Casio EX-Z2000 vs Samsung PL200
95 Imaging
36 Features
28 Overall
32
94 Imaging
37 Features
22 Overall
31
Casio EX-Z2000 vs Samsung PL200 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 26-130mm (F2.8-6.5) lens
- 152g - 99 x 58 x 17mm
- Introduced January 2010
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 31-217mm (F3.3-5.5) lens
- 170g - 100 x 60 x 21mm
- Launched July 2010
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Casio EX-Z2000 vs Samsung PL200 Overview
Following is a in depth overview of the Casio EX-Z2000 versus Samsung PL200, former is a Ultracompact while the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by companies Casio and Samsung. The image resolution of the EX-Z2000 (14MP) and the PL200 (14MP) is pretty similar and they enjoy the exact same sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe EX-Z2000 was released 6 months prior to the PL200 and they are of a similar age. Both the cameras come with different body type with the Casio EX-Z2000 being a Ultracompact camera and the Samsung PL200 being a Compact camera.
Before going straight into a more detailed comparison, below is a simple introduction of how the EX-Z2000 grades versus the PL200 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Photography Glossary Casio EX-Z2000 vs Samsung PL200 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery images for Casio Exilim EX-Z2000 & Samsung PL200. The complete galleries are viewable at Casio EX-Z2000 Gallery & Samsung PL200 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-Z2000 over the Samsung PL200
| EX-Z2000 | PL200 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | Very accurate focusing | ||
| Screen resolution | 461k |  | 230k | Crisper screen (+231k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung PL200 over the Casio EX-Z2000
| PL200 | EX-Z2000 |
|---|
Common features in the Casio EX-Z2000 and Samsung PL200
| EX-Z2000 | PL200 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | January 2010 |  | July 2010 | Similar age |
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen dimension | 3" |  | 3" | Identical screen measurements |
| Selfie screen |  | Lack of selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Lack of Touch friendly screen |
Casio EX-Z2000 vs Samsung PL200 Physical Comparison
When you are looking to carry around your camera, you need to factor its weight and size. The Casio EX-Z2000 features outside dimensions of 99mm x 58mm x 17mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7") having a weight of 152 grams (0.34 lbs) and the Samsung PL200 has specifications of 100mm x 60mm x 21mm (3.9" x 2.4" x 0.8") with a weight of 170 grams (0.37 lbs).
See the Casio EX-Z2000 versus Samsung PL200 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you choose at the time. Underneath is the front view physical size comparison of the EX-Z2000 against the PL200.
Using size and weight, the portability grade of the EX-Z2000 and PL200 is 95 and 94 respectively.
Casio EX-Z2000 vs Samsung PL200 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it is hard to envision the contrast between sensor sizes just by going over specs. The pic below might offer you a greater sense of the sensor sizes in the EX-Z2000 and PL200.
All in all, each of the cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements and the exact same MP and you can expect similar quality of images though you will want to take the age of the products into consideration.
Casio EX-Z2000 vs Samsung PL200 Screen and ViewFinder
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsStreet Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesSports Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banTravel Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthLandscape Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideVlogging Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
Casio EX-Z2000 vs Samsung PL200 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-Z2000 | Samsung PL200 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Casio | Samsung |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-Z2000 | Samsung PL200 |
| Category | Ultracompact | Small Sensor Compact |
| Introduced | 2010-01-06 | 2010-07-21 |
| Body design | Ultracompact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14MP | 14MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Highest resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 4320 x 3240 |
| Highest native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Minimum native ISO | 64 | 80 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detect focus | ||
| Contract detect focus | ||
| Phase detect focus | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 26-130mm (5.0x) | 31-217mm (7.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/2.8-6.5 | f/3.3-5.5 |
| Macro focusing range | - | 5cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of display | 461 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 8 seconds |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/1500 seconds |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | - | 4.60 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, flash off, flash on, red eye reduction | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, Slow sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 × 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 800 x 592 (20 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 640x480 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | H.264 |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 152 grams (0.34 lb) | 170 grams (0.37 lb) |
| Dimensions | 99 x 58 x 17mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7") | 100 x 60 x 21mm (3.9" x 2.4" x 0.8") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | NP-110 | BP70A |
| Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | Yes |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC'/MMC, Internal |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Retail cost | $0 | $0 |