Casio EX-Z2000 vs Sony TX200V
95 Imaging
36 Features
28 Overall
32
96 Imaging
42 Features
48 Overall
44
Casio EX-Z2000 vs Sony TX200V Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 26-130mm (F2.8-6.5) lens
- 152g - 99 x 58 x 17mm
- Introduced January 2010
(Full Review)
- 18MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.3" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 12800
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-4.8) lens
- 129g - 96 x 58 x 16mm
- Announced January 2012
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Casio EX-Z2000 vs Sony TX200V Overview
Below is a in-depth overview of the Casio EX-Z2000 versus Sony TX200V, both Ultracompact digital cameras by competitors Casio and Sony. There exists a noticeable gap between the image resolutions of the EX-Z2000 (14MP) and TX200V (18MP) but they come with the exact same sensor size (1/2.3").
Photography GlossaryThe EX-Z2000 was introduced 3 years prior to the TX200V and that is quite a sizable difference as far as technology is concerned. Both of these cameras come with the identical body type (Ultracompact).
Before going through a complete comparison, below is a concise synopsis of how the EX-Z2000 grades against the TX200V with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Casio EX-Z2000 vs Sony TX200V Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pics for Casio Exilim EX-Z2000 & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX200V. The whole galleries are provided at Casio EX-Z2000 Gallery & Sony TX200V Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-Z2000 over the Sony TX200V
| EX-Z2000 | TX200V | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | More precise focus |
Reasons to pick Sony TX200V over the Casio EX-Z2000
| TX200V | EX-Z2000 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | January 2012 |  | January 2010 | More recent by 25 months |
| Display dimension | 3.3" |  | 3" | Larger display (+0.3") |
| Display resolution | 1230k |  | 461k | Clearer display (+769k dot) |
| Touch friendly display |  | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Casio EX-Z2000 and Sony TX200V
| EX-Z2000 | TX200V | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Absent selfie screen |
Casio EX-Z2000 vs Sony TX200V Physical Comparison
For those who are aiming to lug around your camera, you will want to think about its weight and proportions. The Casio EX-Z2000 features exterior measurements of 99mm x 58mm x 17mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7") and a weight of 152 grams (0.34 lbs) whilst the Sony TX200V has measurements of 96mm x 58mm x 16mm (3.8" x 2.3" x 0.6") along with a weight of 129 grams (0.28 lbs).
Examine the Casio EX-Z2000 versus Sony TX200V in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you use during that time. Here is the front view measurement comparison of the EX-Z2000 compared to the TX200V.
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the EX-Z2000 and TX200V is 95 and 96 respectively.
Casio EX-Z2000 vs Sony TX200V Sensor Comparison
Quite often, its difficult to see the difference between sensor measurements just by checking a spec sheet. The visual below might offer you a more clear sense of the sensor sizing in the EX-Z2000 and TX200V.
Clearly, both cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements but not the same megapixels. You can expect to see the Sony TX200V to resolve more detail using its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also help you crop photos somewhat more aggressively. The older EX-Z2000 is going to be behind when it comes to sensor technology.
Casio EX-Z2000 vs Sony TX200V Screen and ViewFinder
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banStreet Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsSports Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoTravel Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesVlogging Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Casio EX-Z2000 vs Sony TX200V Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-Z2000 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX200V | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Casio | Sony |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-Z2000 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX200V |
| Category | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
| Introduced | 2010-01-06 | 2012-01-30 |
| Body design | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | - | BIONZ |
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixel | 18 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 4896 x 3672 |
| Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 12800 |
| Min native ISO | 64 | 64 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Total focus points | - | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 26-130mm (5.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/2.8-6.5 | f/3.5-4.8 |
| Macro focusing distance | - | 3cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 3 inches | 3.3 inches |
| Resolution of screen | 461k dot | 1,230k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Screen technology | - | 1,229,760 dots equiv. XtraFine TruBlack OLED display |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 2 secs |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/1600 secs |
| Continuous shooting speed | - | 10.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | - | 3.10 m |
| Flash options | Auto, flash off, flash on, red eye reduction | Auto, On, Off, Slow Sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 × 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1440 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | BuiltIn |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 152g (0.34 lb) | 129g (0.28 lb) |
| Dimensions | 99 x 58 x 17mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7") | 96 x 58 x 16mm (3.8" x 2.3" x 0.6") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 220 pictures |
| Battery format | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | NP-110 | NP-BN |
| Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Portrait 1/2) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC card, Internal | Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo/Pro-HG Duo |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Launch price | $0 | $500 |