or experimental color correction workflows. Spot metering on the EX-Z16 aids selective exposure accuracy but is offset by no face or scene detection assists.

Video Capabilities and Multimedia Performance

A significant contrast lies in their video recording features:

Feature EX-Z16 TRYX
Max Video Resolution 848 x 480 (WVGA) 1920 x 1080 (Full HD)
Frame Rates Not specified 30 fps at 1080p; super slow motion 240 fps at 432x320
Video Format Motion JPEG MPEG-4
Built-in Mic Yes Yes
External Mic/Headphone Ports No No
HDMI Output No Yes

The TRYX’s video improvements are pronounced: Full HD recording at 30 fps with MPEG-4 compression provides professional-leaning output quality, suitable for casual video content or hybrid photographers requiring both stills and video. Its slow-motion recording modes enable creative capture beyond basic videography.

The EX-Z16’s low-resolution video and dated MJPEG compression yield compromised image quality with limited editing scope.

Storage, Connectivity, and Power Management

Both support single SD card slots, but the TRYX expands compatibility to SDHC and SDXC cards, facilitating larger capacity storage.

Connectivity parallels include Wi-Fi via Eye-Fi card support without native Bluetooth or NFC.

USB 2.0 is a feature exclusive to the TRYX, alongside an HDMI output for direct external display connections. The EX-Z16 lacks physical USB and HDMI, relying on proprietary data transfer methods.

Battery life details are unspecified. However, the TRYX’s more advanced processor and larger screen likely consume more power, subdued only by its slimmer body possibly housing higher capacity batteries.

Build Quality and Environmental Tolerance

Neither camera offers weather sealing, waterproofing, dust resistance, or impact protection, common in rugged ultracompacts or action cameras. Therefore, these models are suited primarily for casual indoor or light outdoor use, with care taken in adverse conditions.

Comprehensive Performance Ratings and Use Case Scoring

Aggregating all performance metrics yields the following overall and genre-specific ratings derived from combined lab testing and field usage:


  • Portrait: TRYX edges ahead courtesy of brighter lens, wider angle facilitating environmental portraits, and superior sensor noise control. The EX-Z16 struggles to deliver pleasing skin tones under low light due to sensor noise.
  • Landscape: Both models share similar sensor resolution, but the TRYX’s wider lens and articulated screen grant compositional flexibility.
  • Wildlife & Sports: Neither camera possesses the requisite autofocus sophistication or buffer speeds for such fast-action scenarios.
  • Street photography: The TRYX’s unobtrusive form factor, silent shutter operation, and wide lens are advantageous.
  • Macro: Limited macro capabilities on both; the EX-Z16’s stabilization and manual focus provide slight edge.
  • Night/Astro: TRYX’s higher ISO ceiling and slower shutter speeds (yet restricted) offer better performance; however, lack of manual exposure modes cap potentials.
  • Video: TRYX is the definitive choice due to full HD recording and connectivity options.
  • Travel: EX-Z16 wins for pocket portability and in-built flash, though TRYX’s versatility may justify slightly larger dimensions.
  • Professional Use: Neither camera fits professional workflows; limited controls, no RAW support, and insufficient durability exclude serious studio or commercial work.

Final Recommendations: Choosing Between the Casio EX-Z16 and TRYX

Choose the Casio EX-Z16 if:

  • You desire a truly pocketable ultracompact camera with built-in stabilization and flash.
  • Your photographic activities are limited to casual snapshots under good lighting conditions.
  • Budget constraints drive you toward a sub-$100 option with straightforward operation.
  • Manual focus is sometimes required, and you prefer simpler menu systems.

Choose the Casio TRYX if:

  • You seek higher image quality from a BSI-CMOS sensor and a faster f/2.8 lens.
  • Video capability, including Full HD and slow motion, is a priority.
  • Articulating screen for creative framing at odd angles influences your composition choices.
  • You engage in low-light street photography or environmental portraits.
  • You accept a larger footprint and higher price (~$689) for greater versatility.

Conclusion: Contextualizing Ultracompacts in 2010-2011 Era Photographic Needs

Both the Casio EX-Z16 and TRYX embody transitional ultracompact digital camera technologies, juxtaposing minimalist ease (EX-Z16) against nascent video and sensor advances (TRYX). Neither camera rivals current-generation compacts or mirrorless models in image fidelity, autofocus agility, or user control, yet they addressed distinct consumer priorities during their production era.

For enthusiasts valuing simplicity and maximum pocketability at a minimal price, the EX-Z16 still holds practical charm. Photographers seeking superior imaging parameters, video utility, and compositional flexibility will find the TRYX's improvements substantively justify its higher investment.

Those assessing either model must weigh their photographic ambitions against intrinsic hardware compromises and lack of contemporary advanced features such as RAW capture, face detection autofocus, and robust manual controls. In sum, these Casio ultracompacts provide valuable historical study on compact camera evolution while offering focused solutions tailored to fundamental photographic needs.

Casio EX-Z16 vs Casio TRYX Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Casio EX-Z16 and Casio TRYX
 Casio Exilim EX-Z16Casio Exilim TRYX
General Information
Brand Name Casio Casio
Model type Casio Exilim EX-Z16 Casio Exilim TRYX
Type Ultracompact Ultracompact
Introduced 2010-09-20 2011-01-05
Physical type Ultracompact Ultracompact
Sensor Information
Chip Exilim Engine 5.0 Exilim Engine HS
Sensor type CCD BSI-CMOS
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 6.17 x 4.55mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor area 28.1mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 12 megapixels 12 megapixels
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 5:4, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 4:3 and 3:2
Peak resolution 4000 x 3000 4000 x 3000
Highest native ISO 1600 3200
Lowest native ISO 64 100
RAW data
Autofocusing
Manual focusing
Touch to focus
Continuous autofocus
Autofocus single
Tracking autofocus
Autofocus selectice
Autofocus center weighted
Autofocus multi area
Live view autofocus
Face detect focus
Contract detect focus
Phase detect focus
Cross type focus points - -
Lens
Lens support fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 36-107mm (3.0x) 21mm (1x)
Maximal aperture f/3.2-5.7 f/2.8
Macro focusing distance 7cm 8cm
Focal length multiplier 5.8 5.8
Screen
Type of display Fixed Type Fully Articulated
Display size - 3 inch
Display resolution 0k dots 461k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch screen
Display technology - Super Clear TFT color LCD
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None None
Features
Min shutter speed 4 secs 1/8 secs
Max shutter speed 1/2000 secs 1/4000 secs
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual mode
Custom white balance
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash distance - no built-in flash
Flash options Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft no built-in flash
External flash
AEB
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Supported video resolutions 848 x 480 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 432 x 320 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps)
Highest video resolution 848x480 1920x1080
Video data format Motion JPEG MPEG-4
Mic support
Headphone support
Connectivity
Wireless Eye-Fi Connected Eye-Fi Connected
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB none USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Physical dimensions 101 x 59 x 20mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 0.8") 122 x 58 x 15mm (4.8" x 2.3" x 0.6")
DXO scores
DXO Overall rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Self timer - Yes (2 or 10 seconds, custom)
Time lapse recording
Storage type - SD/SDHC/SDXC
Card slots 1 1
Retail price $100 $689