Casio EX-Z2000 vs Samsung WB850F
95 Imaging
36 Features
28 Overall
32
91 Imaging
39 Features
51 Overall
43
Casio EX-Z2000 vs Samsung WB850F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 26-130mm (F2.8-6.5) lens
- 152g - 99 x 58 x 17mm
- Released January 2010
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 23-483mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
- 250g - 109 x 62 x 25mm
- Revealed January 2012
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Casio EX-Z2000 vs Samsung WB850F Overview
On this page, we are analyzing the Casio EX-Z2000 versus Samsung WB850F, former is a Ultracompact while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by competitors Casio and Samsung. The resolution of the EX-Z2000 (14MP) and the WB850F (16MP) is fairly close and both cameras boast the same sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideThe EX-Z2000 was launched 24 months before the WB850F making them a generation away from each other. Each of these cameras have different body design with the Casio EX-Z2000 being a Ultracompact camera and the Samsung WB850F being a Compact camera.
Before diving straight to a in depth comparison, here is a quick overview of how the EX-Z2000 matches up vs the WB850F with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Casio EX-Z2000 vs Samsung WB850F Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pictures for Casio Exilim EX-Z2000 & Samsung WB850F. The complete galleries are available at Casio EX-Z2000 Gallery & Samsung WB850F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-Z2000 over the Samsung WB850F
| EX-Z2000 | WB850F |
|---|
Reasons to pick Samsung WB850F over the Casio EX-Z2000
| WB850F | EX-Z2000 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | January 2012 |  | January 2010 | Newer by 24 months |
| Display resolution | 614k |  | 461k | Crisper display (+153k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-Z2000 and Samsung WB850F
| EX-Z2000 | WB850F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | More accurate focusing | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display dimensions | 3" |  | 3" | Equal display dimensions |
| Selfie screen |  | Lack of selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | Lack of Touch display |
Casio EX-Z2000 vs Samsung WB850F Physical Comparison
For anyone who is intending to travel with your camera, you'll need to take into account its weight and dimensions. The Casio EX-Z2000 comes with exterior dimensions of 99mm x 58mm x 17mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7") and a weight of 152 grams (0.34 lbs) and the Samsung WB850F has dimensions of 109mm x 62mm x 25mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.0") accompanied by a weight of 250 grams (0.55 lbs).
Analyze the Casio EX-Z2000 versus Samsung WB850F in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you are employing at that time. Below is a front view scale comparison of the EX-Z2000 versus the WB850F.
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability rating of the EX-Z2000 and WB850F is 95 and 91 respectively.
Casio EX-Z2000 vs Samsung WB850F Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it is tough to picture the difference in sensor dimensions only by researching specifications. The pic below may provide you a greater sense of the sensor dimensions in the EX-Z2000 and WB850F.
To sum up, the 2 cameras have the same sensor dimensions but different resolution. You can anticipate the Samsung WB850F to render greater detail utilizing its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution will let you crop images a bit more aggressively. The more aged EX-Z2000 will be behind in sensor technology.
Casio EX-Z2000 vs Samsung WB850F Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Glossary Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsStreet Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsSports Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banTravel Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesLandscape Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneVlogging Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
Casio EX-Z2000 vs Samsung WB850F Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-Z2000 | Samsung WB850F | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Casio | Samsung |
| Model | Casio Exilim EX-Z2000 | Samsung WB850F |
| Category | Ultracompact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Released | 2010-01-06 | 2012-01-09 |
| Body design | Ultracompact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Max native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Lowest native ISO | 64 | 100 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 26-130mm (5.0x) | 23-483mm (21.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/2.8-6.5 | f/2.8-5.9 |
| Macro focus range | - | 5cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of screen | 461 thousand dot | 614 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Screen tech | - | AMOLED display |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 8 seconds |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting speed | - | 10.0 frames per second |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | - | 3.50 m |
| Flash options | Auto, flash off, flash on, red eye reduction | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 × 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 480fps (176 x 128), 240fps (384 x 288) |
| Max video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | BuiltIn |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 152 grams (0.34 lb) | 250 grams (0.55 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 99 x 58 x 17mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7") | 109 x 62 x 25mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.0") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | NP-110 | SLB-10A |
| Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Launch price | $0 | $599 |